Humphrey Coliseum · at Mississippi St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MSST | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects MSST 96–56 · win probability MSST 100%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 152.6
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: MSST has more of the edges
MVSU 0, MSST 7 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
MSST offense vs MVSU defense
Offense 34th of 366 against a defense 366th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
MVSU has played the 327th-hardest schedule, MSST the 26th. A record against a soft schedule means less
MVSU offense vs MSST defense
Offense 366th of 366 against a defense 88th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: MVSU 45.2 and allows 55.5; MSST 51.5 and allows 50.9
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: MVSU 26.4%, MSST 29.8%. Defensive: MVSU 64.5%, MSST 69.3%
Three-pointers
MVSU hits 29.5% and allows 37.2%; MSST hits 32.4% and allows 33.9%. Threes are 30.2% and 40.1% of their shots
Free throws
Free throw rate: MVSU 33.9, MSST 30.6. Allowed: MVSU 50.8, MSST 32.3
Home court
MSST at home. This season: MSST 0-0 at home, MVSU 0-0 away
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: MVSU 0%, MSST 23%. Transfers in: MVSU 2, MSST 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: MVSU plays 70.2 a game (111th fastest), MSST 72.3 (29th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: MVSU 21.9%, MSST 16.0%. Forced: MVSU 17.1%, MSST 12.8%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | MSST -40.0 | — |
| Total | — | 152.6 | — |
| Projected score | — | MVSU 56.3 · MSST 96.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | MSST -23.7 | — |
| 1H total | 71.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | MVSU 23.8 · MSST 47.5 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | |
| 2-8 20% | 2-8 20% | 5-5 50% |
Next 3 games
With how the last meeting with each opponent went
No more games listed yet.
No more games listed yet.
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
MVSU 0–1 MSSTMSST leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · MVSU 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2022-23 | MVSU 52 @ MSST 82 | MSST -33.5 | MVSU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Miss Valley St
32 games played
Straight up
2-30
6% wins
Against the spread
16-16
50% covers · avg +0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-18
44% overs · avg +1.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 55-106 | +34.5 | L −16.5 | 145.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 60-108 | +38.5 | L −9.5 | 159.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 56-88 | +41.5 | W +9.5 | 151.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 14 | vs | L 75-81 | +26.5 | W +20.5 | 145.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 73-80 | +20.5 | W +13.5 | 154.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 22 | @ | L 70-86 | +21.5 | W +5.5 | 138.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 84-120 | +42.5 | W +6.5 | 154.5 | O 204 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 52-66 | +9.5 | L −4.5 | 149.5 | U 118 |
| Dec 8 | @ | L 49-108 | +38.5 | L −20.5 | 160.5 | U 157 |
