Cassell Coliseum · at Virginia Tech
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | VT | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects VT 76–76 · win probability VT 51%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 151.7
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: VT has more of the edges
MISS 0, VT 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Free throws
Free throw rate: MISS 33.0, VT 34.0. Allowed: MISS 41.2, VT 28.8
Three-pointers
MISS hits 33.2% and allows 33.5%; VT hits 35.5% and allows 30.6%. Threes are 35.5% and 39.7% of their shots
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: MISS 28.3%, VT 31.9%. Defensive: MISS 67.4%, VT 67.4%
Context
Schedule so far
MISS has played the 20th-hardest schedule, VT the 74th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Home court
VT at home. This season: VT 0-0 at home, MISS 0-0 away
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: MISS 50.5 and allows 50.5; VT 52.2 and allows 50.9
Even
VT offense vs MISS defense
Offense 68th of 366 against a defense 37th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: MISS 32%, VT 47%. Transfers in: MISS 8, VT 8. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
MISS offense vs VT defense
Offense 50th of 366 against a defense 72nd, on the model’s ratings
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: MISS 14.0%, VT 14.9%. Forced: MISS 16.5%, VT 17.3%
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: MISS plays 69.5 a game (145th fastest), VT 69.8 (127th). Faster games mean more points
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | VT -0.2 | — |
| Total | — | 151.7 | — |
| Projected score | — | MISS 75.7 · VT 76 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | VT -0.0 | — |
| 1H total | 70.9 | — |
| 1H projected score | MISS 35.5 · VT 35.5 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% | |
| 3-7 30% | 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Ole Miss
35 games played
Straight up
15-20
43% wins
Against the spread
15-20
43% covers · avg −0.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
20-15
57% overs · avg +2.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 88-58 | -21.5 | W +8.5 | 143.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 86-65 | -37.5 | L −16.5 | 149.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 83-77 | -9.5 | L −3.5 | 152.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 82-60 | -23.5 | L −1.5 | 140.5 | O 142 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 72-65 | -20.5 | L −13.5 | 145.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 69-74 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | O 143 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 74-75 | -10.5 | L −11.5 | 144.5 | O 149 |
| Dec 2 | vs | L 66-75 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 145.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 58-63 | +13.5 | W +8.5 | 151.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 71-67 | -12.5 | L −8.5 | 138.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 80-66 | -20.5 | L −6.5 | 135.5 | O 146 |
| Dec 21 | vs | L 62-76 | +7.5 | L −6.5 | 148.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 79-43 | -28.5 | W +7.5 | 148.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 70-86 | +6.5 | L −9.5 | 146.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 87-94 | +3.5 | L −3.5 | 153.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 76-69 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 143.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 97-95 | +10.5 | W +12.5 | 158.5 | O 192 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 68-67 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 147.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 20 | vs | L 66-78 | +3.5 | L −8.5 | 151.