Premier America Credit Union Arena · at CSU Northridge
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | CSUN | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects CSUN 83–72 · win probability CSUN 84%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 155.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: CSUN has more of the edges
UND 1, CSUN 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
CSUN offense vs UND defense
Offense 140th of 366 against a defense 353rd, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UND 27.4%, CSUN 31.9%. Defensive: UND 67.6%, CSUN 73.4%
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UND 14.1%, CSUN 17.5%. Forced: UND 19.3%, CSUN 16.5%
Shooting
Effective FG%: UND 49.5 and allows 56.5; CSUN 51.3 and allows 51.6
Context
Schedule so far
UND has played the 293rd-hardest schedule, CSUN the 219th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Tempo
About 73 possessions: UND plays 69.7 a game (133rd fastest), CSUN 75.6 (2nd). Faster games mean more points
Three-pointers
UND hits 32.7% and allows 37.1%; CSUN hits 32.4% and allows 34.4%. Threes are 40.6% and 33.6% of their shots
Home court
CSUN at home. This season: CSUN 0-0 at home, UND 0-0 away
Free throws
Free throw rate: UND 37.9, CSUN 34.2. Allowed: UND 43.8, CSUN 34.3
Even
UND offense vs CSUN defense
Offense 304th of 366 against a defense 271st, on the model’s ratings
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UND 24%, CSUN 18%. Transfers in: UND 2, CSUN 7. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | CSUN -11.5 | — |
| Total | — | 155.1 | — |
| Projected score | — | UND 71.8 · CSUN 83.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | CSUN -6.7 | — |
| 1H total | 72.5 | — |
| 1H projected score | UND 32.9 · CSUN 39.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% | |
| 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% |
Next 3 games
With how the last meeting with each opponent went
No more games listed yet.
No more games listed yet.
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
UND 0–1 CSUNCSUN leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · UND 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2025-26 | CSUN 93 @ UND 85 | UND +6.5 | CSUN W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
North Dakota
32 games played
Straight up
15-17
47% wins
Against the spread
21-11
66% covers · avg +1.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-17
47% overs · avg +1.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 62-91 | +36.5 | W +7.5 | 170.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 6 | vs | L 70-74 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 146.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 9 | vs | L 85-93 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 158.5 | O 178 |
| Nov 15 | @ | W 76-74 | +3.5 | W +5.5 | 148.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 60-75 | +29.5 | W +14.5 | 155.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 22 | vs | L 58-75 | +3.5 | L −13.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 23 | @ | W 78-69 | -2.5 | W +6.5 | 146.5 | O 147 |
| Nov 28 | @ | L 55-92 | +18.5 | L −18.5 | 149.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 58-90 | +11.5 | L −20.5 | 151.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 75-79 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 154.5 | U 154 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 66-69 | -7.5 | L −10.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 90-88 | +12.5 | W +14.5 | 157.5 | O 178 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 55-78 | +29.5 | W +6.5 | 151.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 72-61 | -1.5 | W +9.5 | 148.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 90-87 | +7.5 | W +10.5 | 152.5 | O 177 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 79-90 | +5.5 | L −5.5 | 146.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 81-79 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 15 | vs | L 80-91 | +10.5 | L −0.5 | 151.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 96-80 | -1.5 | W +14.5 | 160.5 | O 176 |
