Purdue Boilermakers at Wisconsin Badgers: Model Line and Edge

Tue, Dec 8, 9:00 PM ETKohl Center · at Wisconsin · Conference game

LineNo line yet

Total—

Season records: Purdue and Wisconsin
PUR	This season	WIS
0-0	Record	0-0
0-0	ATS	0-0
0-0	O/U	0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects WIS 77–75 · win probability WIS 55%

Pick this game

Your picksMy picks ›

Winner

Line

—

no line yet

Total

—

model 151.8

Model edge

—

No market line yet

Public

—

No split yet for this game

The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it

PUR 1, WIS 1 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games

PURBig

Rebounding

Offensive rebound rate: PUR 36.4%, WIS 29.1%. Defensive: PUR 72.9%, WIS 71.8%

Context

Tempo

About 68 possessions: PUR plays 65.4 a game (333rd fastest), WIS 70.0 (119th). Faster games mean more points

WISSmall

Home court

WIS at home. This season: WIS 0-0 at home, PUR 0-0 away

Even

Turnovers

Turnover rate: PUR 13.7%, WIS 12.8%. Forced: PUR 15.3%, WIS 14.3%

Even

WIS offense vs PUR defense

Offense 44th of 366 against a defense 18th, on the model’s ratings

Even

Who is back

Minutes back from last season: PUR 43%, WIS 54%. Transfers in: PUR 0, WIS 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price

Context

Schedule so far

PUR has played the 6th-hardest schedule, WIS the 24th. A record against a soft schedule means less

Even

Free throws

Free throw rate: PUR 28.6, WIS 31.5. Allowed: PUR 25.5, WIS 29.9

Even

Shooting

Effective FG%: PUR 57.6 and allows 52.4; WIS 54.5 and allows 51.4

Even

PUR offense vs WIS defense

Offense 38th of 366 against a defense 40th, on the model’s ratings

Even

Three-pointers

PUR hits 38.3% and allows 34.1%; WIS hits 36.2% and allows 33.5%. Threes are 40.2% and 52.1% of their shots

Sorted by how lopsided each matchup is, from national ranks. Reasons to look, not picks: the market already knows most of this.

Model vs market

	Market	Model	Model edge
Spread	—	WIS -1.5	—
Total	—	151.8	—
Projected score	—	PUR 75.1 · WIS 76.6

1st-half model

1st-half slate ›

	Model	Actual
1H spread	WIS -0.8	—
1H total	71.0	—
1H projected score	PUR 35.1 · WIS 35.9	—

The 1st-half model is fitted from the full-game model and past halves. ESPN has no 1st-half lines for college games, so there is no market to compare it with.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

ATS

2025-26 season

	Season	Cover	Venue	Role
PUR WWWLL	17-22	44%	6-5	—
WIS WLWWL	21-14	60%	11-6	—

Venue/role: PUR away; WIS home. Squares: last 5 games ATS (W covered, L didn’t), oldest first.

Totals

2025-26 season

	O-U	Over %	SU
PUR OOOOU	20-19	51%	30-9
WIS OOOUO	22-13	63%	24-11

Squares: last 5 games (O over, U under), oldest first. Tap for the score and line.

Last 10 games

2025-26

	Straight up	Spread	Over / under
PUR	8-2 80%	4-6 40%	6-4 60%
WIS	6-4 60%	6-4 60%	7-3 70%

Wins-losses (pushes last). Spread and over / under skip games without a line.

Next 3 games

With how the last meeting with each opponent went

Purdue

Date	Game	Last meeting
Dec 11	vs TENN	W72–66WU

Wisconsin

Date	Game	Last meeting
Dec 12	vs VILL	L66–76LU

Last meeting: result, against the spread, over / under. Hover a result for its date.

