Schottenstein Center · at Ohio State
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | OSU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects OSU 85–62 · win probability OSU 98%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 147.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: OSU has more of the edges
STBK 0, OSU 7 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
STBK offense vs OSU defense
Offense 235th of 366 against a defense 35th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
STBK has played the 204th-hardest schedule, OSU the 33rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Three-pointers
STBK hits 34.8% and allows 35.7%; OSU hits 35.7% and allows 31.9%. Threes are 45.8% and 40.1% of their shots
OSU offense vs STBK defense
Offense 36th of 366 against a defense 164th, on the model’s ratings
Free throws
Free throw rate: STBK 28.4, OSU 37.2. Allowed: STBK 35.4, OSU 34.7
Shooting
Effective FG%: STBK 50.2 and allows 50.7; OSU 56.2 and allows 50.2
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: STBK 28.0%, OSU 30.4%. Defensive: STBK 67.7%, OSU 70.0%
Home court
OSU at home. This season: OSU 0-0 at home, STBK 0-0 away
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: STBK 48%, OSU 37%. Transfers in: STBK 5, OSU 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: STBK 16.7%, OSU 15.3%. Forced: STBK 17.2%, OSU 15.6%
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: STBK plays 67.3 a game (269th fastest), OSU 67.2 (275th). Faster games mean more points
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | OSU -23.0 | — |
| Total | — | 147.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | STBK 62.4 · OSU 85.4 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | OSU -13.5 | — |
| 1H total | 69.1 | — |
| 1H projected score | STBK 27.8 · OSU 41.3 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | |
| 5-5 50% | 8-2 80% | 4-6 40% |
Next 3 games
With how the last meeting with each opponent went
No more games listed yet.
No more games listed yet.
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Stony Brook
30 games played
Straight up
15-15
50% wins
Against the spread
18-12
60% covers · avg +1.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-15
50% overs · avg +0.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | vs | W 71-60 | -3.5 | W +7.5 | 131.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 79-86 | +20.5 | W +13.5 | 150.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 80-70 | -3.5 | W +6.5 | 136.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 58-86 | +4.5 | L −23.5 | 145.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 61-54 | +4.5 | W +11.5 | 145.5 | U 115 |
| Nov 28 | @ | W 71-68 | +10.5 | W +13.5 | 138.5 | O 139 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 75-84 | +9.5 | W +0.5 | 150.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 77-73 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 78-55 | -7.5 | W +15.5 | 145.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 17 | vs | L 55-71 | -10.5 | L −26.5 | 146.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 51-70 | +6.5 | L −12.5 | 137.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 59-62 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 57-76 | +11.5 | L −7.5 | 159.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 81-80 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 37-56 | +5.5 | L −13.5 | 132.5 | U 93 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 71-75 | +6.5 | W +2.5 | 133.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 76-71 | +6.5 | W +11.5 | 136.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 112-106 | +4.5 | W +10.5 | 142.5 | O 218 |
