The Sandy and John Black Pavilion at Ole Miss · at Ole Miss
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MISS | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects MISS 86–62 · win probability MISS 98%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 148.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: MISS has more of the edges
YSU 1, MISS 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
YSU has played the 304th-hardest schedule, MISS the 20th. A record against a soft schedule means less
YSU offense vs MISS defense
Offense 267th of 366 against a defense 37th, on the model’s ratings
MISS offense vs YSU defense
Offense 50th of 366 against a defense 264th, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: YSU 18.8%, MISS 14.0%. Forced: YSU 17.8%, MISS 16.5%
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: YSU 30.4%, MISS 28.3%. Defensive: YSU 69.3%, MISS 67.4%
Home court
MISS at home. This season: MISS 0-0 at home, YSU 0-0 away
Three-pointers
YSU hits 33.8% and allows 35.5%; MISS hits 33.2% and allows 33.5%. Threes are 49.4% and 35.5% of their shots
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: YSU 8%, MISS 32%. Transfers in: YSU 6, MISS 8. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: YSU 31.4, MISS 33.0. Allowed: YSU 36.0, MISS 41.2
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: YSU plays 68.9 a game (188th fastest), MISS 69.5 (145th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: YSU 53.6 and allows 52.3; MISS 50.5 and allows 50.5
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | MISS -24.0 | — |
| Total | — | 148.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | YSU 62.1 · MISS 86.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | MISS -14.2 | — |
| 1H total | 69.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | YSU 27.6 · MISS 41.8 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | |
| 4-6 40% | 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% |
Next 3 games
With how the last meeting with each opponent went
No more games listed yet.
No more games listed yet.
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Youngstown St
29 games played
Straight up
12-17
41% wins
Against the spread
10-19
34% covers · avg −1.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-14
52% overs · avg +0.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 59-74 | +14.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 7 | @ | W 90-81 | +15.5 | W +24.5 | 152.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 80-84 | +9.5 | W +5.5 | 146.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 75-92 | +1.5 | L −15.5 | 160.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 62-68 | -5.5 | L −11.5 | 152.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 67-61 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 163.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 87-64 | -14.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 69-68 | -3.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 78-55 | -6.5 | W +16.5 | 171.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 77-80 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 74-65 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 141.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 29 | vs | L 68-73 | -9.5 | L −14.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 1 | vs | L 83-85 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 157.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 79-94 | +4.5 | L −10.5 | 146.5 | O 173 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 69-71 | -4.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 83-93 | +4.5 | L −5.5 | 141.5 | O 176 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 78-80 | -8.5 | L −10.5 | 152.