Ellis T. Johnson Arena · at Morehead St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MORE | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects MORE 72–71 · win probability MORE 52%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 142.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: MORE has more of the edges
UNA 2, MORE 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Shooting
Effective FG%: UNA 48.0 and allows 55.2; MORE 49.1 and allows 50.2
MORE offense vs UNA defense
Offense 349th of 366 against a defense 251st, on the model’s ratings
Free throws
Free throw rate: UNA 37.6, MORE 37.7. Allowed: UNA 30.3, MORE 35.6
Three-pointers
UNA hits 30.7% and allows 35.7%; MORE hits 32.0% and allows 34.5%. Threes are 33.6% and 30.5% of their shots
Context
Schedule so far
UNA has played the 294th-hardest schedule, MORE the 346th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Home court
MORE at home. This season: MORE 0-0 at home, UNA 0-0 away
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UNA 31.2%, MORE 35.8%. Defensive: UNA 67.8%, MORE 64.2%
Even
UNA offense vs MORE defense
Offense 308th of 366 against a defense 333rd, on the model’s ratings
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UNA 16%, MORE 29%. Transfers in: UNA 5, MORE 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: UNA plays 66.2 a game (304th fastest), MORE 67.4 (262nd). Faster games mean more points
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UNA 17.5%, MORE 18.1%. Forced: UNA 14.6%, MORE 15.4%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | MORE -0.6 | — |
| Total | — | 142.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | UNA 71.1 · MORE 71.7 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | MORE -0.2 | — |
| 1H total | 66.8 | — |
| 1H projected score | UNA 33.3 · MORE 33.5 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | |
| 8-2 80% | 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% |
Next 3 games
With how the last meeting with each opponent went
No more games listed yet.
No more games listed yet.
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
UNA 1–1 MORESeries tied · 2 games since 2021-22 · UNA 1-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2023-24 | MORE 86 @ UNA 77 | UNA -1.5 | MORE W |
| Dec 3, 2022-23 | UNA 81 @ MORE 75 | MORE -7.5 | UNA W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
North Alabama
28 games played
Straight up
7-21
25% wins
Against the spread
10-18
36% covers · avg −4.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-16
43% overs · avg −0.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | @ | L 62-86 | +24.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 87-83 | -6.5 | L −2.5 | 142.5 | O 170 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 74-78 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 17 | @ | L 61-81 | +25.5 | W +5.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 22 | @ | L 57-71 | +9.5 | L −4.5 | 149.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 1 | @ | W 73-66 | +6.5 | W +13.5 | 134.5 | O 139 |
| Dec 3 | @ | W 65-63 | +16.5 | W +18.5 | 145.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 15 | @ | L 60-68 | -4.5 | L −12.5 | 140.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 57-91 | +10.5 | L −23.5 | 140.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 1 | vs | L 67-70 | -9.5 | L −12.5 | 142.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 55-72 | +2.5 | L −14.5 | 147.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 80-88 | +5.5 | L −2.5 | 148.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 82-73 | +4.5 | W +13.5 | 146.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 15 | vs | L 91-105 | -9.5 | L −23.5 | 157.5 | O 196 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 68-90 | -1.5 | L −23.5 | 133.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 62-87 | +12.5 | L −12.5 | 162.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 64-72 | +9.5 | W +1.5 | 147.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 68-66 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 144.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 60-81 | +10.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 62-91 | +12.5 | L −16.5 | 145.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 9 | vs | L 65-72 | +6.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 73-82 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 145.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 15 | vs | W 84-78 | +4.5 | W +10.5 | 150.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 78-85 | +8.5 | W +1.5 | 156.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 51-73 | +12.5 | L −9.5 | 149.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 73-68 | +2.5 | W +7.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 63-75 | +4.5 | L −7.5 | 146.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 58-69 | +8.5 | L −2.5 | 139.5 | U 127 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