| Jan 22 | @ | W 95-80 | +3.5 | W +18.5 | 148.5 | O 175 |
| Jan 29 | @ | W 81-69 | +4.5 | W +16.5 | 152.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 72-68 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 148.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 5 | vs | L 75-76 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 137.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 69-55 | -3.5 | W +10.5 | 153.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 57-69 | +7.5 | L −4.5 | 135.5 | U 126 |
| Feb 16 | vs | W 72-69 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 135.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 79-72 | -5.5 | W +1.5 | 135.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 69-82 | +3.5 | L −9.5 | 145.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 58-67 | +11.5 | W +2.5 | 140.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 3 | vs | L 57-69 | +1.5 | L −10.5 | 137.5 | U 126 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 89-96 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 148.5 | O 185 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
vs
ME
W 71-60
+7.5
15
@
YALE
L 79-86
+13.5
20
vs
BRWN
W 80-70
+6.5
24
vs
PAC
L 58-86
−23.5
25
vs
BCU
W 61-54
+11.5
28
@
LMU
W 71-68
+13.5
6
@
DUQ
L 75-84
+0.5
9
vs
COLU
W 77-73
+8.5
13
vs
CMU
W 78-55
+15.5
17
vs
UALB
L 55-71
−26.5
21
@
MRST
L 51-70
−12.5
29
@
HAMP
L 59-62
−0.5
31
@
W&M
L 57-76
−7.5
3
vs
NCAT
W 81-80
−3.5
8
@
DREX
L 37-56
−13.5
10
vs
UNCW
L 71-75
+2.5
15
vs
HOF
W 76-71
+11.5
17
vs
COFC
W 112-106
+10.5
22
@
NE
W 95-80
+18.5
29
@
CAM
W 81-69
+16.5
31
@
ELON
W 72-68
+8.5
5
vs
MONM
L 75-76
−2.5
7
vs
NE
W 69-55
+10.5
12
@
TOW
L 57-69
−4.5
16
vs
DREX
W 72-69
+0.5
21
vs
HAMP
W 79-72
+1.5
26
@
MONM
L 69-82
−9.5
28
@
HOF
L 58-67
+2.5
3
vs
TOW
L 57-69
−10.5
7
vs
CAM
L 89-96
−4.5
covered 18didn’t cover 12avg +1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
vs
ME
W 71-60
−0.5
15
@
YALE
L 79-86
+14.5
20
vs
BRWN
W 80-70
+13.5
24
vs
PAC
L 58-86
−1.5
25
vs
BCU
W 61-54
−30.5
28
@
LMU
W 71-68
+0.5
6
@
DUQ
L 75-84
+8.5
9
vs
COLU
W 77-73
+3.5
13
vs
CMU
W 78-55
−12.5
17
vs
UALB
L 55-71
−20.5
21
@
MRST
L 51-70
−16.5
29
@
HAMP
L 59-62
−19.5
31
@
W&M
L 57-76
−26.5
3
vs
NCAT
W 81-80
+19.5
8
@
DREX
L 37-56
−39.5
10
vs
UNCW
L 71-75
+12.5
15
vs
HOF
W 76-71
+10.5
17
vs
COFC
W 112-106
+75.5
22
@
NE
W 95-80
+26.5
29
@
CAM
W 81-69
−2.5
31
@
ELON
W 72-68
−8.5
5
vs
MONM
L 75-76
+13.5
7
vs
NE
W 69-55
−29.5
12
@
TOW
L 57-69
−9.5
16
vs
DREX
W 72-69
+5.5
21
vs
HAMP
W 79-72
+15.5
26
@
MONM
L 69-82
+5.5
28
@
HOF
L 58-67
−15.5
3
vs
TOW
L 57-69
−11.5
7
vs
CAM
L 89-96
+36.5
over 15under 15avg +0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Ohio State
34 games played
Straight up
21-13
62% wins
Against the spread
18-16
53% covers · avg +1.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-18
47% overs · avg −1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 118-102 | -33.5 | L −17.5 | 172.5 | O 220 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 94-68 | -24.5 | W +1.5 | 159.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 75-53 | -23.5 | L −1.5 | 147.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 64-63 | -9.5 | L −8.5 | 156.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 91-58 | -26.5 | W +6.5 | 159.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 113-60 | -30.5 | W +22.5 | 151.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 28 | @ | L 66-67 | -5.5 | L −6.5 | 148.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 86-82 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 155.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 9 | vs | L 80-88 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 162.