Welsh-Ryan Arena · at Northwestern
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | NU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects NU 87–65 · win probability NU 97%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 151.9
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: NU has more of the edges
NE 1, NU 7 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
NU offense vs NE defense
Offense 67th of 366 against a defense 263rd, on the model’s ratings
NE offense vs NU defense
Offense 194th of 366 against a defense 42nd, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
NE has played the 185th-hardest schedule, NU the 36th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Free throws
Free throw rate: NE 29.4, NU 33.9. Allowed: NE 41.9, NU 34.8
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: NE plays 69.9 a game (120th fastest), NU 65.5 (328th). Faster games mean more points
Turnovers
Turnover rate: NE 16.3%, NU 13.1%. Forced: NE 16.8%, NU 17.5%
Shooting
Effective FG%: NE 52.4 and allows 56.4; NU 51.7 and allows 51.0
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: NE 27.3%, NU 28.1%. Defensive: NE 69.8%, NU 65.3%
Three-pointers
NE hits 33.7% and allows 35.8%; NU hits 33.0% and allows 33.4%. Threes are 37.8% and 34.0% of their shots
Home court
NU at home. This season: NU 0-0 at home, NE 0-0 away
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: NE 43%, NU 24%. Transfers in: NE 3, NU 8. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | NU -21.6 | — |
| Total | — | 151.9 | — |
| Projected score | — | NE 65.1 · NU 86.8 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | NU -12.8 | — |
| 1H total | 71.0 | — |
| 1H projected score | NE 29.1 · NU 41.9 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-9 10% | 2-8 20% | 4-6 40% | |
| 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% | 3-7 30% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
NE 0–1 NUNU leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · NE 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2024-25 | NE 60 @ NU 85 | NU -14.5 | NU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Northeastern
31 games played
Straight up
7-24
23% wins
Against the spread
11-20
35% covers · avg −2.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
20-11
65% overs · avg +7.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 75-76 | -2.5 | L −3.5 | 142.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 7 | @ | W 68-65 | +5.5 | W +8.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 11 | @ | W 77-60 | +5.5 | W +22.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 74-85 | -1.5 | L −12.5 | 134.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 57-70 | +2.5 | L −10.5 | 145.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 93-86 | +7.5 | W +14.5 | 147.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 28 | @ | L 73-86 | +17.5 | W +4.5 | 154.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 59-76 | -8.5 | L −25.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 73-56 | -1.5 | W +15.5 | 138.5 | U 129 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 83-91 | +14.5 | W +6.5 | 140.5 | O 174 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 77-85 | +10.5 | W +2.5 | 144.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 91-103 | +4.5 | L −7.5 | 153.5 | O 194 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 85-74 | -3.5 | W +7.5 | 151.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 82-97 | +3.5 | L −11.5 | 154.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 78-87 | +4.5 | L −4.5 | 142.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 78-87 | +2.5 | L −6.5 | 143.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 85-78 | +3.5 | W +10.5 | 157.