Recent meetings

Last 5 of 9 since 2021-22

PUR 4–5 WISWIS leads · 9 games since 2021-22 · PUR 2-7 ATS

Date	Result	Line	Covered
Mar 7, 2025-26	WIS 97 @ PUR 93	PUR -9.5	WIS W
Jan 3, 2025-26	PUR 89 @ WIS 73	WIS +5.5	PUR W
Feb 15, 2024-25	WIS 94 @ PUR 84	PUR -6.5	WIS W
Mar 16, 2023-24	WIS 76 vs PUR 75	PUR -5.5	WIS W
Mar 10, 2023-24	WIS 70 @ PUR 78	PUR -9.5	WIS W

ATS History · 2025-26

WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total

Purdue

39 games played

Straight up

30-9

77% wins

Against the spread

17-22

44% covers · avg −0.2 pts vs the line

Over / Under

20-19

51% overs · avg +1.4 pts vs the total

Straight up

30-977%

W W W W W W W W L W W W W W W W W W L L L W W W W L W L L W L W W W W W W W L

3 of last 4 wonno streak

Against the spread

17-2244%

L L W L L W W W L W W W W W L L L L L L L W L W W L W L L L L L W L W W W L L

2 straight misses ATS2 of last 4 covered

Over / Under

20-1951%

U O U O U U O U U U U U O O U O O U U O U O U O U O O O O U O O U U O O O O U

3 of last 4 overno streak

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 4	vsEVAN	W 82-51	-33.5	L −2.5	150.5	U 133
Nov 7	vsOAK	W 87-77	-31.5	L −21.5	158.5	O 164
Nov 13	@ALA	W 87-80	+3.5	W +10.5	172.5	U 167
Nov 16	vsAKR	W 97-79	-18.5	L −0.5	163.5	O 176
Nov 20	vsMEM	W 80-71	-14.5	L −5.5	156.5	U 151
Nov 21	vsTTU	W 86-56	-3.5	W +26.5	153.5	U 142
Nov 28	vsEIU	W 109-62	-40.5	W +6.5	141.5	O 171
Dec 2	@RUTG	W 81-65	-13.5	W +2.5	146.5	U 146
Dec 6	vsISU	L 58-81	-4.5	L −27.5	154.5	U 139
Dec 10	vsMINN	W 85-57	-19.5	W +8.5	143.5	U 142
Dec 13	vsMARQ	W 79-59	-16.5	W +3.5	154.5	U 138
Dec 20	vsAUB	W 88-60	-7.5	W +20.5	152.5	U 148
Dec 29	vsKENT	W 101-60	-24.5	W +16.5	155.5	O 161
Jan 3	@WIS	W 89-73	-5.5	W +10.5	153.5	O 162
Jan 7	vsWASH	W 81-73	-16.5	L −8.5	154.5	U 154
Jan 10	vsPSU	W 93-85	-22.5	L −14.5	152.5	O 178
Jan 14	vsIOWA	W 79-72	-10.5	L −3.5	145.5	O 151
Jan 17	@USC	W 69-64	-9.5	L −4.5	155.5	U 133
Jan 20	@UCLA	L 67-69	-5.5	L −7.5	147.5	U 136
Jan 24	vsILL	L 82-88	-5.5	L −11.5	152.5	O 170
Jan 27	@IU	L 67-72	-4.5	L −9.5	150.5	U 139
Feb 1	@MD	W 93-63	-15.5	W +14.5	148.5	O 156
Feb 7	vsORE	W 68-64	-19.5	L −15.5	144.5	U 132
Feb 10	@NEB	W 80-77	+2.5	W +5.5	146.5	O 157
Feb 14	@IOWA	W 78-57	-2.5	W +18.5	142.5	U 135
Feb 17	vsMICH	L 80-91	+2.5	L −8.5	156.5	O 171
Feb 20	vsIU	W 93-64	-11.5	W +17.5	150.5	O 157
Feb 26	vsMSU	L 74-76	-5.5	L −7.5	143.5	O 150
Mar 1	@OSU	L 74-82	-6.5	L −14.5	149.5	O 156
Mar 4	@NU	W 70-66	-12.5	L −8.5	145.5	U 136
Mar 7	vsWIS	L 93-97	-9.5	L −13.5	154.5	O 190
Mar 12	vsNU	W 81-68	-13.5	L −0.5	139.5	O 149
Mar 13	vsNEB	W 74-58	-4.5	W +11.5	145.5	U 132
Mar 14	vsUCLA	W 73-66	-7.5	L −0.5	143.5	U 139
Mar 15	vsMICH	W 80-72	+4.5	W +12.5	149.5	O 152
Mar 20	vsQUC	W 104-71	-25.5	W +7.5	159.5	O 175
Mar 22	vsMIA	W 79-69	-8.5	W +1.5	146.5	O 148
Mar 26	vsTEX	W 79-77	-8.5	L −6.5	146.5	O 156
Mar 28	vsARIZ	L 64-79	+5.5	L −9.5	152.5	U 143