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 89-88 | -3.5 | L −2.5 | 145.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 70-71 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 157.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 23 | vs | W 89-63 | -28.5 | L −2.5 | 153.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 2 | @ | W 80-73 | -9.5 | L −2.5 | 151.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 5 | vs | L 69-72 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 155.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 72-62 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 152.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 11 | @ | L 74-81 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 155.5 | U 155 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 86-74 | -4.5 | W +7.5 | 146.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 82-74 | -7.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 23 | @ | L 62-74 | +16.5 | W +4.5 | 165.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 26 | vs | W 84-78 | -11.5 | L −5.5 | 153.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 82-92 | +4.5 | L −5.5 | 155.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 82-62 | -6.5 | W +13.5 | 150.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 8 | vs | L 61-82 | +8.5 | L −12.5 | 161.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 89-82 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 152.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 66-70 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 86-69 | -1.5 | W +15.5 | 157.5 | U 155 |
| Feb 22 | @ | L 60-66 | +10.5 | W +4.5 | 146.5 | U 126 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 57-74 | +6.5 | L −10.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 1 | vs | W 82-74 | +6.5 | W +14.5 | 149.5 | O 156 |
| Mar 4 | @ | W 94-62 | -7.5 | W +24.5 | 152.5 | O 156 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 91-78 | -3.5 | W +9.5 | 148.5 | O 169 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 72-69 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 140.5 | O 141 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 67-71 | +12.5 | W +8.5 | 155.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 64-66 | -2.5 | L −4.5 | 145.5 | U 130 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
IUIN
W 118-102
−17.5
7
vs
PFW
W 94-68
+1.5
11
vs
APP
W 75-53
−1.5
16
vs
ND
W 64-63
−8.5
20
vs
WMU
W 91-58
+6.5
25
vs
MSM
W 113-60
+22.5
28
@
PITT
L 66-67
−6.5
6
@
NU
W 86-82
+2.5
9
vs
ILL
L 80-88
−4.5
13
vs
WVU
W 89-88
−2.5
20
vs
UNC
L 70-71
+1.5
23
vs
GRAM
W 89-63
−2.5
2
@
RUTG
W 80-73
−2.5
5
vs
NEB
L 69-72
−5.5
8
@
ORE
W 72-62
+11.5
11
@
WASH
L 74-81
−5.5
17
vs
UCLA
W 86-74
+7.5
20
vs
MINN
W 82-74
+0.5
23
@
MICH
L 62-74
+4.5
26
vs
PSU
W 84-78
−5.5
31
@
WIS
L 82-92
−5.5
5
@
MD
W 82-62
+13.5
8
vs
MICH
L 61-82
−12.5
11
vs
USC
W 89-82
−0.5
14
vs
UVA
L 66-70
+1.5
17
vs
WIS
W 86-69
+15.5
22
@
MSU
L 60-66
+4.5
25
@
IOWA
L 57-74
−10.5
1
vs
PUR
W 82-74
+14.5
4
@
PSU
W 94-62
+24.5
7
vs
IU
W 91-78
+9.5
12
vs
IOWA
W 72-69
+4.5
13
vs
MICH
L 67-71
+8.5
19
vs
TCU
L 64-66
−4.5
covered 18didn’t cover 16avg +1.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
IUIN
W 118-102
+47.5
7
vs
PFW
W 94-68
+2.5
11
vs
APP
W 75-53
−19.5
16
vs
ND
W 64-63
−29.5
20
vs
WMU
W 91-58
−10.5
25
vs
MSM
W 113-60
+21.5
28
@
PITT
L 66-67
−15.5
6
@
NU
W 86-82
+12.5
9
vs
ILL
L 80-88
+5.5
13
vs
WVU
W 89-88
+31.5
20
vs
UNC
L 70-71
−16.5
23
vs
GRAM
W 89-63
−1.5
2
@
RUTG
W 80-73
+1.5
5
vs
NEB
L 69-72
−14.5
8
@
ORE
W 72-62
−18.5
11
@
WASH
L 74-81
−0.5
17
vs
UCLA
W 86-74
+13.5
20
vs
MINN
W 82-74
+12.5
23
@
MICH
L 62-74
−29.5
26
vs
PSU
W 84-78
+8.5
31
@
WIS
L 82-92
+18.5
5
@
MD
W 82-62