| Jan 22 | @ | W 79-62 | +1.5 | W +18.5 | 149.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 93-86 | +5.5 | W +12.5 | 162.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 29 | @ | W 81-80 | +11.5 | W +12.5 | 152.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 76-73 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 150.5 | U 149 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 79-98 | -3.5 | L −22.5 | 161.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 72-71 | +2.5 | W +3.5 | 156.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 66-83 | +5.5 | L −11.5 | 149.5 | U 149 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 85-70 | -9.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 83-91 | +9.5 | W +1.5 | 151.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 63-96 | +11.5 | L −21.5 | 152.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 83-67 | +2.5 | W +18.5 | 160.5 | U 150 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 67-66 | +11.5 | W +12.5 | 153.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 62-70 | +11.5 | W +3.5 | 147.5 | U 132 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
ALA
L 62-91
+7.5
6
vs
UCR
L 70-74
−5.5
9
vs
CSUN
L 85-93
−1.5
15
@
UCR
W 76-74
+5.5
19
@
CREI
L 60-75
+14.5
22
vs
CCU
L 58-75
−13.5
23
@
WIU
W 78-69
+6.5
28
@
HAW
L 55-92
−18.5
3
@
IDHO
L 58-90
−20.5
6
vs
MONT
L 75-79
+1.5
13
vs
WIU
L 66-69
−10.5
18
vs
WIN
W 90-88
+14.5
21
@
NEB
L 55-78
+6.5
1
vs
ORU
W 72-61
+9.5
3
vs
SDST
W 90-87
+10.5
8
@
OMA
L 79-90
−5.5
10
@
KC
W 81-79
+3.5
15
vs
STMN
L 80-91
−0.5
17
vs
SDAK
W 96-80
+14.5
22
@
ORU
W 79-62
+18.5
24
@
DEN
W 93-86
+12.5
29
@
STMN
W 81-80
+12.5
5
vs
OMA
W 76-73
+1.5
7
vs
DEN
L 79-98
−22.5
11
@
SDAK
W 72-71
+3.5
14
vs
NDSU
L 66-83
−11.5
19
vs
KC
W 85-70
+5.5
21
@
SDST
L 83-91
+1.5
28
@
NDSU
L 63-96
−21.5
6
vs
DEN
W 83-67
+18.5
7
vs
STMN
W 67-66
+12.5
8
vs
NDSU
L 62-70
+3.5
covered 21didn’t cover 11avg +1.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
ALA
L 62-91
−17.5
6
vs
UCR
L 70-74
−2.5
9
vs
CSUN
L 85-93
+19.5
15
@
UCR
W 76-74
+1.5
19
@
CREI
L 60-75
−20.5
22
vs
CCU
L 58-75
−14.5
23
@
WIU
W 78-69
+0.5
28
@
HAW
L 55-92
−2.5
3
@
IDHO
L 58-90
−3.5
6
vs
MONT
L 75-79
−0.5
13
vs
WIU
L 66-69
−10.5
18
vs
WIN
W 90-88
+20.5
21
@
NEB
L 55-78
−18.5
1
vs
ORU
W 72-61
−15.5
3
vs
SDST
W 90-87
+24.5
8
@
OMA
L 79-90
+22.5
10
@
KC
W 81-79
+13.5
15
vs
STMN
L 80-91
+19.5
17
vs
SDAK
W 96-80
+15.5
22
@
ORU
W 79-62
−8.5
24
@
DEN
W 93-86
+16.5
29
@
STMN
W 81-80
+8.5
5
vs
OMA
W 76-73
−1.5
7
vs
DEN
L 79-98
+15.5
11
@
SDAK
W 72-71
−13.5
14
vs
NDSU
L 66-83
−0.5
19
vs
KC
W 85-70
+4.5
21
@
SDST
L 83-91
+22.5
28
@
NDSU
L 63-96
+6.5
6
vs
DEN
W 83-67
−10.5
7
vs
STMN
W 67-66
−20.5
8
vs
NDSU
L 62-70
−15.5
over 15under 17avg +1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
CSU Northridge
32 games played
Straight up
18-14
56% wins
Against the spread
14-18
44% covers · avg −0.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-13
