Icardo Center · at Bakersfield · Conference game
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | CSUB | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects CSUN 81–76 · win probability CSUN 69%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 156.9
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: CSUN has more of the edges
CSUN 4, CSUB 1 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
CSUN offense vs CSUB defense
Offense 140th of 366 against a defense 348th, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: CSUN 31.9%, CSUB 30.4%. Defensive: CSUN 73.4%, CSUB 64.4%
Shooting
Effective FG%: CSUN 51.3 and allows 51.6; CSUB 45.7 and allows 54.0
Three-pointers
CSUN hits 32.4% and allows 34.4%; CSUB hits 29.0% and allows 36.0%. Threes are 33.6% and 28.9% of their shots
Home court
CSUB at home. This season: CSUB 0-0 at home, CSUN 0-0 away
Even
CSUB offense vs CSUN defense
Offense 287th of 366 against a defense 271st, on the model’s ratings
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: CSUN 18%, CSUB 10%. Transfers in: CSUN 7, CSUB 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 74 possessions: CSUN plays 75.6 a game (2nd fastest), CSUB 72.7 (22nd). Faster games mean more points
Context
Schedule so far
CSUN has played the 219th-hardest schedule, CSUB the 211th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: CSUN 17.5%, CSUB 18.8%. Forced: CSUN 16.5%, CSUB 17.9%
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: CSUN 34.2, CSUB 42.2. Allowed: CSUN 34.3, CSUB 42.6
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | CSUN -5.6 | — |
| Total | — | 156.9 | — |
| Projected score | — | CSUN 81.2 · CSUB 75.7 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | CSUN -3.5 | — |
| 1H total | 73.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | CSUN 38.4 · CSUB 34.9 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | |
| 0-10 0% | 4-6 40% | 7-3 70% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 11 since 2021-22
CSUN 6–5 CSUBCSUN leads · 11 games since 2021-22 · CSUN has won the last 3 meetings · CSUN 5-6 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2025-26 | CSUN 86 @ CSUB 84 | CSUB +8.5 | CSUB W |
| Dec 4, 2025-26 | CSUB 66 @ CSUN 87 | CSUN -5.5 | CSUN W |
| Feb 1, 2024-25 | CSUB 62 @ CSUN 88 | CSUN -10.5 | CSUN W |
| Jan 11, 2024-25 | CSUN 90 @ CSUB 94 | CSUB +4.5 | CSUB W |
| Feb 15, 2023-24 | CSUN 76 @ CSUB 71 | CSUB +2.5 | CSUN W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
CSU Northridge
32 games played
Straight up
18-14
56% wins
Against the spread
14-18
44% covers · avg −0.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-13
59% overs · avg +2.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6 | @ | L 57-86 | +9.5 | L −19.5 | 153.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 9 | @ | W 93-85 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | O 178 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 68-90 | +4.5 | L −17.5 | 156.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 94-85 | +4.5 | W +13.5 | 157.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 64-78 | +1.5 | L −12.5 | 159.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 50-82 | +1.5 | L −30.5 | 148.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 4 | vs | W 87-66 | -5.5 | W +15.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 71-85 | +7.5 | L −6.5 | 152.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 89-87 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 161.5 | O 176 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 88-66 | +1.5 | W +23.5 | 144.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 100-88 | -8.5 | W +3.5 | 164.5 | O 188 |