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

EVAN

W 82-51

−2.5

OAK

W 87-77

−21.5

ALA

W 87-80

+10.5

AKR

W 97-79

−0.5

MEM

W 80-71

−5.5

TTU

W 86-56

+26.5

EIU

W 109-62

+6.5

RUTG

W 81-65

+2.5

ISU

L 58-81

−27.5

MINN

W 85-57

+8.5

MARQ

W 79-59

+3.5

AUB

W 88-60

+20.5

KENT

W 101-60

+16.5

WIS

W 89-73

+10.5

WASH

W 81-73

−8.5

PSU

W 93-85

−14.5

IOWA

W 79-72

−3.5

USC

W 69-64

−4.5

UCLA

L 67-69

−7.5

ILL

L 82-88

−11.5

L 67-72

−9.5

W 93-63

+14.5

ORE

W 68-64

−15.5

NEB

W 80-77

+5.5

IOWA

W 78-57

+18.5

MICH

L 80-91

−8.5

W 93-64

+17.5

MSU

L 74-76

−7.5

OSU

L 74-82

−14.5

W 70-66

−8.5

WIS

L 93-97

−13.5

W 81-68

−0.5

NEB

W 74-58

+11.5

UCLA

W 73-66

−0.5

MICH

W 80-72

+12.5

QUC

W 104-71

+7.5

MIA

W 79-69

+1.5

TEX

W 79-77

−6.5

ARIZ

L 64-79

−9.5

covered 17didn’t cover 22avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

EVAN

W 82-51

−17.5

OAK

W 87-77

+5.5

ALA

W 87-80

−5.5

AKR

W 97-79

+12.5

MEM

W 80-71

−5.5

TTU

W 86-56

−11.5

EIU

W 109-62

+29.5

RUTG

W 81-65

−0.5

ISU

L 58-81

−15.5

MINN

W 85-57

−1.5

MARQ

W 79-59

−16.5

AUB

W 88-60

−4.5

KENT

W 101-60

+5.5

WIS

W 89-73

+8.5

WASH

W 81-73

−0.5

PSU

W 93-85

+25.5

IOWA

W 79-72

+5.5

USC

W 69-64

−22.5

UCLA

L 67-69

−11.5

ILL

L 82-88

+17.5

L 67-72

−11.5

W 93-63

+7.5

ORE

W 68-64

−12.5

NEB

W 80-77

+10.5

IOWA

W 78-57

−7.5

MICH

L 80-91

+14.5

W 93-64

+6.5

MSU

L 74-76

+6.5

OSU

L 74-82

+6.5

W 70-66

−9.5

WIS

L 93-97

+35.5

W 81-68

+9.5

NEB

W 74-58

−13.5

UCLA

W 73-66

−4.5

MICH

W 80-72

+2.5

QUC

W 104-71

+15.5

MIA

W 79-69

+1.5

TEX

W 79-77

+9.5

ARIZ

L 64-79

−9.5

over 20under 19avg +1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin

Wisconsin

35 games played

Straight up

24-11

69% wins

Against the spread

21-14

60% covers · avg +1.3 pts vs the line

Over / Under

22-13

63% overs · avg +3.5 pts vs the total

Straight up

24-1169%