59% overs · avg +2.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6 | @ | L 57-86 | +9.5 | L −19.5 | 153.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 9 | @ | W 93-85 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | O 178 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 68-90 | +4.5 | L −17.5 | 156.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 94-85 | +4.5 | W +13.5 | 157.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 64-78 | +1.5 | L −12.5 | 159.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 50-82 | +1.5 | L −30.5 | 148.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 4 | vs | W 87-66 | -5.5 | W +15.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 71-85 | +7.5 | L −6.5 | 152.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 89-87 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 161.5 | O 176 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 88-66 | +1.5 | W +23.5 | 144.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 100-88 | -8.5 | W +3.5 | 164.5 | O 188 |
| Dec 27 | @ | L 80-88 | +15.5 | W +7.5 | 160.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 80-89 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 162.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 74-65 | -2.5 | W +6.5 | 156.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 95-90 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 175.5 | O 185 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 79-86 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 173.5 | U 165 |
| Jan 15 | @ | W 84-79 | +7.5 | W +12.5 | 159.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 80-87 | -7.5 | L −14.5 | 158.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 68-89 | +10.5 | L −10.5 | 158.5 | U 157 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 94-78 | -3.5 | W +12.5 | 163.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 81-64 | +1.5 | W +18.5 | 160.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 97-96 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 177.5 | O 193 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 88-74 | -10.5 | W +3.5 | 160.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 84-60 | +2.5 | W +26.5 | 162.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 85-83 | +5.5 | W +7.5 | 156.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 78-76 | -2.5 | L −0.5 | 157.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 26 | vs | L 67-68 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 153.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 84-95 | -4.5 | L −15.5 | 158.5 | O 179 |
| Mar 5 | @ | W 86-84 | -8.5 | L −6.5 | 163.5 | O 170 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 77-90 | -5.5 | L −18.5 | 170.5 | U 167 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 80-70 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 153.5 | U 150 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 78-93 | +3.5 | L −11.5 | 152.5 | O 171 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
6
@
UNI
L 57-86
−19.5
9
@
UND
W 93-85
+1.5
11
@
NDSU
L 68-90
−17.5
16
vs
TROY
W 94-85
+13.5
26
vs
IDHO
L 64-78
−12.5
28
vs
IDST
L 50-82
−30.5
4
vs
CSUB
W 87-66
+15.5
6
@
UCI
L 71-85
−6.5
10
vs
FRES
W 89-87
−1.5
13
@
DEL
W 88-66
+23.5
22
vs
SAC
W 100-88
+3.5
27
@
STAN
L 80-88
+7.5
1
@
UCD
L 80-89
−5.5
3
vs
UCSB
W 74-65
+6.5
8
vs
CP
W 95-90
−1.5
10
@
CSUF
L 79-86
−5.5
15
@
UCSD
W 84-79
+12.5
17
vs
LBSU
L 80-87
−14.5
24
@
HAW
L 68-89
−10.5
29
vs
UCD
W 94-78
+12.5
31
vs
UCSD
W 81-64
+18.5
5
@
CP
W 97-96
−1.5
7
vs
UCR
W 88-74
+3.5
14
vs
HAW
W 84-60
+26.5
19
@
UCSB
W 85-83
+7.5
21
@
LBSU
W 78-76
−0.5
26
vs
UCI
L 67-68
−2.5
28
@
UCR
L 84-95
−15.5
5
@
CSUB
W 86-84
−6.5
7
vs
CSUF
L 77-90
−18.5
12
vs
UCSD
W 80-70
+11.5
13
vs
UCI
L 78-93
−11.5
covered 14didn’t cover 18avg −0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
6
@
UNI
L 57-86
−10.5
9
@
UND
W 93-85
+19.5
11
@
NDSU
L 68-90
+1.5
16
vs
TROY
W 94-85
+21.5
26
vs
IDHO
L 64-78
−17.5
28
vs
IDST
L 50-82
−16.5
4
vs
CSUB
W 87-66
−2.5
6
@
UCI
L 71-85
+3.5
10
vs
FRES
W 89-87
+14.5
13
@
DEL
W 88-66
+9.5
22
vs
SAC
W 100-88
+23.5
27
@
STAN
L 80-88
+7.5
1
@
UCD
L 80-89
+6.5
3
vs
UCSB
W 74-65
−17.5
8
vs
CP