| Dec 16 | vs | L 64-88 | +17.5 | L −6.5 | 142.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 49-96 | +40.5 | L −6.5 | 164.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 51-86 | +42.5 | W +7.5 | 137.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 69-93 | +44.5 | W +20.5 | 153.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 69-89 | +13.5 | L −6.5 | 144.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 5 | vs | L 51-71 | +10.5 | L −9.5 | 135.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 69-70 | +18.5 | W +17.5 | 152.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 12 | @ | L 51-84 | +12.5 | L −20.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 63-79 | +16.5 | W +0.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 19 | vs | L 48-62 | +11.5 | L −2.5 | 139.5 | U 110 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 69-80 | +20.5 | W +9.5 | 141.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 70-78 | +10.5 | W +2.5 | 143.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 81-97 | +8.5 | L −7.5 | 143.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 9 | vs | L 66-74 | +5.5 | L −2.5 | 140.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 65-72 | +15.5 | W +8.5 | 138.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 16 | @ | L 55-92 | +16.5 | L −20.5 | 142.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 62-72 | +8.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 72-71 | +11.5 | W +12.5 | 143.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 23 | @ | L 62-83 | +16.5 | L −4.5 | 136.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 70-69 | +14.5 | W +15.5 | 147.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 64-67 | +9.5 | W +6.5 | 139.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 5 | @ | L 77-85 | +11.5 | W +3.5 | 144.5 | O 162 |
| Mar 9 | vs | L 52-77 | +13.5 | L −11.5 | 135.5 | U 129 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
UAB
L 55-106
−16.5
7
@
MUR
L 60-108
−9.5
12
@
HAW
L 56-88
+9.5
14
vs
UTU
L 75-81
+20.5
15
vs
MAN
L 73-80
+13.5
22
@
CSUB
L 70-86
+5.5
25
@
TA&M
L 84-120
+6.5
3
@
ULM
L 52-66
−4.5
8
@
KSU
L 49-108
−20.5
16
vs
TAR
L 64-88
−6.5
19
@
FSU
L 49-96
−6.5
22
@
WVU
L 51-86
+7.5
29
@
OU
L 69-93
+20.5
3
vs
ALST
L 69-89
−6.5
5
vs
AAMU
L 51-71
−9.5
10
@
PV
L 69-70
+17.5
12
@
TXSO
L 51-84
−20.5
17
vs
BCU
L 63-79
+0.5
19
vs
FAMU
L 48-62
−2.5
28
@
SOU
L 69-80
+9.5
31
vs
UAPB
L 70-78
+2.5
7
vs
JKST
L 81-97
−7.5
9
vs
ALCN
L 66-74
−2.5
14
@
AAMU
L 65-72
+8.5
16
@
ALST
L 55-92
−20.5
19
vs
PV
L 62-72
−1.5
21
vs
TXSO
W 72-71
+12.5
23
@
GRAM
L 62-83
−4.5
28
@
UAPB
W 70-69
+15.5
3
@
ALCN
L 64-67
+6.5
5
@
JKST
L 77-85
+3.5
9
vs
GRAM
L 52-77
−11.5
covered 16didn’t cover 16avg +0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
UAB
L 55-106
+15.5
7
@
MUR
L 60-108
+8.5
12
@
HAW
L 56-88
−7.5
14
vs
UTU
L 75-81
+10.5
15
vs
MAN
L 73-80
−1.5
22
@
CSUB
L 70-86
+17.5
25
@
TA&M
L 84-120
+49.5
3
@
ULM
L 52-66
−31.5
8
@
KSU
L 49-108
−3.5
16
vs
TAR
L 64-88
+9.5
19
@
FSU
L 49-96
−19.5
22
@
WVU
L 51-86
−0.5
29
@
OU
L 69-93
+8.5
3
vs
ALST
L 69-89
+13.5
5
vs
AAMU
L 51-71
−13.5
10
@
PV
L 69-70
−13.5
12
@
TXSO
L 51-84
−7.5
17
vs
BCU
L 63-79
−2.5
19
vs
FAMU
L 48-62
−29.5
28
@
SOU
L 69-80
+7.5
31
vs
UAPB
L 70-78
+4.5
7
vs
JKST
L 81-97
+34.5
9
vs
ALCN
L 66-74
−0.5
14
@
AAMU
L 65-72
−1.5
16
@
ALST
L 55-92
+4.5
19
vs
PV
L 62-72
−19.5
21
vs
TXSO
W 72-71
−0.5
23
@
GRAM
L 62-83
+8.5
28
@
UAPB
W 70-69
−8.5
3
@
ALCN
L 64-67
−8.5
5
@
JKST
L 77-85
+17.5
9
vs
GRAM
L 52-77
−6.5
over 14under 18avg +1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Mississippi St
32 games played
Straight up
13-19
41% wins
Against the spread
10-22
31% covers · avg −4.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-16