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 68-81 | +3.5 | L −9.5 | 143.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 22 | vs | L 80-95 | -3.5 | L −18.5 | 148.5 | O 175 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 78-83 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 139.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 84-89 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 161.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 63-80 | +8.5 | L −8.5 | 153.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 55-69 | +3.5 | L −10.5 | 153.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 67-94 | +5.5 | L −21.5 | 167.5 | U 161 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 61-70 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 143.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 68-82 | +6.5 | L −7.5 | 144.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 77-84 | +11.5 | W +4.5 | 164.5 | U 161 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 65-76 | +3.5 | L −7.5 | 145.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 3 | vs | L 83-89 | +3.5 | L −2.5 | 148.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 88-72 | -2.5 | W +13.5 | 151.5 | O 160 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 77-84 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 138.5 | O 161 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
BU
L 75-76
−3.5
7
@
COLG
W 68-65
+8.5
11
@
HARV
W 77-60
+22.5
15
vs
UVM
L 74-85
−12.5
20
@
PRIN
L 57-70
−10.5
22
vs
DUQ
W 93-86
+14.5
28
@
WAKE
L 73-86
+4.5
3
@
HC
L 59-76
−25.5
7
vs
CCSU
W 73-56
+15.5
20
@
SYR
L 83-91
+6.5
22
@
URI
L 77-85
+2.5
29
@
ELON
L 91-103
−7.5
31
@
NCAT
W 85-74
+7.5
3
@
CAM
L 82-97
−11.5
8
vs
UNCW
L 78-87
−4.5
10
vs
TOW
L 78-87
−6.5
15
vs
ELON
W 85-78
+10.5
19
@
MONM
L 68-81
−9.5
22
vs
STBK
L 80-95
−18.5
24
@
DREX
L 78-83
−0.5
31
vs
COFC
L 84-89
−1.5
5
@
HOF
L 63-80
−8.5
7
@
STBK
L 55-69
−10.5
12
vs
W&M
L 67-94
−21.5
19
vs
DREX
L 61-70
−10.5
21
vs
HOF
L 68-82
−7.5
26
@
W&M
L 77-84
+4.5
28
@
HAMP
L 65-76
−7.5
3
vs
MONM
L 83-89
−2.5
6
vs
NCAT
W 88-72
+13.5
7
vs
DREX
L 77-84
−2.5
covered 11didn’t cover 20avg −2.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
BU
L 75-76
+8.5
7
@
COLG
W 68-65
−14.5
11
@
HARV
W 77-60
−7.5
15
vs
UVM
L 74-85
+24.5
20
@
PRIN
L 57-70
−18.5
22
vs
DUQ
W 93-86
+31.5
28
@
WAKE
L 73-86
+4.5
3
@
HC
L 59-76
−10.5
7
vs
CCSU
W 73-56
−9.5
20
@
SYR
L 83-91
+33.5
22
@
URI
L 77-85
+17.5
29
@
ELON
L 91-103
+40.5
31
@
NCAT
W 85-74
+7.5
3
@
CAM
L 82-97
+24.5
8
vs
UNCW
L 78-87
+22.5
10
vs
TOW
L 78-87
+21.5
15
vs
ELON
W 85-78
+5.5
19
@
MONM
L 68-81
+5.5
22
vs
STBK
L 80-95
+26.5
24
@
DREX
L 78-83
+21.5
31
vs
COFC
L 84-89
+11.5
5
@
HOF
L 63-80
−10.5
7
@
STBK
L 55-69
−29.5
12
vs
W&M
L 67-94
−6.5
19
vs
DREX
L 61-70
−12.5
21
vs
HOF
L 68-82
+5.5
26
@
W&M
L 77-84
−3.5
28
@
HAMP
L 65-76
−4.5
3
vs
MONM
L 83-89
+23.5
6
vs
NCAT
W 88-72
+8.5
7
vs
DREX
L 77-84
+22.5
over 20under 11avg +7.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Northwestern
34 games played
Straight up
15-19
44% wins
Against the spread
18-16
53% covers · avg +0.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-19
44% overs · avg −1.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 70-47 | -26.5 | L −3.5 | 140.5 | U 117 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 76-52 | -17.5 | W +6.5 | 136.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 10 | vs | W 110-63 | -23.5 | W +23.5 | 151.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 14 | @ | W 81-79 | -5.5 | L −3.5 | 145.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 78-83 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 149.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 79-77 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 81-86 | -2.5 | L −7.5 | 159.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 73-85 | +10.5 | L −1.5 | 155.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 82-86 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 155.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 93-53 | -30.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 86-70 | -14.5 | W +1.5 | 145.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 58-61 | +3.5 | W +0.5 | 154.5 | U 119 |
