Beasley Coliseum · at Washington St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | WSU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects WSU 79–70 · win probability WSU 77%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 149.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: WSU has more of the edges
IDHO 1, WSU 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
IDHO has played the 262nd-hardest schedule, WSU the 100th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Turnovers
Turnover rate: IDHO 15.0%, WSU 18.5%. Forced: IDHO 15.0%, WSU 14.5%
WSU offense vs IDHO defense
Offense 130th of 366 against a defense 233rd, on the model’s ratings
IDHO offense vs WSU defense
Offense 253rd of 366 against a defense 166th, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
IDHO hits 34.1% and allows 35.2%; WSU hits 36.5% and allows 35.4%. Threes are 47.0% and 44.8% of their shots
Home court
WSU at home. This season: WSU 0-0 at home, IDHO 0-0 away
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: IDHO 23%, WSU 1%. Transfers in: IDHO 3, WSU 8. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: IDHO 28.4%, WSU 29.5%. Defensive: IDHO 75.8%, WSU 71.8%
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: IDHO plays 69.4 a game (153rd fastest), WSU 68.9 (183rd). Faster games mean more points
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: IDHO 34.6, WSU 30.2. Allowed: IDHO 38.5, WSU 33.0
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: IDHO 51.4 and allows 50.5; WSU 54.7 and allows 52.6
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | WSU -8.5 | — |
| Total | — | 149.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | IDHO 70.4 · WSU 78.9 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | WSU -5.0 | — |
| 1H total | 69.8 | — |
| 1H projected score | IDHO 32.4 · WSU 37.4 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% | |
| 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
IDHO 1–3 WSUWSU leads · 4 games since 2021-22 · IDHO 1-3 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2025-26 | IDHO 83 @ WSU 81 | WSU -7.5 | IDHO W |
| Nov 11, 2024-25 | IDHO 67 @ WSU 90 | WSU -15.5 | WSU W |
| Nov 6, 2023-24 | IDHO 59 @ WSU 84 | WSU -20.5 | WSU W |
| Nov 18, 2021-22 | WSU 109 @ IDHO 61 | IDHO +19.5 | WSU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Idaho
33 games played
Straight up
18-15
55% wins
Against the spread
16-17
48% covers · avg +0.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-19
42% overs · avg −1.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | W 83-81 | +7.5 | W +9.5 | 154.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 74-78 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 155.5 | U 152 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 67-75 | +5.5 | L −2.5 | 148.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 78-64 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 159.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 68-94 | -1.5 | L −27.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 90-58 | -11.5 | W +20.5 | 151.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 84-81 | +5.5 | W +8.5 | 147.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 65-80 | +11.5 | L −3.5 | 144.5 | O 145 |
| Dec 21 | @ | W 83-80 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 167.5 | U 163 |