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 88-81 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 139.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 64-65 | -6.5 | L −7.5 | 151.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 85-76 | -10.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 90-61 | +2.5 | W +31.5 | 147.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 66-72 | -3.5 | L −9.5 | 143.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 86-82 | +3.5 | W +7.5 | 155.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 70-76 | -4.5 | L −10.5 | 151.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 106-82 | -11.5 | W +12.5 | 157.5 | O 188 |
| Feb 22 | vs | W 64-58 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 152.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 65-78 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 147.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 63-85 | +1.5 | L −20.5 | 141.5 | O 148 |
| Mar 4 | @ | L 53-68 | +3.5 | L −11.5 | 143.5 | U 121 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
PITT
L 59-74
−0.5
7
@
GCU
W 90-81
+24.5
15
@
SBU
L 80-84
+5.5
19
@
TOL
L 75-92
−15.5
23
vs
UNCG
L 62-68
−11.5
24
vs
GASO
W 67-61
+4.5
28
vs
CHST
W 87-64
+8.5
3
vs
WRST
W 69-68
−2.5
6
@
IUIN
W 78-55
+16.5
17
@
RMU
L 77-80
−0.5
20
vs
UPST
W 74-65
+2.5
29
vs
DETM
L 68-73
−14.5
1
vs
OAK
L 83-85
−3.5
4
@
NKU
L 79-94
−10.5
7
vs
PFW
L 69-71
−6.5
15
@
WRST
L 83-93
−5.5
17
@
CLE
L 78-80
−10.5
22
vs
GB
W 88-81
−0.5
24
vs
MILW
L 64-65
−7.5
30
vs
IUIN
W 85-76
−1.5
4
@
PFW
W 90-61
+31.5
7
vs
RMU
L 66-72
−9.5
12
@
OAK
W 86-82
+7.5
15
@
DETM
L 70-76
−10.5
18
vs
CLE
W 106-82
+12.5
22
vs
NKU
W 64-58
+3.5
25
@
MILW
L 65-78
−14.5
28
@
GB
L 63-85
−20.5
4
@
RMU
L 53-68
−11.5
covered 10didn’t cover 19avg −1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
PITT
L 59-74
−12.5
7
@
GCU
W 90-81
+18.5
15
@
SBU
L 80-84
+17.5
19
@
TOL
L 75-92
+6.5
23
vs
UNCG
L 62-68
−22.5
24
vs
GASO
W 67-61
−35.5
28
vs
CHST
W 87-64
+4.5
3
vs
WRST
W 69-68
−7.5
6
@
IUIN
W 78-55
−38.5
17
@
RMU
L 77-80
+16.5
20
vs
UPST
W 74-65
−2.5
29
vs
DETM
L 68-73
−5.5
1
vs
OAK
L 83-85
+10.5
4
@
NKU
L 79-94
+26.5
7
vs
PFW
L 69-71
−5.5
15
@
WRST
L 83-93
+34.5
17
@
CLE
L 78-80
+5.5
22
vs
GB
W 88-81
+29.5
24
vs
MILW
L 64-65
−22.5
30
vs
IUIN
W 85-76
+7.5
4
@
PFW
W 90-61
+3.5
7
vs
RMU
L 66-72
−5.5
12
@
OAK
W 86-82
+12.5
15
@
DETM
L 70-76
−5.5
18
vs
CLE
W 106-82
+30.5
22
vs
NKU
W 64-58
−30.5
25
@
MILW
L 65-78
−4.5
28
@
GB
L 63-85
+6.5
4
@
RMU
L 53-68
−22.5
over 15under 14avg +0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Ole Miss
35 games played
Straight up
15-20
43% wins
Against the spread
15-20
43% covers · avg −0.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
20-15
57% overs · avg +2.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 88-58 | -21.5 | W +8.5 | 143.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 86-65 | -37.5 | L −16.5 | 149.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 83-77 | -9.5 | L −3.5 | 152.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 82-60 | -23.5 | L −1.5 | 140.5 | O 142 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 72-65 | -20.5 | L −13.5 | 145.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 69-74 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | O 143 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 74-75 | -10.5 | L −11.5 | 144.5 | O 149 |
| Dec 2 | vs | L 66-75 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 145.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 58-63 | +13.5 | W +8.5 | 151.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 71-67 | -12.5 | L −8.5 | 138.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 80-66 | -20.5 | L −6.5 | 135.5 | O 146 |