| Dec 27 | @ | L 80-88 | +15.5 | W +7.5 | 160.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 80-89 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 162.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 74-65 | -2.5 | W +6.5 | 156.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 95-90 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 175.5 | O 185 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 79-86 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 173.5 | U 165 |
| Jan 15 | @ | W 84-79 | +7.5 | W +12.5 | 159.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 80-87 | -7.5 | L −14.5 | 158.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 68-89 | +10.5 | L −10.5 | 158.5 | U 157 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 94-78 | -3.5 | W +12.5 | 163.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 81-64 | +1.5 | W +18.5 | 160.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 97-96 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 177.5 | O 193 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 88-74 | -10.5 | W +3.5 | 160.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 84-60 | +2.5 | W +26.5 | 162.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 85-83 | +5.5 | W +7.5 | 156.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 78-76 | -2.5 | L −0.5 | 157.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 26 | vs | L 67-68 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 153.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 84-95 | -4.5 | L −15.5 | 158.5 | O 179 |
| Mar 5 | @ | W 86-84 | -8.5 | L −6.5 | 163.5 | O 170 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 77-90 | -5.5 | L −18.5 | 170.5 | U 167 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 80-70 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 153.5 | U 150 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 78-93 | +3.5 | L −11.5 | 152.5 | O 171 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
6
@
UNI
L 57-86
−19.5
9
@
UND
W 93-85
+1.5
11
@
NDSU
L 68-90
−17.5
16
vs
TROY
W 94-85
+13.5
26
vs
IDHO
L 64-78
−12.5
28
vs
IDST
L 50-82
−30.5
4
vs
CSUB
W 87-66
+15.5
6
@
UCI
L 71-85
−6.5
10
vs
FRES
W 89-87
−1.5
13
@
DEL
W 88-66
+23.5
22
vs
SAC
W 100-88
+3.5
27
@
STAN
L 80-88
+7.5
1
@
UCD
L 80-89
−5.5
3
vs
UCSB
W 74-65
+6.5
8
vs
CP
W 95-90
−1.5
10
@
CSUF
L 79-86
−5.5
15
@
UCSD
W 84-79
+12.5
17
vs
LBSU
L 80-87
−14.5
24
@
HAW
L 68-89
−10.5
29
vs
UCD
W 94-78
+12.5
31
vs
UCSD
W 81-64
+18.5
5
@
CP
W 97-96
−1.5
7
vs
UCR
W 88-74
+3.5
14
vs
HAW
W 84-60
+26.5
19
@
UCSB
W 85-83
+7.5
21
@
LBSU
W 78-76
−0.5
26
vs
UCI
L 67-68
−2.5
28
@
UCR
L 84-95
−15.5
5
@
CSUB
W 86-84
−6.5
7
vs
CSUF
L 77-90
−18.5
12
vs
UCSD
W 80-70
+11.5
13
vs
UCI
L 78-93
−11.5
covered 14didn’t cover 18avg −0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
6
@
UNI
L 57-86
−10.5
9
@
UND
W 93-85
+19.5
11
@
NDSU
L 68-90
+1.5
16
vs
TROY
W 94-85
+21.5
26
vs
IDHO
L 64-78
−17.5
28
vs
IDST
L 50-82
−16.5
4
vs
CSUB
W 87-66
−2.5
6
@
UCI
L 71-85
+3.5
10
vs
FRES
W 89-87
+14.5
13
@
DEL
W 88-66
+9.5
22
vs
SAC
W 100-88
+23.5
27
@
STAN
L 80-88
+7.5
1
@
UCD
L 80-89
+6.5
3
vs
UCSB
W 74-65
−17.5
8
vs
CP
W 95-90
+9.5
10
@
CSUF
L 79-86
−8.5
15
@
UCSD
W 84-79
+3.5
17
vs
LBSU
L 80-87
+8.5
24
@
HAW
L 68-89
−1.5
29
vs
UCD
W 94-78
+8.5
31
vs
UCSD
W 81-64
−15.5
5
@
CP
W 97-96
+15.5
7
vs
UCR
W 88-74
+1.5
14
vs
HAW
W 84-60
−18.5
19
@
UCSB
W 85-83
+11.5
21
@
LBSU
W 78-76
−3.5
26
vs
UCI
L 67-68
−18.5
28
@
UCR
L 84-95
+20.5
5
@
CSUB
W 86-84
+6.5
7
vs
CSUF
L 77-90
−3.5
12
vs
UCSD
W 80-70
−3.5
13
vs
UCI
L 78-93
+18.5
over 19under 13avg +2.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Bakersfield
30 games played
Straight up
6-24
20% wins
Against the spread
12-18
40% covers · avg −3.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-14
