Viking Pavilion · at Portland St · Conference game
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | PRST | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects PRST 73–72 · win probability PRST 55%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 145.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: PRST has more of the edges
IDHO 1, PRST 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
IDHO has played the 262nd-hardest schedule, PRST the 322nd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Three-pointers
IDHO hits 34.1% and allows 35.2%; PRST hits 32.6% and allows 32.3%. Threes are 47.0% and 34.4% of their shots
Home court
PRST at home. This season: PRST 0-0 at home, IDHO 0-0 away
PRST offense vs IDHO defense
Offense 284th of 366 against a defense 233rd, on the model’s ratings
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: IDHO 15.0%, PRST 16.9%. Forced: IDHO 15.0%, PRST 18.0%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: IDHO 23%, PRST 6%. Transfers in: IDHO 3, PRST 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: IDHO 51.4 and allows 50.5; PRST 50.5 and allows 48.8
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: IDHO 28.4%, PRST 30.0%. Defensive: IDHO 75.8%, PRST 73.6%
Even
IDHO offense vs PRST defense
Offense 253rd of 366 against a defense 244th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: IDHO plays 69.4 a game (153rd fastest), PRST 69.6 (140th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: IDHO 34.6, PRST 37.1. Allowed: IDHO 38.5, PRST 42.8
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | PRST -1.5 | — |
| Total | — | 145.1 | — |
| Projected score | — | IDHO 71.8 · PRST 73.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | PRST -0.8 | — |
| 1H total | 67.9 | — |
| 1H projected score | IDHO 33.6 · PRST 34.3 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% | |
| 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 11 since 2021-22
IDHO 2–9 PRSTPRST leads · 11 games since 2021-22 · PRST has won the last 2 meetings · IDHO 3-8 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2025-26 | IDHO 67 @ PRST 77 | PRST -3.5 | PRST W |
| Jan 24, 2025-26 | PRST 69 @ IDHO 66 | IDHO -1.5 | PRST W |
| Mar 10, 2024-25 | IDHO 80 vs PRST 70 | PRST -4.5 | IDHO W |
| Feb 6, 2024-25 | PRST 76 @ IDHO 69 | IDHO +1.5 | PRST W |
| Jan 11, 2024-25 | IDHO 63 @ PRST 75 | PRST -2.5 | PRST W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Idaho
33 games played
Straight up
18-15
55% wins
Against the spread
16-17
48% covers · avg +0.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-19
42% overs · avg −1.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | W 83-81 | +7.5 | W +9.5 | 154.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 74-78 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 155.5 | U 152 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 67-75 | +5.5 | L −2.5 | 148.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 78-64 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 159.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 68-94 | -1.5 | L −27.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 90-58 | -11.5 | W +20.5 | 151.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 84-81 | +5.5 | W +8.5 | 147.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 65-80 | +11.5 | L −3.5 | 144.5 | O 145 |
| Dec 21 | @ | W 83-80 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 167.5 | U 163 |
| Dec 23 | @ | L 63-64 | -7.5 | L −8.5 | 150.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 84-81 | -6.5 | L −3.5 | 158.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 73-79 | -4.5 | L −10.5 | 154.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 92-89 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 68-76 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 75-67 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 158.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 86-76 | -10.5 | L −0.5 | 161.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 66-69 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 83-91 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 155.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 79-62 | -5.5 | W +11.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 66-73 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 147.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 68-73 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 152.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 72-83 | -5.5 | L −16.5 | 153.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 99-69 | -6.5 | W +23.5 | 146.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 67-77 | +3.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 86-80 | -4.5 | W +1.5 | 163.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 78-58 | -10.5 | W +9.5 | 145.