| Dec 21 | vs | L 62-76 | +7.5 | L −6.5 | 148.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 79-43 | -28.5 | W +7.5 | 148.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 70-86 | +6.5 | L −9.5 | 146.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 87-94 | +3.5 | L −3.5 | 153.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 76-69 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 143.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 97-95 | +10.5 | W +12.5 | 158.5 | O 192 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 68-67 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 147.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 20 | vs | L 66-78 | +3.5 | L −8.5 | 151.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 63-72 | +11.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 68-71 | +10.5 | W +7.5 | 149.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 66-84 | +12.5 | L −5.5 | 139.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 68-79 | +9.5 | L −1.5 | 145.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 74-93 | +6.5 | L −12.5 | 164.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 78-90 | -3.5 | L −15.5 | 146.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 77-80 | +9.5 | W +6.5 | 157.5 | U 157 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 75-94 | +13.5 | L −5.5 | 152.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 25 | vs | L 99-106 | -2.5 | L −9.5 | 147.5 | O 205 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 85-79 | +10.5 | W +16.5 | 153.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 3 | vs | L 86-89 | +7.5 | W +4.5 | 155.5 | O 175 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 61-64 | -7.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 76-66 | +5.5 | W +15.5 | 147.5 | U 142 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 76-72 | +5.5 | W +9.5 | 156.5 | U 148 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 80-79 | +12.5 | W +13.5 | 166.5 | U 159 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 90-93 | +8.5 | W +5.5 | 159.5 | O 183 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
SELA
W 88-58
+8.5
7
vs
ULM
W 86-65
−16.5
11
vs
MEM
W 83-77
−3.5
14
vs
CSUB
W 82-60
−1.5
18
vs
APSU
W 72-65
−13.5
25
vs
IOWA
L 69-74
−0.5
26
vs
UTAH
L 74-75
−11.5
2
vs
MIA
L 66-75
−10.5
6
@
SJU
L 58-63
+8.5
13
vs
USM
W 71-67
−8.5
17
vs
AAMU
W 80-66
−6.5
21
vs
NCSU
L 62-76
−6.5
29
vs
ALCN
W 79-43
+7.5
3
@
OU
L 70-86
−9.5
7
vs
ARK
L 87-94
−3.5
10
vs
MIZ
W 76-69
+5.5
14
@
UGA
W 97-95
+12.5
17
@
MSST
W 68-67
+4.5
20
vs
AUB
L 66-78
−8.5
24
@
UK
L 63-72
+2.5
31
@
VAN
L 68-71
+7.5
3
@
TENN
L 66-84
−5.5
7
@
TEX
L 68-79
−1.5
11
vs
ALA
L 74-93
−12.5
14
vs
MSST
L 78-90
−15.5
18
@
TA&M
L 77-80
+6.5
21
vs
FLA
L 75-94
−5.5
25
vs
LSU
L 99-106
−9.5
28
@
AUB
W 85-79
+16.5
3
vs
VAN
L 86-89
+4.5
7
vs
SC
L 61-64
−10.5
11
vs
TEX
W 76-66
+15.5
12
vs
UGA
W 76-72
+9.5
13
vs
ALA
W 80-79
+13.5
14
vs
ARK
L 90-93
+5.5
covered 15didn’t cover 20avg −0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
SELA
W 88-58
+2.5
7
vs
ULM
W 86-65
+1.5
11
vs
MEM
W 83-77
+7.5
14
vs
CSUB
W 82-60
+1.5
18
vs
APSU
W 72-65
−8.5
25
vs
IOWA
L 69-74
+2.5
26
vs
UTAH
L 74-75
+4.5
2
vs
MIA
L 66-75
−4.5
6
@
SJU
L 58-63
−30.5
13
vs
USM
W 71-67
−0.5
17
vs
AAMU
W 80-66
+10.5
21
vs
NCSU
L 62-76
−10.5
29
vs
ALCN
W 79-43
−26.5
3
@
OU
L 70-86
+9.5
7
vs
ARK
L 87-94
+27.5
10
vs
MIZ
W 76-69
+1.5
14
@
UGA
W 97-95
+33.5
17
@
MSST
W 68-67
−12.5
20
vs
AUB
L 66-78
−7.5
24
@
UK
L 63-72
−10.5
31
@
VAN
L 68-71
−10.5
3
@
TENN
L 66-84
+10.5
7
@
TEX
L 68-79
+1.5
11
vs
ALA
L 74-93
+2.5
14
vs
MSST
L 78-90
+21.5
18
@
TA&M
L 77-80
−0.5
21
vs
FLA