| Dec 23 | @ | L 63-64 | -7.5 | L −8.5 | 150.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 84-81 | -6.5 | L −3.5 | 158.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 73-79 | -4.5 | L −10.5 | 154.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 92-89 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 68-76 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 75-67 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 158.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 86-76 | -10.5 | L −0.5 | 161.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 66-69 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 83-91 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 155.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 79-62 | -5.5 | W +11.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 66-73 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 147.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 68-73 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 152.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 72-83 | -5.5 | L −16.5 | 153.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 99-69 | -6.5 | W +23.5 | 146.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 67-77 | +3.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 86-80 | -4.5 | W +1.5 | 163.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 78-58 | -10.5 | W +9.5 | 145.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 67-76 | -2.5 | L −11.5 | 156.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 2 | @ | W 85-81 | +3.5 | W +7.5 | 151.5 | O 166 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 68-45 | -6.5 | W +16.5 | 158.5 | U 113 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 78-74 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 143.5 | O 152 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 81-68 | -1.5 | W +11.5 | 148.5 | O 149 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 77-66 | -3.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 47-78 | +24.5 | L −6.5 | 137.5 | U 125 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
WSU
W 83-81
+9.5
12
@
USD
L 74-78
−5.5
15
@
UCSD
L 67-75
−2.5
26
vs
CSUN
W 78-64
+12.5
28
vs
SHSU
L 68-94
−27.5
3
vs
UND
W 90-58
+20.5
6
@
SDST
W 84-81
+8.5
10
@
ND
L 65-80
−3.5
21
@
CP
W 83-80
+1.5
23
@
CSUB
L 63-64
−8.5
3
vs
EWU
W 84-81
−3.5
8
vs
MONT
L 73-79
−10.5
10
vs
MTST
W 92-89
+1.5
15
@
IDST
L 68-76
−5.5
17
@
WEB
W 75-67
+6.5
22
vs
SAC
W 86-76
−0.5
24
vs
PRST
L 66-69
−4.5
29
@
UNCO
L 83-91
−5.5
31
@
NAU
W 79-62
+11.5
5
@
MTST
L 66-73
−4.5
7
@
MONT
L 68-73
−3.5
12
vs
WEB
L 72-83
−16.5
14
vs
IDST
W 99-69
+23.5
19
@
PRST
L 67-77
−6.5
21
@
SAC
W 86-80
+1.5
26
vs
NAU
W 78-58
+9.5
28
vs
UNCO
L 67-76
−11.5
2
@
EWU
W 85-81
+7.5
7
vs
SAC
W 68-45
+16.5
8
vs
MTST
W 78-74
+2.5
10
vs
EWU
W 81-68
+11.5
11
vs
MONT
W 77-66
+7.5
19
vs
HOU
L 47-78
−6.5
covered 16didn’t cover 17avg +0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
WSU
W 83-81
+9.5
12
@
USD
L 74-78
−3.5
15
@
UCSD
L 67-75
−6.5
26
vs
CSUN
W 78-64
−17.5
28
vs
SHSU
L 68-94
+7.5
3
vs
UND
W 90-58
−3.5
6
@
SDST
W 84-81
+17.5
10
@
ND
L 65-80
+0.5
21
@
CP
W 83-80
−4.5
23
@
CSUB
L 63-64
−23.5
3
vs
EWU
W 84-81
+6.5
8
vs
MONT
L 73-79
−2.5
10
vs
MTST
W 92-89
+36.5
15
@
IDST
L 68-76
−5.5
17
@
WEB
W 75-67
−16.5
22
vs
SAC
W 86-76
+0.5
24
vs
PRST
L 66-69
−10.5
29
@
UNCO
L 83-91
+18.5
31
@
NAU
W 79-62
−5.5
5
@
MTST
L 66-73
−8.5
7
@
MONT
L 68-73
−11.5
12
vs
WEB
L 72-83
+1.5
14
vs
IDST
W 99-69
+21.5
19
@
PRST
L 67-77
−1.5
21
@
SAC
W 86-80
+2.5
26
vs
NAU
W 78-58
−9.5
28
vs
UNCO
L 67-76
−13.5
2
@
EWU
W 85-81
+14.5
7
vs
SAC
W 68-45
−45.5
8
vs
MTST
W 78-74
+8.5
10
vs
EWU
W 81-68
+0.5
11
vs
MONT
W 77-66
−4.5
19
vs
HOU
L 47-78
−12.5
over 14under 19avg −1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Washington St
31 games played
Straight up
11-20
35% wins
Against the spread
15-16
48% covers · avg −0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-15
52% overs · avg +2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 81-83 | -7.5 | L −9.5 | 154.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 69-85 | +4.5 | L −11.5 | 153.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 10 | vs | W 81-71 | -2.5 | W +7.5 | 157.5 | U 152 |