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 63-72 | +11.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 68-71 | +10.5 | W +7.5 | 149.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 66-84 | +12.5 | L −5.5 | 139.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 68-79 | +9.5 | L −1.5 | 145.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 74-93 | +6.5 | L −12.5 | 164.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 78-90 | -3.5 | L −15.5 | 146.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 77-80 | +9.5 | W +6.5 | 157.5 | U 157 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 75-94 | +13.5 | L −5.5 | 152.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 25 | vs | L 99-106 | -2.5 | L −9.5 | 147.5 | O 205 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 85-79 | +10.5 | W +16.5 | 153.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 3 | vs | L 86-89 | +7.5 | W +4.5 | 155.5 | O 175 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 61-64 | -7.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 76-66 | +5.5 | W +15.5 | 147.5 | U 142 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 76-72 | +5.5 | W +9.5 | 156.5 | U 148 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 80-79 | +12.5 | W +13.5 | 166.5 | U 159 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 90-93 | +8.5 | W +5.5 | 159.5 | O 183 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
SELA
W 88-58
+8.5
7
vs
ULM
W 86-65
−16.5
11
vs
MEM
W 83-77
−3.5
14
vs
CSUB
W 82-60
−1.5
18
vs
APSU
W 72-65
−13.5
25
vs
IOWA
L 69-74
−0.5
26
vs
UTAH
L 74-75
−11.5
2
vs
MIA
L 66-75
−10.5
6
@
SJU
L 58-63
+8.5
13
vs
USM
W 71-67
−8.5
17
vs
AAMU
W 80-66
−6.5
21
vs
NCSU
L 62-76
−6.5
29
vs
ALCN
W 79-43
+7.5
3
@
OU
L 70-86
−9.5
7
vs
ARK
L 87-94
−3.5
10
vs
MIZ
W 76-69
+5.5
14
@
UGA
W 97-95
+12.5
17
@
MSST
W 68-67
+4.5
20
vs
AUB
L 66-78
−8.5
24
@
UK
L 63-72
+2.5
31
@
VAN
L 68-71
+7.5
3
@
TENN
L 66-84
−5.5
7
@
TEX
L 68-79
−1.5
11
vs
ALA
L 74-93
−12.5
14
vs
MSST
L 78-90
−15.5
18
@
TA&M
L 77-80
+6.5
21
vs
FLA
L 75-94
−5.5
25
vs
LSU
L 99-106
−9.5
28
@
AUB
W 85-79
+16.5
3
vs
VAN
L 86-89
+4.5
7
vs
SC
L 61-64
−10.5
11
vs
TEX
W 76-66
+15.5
12
vs
UGA
W 76-72
+9.5
13
vs
ALA
W 80-79
+13.5
14
vs
ARK
L 90-93
+5.5
covered 15didn’t cover 20avg −0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
SELA
W 88-58
+2.5
7
vs
ULM
W 86-65
+1.5
11
vs
MEM
W 83-77
+7.5
14
vs
CSUB
W 82-60
+1.5
18
vs
APSU
W 72-65
−8.5
25
vs
IOWA
L 69-74
+2.5
26
vs
UTAH
L 74-75
+4.5
2
vs
MIA
L 66-75
−4.5
6
@
SJU
L 58-63
−30.5
13
vs
USM
W 71-67
−0.5
17
vs
AAMU
W 80-66
+10.5
21
vs
NCSU
L 62-76
−10.5
29
vs
ALCN
W 79-43
−26.5
3
@
OU
L 70-86
+9.5
7
vs
ARK
L 87-94
+27.5
10
vs
MIZ
W 76-69
+1.5
14
@
UGA
W 97-95
+33.5
17
@
MSST
W 68-67
−12.5
20
vs
AUB
L 66-78
−7.5
24
@
UK
L 63-72
−10.5
31
@
VAN
L 68-71
−10.5
3
@
TENN
L 66-84
+10.5
7
@
TEX
L 68-79
+1.5
11
vs
ALA
L 74-93
+2.5
14
vs
MSST
L 78-90
+21.5
18
@
TA&M
L 77-80
−0.5
21
vs
FLA
L 75-94
+16.5
25
vs
LSU
L 99-106
+57.5
28
@
AUB
W 85-79
+10.5
3
vs
VAN
L 86-89
+19.5
7
vs
SC
L 61-64
−22.5
11
vs
TEX
W 76-66
−5.5
12
vs
UGA
W 76-72
−8.5
13
vs
ALA
W 80-79
−7.5
14
vs
ARK
L 90-93
+23.5
over 20under 15avg +2.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Virginia Tech
32 games played
Straight up
19-13
59% wins
Against the spread
19-13
59% covers · avg +1.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-15