50% overs · avg +3.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | vs | W 86-62 | -24.5 | L −0.5 | 151.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 10 | vs | L 80-96 | +5.5 | L −10.5 | 150.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 75-68 | -27.5 | L −20.5 | 150.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 20 | vs | L 77-98 | -2.5 | L −23.5 | 164.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 78-80 | -6.5 | L −8.5 | 151.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 81-78 | -23.5 | L −20.5 | 160.5 | U 159 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 81-87 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 162.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 3 | @ | W 85-73 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 150.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 7 | vs | L 62-65 | -4.5 | L −7.5 | 150.5 | U 127 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 82-74 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 153.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 87-83 | -16.5 | L −12.5 | 152.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 71-66 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 94-56 | -17.5 | W +20.5 | 154.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 101-98 | +9.5 | W +12.5 | 157.5 | O 199 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 72-53 | -1.5 | W +17.5 | 158.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 68-92 | +10.5 | L −13.5 | 152.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 13 | vs | L 82-97 | +4.5 | L −10.5 | 171.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 67-68 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 147.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 68-88 | +8.5 | L −11.5 | 163.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 56-88 | +7.5 | L −24.5 | 159.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 80-66 | +7.5 | W +21.5 | 154.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 79-84 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 68-88 | +5.5 | L −14.5 | 163.5 | U 156 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 64-73 | +8.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 90-78 | +3.5 | W +15.5 | 146.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 91-85 | +5.5 | W +11.5 | 155.5 | O 176 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 89-97 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 151.5 | O 186 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 75-100 | +12.5 | L −12.5 | 176.5 | U 175 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 64-88 | +1.5 | L −22.5 | 154.5 | U 152 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 74-108 | +20.5 | L −13.5 | 161.5 | O 182 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 96-102 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 167.5 | O 198 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 61-79 | +8.5 | L −9.5 | 160.5 | U 140 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
vs
UNA
W 86-62
−0.5
10
vs
ISU
L 80-96
−10.5
15
vs
SELA
W 75-68
−20.5
20
vs
KSU
L 77-98
−23.5
21
vs
UNM
L 78-80
−8.5
24
vs
NOLA
W 81-78
−20.5
28
vs
SMU
L 81-87
−7.5
3
@
GT
W 85-73
+10.5
7
vs
SF
L 62-65
−7.5
13
vs
UTAH
W 82-74
+6.5
16
vs
LIU
W 87-83
−12.5
20
vs
MEM
W 71-66
+1.5
29
vs
ALST
W 94-56
+20.5
3
@
TEX
W 101-98
+12.5
7
vs
OU
W 72-53
+17.5
10
@
UK
L 68-92
−13.5
13
vs
ALA
L 82-97
−10.5
17
vs
MISS
L 67-68
−4.5
21
@
TA&M
L 68-88
−11.5
24
vs
VAN
L 56-88
−24.5
28
@
LSU
W 80-66
+21.5
31
@
MIZ
L 79-84
+1.5
7
vs
ARK
L 68-88
−14.5
11
vs
TENN
L 64-73
−0.5
14
@
MISS
W 90-78
+15.5
18
vs
AUB
W 91-85
+11.5
21
@
SC
L 89-97
−9.5
25
@
ALA
L 75-100
−12.5
28
vs
MIZ
L 64-88
−22.5
3
@
FLA
L 74-108
−13.5
7
vs
UGA
L 96-102
−0.5
11
vs
AUB
L 61-79
−9.5
covered 10didn’t cover 22avg −4.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
vs
UNA
W 86-62
−3.5
10
vs
ISU
L 80-96
+25.5
15
vs
SELA
W 75-68
−7.5
20
vs
KSU
L 77-98
+10.5
21
vs
UNM
L 78-80
+6.5
24
vs
NOLA
W 81-78
−1.5
28
vs
SMU
L 81-87
+5.5
3
@
GT
W 85-73
+7.5
7
vs
SF
L 62-65
−23.5
13
vs
UTAH
W 82-74
+2.5
16
vs
LIU
W 87-83
+17.5
20
vs
MEM
W 71-66
−16.5
29
vs
ALST
W 94-56
−4.5
3
@
TEX
W 101-98
+41.5
7
vs
OU
W 72-53
−33.5
10
@
UK
L 68-92