| Nov 14 | vs | L 69-81 | +8.5 | L −3.5 | 158.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 98-74 | -12.5 | W +11.5 | 157.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 94-100 | +4.5 | L −1.5 | 157.5 | O 194 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 61-75 | +8.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 60-64 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 148.5 | U 124 |
| Dec 7 | vs | L 64-78 | -2.5 | L −16.5 | 145.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 14 | @ | L 61-68 | +12.5 | W +5.5 | 156.5 | U 129 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 78-63 | -6.5 | W +8.5 | 153.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 84-78 | -7.5 | L −1.5 | 151.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 28 | @ | W 67-62 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | U 129 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 55-69 | +6.5 | L −7.5 | 144.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 78-76 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 142.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 81-67 | -6.5 | W +7.5 | 140.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 82-88 | +15.5 | W +9.5 | 143.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 15 | vs | L 65-86 | +16.5 | L −4.5 | 155.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 18 | @ | L 80-85 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 92-96 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 152.5 | O 188 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 95-79 | -11.5 | W +4.5 | 146.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 70-58 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 142.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 104-74 | -8.5 | W +21.5 | 152.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 64-74 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 147.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 92-96 | +8.5 | W +4.5 | 160.5 | O 188 |
| Feb 10 | @ | L 53-83 | +21.5 | L −8.5 | 156.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 87-70 | -2.5 | W +14.5 | 144.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 67-83 | +8.5 | L −7.5 | 149.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 66-67 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 149.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 79-88 | -7.5 | L −16.5 | 158.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 68-74 | -5.5 | L −11.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
IDHO
L 81-83
−9.5
7
@
DAV
L 69-85
−11.5
10
vs
STMN
W 81-71
+7.5
14
vs
WASH
L 69-81
−3.5
19
vs
SUU
W 98-74
+11.5
25
vs
ASU
L 94-100
−1.5
26
vs
HALL
L 61-75
−5.5
2
@
BRAD
L 60-64
+1.5
7
vs
NEV
L 64-78
−16.5
14
@
USC
L 61-68
+5.5
17
vs
EWU
W 78-63
+8.5
20
vs
MER
W 84-78
−1.5
28
@
PORT
W 67-62
+1.5
30
@
SEA
L 55-69
−7.5
2
vs
LMU
W 78-76
−1.5
4
vs
ORST
W 81-67
+7.5
10
@
SMC
L 82-88
+9.5
15
vs
GONZ
L 65-86
−4.5
18
@
SF
L 80-85
+0.5
21
@
USD
L 92-96
−5.5
24
vs
PEPP
W 95-79
+4.5
28
vs
SEA
W 70-58
+10.5
31
vs
PORT
W 104-74
+21.5
4
@
ORST
L 64-74
−11.5
7
vs
SCU
L 92-96
+4.5
10
@
GONZ
L 53-83
−8.5
18
vs
PAC
W 87-70
+14.5
21
vs
SMC
L 67-83
−7.5
25
@
LMU
L 66-67
+0.5
28
@
PEPP
L 79-88
−16.5
6
vs
PORT
L 68-74
−11.5
covered 15didn’t cover 16avg −0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
IDHO
L 81-83
+9.5
7
@
DAV
L 69-85
+0.5
10
vs
STMN
W 81-71
−5.5
14
vs
WASH
L 69-81
−8.5
19
vs
SUU
W 98-74
+14.5
25
vs
ASU
L 94-100
+36.5
26
vs
HALL
L 61-75
−11.5
2
@
BRAD
L 60-64
−24.5
7
vs
NEV
L 64-78
−3.5
14
@
USC
L 61-68
−27.5
17
vs
EWU
W 78-63
−12.5
20
vs
MER
W 84-78
+10.5
28
@
PORT
W 67-62
−23.5
30
@
SEA
L 55-69
−20.5
2
vs
LMU
W 78-76
+11.5
4
vs
ORST
W 81-67
+7.5
10
@
SMC