| Dec 30 | vs | W 80-60 | -19.5 | W +0.5 | 148.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 78-84 | -4.5 | L −10.5 | 138.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 66-76 | +13.5 | W +3.5 | 143.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 11 | @ | L 75-77 | -4.5 | L −6.5 | 144.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 68-79 | +9.5 | L −1.5 | 151.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 58-77 | +4.5 | L −14.5 | 149.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 74-68 | +6.5 | W +12.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 64-71 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 94-73 | -7.5 | W +13.5 | 148.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 62-76 | -1.5 | L −15.5 | 146.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 44-84 | +16.5 | L −23.5 | 149.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 8 | @ | L 70-76 | +10.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | O 146 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 75-87 | +15.5 | W +3.5 | 153.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 49-68 | +13.5 | L −5.5 | 146.5 | U 117 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 78-74 | -7.5 | L −3.5 | 142.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 24 | @ | W 72-68 | +9.5 | W +13.5 | 145.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 63-62 | -3.5 | L −2.5 | 141.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 66-70 | +12.5 | W +8.5 | 145.5 | U 136 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 66-67 | +4.5 | W +3.5 | 133.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 76-66 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 143.5 | U 142 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 74-61 | +6.5 | W +19.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 68-81 | +13.5 | W +0.5 | 139.5 | O 149 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
MERC
W 70-47
−3.5
7
vs
BU
W 76-52
+6.5
10
vs
CLE
W 110-63
+23.5
14
@
DEP
W 81-79
−3.5
21
vs
UVA
L 78-83
−0.5
23
vs
SC
W 79-77
−2.5
27
vs
OKST
L 81-86
−7.5
3
@
WIS
L 73-85
−1.5
6
vs
OSU
L 82-86
−2.5
13
vs
JKST
W 93-53
+9.5
16
vs
VAL
W 86-70
+1.5
20
vs
BTLR
L 58-61
+0.5
30
vs
HOW
W 80-60
+0.5
3
vs
MINN
L 78-84
−10.5
8
@
MSU
L 66-76
+3.5
11
@
RUTG
L 75-77
−6.5
14
vs
ILL
L 68-79
−1.5
17
vs
NEB
L 58-77
−14.5
21
@
USC
W 74-68
+12.5
24
@
UCLA
L 64-71
+0.5
29
vs
PSU
W 94-73
+13.5
31
vs
WASH
L 62-76
−15.5
4
@
ILL
L 44-84
−23.5
8
@
IOWA
L 70-76
+4.5
11
vs
MICH
L 75-87
+3.5
14
@
NEB
L 49-68
−5.5
18
vs
MD
W 78-74
−3.5
24
@
IU
W 72-68
+13.5
28
vs
ORE
W 63-62
−2.5
4
vs
PUR
L 66-70
+8.5
7
@
MINN
L 66-67
+3.5
10
vs
PSU
W 76-66
+5.5
11
vs
IU
W 74-61
+19.5
12
vs
PUR
L 68-81
+0.5
covered 18didn’t cover 16avg +0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
MERC
W 70-47
−23.5
7
vs
BU
W 76-52
−8.5
10
vs
CLE
W 110-63
+21.5
14
@
DEP
W 81-79
+14.5
21
vs
UVA
L 78-83
+11.5
23
vs
SC
W 79-77
+9.5
27
vs
OKST
L 81-86
+7.5
3
@
WIS
L 73-85
+2.5
6
vs
OSU
L 82-86
+12.5
13
vs
JKST
W 93-53
−0.5
16
vs
VAL
W 86-70
+10.5
20
vs
BTLR
L 58-61
−35.5
30
vs
HOW
W 80-60
−8.5
3
vs
MINN
L 78-84
+23.5
8
@
MSU
L 66-76
−1.5
11
@
RUTG
L 75-77
+7.5
14
vs
ILL
L 68-79
−4.5
17
vs
NEB
L 58-77
−14.5
21
@
USC
W 74-68
−7.5
24
@
UCLA
L 64-71
−8.5
29
vs
PSU
W 94-73
+18.5