53% overs · avg +5.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 60-87 | +15.5 | L −11.5 | 147.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 74-58 | -7.5 | W +8.5 | 141.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 60-82 | +23.5 | W +1.5 | 140.5 | O 142 |
| Nov 17 | @ | L 80-93 | +8.5 | L −4.5 | 141.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 86-70 | -21.5 | L −5.5 | 138.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 59-89 | +26.5 | L −3.5 | 159.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 76-71 | +10.5 | W +15.5 | 150.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 4 | @ | L 66-87 | +5.5 | L −15.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 84-109 | +12.5 | L −12.5 | 145.5 | O 193 |
| Dec 11 | vs | L 69-80 | +7.5 | L −3.5 | 149.5 | U 149 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 62-70 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 147.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 23 | vs | W 64-63 | +7.5 | W +8.5 | 150.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 1 | vs | L 77-81 | +11.5 | W +7.5 | 143.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 81-79 | +9.5 | W +11.5 | 151.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 67-66 | -3.5 | L −2.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 75-81 | +6.5 | W +0.5 | 142.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 15 | vs | L 69-75 | +7.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 62-83 | +8.5 | L −12.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 71-98 | +17.5 | L −9.5 | 144.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 29 | vs | L 79-104 | +1.5 | L −23.5 | 161.5 | O 183 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 72-80 | +5.5 | L −2.5 | 152.5 | U 152 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 62-78 | +16.5 | W +0.5 | 144.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 66-82 | +9.5 | L −6.5 | 157.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 74-89 | +13.5 | L −1.5 | 151.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 65-93 | +6.5 | L −21.5 | 150.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 80-88 | +5.5 | L −2.5 | 160.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 72-84 | +14.5 | W +2.5 | 148.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 87-88 | +3.5 | W +2.5 | 152.5 | O 175 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 84-86 | +8.5 | W +6.5 | 163.5 | O 170 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 76-108 | +8.5 | L −23.5 | 174.5 | O 184 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
CAL
L 60-87
−11.5
11
vs
WIU
W 74-58
+8.5
14
@
MISS
L 60-82
+1.5
17
@
PRST
L 80-93
−4.5
22
vs
MVSU
W 86-70
−5.5
25
@
FSU
L 59-89
−3.5
30
vs
FRES
W 76-71
+15.5
4
@
CSUN
L 66-87
−15.5
6
@
UCSB
L 84-109
−12.5
11
vs
NDSU
L 69-80
−3.5
13
vs
PEPP
L 62-70
−9.5
23
vs
IDHO
W 64-63
+8.5
1
vs
UCI
L 77-81
+7.5
3
@
UCD
W 81-79
+11.5
8
vs
UCR
W 67-66
−2.5
10
@
LBSU
L 75-81
+0.5
15
vs
UCSB
L 69-75
+1.5
17
vs
UCSD
L 62-83
−12.5
22
@
HAW
L 71-98
−9.5
29
vs
CP
L 79-104
−23.5
31
vs
UCD
L 72-80
−2.5
5
@
UCI
L 62-78
+0.5
7
@
CSUF
L 66-82
−6.5
12
vs
HAW
L 74-89
−1.5
19
@
UCR
L 65-93
−21.5
21
vs
CSUF
L 80-88
−2.5
26
@
UCSD
L 72-84
+2.5
28
vs
LBSU
L 87-88
+2.5
5
vs
CSUN
L 84-86
+6.5
7
@
CP
L 76-108
−23.5
covered 12didn’t cover 18avg −3.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
CAL
L 60-87
−0.5
11
vs
WIU
W 74-58
−9.5
14
@
MISS
L 60-82
+1.5
17
@
PRST
L 80-93
+31.5
22
vs
MVSU
W 86-70
+17.5
25
@
FSU
L 59-89
−11.5
30
vs
FRES
W 76-71
−3.5
4
@
CSUN
L 66-87
−2.5
6
@
UCSB
L 84-109
+47.5
11
vs
NDSU
L 69-80
−0.5
13
vs
PEPP
L 62-70
−15.5
23
vs
IDHO
W 64-63
−23.5
1
vs
UCI
L 77-81
+14.5