53% overs · avg +3.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 98-67 | -18.5 | W +12.5 | 146.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 107-101 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 157.5 | O 208 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 94-59 | -12.5 | W +22.5 | 158.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 84-76 | -18.5 | L −10.5 | 145.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 78-61 | -24.5 | L −7.5 | 151.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 66-64 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 153.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 66-77 | +5.5 | L −5.5 | 144.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 68-86 | +2.5 | L −15.5 | 153.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 86-83 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 149.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 73-62 | -4.5 | W +6.5 | 144.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 11 | vs | W 96-74 | -20.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 82-53 | -27.5 | W +1.5 | 139.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 82-81 | -12.5 | L −11.5 | 158.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 95-85 | +5.5 | W +15.5 | 153.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 78-81 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 153.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 68-69 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 148.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 78-75 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 148.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 76-77 | +8.5 | W +7.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 89-76 | -6.5 | W +6.5 | 143.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 76-74 | +3.5 | W +5.5 | 152.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 71-85 | +14.5 | W +0.5 | 160.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 71-65 | -9.5 | L −3.5 | 155.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 58-72 | +13.5 | L −0.5 | 148.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 73-82 | +10.5 | W +1.5 | 154.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 76-66 | +8.5 | W +18.5 | 138.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 69-92 | -4.5 | L −27.5 | 156.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 66-67 | +8.5 | W +7.5 | 148.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 82-63 | -3.5 | W +15.5 | 150.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 82-89 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 149.5 | O 171 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 72-63 | -11.5 | L −2.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 72-76 | +11.5 | W +7.5 | 145.5 | O 148 |
| Mar 10 | vs | L 89-95 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 150.5 | O 184 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
CHSO
W 98-67
+12.5
8
vs
PROV
W 107-101
+8.5
12
vs
JOES
W 94-59
+22.5
16
vs
CLT
W 84-76
−10.5
19
vs
BRY
W 78-61
−7.5
26
vs
CSU
W 66-64
−2.5
27
vs
SMC
L 66-77
−5.5
28
vs
VCU
L 68-86
−15.5
2
@
SC
W 86-83
+5.5
6
vs
GMU
W 73-62
+6.5
11
vs
WCU
W 96-74
+1.5
14
vs
UMES
W 82-53
+1.5
20
vs
ELON
W 82-81
−11.5
31
vs
UVA
W 95-85
+15.5
3
@
WAKE
L 78-81
+2.5
7
vs
STAN
L 68-69
−4.5
10
vs
CAL
W 78-75
−2.5
14
@
SMU
L 76-77
+7.5
17
vs
ND
W 89-76
+6.5
21
@
SYR
W 76-74
+5.5
24
@
LOU
L 71-85
+0.5
27
vs
GT
W 71-65
−3.5
31
vs
DUKE
L 58-72
−0.5
7
@
NCSU
L 73-82
+1.5
11
@
CLEM
W 76-66
+18.5
14
vs
FSU
L 69-92
−27.5
17
@
MIA
L 66-67
+7.5
21
vs
WAKE
W 82-63
+15.5
28
@
UNC
L 82-89
+0.5
3
vs
BC
W 72-63
−2.5
7
@
UVA
L 72-76
+7.5
10
vs
WAKE
L 89-95
−4.5
covered 19didn’t cover 13avg +1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
CHSO
W 98-67
+18.5
8
vs
PROV
W 107-101
+50.5
12
vs
JOES
W 94-59
−5.5
16
vs
CLT
W 84-76
+14.5
19
vs
BRY
W 78-61
−12.5
26
vs
CSU
W 66-64
−23.5
27
vs
SMC
L 66-77
−1.5
28
vs
VCU
L 68-86
+0.5
2
@
SC
W 86-83
+19.5
6
vs
GMU
W 73-62
−9.5
11
vs
WCU
W 96-74
+17.5
14
vs
UMES
W 82-53
−4.5
20
vs
ELON
W 82-81
+4.5
31
vs
UVA
W 95-85
+26.5
3
@
WAKE
L 78-81
+5.5
7
vs
STAN
L 68-69
−11.5
10
vs
CAL
W 78-75
+4.5
14
@
SMU