L 82-88
+26.5
15
vs
GONZ
L 65-86
−4.5
18
@
SF
L 80-85
+18.5
21
@
USD
L 92-96
+35.5
24
vs
PEPP
W 95-79
+27.5
28
vs
SEA
W 70-58
−14.5
31
vs
PORT
W 104-74
+25.5
4
@
ORST
L 64-74
−9.5
7
vs
SCU
L 92-96
+27.5
10
@
GONZ
L 53-83
−20.5
18
vs
PAC
W 87-70
+12.5
21
vs
SMC
L 67-83
+0.5
25
@
LMU
L 66-67
−16.5
28
@
PEPP
L 79-88
+8.5
6
vs
PORT
L 68-74
−7.5
over 16under 15avg +2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Washington St has the better starters
Position by position: Idaho 0, Washington St 2, even 3
IdahoBetterWashington St
G K. Gonzalez18 pts · 1 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G S. Akins TR5.3 pts · 1.5 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 57
G R. Lafferty TR0.9 pts · 1.6 reb · 1.3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F F. Roxburgh TR10.9 pts · 5.7 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 21
G M. Klapper2.8 pts · 1.9 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 35
→WSUSmall
F R. Harrison TR14.2 pts · 6.2 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 67
F H. Ward TR5 pts · 3.4 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 35
=No call
F L. Dembele TR5.2 pts · 4.2 reb · 1.4 ast
Not ranked
F S. Joba4.9 pts · 3.4 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 25
→WSUSmall
F T. Kropp TR3.1 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 48
IdahoBetterWashington St
IDHO offense253rd of 366 · -7.6
→WSUSmall
WSU defense166th of 366 · -3.7
IDHO defense233rd of 366 · -6.2
→WSUSmall
WSU offense130th of 366 · -3.5
Backcourt-1.6 · 3 players
→WSUSmall
Backcourt-0.2 · 1 player
Frontcourt-1.9 · 2 players
=Even
Frontcourt-2.6 · 4 players
Bench-0.2 · 1 player
=Even
Bench-0.5 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestIDHO betterWSU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
K. Gonzalez18 minR. Lafferty13 min · TRM. Klapper12 minK. Wynott10 min · TRB. KennisonNewT. WalNew
Forwards
H. Ward19 min · TRS. Joba17 minD. Trejo-DelgadoNewM. DiaoNewW. JensonNewN. Newman-GomezNew
Guards
S. Akins15 min · TRJ. Phillips11 min · TRJ. Harrell9 min · TRR. Jones7 min · TRD. Blakely1 minC. JonesNew
Forwards
F. Roxburgh31 min · TRR. Harrison31 min · TRL. Dembele20 min · TRT. Kropp12 min · TRM. SankheNewB. KymanNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 75.8 #147 | Points per game | 75.7 #152 |
| 1.10 #145 | Points per possession | 1.10 #136 |
| 69.4 #153 | Pace (possessions) | 68.9 #183 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.4 #177 | Effective FG% | 54.7 #48 |
| 34.1 #168 | 3-point % | 36.5 #40 |
| 47.0 #34 | 3-point attempt rate | 44.8 #73 |
| 34.6 #193 | Free throw rate | 30.2 #305 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.0 #69 | Turnover rate | 18.5 #295 |
| 28.4 #250 | Offensive rebound rate | 29.5 #221 |
| 11.4 #313 | Assists per game | 13.8 #163 |
| Defense | ||
| 74.1 #157 | Points allowed | 77.3 #245 |
| 1.06 #112 | Points allowed per possession | 1.12 #266 |
| 50.5 #128 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.6 #248 |
| 35.2 #264 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.4 #273 |
| 15.0 #288 | Turnovers forced | 14.5 #322 |
| 75.8 #5 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.8 #71 |
| 5.6 #282 | Steals per game | 5.5 #299 |
| 2.4 #319 | Blocks per game | 2.9 #242 |
Idaho
18-15 in 2025-26 overall · 13-9 in conference · Big Sky Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Houston47–78
- Wvs Montana77–66
- Wvs E Washington81–68
- Wvs Montana St78–74
- Wvs Sacramento St68–45
A week or more of rest.
Washington St
11-20 in 2025-26 overall · 7-12 in conference · Pac-12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Portland68–74
- L@ Pepperdine79–88
- L@ LMU66–67
- Lvs Saint Mary's67–83
- Wvs Pacific87–70
A week or more of rest.