L 75-94
+16.5
25
vs
LSU
L 99-106
+57.5
28
@
AUB
W 85-79
+10.5
3
vs
VAN
L 86-89
+19.5
7
vs
SC
L 61-64
−22.5
11
vs
TEX
W 76-66
−5.5
12
vs
UGA
W 76-72
−8.5
13
vs
ALA
W 80-79
−7.5
14
vs
ARK
L 90-93
+23.5
over 20under 15avg +2.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Ole Miss has the better starters
Position by position: Youngstown St 0, Ole Miss 5, even 0
Youngstown StBetterOle Miss
G L. Holmstrom TR10.9 pts · 2.2 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 30
→MISSBig
G C. Stephenson TR18.1 pts · 6.3 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 90
G J. Haynes3.9 pts · 1.5 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 16
→MISSBig
G I. Kamardine11.3 pts · 3.4 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 78
G J. Tyler TR4.3 pts · 0.9 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 18
→MISSBig
G A. Clark TR12.7 pts · 3 reb · 4.9 ast
Score 88
G J. Nwankwo TR3 pts · 2.4 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 28
→MISSBig
F D. Haskins TR11.1 pts · 6.4 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 76
F J. Coleman TR3.9 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 5
→MISSBig
F R. Siulepa TR10 pts · 5.5 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 77
Youngstown StBetterOle Miss
YSU offense267th of 366 · -8.1
→MISSBig
MISS defense37th of 366 · +3.0
YSU defense264th of 366 · -6.8
→MISSBig
MISS offense50th of 366 · +3.6
Backcourt-5.5 · 4 players
→MISSBig
Backcourt+6.6 · 3 players
Frontcourt-1.8 · 1 player
→MISSBig
Frontcourt+2.9 · 2 players
Bench-2.0 · 2 players
→MISSBig
Bench+2.4 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestYSU betterMISS betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
L. Holmstrom27 min · TRJ. Haynes15 minJ. Tyler13 min · TRJ. Nwankwo12 min · TRD. Aekins7 min · TRJ. LivingstonNew
Forwards
J. Coleman13 min · TRJ. Moupadele12 min · TRL. LokhmanchukNewE. Summers-LivingstonNew
Centers
K. AmoakoNew
Guards
C. Stephenson33 min · TRI. Kamardine31 minA. Clark31 min · TRP. Pinkins25 minZ. Day8 minB. HenshallNew
Forwards
D. Haskins28 min · TRR. Siulepa27 min · TRS. Trouet26 min · TRC. Brown13 min · TRD. PattonNew
Centers
M. Handlogten15 min · TRS. Cicic13 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 75.1 #162 | Points per game | 75.9 #145 |
| 1.09 #160 | Points per possession | 1.09 #157 |
| 68.9 #188 | Pace (possessions) | 69.5 #145 |
| Shooting | ||
| 53.6 #76 | Effective FG% | 50.5 #217 |
| 33.8 #184 | 3-point % | 33.2 #221 |
| 49.4 #17 | 3-point attempt rate | 35.5 #258 |
| 31.4 #272 | Free throw rate | 33.0 #238 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.8 #314 | Turnover rate | 14.0 #23 |
| 30.4 #182 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.3 #253 |
| 14.0 #144 | Assists per game | 13.5 #178 |
| Defense | ||
| 74.9 #185 | Points allowed | 76.1 #219 |
| 1.09 #190 | Points allowed per possession | 1.10 #215 |
| 52.3 #228 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.5 #127 |
| 35.5 #280 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.5 #151 |
| 17.8 #106 | Turnovers forced | 16.5 #190 |
| 69.3 #191 | Defensive rebound rate | 67.4 #285 |
| 6.7 #151 | Steals per game | 7.1 #118 |
| 3.5 #146 | Blocks per game | 4.3 #48 |
Youngstown St
12-17 in 2025-26 overall · 8-13 in conference · Horizon League
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Robert Morris53–68
- L@ Green Bay63–85
- L@ Milwaukee65–78
- Wvs N Kentucky64–58
- Wvs Cleveland St106–82
A week or more of rest.
Ole Miss
15-20 in 2025-26 overall · 7-15 in conference · Southeastern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Arkansas90–93
- Wvs Alabama80–79
- Wvs Georgia76–72
- Wvs Texas76–66
- Lvs South Carolina61–64
A week or more of rest.