+7.5
13
vs
ALA
L 82-97
+7.5
17
vs
MISS
L 67-68
−12.5
21
@
TA&M
L 68-88
−7.5
24
vs
VAN
L 56-88
−15.5
28
@
LSU
W 80-66
−8.5
31
@
MIZ
L 79-84
+16.5
7
vs
ARK
L 68-88
−7.5
11
vs
TENN
L 64-73
−10.5
14
@
MISS
W 90-78
+21.5
18
vs
AUB
W 91-85
+20.5
21
@
SC
L 89-97
+34.5
25
@
ALA
L 75-100
−1.5
28
vs
MIZ
L 64-88
−2.5
3
@
FLA
L 74-108
+20.5
7
vs
UGA
L 96-102
+30.5
11
vs
AUB
L 61-79
−20.5
over 16under 16avg +3.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Mississippi St has the better starters
Position by position: Miss Valley St 0, Mississippi St 1, even 4
Miss Valley StBetterMississippi St
G T. Foster TR5.9 pts · 2.2 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 20
→MSSTBig
G J. Hubbard22.1 pts · 2.5 reb · 3.6 ast
Score 99
G T. James TR0.5 pts · 0.4 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G R. Johnson TR14.8 pts · 3 reb · 3.9 ast
Score 86
G E. Pippins NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
G T. Simpkins TR9.7 pts · 2.8 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 83
G A. Abrams NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
F K. Sanders TR5.2 pts · 3.1 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 31
F T. Williams NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
C N. Okafor TR11.2 pts · 5.6 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 71
Miss Valley StBetterMississippi St
MVSU offense366th of 366 · -17.5
→MSSTBig
MSST defense88th of 366 · -0.1
MVSU defense366th of 366 · -14.3
→MSSTBig
MSST offense34th of 366 · +5.5
Backcourt-2.1 · 4 players
→MSSTBig
Backcourt+9.6 · 3 players
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
=No call
Frontcourt+0.6 · 2 players
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench-2.0 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestMVSU betterMSST betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Foster20 min · TRT. James3 min · TRE. PippinsNewA. AbramsNewM. AngloNewC. CameronNew
Forwards
T. WilliamsNewQ. PangNewG. MartinezNewH. WilsonNewM. McCoyNew
Centers
T. WuNew
Guards
J. Hubbard33 minR. Johnson29 min · TRT. Simpkins25 min · TRK. Grace12 minA. Magee11 min · TRC. PaulNew
Forwards
K. Sanders20 min · TRT. Bassong19 min · TRT. ReedNew
Centers
N. Okafor23 min · TRG. CholNewT. BartlettNewT. ReedNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63.2 #356 | Points per game | 77.6 #103 |
| 0.90 #364 | Points per possession | 1.07 #205 |
| 70.2 #111 | Pace (possessions) | 72.3 #29 |
| Shooting | ||
| 45.2 #359 | Effective FG% | 51.5 #172 |
| 29.5 #346 | 3-point % | 32.4 #262 |
| 30.2 #351 | 3-point attempt rate | 40.1 #169 |
| 33.9 #215 | Free throw rate | 30.6 #288 |
| Possessions | ||
| 21.9 #361 | Turnover rate | 16.0 #143 |
| 26.4 #313 | Offensive rebound rate | 29.8 #210 |
| 11.9 #296 | Assists per game | 12.8 #231 |
| Defense | ||
| 83.7 #353 | Points allowed | 81.8 #338 |
| 1.20 #355 | Points allowed per possession | 1.13 #299 |
| 55.5 #341 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.9 #154 |
| 37.2 #346 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.9 #179 |
| 17.1 #142 | Turnovers forced | 12.8 #358 |
| 64.5 #346 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.3 #190 |
| 7.1 #119 | Steals per game | 5.8 #260 |
| 2.6 #300 | Blocks per game | 4.4 #44 |
Miss Valley St
2-30 in 2025-26 overall · 2-17 in conference · Southwestern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Grambling52–77
- L@ Jackson St77–85
- L@ Alcorn St64–67
- W@ AR-Pine Bluff70–69
- L@ Grambling62–83
A week or more of rest.
Mississippi St
13-19 in 2025-26 overall · 5-14 in conference · Southeastern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Auburn61–79
- Lvs Georgia96–102
- L@ Florida74–108
- Lvs Missouri64–88
- L@ Alabama75–100
A week or more of rest.