@
MSST
L 62-86
+0.5
11
vs
NWST
W 87-83
−2.5
15
vs
ETSU
L 74-78
−5.5
17
@
CLEM
L 61-81
+5.5
22
@
UTC
L 57-71
−4.5
1
@
JXST
W 73-66
+13.5
3
@
SF
W 65-63
+18.5
15
@
AAMU
L 60-68
−12.5
19
@
LMU
L 57-91
−23.5
1
vs
STET
L 67-70
−12.5
3
vs
FGCU
L 55-72
−14.5
8
@
EKU
L 80-88
−2.5
10
@
BELL
W 82-73
+13.5
15
vs
UNF
L 91-105
−23.5
17
vs
JAX
L 68-90
−23.5
21
@
QUC
L 62-87
−12.5
29
@
FGCU
L 64-72
+1.5
31
@
STET
W 68-66
+3.5
4
@
CARK
L 60-81
−10.5
7
@
APSU
L 62-91
−16.5
9
vs
CARK
L 65-72
−0.5
11
vs
WGA
L 73-82
−10.5
15
vs
EKU
W 84-78
+10.5
18
vs
QUC
L 78-85
+1.5
21
@
LIP
L 51-73
−9.5
25
vs
BELL
W 73-68
+7.5
28
@
WGA
L 63-75
−7.5
4
vs
FGCU
L 58-69
−2.5
covered 10didn’t cover 18avg −4.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
@
MSST
L 62-86
−3.5
11
vs
NWST
W 87-83
+27.5
15
vs
ETSU
L 74-78
+6.5
17
@
CLEM
L 61-81
−2.5
22
@
UTC
L 57-71
−21.5
1
@
JXST
W 73-66
+4.5
3
@
SF
W 65-63
−17.5
15
@
AAMU
L 60-68
−12.5
19
@
LMU
L 57-91
+7.5
1
vs
STET
L 67-70
−5.5
3
vs
FGCU
L 55-72
−20.5
8
@
EKU
L 80-88
+19.5
10
@
BELL
W 82-73
+8.5
15
vs
UNF
L 91-105
+38.5
17
vs
JAX
L 68-90
+24.5
21
@
QUC
L 62-87
−13.5
29
@
FGCU
L 64-72
−11.5
31
@
STET
W 68-66
−10.5
4
@
CARK
L 60-81
−6.5
7
@
APSU
L 62-91
+7.5
9
vs
CARK
L 65-72
−8.5
11
vs
WGA
L 73-82
+9.5
15
vs
EKU
W 84-78
+11.5
18
vs
QUC
L 78-85
+6.5
21
@
LIP
L 51-73
−25.5
25
vs
BELL
W 73-68
−5.5
28
@
WGA
L 63-75
−8.5
4
vs
FGCU
L 58-69
−12.5
over 12under 16avg −0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Morehead St
30 games played
Straight up
17-13
57% wins
Against the spread
18-12
60% covers · avg +0.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-14
53% overs · avg +3.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ | L 65-81 | +22.5 | W +6.5 | 152.5 | U 146 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 81-120 | +28.5 | L −10.5 | 150.5 | O 201 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 56-83 | +29.5 | W +2.5 | 151.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 62-77 | +10.5 | L −4.5 | 144.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 83-80 | -6.5 | L −3.5 | 145.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 80-85 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 181.5 | U 165 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 52-84 | +16.5 | L −15.5 | 158.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 72-80 | +7.5 | L −0.5 | 134.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 78-64 | -2.5 | W +11.5 | 136.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 64-60 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 64-77 | +6.5 | L −6.5 | 147.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 73-72 | +4.5 | W +5.5 | 131.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 68-76 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 135.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 71-69 | +5.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 100-105 | +7.5 | W +2.5 | 148.5 | O 205 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 76-70 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 141.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 71-66 | -8.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 73-68 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 134.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 67-65 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 130.5 | O 132 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 78-79 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 148.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 70-82 | +7.5 | L −4.5 | 144.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 61-55 | +8.5 | W +14.5 | 136.5 | U 116 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 73-66 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 94-86 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 148.5 | O 180 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 73-70 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 137.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 81-59 | -8.5 | W +13.5 | 143.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 64-63 | -7.5 | L −6.5 | 142.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 26 | @ | W 76-70 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 138.5 | O 146 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 66-61 | +3.5 | W +8.5 | 139.5 | U 127 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 67-93 | +5.5 | L −20.5 | 143.5 | O 160 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@