L 76-77
−2.5
17
vs
ND
W 89-76
+21.5
21
@
SYR
W 76-74
−2.5
24
@
LOU
L 71-85
−4.5
27
vs
GT
W 71-65
−19.5
31
vs
DUKE
L 58-72
−18.5
7
@
NCSU
L 73-82
+0.5
11
@
CLEM
W 76-66
+3.5
14
vs
FSU
L 69-92
+4.5
17
@
MIA
L 66-67
−15.5
21
vs
WAKE
W 82-63
−5.5
28
@
UNC
L 82-89
+21.5
3
vs
BC
W 72-63
−7.5
7
@
UVA
L 72-76
+2.5
10
vs
WAKE
L 89-95
+33.5
over 17under 15avg +3.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Ole Miss has the better starters
Position by position: Ole Miss 2, Virginia Tech 1, even 2
Ole MissBetterVirginia Tech
G C. Stephenson TR18.1 pts · 6.3 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 90
←MISSSmall
G E. Copeland TR14.5 pts · 3.7 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 67
G I. Kamardine11.3 pts · 3.4 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 78
=Even
G B. Hammond13.2 pts · 2.3 reb · 3.2 ast
Score 89
G A. Clark TR12.7 pts · 3 reb · 4.9 ast
Score 88
←MISSSmall
G I. Elohim TR12.2 pts · 4.1 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 71
F D. Haskins TR11.1 pts · 6.4 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 76
=Even
G T. Johnson8 pts · 4.5 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 77
F R. Siulepa TR10 pts · 5.5 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 77
→VTSmall
F A. Hansberry14.3 pts · 7.4 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 92
Ole MissBetterVirginia Tech
MISS offense50th of 366 · +3.6
=Even
VT defense72nd of 366 · +0.8
MISS defense37th of 366 · +3.0
=Even
VT offense68th of 366 · +1.8
Backcourt+6.6 · 3 players
←MISSSmall
Backcourt+4.7 · 4 players
Frontcourt+2.9 · 2 players
=Even
Frontcourt+3.8 · 1 player
Bench+2.4 · 5 players
=Even
Bench+1.5 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestMISS betterVT betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
C. Stephenson33 min · TRI. Kamardine31 minA. Clark31 min · TRP. Pinkins25 minZ. Day8 minB. HenshallNew
Forwards
D. Haskins28 min · TRR. Siulepa27 min · TRS. Trouet26 min · TRC. Brown13 min · TRD. PattonNew
Centers
M. Handlogten15 min · TRS. Cicic13 min · TR
Guards
E. Copeland32 min · TRB. Hammond32 minI. Elohim29 min · TRT. Johnson26 minJ. Curry24 min · TRB. Johnson21 min · TR
Forwards
A. Hansberry31 minM. Heide19 min · TRK. Atak14 min · TRS. Jones7 min
Centers
M. Sagnia12 min · TRS. DavisNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 75.9 #145 | Points per game | 78.8 #85 |
| 1.09 #157 | Points per possession | 1.13 #89 |
| 69.5 #145 | Pace (possessions) | 69.8 #127 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.5 #217 | Effective FG% | 52.2 #134 |
| 33.2 #221 | 3-point % | 35.5 #88 |
| 35.5 #258 | 3-point attempt rate | 39.7 #179 |
| 33.0 #238 | Free throw rate | 34.0 #209 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.0 #23 | Turnover rate | 14.9 #60 |
| 28.3 #253 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.9 #129 |
| 13.5 #178 | Assists per game | 14.4 #122 |
| Defense | ||
| 76.1 #219 | Points allowed | 74.9 #184 |
| 1.10 #215 | Points allowed per possession | 1.07 #141 |
| 50.5 #127 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.9 #147 |
| 33.5 #151 | Opponent 3-point % | 30.6 #26 |
| 16.5 #190 | Turnovers forced | 17.3 #131 |
| 67.4 #285 | Defensive rebound rate | 67.4 #284 |
| 7.1 #118 | Steals per game | 6.4 #187 |
| 4.3 #48 | Blocks per game | 3.2 #190 |
Ole Miss
15-20 in 2025-26 overall · 7-15 in conference · Southeastern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Arkansas90–93
- Wvs Alabama80–79
- Wvs Georgia76–72
- Wvs Texas76–66
- Lvs South Carolina61–64
A week or more of rest.
Virginia Tech
19-13 in 2025-26 overall · 8-11 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Wake Forest89–95
- L@ Virginia72–76
- Wvs Boston College72–63
- L@ North Carolina82–89
- Wvs Wake Forest82–63
A week or more of rest.