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 67-76 | -2.5 | L −11.5 | 156.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 2 | @ | W 85-81 | +3.5 | W +7.5 | 151.5 | O 166 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 68-45 | -6.5 | W +16.5 | 158.5 | U 113 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 78-74 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 143.5 | O 152 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 81-68 | -1.5 | W +11.5 | 148.5 | O 149 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 77-66 | -3.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 47-78 | +24.5 | L −6.5 | 137.5 | U 125 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
WSU
W 83-81
+9.5
12
@
USD
L 74-78
−5.5
15
@
UCSD
L 67-75
−2.5
26
vs
CSUN
W 78-64
+12.5
28
vs
SHSU
L 68-94
−27.5
3
vs
UND
W 90-58
+20.5
6
@
SDST
W 84-81
+8.5
10
@
ND
L 65-80
−3.5
21
@
CP
W 83-80
+1.5
23
@
CSUB
L 63-64
−8.5
3
vs
EWU
W 84-81
−3.5
8
vs
MONT
L 73-79
−10.5
10
vs
MTST
W 92-89
+1.5
15
@
IDST
L 68-76
−5.5
17
@
WEB
W 75-67
+6.5
22
vs
SAC
W 86-76
−0.5
24
vs
PRST
L 66-69
−4.5
29
@
UNCO
L 83-91
−5.5
31
@
NAU
W 79-62
+11.5
5
@
MTST
L 66-73
−4.5
7
@
MONT
L 68-73
−3.5
12
vs
WEB
L 72-83
−16.5
14
vs
IDST
W 99-69
+23.5
19
@
PRST
L 67-77
−6.5
21
@
SAC
W 86-80
+1.5
26
vs
NAU
W 78-58
+9.5
28
vs
UNCO
L 67-76
−11.5
2
@
EWU
W 85-81
+7.5
7
vs
SAC
W 68-45
+16.5
8
vs
MTST
W 78-74
+2.5
10
vs
EWU
W 81-68
+11.5
11
vs
MONT
W 77-66
+7.5
19
vs
HOU
L 47-78
−6.5
covered 16didn’t cover 17avg +0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
WSU
W 83-81
+9.5
12
@
USD
L 74-78
−3.5
15
@
UCSD
L 67-75
−6.5
26
vs
CSUN
W 78-64
−17.5
28
vs
SHSU
L 68-94
+7.5
3
vs
UND
W 90-58
−3.5
6
@
SDST
W 84-81
+17.5
10
@
ND
L 65-80
+0.5
21
@
CP
W 83-80
−4.5
23
@
CSUB
L 63-64
−23.5
3
vs
EWU
W 84-81
+6.5
8
vs
MONT
L 73-79
−2.5
10
vs
MTST
W 92-89
+36.5
15
@
IDST
L 68-76
−5.5
17
@
WEB
W 75-67
−16.5
22
vs
SAC
W 86-76
+0.5
24
vs
PRST
L 66-69
−10.5
29
@
UNCO
L 83-91
+18.5
31
@
NAU
W 79-62
−5.5
5
@
MTST
L 66-73
−8.5
7
@
MONT
L 68-73
−11.5
12
vs
WEB
L 72-83
+1.5
14
vs
IDST
W 99-69
+21.5
19
@
PRST
L 67-77
−1.5
21
@
SAC
W 86-80
+2.5
26
vs
NAU
W 78-58
−9.5
28
vs
UNCO
L 67-76
−13.5
2
@
EWU
W 85-81
+14.5
7
vs
SAC
W 68-45
−45.5
8
vs
MTST
W 78-74
+8.5
10
vs
EWU
W 81-68
+0.5
11
vs
MONT
W 77-66
−4.5
19
vs
HOU
L 47-78
−12.5
over 14under 19avg −1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Portland St
28 games played
Straight up
17-11
61% wins
Against the spread
19-9
68% covers · avg +1.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-16
43% overs · avg −0.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 79-89 | +11.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 70-80 | +13.5 | W +3.5 | 154.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 93-80 | -8.5 | W +4.5 | 141.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 25 | @ | W 68-63 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 3 | @ | W 77-71 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 158.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 55-60 | -12.5 | L −17.5 | 144.5 | U 115 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 73-84 | +16.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 61-63 | +2.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 1 | @ | W 95-90 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 148.5 | O 185 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 93-87 | +3.5 | W +9.5 | 142.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 96-69 | -9.5 | W +17.5 | 160.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 76-73 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 155.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 63-52 | -11.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 22 | @ | W 65-61 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 150.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 69-66 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 29 | vs | L 60-64 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 63-54 | -4.5 | W +4.5 | 138.5 | U 117 |
| Feb 2 | vs | W 88-65 | -7.5 | W +15.5 | 136.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 74-73 | -3.5 | L −2.5 | 150.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 77-68 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 136.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 65-77 | +3.5 | L −8.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 77-67 | -3.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 55-67 | -6.5 | L −18.5 | 146.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 69-84 | +2.5 | L −12.5 | 140.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 68-74 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Mar 2 | vs | W 84-60 | -4.5 | W +19.5 | 144.5 | U 144 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 85-78 | -5.5 | W +1.5 | 141.5 | O 163 |