W 95-90
+9.5
10
@
CSUF
L 79-86
−8.5
15
@
UCSD
W 84-79
+3.5
17
vs
LBSU
L 80-87
+8.5
24
@
HAW
L 68-89
−1.5
29
vs
UCD
W 94-78
+8.5
31
vs
UCSD
W 81-64
−15.5
5
@
CP
W 97-96
+15.5
7
vs
UCR
W 88-74
+1.5
14
vs
HAW
W 84-60
−18.5
19
@
UCSB
W 85-83
+11.5
21
@
LBSU
W 78-76
−3.5
26
vs
UCI
L 67-68
−18.5
28
@
UCR
L 84-95
+20.5
5
@
CSUB
W 86-84
+6.5
7
vs
CSUF
L 77-90
−3.5
12
vs
UCSD
W 80-70
−3.5
13
vs
UCI
L 78-93
+18.5
over 19under 13avg +2.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
CSU Northridge has the better starters
Position by position: North Dakota 0, CSU Northridge 3, even 2
North DakotaBetterCSU Northridge
G Z. Kraft7.7 pts · 2 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 23
→CSUNBig
G J. Davis16.2 pts · 4.7 reb · 7.5 ast
Score 71
G S. Hincapie TR4.9 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 11
→CSUNSmall
G C. Smith TR7.1 pts · 7.1 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 36
G T. Wagner TR1.7 pts · 1.2 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G M. Ballew TR8.3 pts · 1.8 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 19
F K. Ouse0.5 pts · 0.4 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G B. Hicks TR8.6 pts · 3.5 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 49
C J. Jones2.7 pts · 3.3 reb · 1 ast
Score 1
→CSUNSmall
G K. Ekissi TR4.7 pts · 1.7 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 29
North DakotaBetterCSU Northridge
UND offense304th of 366 · -9.5
=Even
CSUN defense271st of 366 · -6.8
UND defense353rd of 366 · -9.9
→CSUNBig
CSUN offense140th of 366 · -4.2
Backcourt-4.8 · 3 players
=Even
Backcourt-4.7 · 5 players
Frontcourt-4.5 · 2 players
=No call
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench-2.4 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestUND betterCSUN betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
Z. Kraft25 minS. Hincapie16 min · TRT. Wagner7 min · TRL. WinkelNewZ. ParksNewJ. MooreNew
Forwards
K. Ouse6 minA. RadojevicNewJ. ThomasNewD. ElyNew
Centers
J. Jones19 min
Guards
J. Davis34 minC. Smith30 min · TRM. Ballew23 min · TRB. Hicks22 min · TRK. Ekissi17 min · TRG. Gazarian2 min
Forwards
J. Martin7 min · TRB. OmotNew
Centers
E. Stephen15 min · TRL. Niang8 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 74.2 #187 | Points per game | 80.6 #54 |
| 1.07 #214 | Points per possession | 1.06 #219 |
| 69.7 #133 | Pace (possessions) | 75.6 #2 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.5 #272 | Effective FG% | 51.3 #183 |
| 32.7 #246 | 3-point % | 32.4 #260 |
| 40.6 #155 | 3-point attempt rate | 33.6 #308 |
| 37.9 #106 | Free throw rate | 34.2 #200 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.1 #27 | Turnover rate | 17.5 #237 |
| 27.4 #284 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.9 #130 |
| 10.8 #343 | Assists per game | 16.7 #31 |
| Defense | ||
| 79.6 #310 | Points allowed | 81.3 #336 |
| 1.14 #306 | Points allowed per possession | 1.08 #153 |
| 56.5 #353 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.6 #191 |
| 37.1 #345 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.4 #210 |
| 19.3 #36 | Turnovers forced | 16.5 #187 |
| 67.6 #276 | Defensive rebound rate | 73.4 #26 |
| 7.9 #49 | Steals per game | 6.6 #166 |
| 2.5 #307 | Blocks per game | 2.8 #259 |
North Dakota
15-17 in 2025-26 overall · 12-7 in conference · Summit League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs N Dakota St62–70
- Wvs St Thomas67–66
- Wvs Denver83–67
- L@ N Dakota St63–96
- L@ S Dakota St83–91
A week or more of rest.
CSU Northridge
18-14 in 2025-26 overall · 13-9 in conference · Big West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs UC Irvine78–93
- Wvs UC San Diego80–70
- Lvs Fullerton77–90
- W@ Bakersfield86–84
- L@ UC Riverside84–95
A week or more of rest.