31
vs
WASH
L 62-76
−8.5
4
@
ILL
L 44-84
−21.5
8
@
IOWA
L 70-76
+6.5
11
vs
MICH
L 75-87
+8.5
14
@
NEB
L 49-68
−29.5
18
vs
MD
W 78-74
+9.5
24
@
IU
W 72-68
−5.5
28
vs
ORE
W 63-62
−16.5
4
vs
PUR
L 66-70
−9.5
7
@
MINN
L 66-67
−0.5
10
vs
PSU
W 76-66
−1.5
11
vs
IU
W 74-61
−7.5
12
vs
PUR
L 68-81
+9.5
over 15under 19avg −1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Northwestern has the better starters
Position by position: Northeastern 0, Northwestern 2, even 3
NortheasternBetterNorthwestern
G M. Loughnane10.2 pts · 2.9 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 45
=No call
G L. Pratt TR17 pts · 1.7 reb · 3.3 ast
Not ranked
G R. King TR5.8 pts · 2.1 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 46
→NUBig
F J. Karasinski TR21.7 pts · 4.7 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 97
G M. Newton5.4 pts · 2 reb · 0.9 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F C. Smith TR11.9 pts · 4.2 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 48
G R. Williams7.4 pts · 1.1 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 89
=Even
F L. McEldon TR11.7 pts · 6.2 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 82
C P. Pinter3.3 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 5
→NUBig
F O. Federiko TR8.3 pts · 4.8 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 61
NortheasternBetterNorthwestern
NE offense194th of 366 · -6.0
→NUBig
NU defense42nd of 366 · +2.7
NE defense263rd of 366 · -6.8
→NUBig
NU offense67th of 366 · +1.8
Backcourt-0.9 · 4 players
→NUSmall
Backcourt+0.9 · 1 player
Frontcourt-2.0 · 1 player
→NUBig
Frontcourt+7.1 · 4 players
Bench-1.8 · 3 players
=Even
Bench-2.1 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestNE betterNU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
M. Loughnane31 minR. King19 min · TRM. Newton17 minR. Williams15 minL. Bond14 min · TRD. GrosberNew
Forwards
B. Young5 min · TRJ. IcitovicNewD. JungNewS. BaptisteNew
Centers
P. Pinter14 minL. Koelsch9 min
Guards
L. Pratt33 min · TRA. Ciaravino22 minJ. West22 minA. Kostic12 min · TRD. Williams9 min · TRP. Gill4 min
Forwards
J. Karasinski30 min · TRC. Smith30 min · TRL. McEldon26 min · TRO. Federiko23 min · TRR. Soulis20 min · TRE. EschmeyerNew
Centers
S. GhaiNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 74.9 #168 | Points per game | 73.2 #220 |
| 1.07 #210 | Points per possession | 1.12 #100 |
| 69.9 #120 | Pace (possessions) | 65.5 #328 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.4 #130 | Effective FG% | 51.7 #159 |
| 33.7 #187 | 3-point % | 33.0 #232 |
| 37.8 #218 | 3-point attempt rate | 34.0 #296 |
| 29.4 #324 | Free throw rate | 33.9 #213 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.3 #159 | Turnover rate | 13.1 #6 |
| 27.3 #286 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.1 #260 |
| 15.3 #75 | Assists per game | 17.2 #18 |
| Defense | ||
| 80.9 #331 | Points allowed | 72.0 #106 |
| 1.16 #335 | Points allowed per possession | 1.09 #210 |
| 56.4 #351 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.0 #157 |
| 35.8 #297 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.4 #145 |
| 16.8 #163 | Turnovers forced | 17.5 #120 |
| 69.8 #169 | Defensive rebound rate | 65.3 #332 |
| 7.0 #131 | Steals per game | 5.8 #256 |
| 3.0 #229 | Blocks per game | 3.6 #131 |
Northeastern
7-24 in 2025-26 overall · 3-17 in conference · Coastal Athletic Association
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Drexel77–84
- Wvs NC A&T88–72
- Lvs Monmouth83–89
- L@ Hampton65–76
- L@ William & Mary77–84
A week or more of rest.
Northwestern
15-19 in 2025-26 overall · 7-16 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Purdue68–81
- Wvs Indiana74–61
- Wvs Penn State76–66
- L@ Minnesota66–67
- Lvs Purdue66–70
A week or more of rest.