| Mar 10 | vs | L 72-75 | -3.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | O 147 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
STAN
L 79-89
+1.5
12
@
SF
L 70-80
+3.5
17
vs
CSUB
W 93-80
+4.5
25
@
UTU
W 68-63
+3.5
3
@
SDAK
W 77-71
+3.5
6
vs
OMA
L 55-60
−17.5
17
@
COLO
L 73-84
+5.5
20
@
TULN
L 61-63
+0.5
1
@
WEB
W 95-90
+3.5
3
@
IDST
W 93-87
+9.5
10
vs
SAC
W 96-69
+17.5
15
vs
UNCO
W 76-73
+0.5
17
vs
NAU
W 63-52
−0.5
22
@
EWU
W 65-61
+1.5
24
@
IDHO
W 69-66
+4.5
29
vs
MONT
L 60-64
−8.5
31
vs
MTST
W 63-54
+4.5
2
vs
IDST
W 88-65
+15.5
7
@
SAC
W 74-73
−2.5
12
@
NAU
W 77-68
+2.5
14
@
UNCO
L 65-77
−8.5
19
vs
IDHO
W 77-67
+6.5
21
vs
EWU
L 55-67
−18.5
26
@
MTST
L 69-84
−12.5
28
@
MONT
L 68-74
−4.5
2
vs
WEB
W 84-60
+19.5
8
vs
IDST
W 85-78
+1.5
10
vs
MONT
L 72-75
−6.5
covered 19didn’t cover 9avg +1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
STAN
L 79-89
+23.5
12
@
SF
L 70-80
−4.5
17
vs
CSUB
W 93-80
+31.5
25
@
UTU
W 68-63
−15.5
3
@
SDAK
W 77-71
−10.5
6
vs
OMA
L 55-60
−29.5
17
@
COLO
L 73-84
+6.5
20
@
TULN
L 61-63
−21.5
1
@
WEB
W 95-90
+36.5
3
@
IDST
W 93-87
+37.5
10
vs
SAC
W 96-69
+4.5
15
vs
UNCO
W 76-73
−6.5
17
vs
NAU
W 63-52
−25.5
22
@
EWU
W 65-61
−24.5
24
@
IDHO
W 69-66
−10.5
29
vs
MONT
L 60-64
−19.5
31
vs
MTST
W 63-54
−21.5
2
vs
IDST
W 88-65
+16.5
7
@
SAC
W 74-73
−3.5
12
@
NAU
W 77-68
+8.5
14
@
UNCO
L 65-77
−7.5
19
vs
IDHO
W 77-67
−1.5
21
vs
EWU
L 55-67
−24.5
26
@
MTST
L 69-84
+12.5
28
@
MONT
L 68-74
+0.5
2
vs
WEB
W 84-60
−0.5
8
vs
IDST
W 85-78
+21.5
10
vs
MONT
L 72-75
+1.5
over 12under 16avg −0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Idaho 0, Portland St 0, even 5
IdahoBetterPortland St
G K. Gonzalez18 pts · 1 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G E. Skytt TR3.4 pts · 1.8 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 26
G R. Lafferty TR0.9 pts · 1.6 reb · 1.3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G K. Johnson TR1.8 pts · 0.8 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 39
G M. Klapper2.8 pts · 1.9 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 35
=No call
G C. Ness0.6 pts · 0.3 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
F H. Ward TR5 pts · 3.4 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 35
=No call
F B. Barron0.7 pts · 1.1 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
F S. Joba4.9 pts · 3.4 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 25
=Even
C K. Ibekwe TR3.5 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 34
IdahoBetterPortland St
IDHO offense253rd of 366 · -7.6
=Even
PRST defense244th of 366 · -6.4
IDHO defense233rd of 366 · -6.2
=Even
PRST offense284th of 366 · -8.8
Backcourt-1.6 · 3 players
=Even
Backcourt-1.7 · 3 players
Frontcourt-1.9 · 2 players
→PRSTSmall
Frontcourt-0.6 · 2 players
Bench-0.2 · 1 player
=Even
Bench-0.3 · 2 players
Score, worst to bestIDHO betterPRST betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
K. Gonzalez18 minR. Lafferty13 min · TRM. Klapper12 minK. Wynott10 min · TRB. KennisonNewT. WalNew
Forwards
H. Ward19 min · TRS. Joba17 minD. Trejo-DelgadoNewM. DiaoNewW. JensonNewN. Newman-GomezNew
Guards
E. Skytt12 min · TRK. Johnson10 min · TRC. Ness4 minN. PollardNewT. FrankNewD. JohnsonNew
Forwards
B. Barron4 minC. Chukwu3 minL. Kearney3 min · TRJ. RandolphNewA. PusateriNewF. CoratoNew
Centers
K. Ibekwe9 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 75.8 #147 | Points per game | 73.9 #199 |
| 1.10 #145 | Points per possession | 1.06 #220 |
| 69.4 #153 | Pace (possessions) | 69.6 #140 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.4 #177 | Effective FG% | 50.5 #211 |
| 34.1 #168 | 3-point % | 32.6 #250 |
| 47.0 #34 | 3-point attempt rate | 34.4 #287 |
| 34.6 #193 | Free throw rate | 37.1 #126 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.0 #69 | Turnover rate | 16.9 #200 |
| 28.4 #250 | Offensive rebound rate | 30.0 #199 |
| 11.4 #313 | Assists per game | 13.4 #186 |
| Defense | ||
| 74.1 #157 | Points allowed | 71.2 #80 |
| 1.06 #112 | Points allowed per possession | 1.02 #45 |
| 50.5 #128 | Opponent effective FG% | 48.8 #56 |
| 35.2 #264 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.3 #77 |
| 15.0 #288 | Turnovers forced | 18.0 #94 |
| 75.8 #5 | Defensive rebound rate | 73.6 #23 |
| 5.6 #282 | Steals per game | 7.2 #104 |
| 2.4 #319 | Blocks per game | 3.8 #108 |
Idaho
18-15 in 2025-26 overall · 13-9 in conference · Big Sky Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Houston47–78
- Wvs Montana77–66
- Wvs E Washington81–68
- Wvs Montana St78–74
- Wvs Sacramento St68–45
A week or more of rest.
Portland St
17-11 in 2025-26 overall · 14-6 in conference · Big Sky Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Montana72–75
- Wvs Idaho St85–78
- Wvs Weber St84–60
- L@ Montana68–74
- L@ Montana St69–84
A week or more of rest.