W W W W L W L W W L L W W L W W W W W L W W L W W L W L W W W W W L L

2 straight losses2 of last 4 won

Against the spread

21-1460%

W L W L L W L W W L L W W L W W W L W L L W W W W L W L W W W L W W L

2 of last 4 coveredno streak

Over / Under

22-1363%

O O U O O O U O O U U U U O U O O O O U U O U O O U O O O U O O O U O

3 of last 4 overno streak

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 3	vsCAM	W 96-64	-20.5	W +11.5	151.5	O 160
Nov 7	vsNIU	W 97-72	-28.5	L −3.5	157.5	O 169
Nov 11	vsBALL	W 86-55	-26.5	W +4.5	156.5	U 141
Nov 17	vsSIUE	W 94-69	-25.5	L −0.5	146.5	O 163
Nov 21	@BYU	L 70-98	+4.5	L −23.5	165.5	O 168
Nov 27	vsPROV	W 104-83	-6.5	W +14.5	166.5	O 187
Nov 28	vsTCU	L 63-74	-5.5	L −16.5	157.5	U 137
Dec 3	vsNU	W 85-73	-10.5	W +1.5	155.5	O 158
Dec 6	vsMARQ	W 96-76	-11.5	W +8.5	160.5	O 172
Dec 10	@NEB	L 60-90	+1.5	L −28.5	158.5	U 150
Dec 19	vsVILL	L 66-76	-3.5	L −13.5	152.5	U 142
Dec 22	vsCMU	W 88-61	-26.5	W +0.5	152.5	U 149
Dec 30	vsMILW	W 80-60	-19.5	W +0.5	157.5	U 140
Jan 3	vsPUR	L 73-89	+5.5	L −10.5	153.5	O 162
Jan 6	vsUCLA	W 80-72	-3.5	W +4.5	152.5	U 152
Jan 10	@MICH	W 91-88	+19.5	W +22.5	169.5	O 179
Jan 13	@MINN	W 78-75	-1.5	W +1.5	146.5	O 153
Jan 17	vsRUTG	W 96-87	-15.5	L −6.5	149.5	O 183
Jan 22	@PSU	W 98-71	-5.5	W +21.5	157.5	O 169
Jan 25	vsUSC	L 71-73	-7.5	L −9.5	158.5	U 144
Jan 28	vsMINN	W 67-63	-9.5	L −5.5	146.5	U 130
Jan 31	vsOSU	W 92-82	-4.5	W +5.5	155.5	O 174
Feb 7	@IU	L 77-78	+3.5	W +2.5	157.5	U 155
Feb 10	@ILL	W 92-90	+9.5	W +11.5	153.5	O 182
Feb 13	vsMSU	W 92-71	+1.5	W +22.5	149.5	O 163
Feb 17	@OSU	L 69-86	+1.5	L −15.5	157.5	U 155
Feb 22	vsIOWA	W 84-71	-2.5	W +10.5	147.5	O 155
Feb 25	@ORE	L 71-85	-5.5	L −19.5	152.5	O 156
Feb 28	@WASH	W 90-73	-1.5	W +15.5	153.5	O 163
Mar 4	vsMD	W 78-45	-14.5	W +18.5	153.5	U 123
Mar 7	@PUR	W 97-93	+9.5	W +13.5	154.5	O 190
Mar 12	vsWASH	W 85-82	-6.5	L −3.5	157.5	O 167
Mar 13	vsILL	W 91-88	+8.5	W +11.5	158.5	O 179
Mar 14	vsMICH	L 65-68	+12.5	W +9.5	161.5	U 133
Mar 19	vsHPU	L 82-83	-10.5	L −11.5	161.5	O 165