−6.5
8
vs
MICH
L 61-82
−18.5
11
vs
USC
W 89-82
+18.5
14
vs
UVA
L 66-70
−10.5
17
vs
WIS
W 86-69
−2.5
22
@
MSU
L 60-66
−20.5
25
@
IOWA
L 57-74
−10.5
1
vs
PUR
W 82-74
+6.5
4
@
PSU
W 94-62
+3.5
7
vs
IU
W 91-78
+20.5
12
vs
IOWA
W 72-69
+0.5
13
vs
MICH
L 67-71
−17.5
19
vs
TCU
L 64-66
−15.5
over 16under 18avg −1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Ohio State has the better starters
Position by position: Stony Brook 0, Ohio State 4, even 1
Stony BrookBetterOhio State
G C. O'Connor8.3 pts · 2.3 reb · 1.8 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G J. Mobley15.7 pts · 2.4 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 93
G E. Simmon6 pts · 1.4 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 46
→OSUBig
G J. Pippen TR13.9 pts · 4 reb · 4.6 ast
Score 90
F B. Ndjonga TR13.8 pts · 5.7 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 45
→OSUBig
G J. Williams TR14.9 pts · 4.5 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 92
F T. Valentiny4.6 pts · 3.3 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 18
→OSUBig
G C. Givens TR9.4 pts · 2.1 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 65
F Q. Gorman3.9 pts · 3.4 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 25
→OSUBig
F A. Bynum9.7 pts · 4.9 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 73
Stony BrookBetterOhio State
STBK offense235th of 366 · -7.2
→OSUBig
OSU defense35th of 366 · +3.3
STBK defense164th of 366 · -3.7
→OSUBig
OSU offense36th of 366 · +5.2
Backcourt-1.0 · 2 players
→OSUBig
Backcourt+9.1 · 4 players
Frontcourt-3.4 · 3 players
→OSUBig
Frontcourt+1.1 · 1 player
Bench-0.4 · 5 players
→OSUSmall
Bench+1.0 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestSTBK betterOSU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
C. O'Connor27 minE. Simmon17 minJ. Butler13 minM. Ugusuk11 min · TRK. Price7 min · TRL. Dagostino2 min
Forwards
B. Ndjonga33 min · TRT. Valentiny19 minQ. Gorman19 minJ. Daughtry16 min · TRE. Vatan3 min · TR
Centers
L. Van ElswykNew
Guards
J. Mobley32 minJ. Pippen31 min · TRJ. Williams30 min · TRC. Givens26 min · TRB. Nash2 minM. HerroNew
Forwards
A. Bynum29 minA. Jelavic16 min · TRJ. OjianwunaNewA. ThompsonNewA. SmithNewV. LazarevicNew
Centers
I. Njegovan11 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 70.7 #270 | Points per game | 79.3 #76 |
| 1.05 #254 | Points per possession | 1.18 #31 |
| 67.3 #269 | Pace (possessions) | 67.2 #275 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.2 #227 | Effective FG% | 56.2 #19 |
| 34.8 #128 | 3-point % | 35.7 #72 |
| 45.8 #50 | 3-point attempt rate | 40.1 #170 |
| 28.4 #339 | Free throw rate | 37.2 #122 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.7 #181 | Turnover rate | 15.3 #91 |
| 28.0 #267 | Offensive rebound rate | 30.4 #185 |
| 12.9 #216 | Assists per game | 14.5 #117 |
| Defense | ||
| 72.5 #118 | Points allowed | 72.6 #120 |
| 1.08 #168 | Points allowed per possession | 1.08 #164 |
| 50.7 #138 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.2 #114 |
| 35.7 #291 | Opponent 3-point % | 31.9 #57 |
| 17.2 #135 | Turnovers forced | 15.6 #243 |
| 67.7 #275 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.0 #160 |
| 6.3 #201 | Steals per game | 4.8 #340 |
| 3.6 #122 | Blocks per game | 2.4 #311 |
Stony Brook
15-15 in 2025-26 overall · 9-10 in conference · Coastal Athletic Association
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Campbell89–96
- Lvs Towson57–69
- L@ Hofstra58–67
- L@ Monmouth69–82
- Wvs Hampton79–72
A week or more of rest.
Ohio State
21-13 in 2025-26 overall · 13-9 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs TCU64–66
- Lvs Michigan67–71
- Wvs Iowa72–69
- Wvs Indiana91–78
- W@ Penn State94–62
A week or more of rest.