3
@
UCD
W 81-79
+8.5
8
vs
UCR
W 67-66
−14.5
10
@
LBSU
L 75-81
+13.5
15
vs
UCSB
L 69-75
−0.5
17
vs
UCSD
L 62-83
−2.5
22
@
HAW
L 71-98
+24.5
29
vs
CP
L 79-104
+21.5
31
vs
UCD
L 72-80
−0.5
5
@
UCI
L 62-78
−4.5
7
@
CSUF
L 66-82
−9.5
12
vs
HAW
L 74-89
+11.5
19
@
UCR
L 65-93
+7.5
21
vs
CSUF
L 80-88
+7.5
26
@
UCSD
L 72-84
+7.5
28
vs
LBSU
L 87-88
+22.5
5
vs
CSUN
L 84-86
+6.5
7
@
CP
L 76-108
+9.5
over 16under 14avg +5.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: CSU Northridge 1, Bakersfield 1, even 3
CSU NorthridgeBetterBakersfield
G J. Davis16.2 pts · 4.7 reb · 7.5 ast
Score 71
←CSUNSmall
G B. Cofield TR9.8 pts · 4.8 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 42
G C. Smith TR7.1 pts · 7.1 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 36
→CSUBSmall
G J. Alexander9.4 pts · 3.4 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 62
G M. Ballew TR8.3 pts · 1.8 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 19
=No call
G S. Pouedet TR0.6 pts · 0.2 reb · 0.4 ast
Not ranked
G B. Hicks TR8.6 pts · 3.5 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 49
=Even
F C. Dioramma TR4.8 pts · 4.1 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 38
G K. Ekissi TR4.7 pts · 1.7 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 29
=No call
F C. Barnes TR0.3 pts · 1.3 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
CSU NorthridgeBetterBakersfield
CSUN offense140th of 366 · -4.2
←CSUNBig
CSUB defense348th of 366 · -9.5
CSUN defense271st of 366 · -6.8
=Even
CSUB offense287th of 366 · -8.9
Backcourt-4.7 · 5 players
→CSUBBig
Backcourt-1.4 · 3 players
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
=No call
Frontcourt-0.9 · 2 players
Bench-2.4 · 4 players
=No call
BenchNo numbers yet
Score, worst to bestCSUN betterCSUB betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Davis34 minC. Smith30 min · TRM. Ballew23 min · TRB. Hicks22 min · TRK. Ekissi17 min · TRG. Gazarian2 min
Forwards
J. Martin7 min · TRB. OmotNew
Centers
E. Stephen15 min · TRL. Niang8 min · TR
Guards
B. Cofield21 min · TRJ. Alexander20 minS. Pouedet5 min · TRS. WigingtonNewK. BradleyNewE. BrysonNew
Forwards
C. Dioramma15 min · TRC. Barnes6 min · TRT. KoppensNewP. IvancicNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 80.6 #54 | Points per game | 72.0 #244 |
| 1.06 #219 | Points per possession | 0.99 #336 |
| 75.6 #2 | Pace (possessions) | 72.7 #22 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.3 #183 | Effective FG% | 45.7 #355 |
| 32.4 #260 | 3-point % | 29.0 #353 |
| 33.6 #308 | 3-point attempt rate | 28.9 #356 |
| 34.2 #200 | Free throw rate | 42.2 #27 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.5 #237 | Turnover rate | 18.8 #313 |
| 31.9 #130 | Offensive rebound rate | 30.4 #181 |
| 16.7 #31 | Assists per game | 10.9 #340 |
| Defense | ||
| 81.3 #336 | Points allowed | 83.4 #351 |
| 1.08 #153 | Points allowed per possession | 1.15 #326 |
| 51.6 #191 | Opponent effective FG% | 54.0 #301 |
| 34.4 #210 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.0 #306 |
| 16.5 #187 | Turnovers forced | 17.9 #101 |
| 73.4 #26 | Defensive rebound rate | 64.4 #349 |
| 6.6 #166 | Steals per game | 7.4 #91 |
| 2.8 #259 | Blocks per game | 5.0 #18 |
CSU Northridge
18-14 in 2025-26 overall · 13-9 in conference · Big West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs UC Irvine78–93
- Wvs UC San Diego80–70
- Lvs Fullerton77–90
- W@ Bakersfield86–84
- L@ UC Riverside84–95
A week or more of rest.
Bakersfield
6-24 in 2025-26 overall · 2-18 in conference · Big West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Cal Poly76–108
- Lvs CSU Northridge84–86
- Lvs Long Beach St87–88
- L@ UC San Diego72–84
- Lvs Fullerton80–88
A week or more of rest.