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

CAM

W 96-64

+11.5

NIU

W 97-72

−3.5

BALL

W 86-55

+4.5

SIUE

W 94-69

−0.5

BYU

L 70-98

−23.5

PROV

W 104-83

+14.5

TCU

L 63-74

−16.5

W 85-73

+1.5

MARQ

W 96-76

+8.5

NEB

L 60-90

−28.5

VILL

L 66-76

−13.5

CMU

W 88-61

+0.5

MILW

W 80-60

+0.5

PUR

L 73-89

−10.5

UCLA

W 80-72

+4.5

MICH

W 91-88

+22.5

MINN

W 78-75

+1.5

RUTG

W 96-87

−6.5

PSU

W 98-71

+21.5

USC

L 71-73

−9.5

MINN

W 67-63

−5.5

OSU

W 92-82

+5.5

L 77-78

+2.5

ILL

W 92-90

+11.5

MSU

W 92-71

+22.5

OSU

L 69-86

−15.5

IOWA

W 84-71

+10.5

ORE

L 71-85

−19.5

WASH

W 90-73

+15.5

W 78-45

+18.5

PUR

W 97-93

+13.5

WASH

W 85-82

−3.5

ILL

W 91-88

+11.5

MICH

L 65-68

+9.5

HPU

L 82-83

−11.5

covered 21didn’t cover 14avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

CAM

W 96-64

+8.5

NIU

W 97-72

+11.5

BALL

W 86-55

−15.5

SIUE

W 94-69

+16.5

BYU

L 70-98

+2.5

PROV

W 104-83

+20.5

TCU

L 63-74

−20.5

W 85-73

+2.5

MARQ

W 96-76

+11.5

NEB

L 60-90

−8.5

VILL

L 66-76

−10.5

CMU

W 88-61

−3.5

MILW

W 80-60

−17.5

PUR

L 73-89

+8.5

UCLA

W 80-72

−0.5

MICH

W 91-88

+9.5

MINN

W 78-75

+6.5

RUTG

W 96-87

+33.5

PSU

W 98-71

+11.5

USC

L 71-73

−14.5

MINN

W 67-63

−16.5

OSU

W 92-82

+18.5

L 77-78

−2.5

ILL

W 92-90

+28.5

MSU

W 92-71

+13.5

OSU

L 69-86

−2.5

IOWA

W 84-71

+7.5

ORE

L 71-85

+3.5

WASH

W 90-73

+9.5

W 78-45

−30.5

PUR

W 97-93

+35.5

WASH

W 85-82

+9.5

ILL

W 91-88

+20.5

MICH

L 65-68

−28.5

HPU

L 82-83

+3.5

over 22under 13avg +3.5 ptslonger = bigger margin

Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.

Wisconsin has the better starters

Position by position: Purdue 0, Wisconsin 2, even 3

PurdueBetterWisconsin

G C. Cox8.5 pts · 2.8 reb · 1.3 ast Score 82

Even

G E. Elmer TR12.8 pts · 6.1 reb · 1.1 ast Score 68

G G. Harris4.6 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.8 ast Score 75

Even

G T. Autry TR10.9 pts · 3.6 reb · 1.4 ast Score 61

G J. Benter4.4 pts · 2.6 reb · 0.8 ast Score 75

WISSmall

G B. Carrington8.3 pts · 2.4 reb · 1.1 ast Score 90

G O. Mayer5.5 pts · 1.1 reb · 1.2 ast Score 64

WISSmall

F N. Winter13.1 pts · 8.5 reb · 1.5 ast Score 96

C D. Jacobsen5.5 pts · 3 reb · 0.3 ast Score 88

Even

F A. Rapp9.7 pts · 4 reb · 1.6 ast Score 83

PurdueBetterWisconsin

PUR offense38th of 366 · +5.0

Even

WIS defense40th of 366 · +2.9

PUR defense18th of 366 · +6.0

Even

WIS offense44th of 366 · +4.5

Backcourt+2.4 · 4 players

Even

Backcourt+2.0 · 3 players

Frontcourt+1.8 · 1 player

WISBig

Frontcourt+6.7 · 2 players

Bench-0.0 · 2 players

PURSmall

Bench-2.6 · 5 players

Score, worst to bestPUR betterWIS betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Projected starters: college teams publish no depth chart, so these come from minutes played, and a freshman or a new starter can change them. The score is the share of ranked players at the position that player is ahead of. Numbers are this season's once a player has 30 minutes, 2025-26's before that. Bench is the next five by minutes. Tap a player for the full numbers.