WAKE
L 65-81
+6.5
9
@
UGA
L 81-120
−10.5
11
@
CLEM
L 56-83
+2.5
21
@
ETSU
L 62-77
−4.5
22
vs
ULM
W 83-80
−3.5
29
@
IUIN
L 80-85
−1.5
2
@
MUR
L 52-84
−15.5
6
@
PRES
L 72-80
−0.5
16
vs
LR
W 78-64
+11.5
20
@
USI
W 64-60
+2.5
1
@
LIN
L 64-77
−6.5
3
@
SIUE
W 73-72
+5.5
8
vs
UTM
L 68-76
−5.5
10
vs
SEMO
W 71-69
+7.5
15
@
TNST
L 100-105
+2.5
17
@
TNTC
W 76-70
+7.5
22
vs
WIU
W 71-66
−3.5
24
vs
EIU
W 73-68
+0.5
29
vs
SIUE
W 67-65
+0.5
31
vs
LIN
L 78-79
+0.5
5
@
SEMO
L 70-82
−4.5
7
@
UTM
W 61-55
+14.5
12
vs
TNTC
W 73-66
+2.5
14
vs
TNST
W 94-86
+9.5
19
@
EIU
W 73-70
+1.5
21
@
WIU
W 81-59
+13.5
24
vs
USI
W 64-63
−6.5
26
@
LR
W 76-70
+8.5
6
vs
SEMO
W 66-61
+8.5
7
vs
TNST
L 67-93
−20.5
covered 18didn’t cover 12avg +0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@
WAKE
L 65-81
−6.5
9
@
UGA
L 81-120
+50.5
11
@
CLEM
L 56-83
−12.5
21
@
ETSU
L 62-77
−5.5
22
vs
ULM
W 83-80
+17.5
29
@
IUIN
L 80-85
−16.5
2
@
MUR
L 52-84
−22.5
6
@
PRES
L 72-80
+17.5
16
vs
LR
W 78-64
+5.5
20
@
USI
W 64-60
−21.5
1
@
LIN
L 64-77
−6.5
3
@
SIUE
W 73-72
+13.5
8
vs
UTM
L 68-76
+8.5
10
vs
SEMO
W 71-69
−4.5
15
@
TNST
L 100-105
+56.5
17
@
TNTC
W 76-70
+4.5
22
vs
WIU
W 71-66
−1.5
24
vs
EIU
W 73-68
+6.5
29
vs
SIUE
W 67-65
+1.5
31
vs
LIN
L 78-79
+8.5
5
@
SEMO
L 70-82
+7.5
7
@
UTM
W 61-55
−20.5
12
vs
TNTC
W 73-66
−4.5
14
vs
TNST
W 94-86
+31.5
19
@
EIU
W 73-70
+5.5
21
@
WIU
W 81-59
−3.5
24
vs
USI
W 64-63
−15.5
26
@
LR
W 76-70
+7.5
6
vs
SEMO
W 66-61
−12.5
7
vs
TNST
L 67-93
+16.5
over 16under 14avg +3.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
North Alabama has the better starters
Position by position: North Alabama 1, Morehead St 0, even 4
North AlabamaBetterMorehead St
G M. Evbagharu TR9.2 pts · 7 reb · 3.1 ast
Score 43
←UNASmall
G C. Dawson8.1 pts · 1.4 reb · 2.7 ast
Score 22
G B. Patton6 pts · 1.9 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 17
=Even
G V. Dawson3.3 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 7
G J. Clark TR6.1 pts · 1.9 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G J. Winkleman1 pts · 0 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
F D. Yates TR6.5 pts · 3.6 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 59
=No call
G I. Day NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
F J. Whitted TR2.8 pts · 3.5 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 9
=Even
F C. Parker2.7 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 1
North AlabamaBetterMorehead St
UNA offense308th of 366 · -9.6
=Even
MORE defense333rd of 366 · -8.7
UNA defense251st of 366 · -6.6
←UNASmall
MORE offense349th of 366 · -12.3
Backcourt-3.3 · 3 players
←UNASmall
Backcourt-4.4 · 4 players
Frontcourt-1.6 · 2 players
←UNASmall
Frontcourt-2.7 · 1 player
Bench-3.8 · 2 players
=No call
BenchNo numbers yet
Score, worst to bestUNA betterMORE betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
M. Evbagharu34 min · TRB. Patton18 minJ. Clark15 min · TRQ. Lax15 min · TRC. Graham-Howard14 minC. HarrisNew
Forwards
D. Yates17 min · TRJ. Whitted15 min · TRD. CarterNewA. OsmanNewJ. GulleyNew
Centers
M. ChaffeeNew
Guards
C. Dawson26 minV. Dawson16 minJ. Winkleman1 minI. DayNewK. CarbonNewK. ShawNew
Forwards
C. Parker16 minD. AlexanderNewL. BassNewT. TangioraNewJ. PriesterNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67.9 #317 | Points per game | 72.0 #243 |
| 1.02 #300 | Points per possession | 1.07 #202 |
| 66.2 #304 | Pace (possessions) | 67.4 #262 |
| Shooting | ||
| 48.0 #312 | Effective FG% | 49.1 #285 |
| 30.7 #327 | 3-point % | 32.0 #281 |
| 33.6 #306 | 3-point attempt rate | 30.5 #349 |
| 37.6 #111 | Free throw rate | 37.7 #109 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.5 #238 | Turnover rate | 18.1 #275 |
| 31.2 #160 | Offensive rebound rate | 35.8 #27 |
| 9.7 #363 | Assists per game | 12.0 #285 |
| Defense | ||
| 78.0 #267 | Points allowed | 75.5 #205 |
| 1.18 #350 | Points allowed per possession | 1.12 #264 |
| 55.2 #337 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.2 #109 |
| 35.7 #292 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.5 #221 |
| 14.6 #319 | Turnovers forced | 15.4 #259 |
| 67.8 #268 | Defensive rebound rate | 64.2 #351 |
| 6.3 #202 | Steals per game | 6.0 #234 |
| 3.7 #112 | Blocks per game | 3.0 #213 |
North Alabama
7-21 in 2025-26 overall · 4-15 in conference · United Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs FGCU58–69
- L@ West Georgia63–75
- Wvs Bellarmine73–68
- L@ Lipscomb51–73
- Lvs Queens University Royals78–85
A week or more of rest.
Morehead St
17-13 in 2025-26 overall · 16-6 in conference · Ohio Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Tennessee St67–93
- Wvs SE Missouri66–61
- W@ Little Rock76–70
- Wvs Southern Indiana Screaming Eagles64–63
- W@ W Illinois81–59
A week or more of rest.