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined

Purdue

Guards

C. Cox24 minG. Harris16 minJ. Benter15 minO. Mayer14 minJ. Rayl2 minJ. Lusk2 min

Forwards

S. KingNewC. PierceNewE. ShahrvinNewR. BurgessNewR. KnightNew

Centers

D. Jacobsen13 minS. HuanNew

Wisconsin

Guards

E. Elmer31 min · TRT. Autry29 min · TRB. Carrington18 minJ. Janicki17 minH. Jones7 minZ. Kinziger6 min

Forwards

N. Winter31 minA. Rapp23 minV. Onuetu18 min · TRW. Garlock7 minI. RiddleNew

In order of minutes, from rosters as of today. ESPN lists players only as guards, forwards or centers, and no injury report exists for college basketball, so a player who is out may still show here.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams

ChartTable

Scoring

Points per game

PUR81.6 #35

WIS83.0 #28

Points per possession

PUR1.25 #2

WIS1.18 #27

Pace (possessions)

PUR65.4 #333

WIS70.0 #119

Shooting

Effective FG%

PUR57.6 #10

WIS54.5 #52

3-point %

PUR38.3 #11

WIS36.2 #50

3-point attempt rate

PUR40.2 #164

WIS52.1 #6

Free throw rate

PUR28.6 #336

WIS31.5 #267

Possessions

Turnover rate

PUR13.7 #16

WIS12.8 #4

Offensive rebound rate

PUR36.4 #19

WIS29.1 #232

Assists per game

PUR19.6 #2

WIS16.0 #48

Defense

Points allowed

PUR70.5 #65

WIS76.1 #221

Points allowed per possession

PUR1.08 #162

WIS1.09 #193

Opponent effective FG%

PUR52.4 #232

WIS51.4 #178

Opponent 3-point %

PUR34.1 #192

WIS33.5 #152

Turnovers forced

PUR15.3 #263

WIS14.3 #327

Defensive rebound rate

PUR72.9 #39

WIS71.8 #74

Steals per game

PUR5.5 #297

WIS5.6 #287

Blocks per game

PUR2.8 #257

WIS3.1 #198

PUR		WIS
Scoring
81.6 #35	Points per game	83.0 #28
1.25 #2	Points per possession	1.18 #27
65.4 #333	Pace (possessions)	70.0 #119
Shooting
57.6 #10	Effective FG%	54.5 #52
38.3 #11	3-point %	36.2 #50
40.2 #164	3-point attempt rate	52.1 #6
28.6 #336	Free throw rate	31.5 #267
Possessions
13.7 #16	Turnover rate	12.8 #4
36.4 #19	Offensive rebound rate	29.1 #232
19.6 #2	Assists per game	16.0 #48
Defense
70.5 #65	Points allowed	76.1 #221
1.08 #162	Points allowed per possession	1.09 #193
52.4 #232	Opponent effective FG%	51.4 #178
34.1 #192	Opponent 3-point %	33.5 #152
15.3 #263	Turnovers forced	14.3 #327
72.9 #39	Defensive rebound rate	71.8 #74
5.5 #297	Steals per game	5.6 #287
2.8 #257	Blocks per game	3.1 #198

From the box scores. A longer bar is a better national rank, on every row; the better team's bar is solid. A green rank is near the top of Division I, a red one near the bottom. Pace and 3-point rate are styles, so they have no better side.

Purdue

30-9 in 2025-26 overall · 17-7 in conference · Big Ten Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs Arizona64–79
Wvs Texas79–77
Wvs Miami79–69
Wvs Queens University Royals104–71
Wvs Michigan80–72

A week or more of rest.

Wisconsin

24-11 in 2025-26 overall · 16-7 in conference · Big Ten Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs High Point82–83
Lvs Michigan65–68
Wvs Illinois91–88
Wvs Washington85–82
W@ Purdue97–93

A week or more of rest.

Purdue Boilermakers at Wisconsin Badgers

What could decide it

Market

Model vs market

1st-half model

ATS

Totals

Last 10 games

Next 3 games

Recent meetings

ATS History · 2025-26

Purdue

Wisconsin

Wisconsin has the better starters

Depth chart

Matchup stats

Purdue

Wisconsin