Mabee Center · at Oral Roberts
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | ORU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects ORU 74–74 · win probability ORU 50%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 147.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: MOST has more of the edges
MOST 7, ORU 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: MOST 16.7%, ORU 18.4%. Forced: MOST 16.9%, ORU 14.7%
Three-pointers
MOST hits 33.0% and allows 34.4%; ORU hits 32.0% and allows 37.4%. Threes are 41.3% and 45.6% of their shots
Free throws
Free throw rate: MOST 43.8, ORU 34.8. Allowed: MOST 40.2, ORU 39.1
Shooting
Effective FG%: MOST 51.1 and allows 52.0; ORU 49.6 and allows 53.6
Context
Schedule so far
MOST has played the 180th-hardest schedule, ORU the 246th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: MOST plays 67.4 a game (261st fastest), ORU 69.7 (134th). Faster games mean more points
ORU offense vs MOST defense
Offense 279th of 366 against a defense 219th, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: MOST 32.0%, ORU 28.4%. Defensive: MOST 68.0%, ORU 68.2%
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: MOST 25%, ORU 54%. Transfers in: MOST 0, ORU 2. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Home court
ORU at home. This season: ORU 0-0 at home, MOST 0-0 away
MOST offense vs ORU defense
Offense 275th of 366 against a defense 326th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | MOST -0.1 | — |
| Total | — | 147.1 | — |
| Projected score | — | MOST 73.6 · ORU 73.5 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | MOST -0.2 | — |
| 1H total | 68.8 | — |
| 1H projected score | MOST 34.5 · ORU 34.3 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 6-4 60% | 7-3 70% | |
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
MOST 4–1 ORUMOST leads · 5 games since 2021-22 · MOST has won the last 3 meetings · MOST 4-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2025-26 | ORU 62 @ MOST 63 | MOST -4.5 | ORU W |
| Dec 1, 2024-25 | MOST 72 @ ORU 67 | ORU +1.5 | MOST W |
| Nov 13, 2023-24 | ORU 69 @ MOST 84 | MOST -6.5 | MOST W |
| Dec 16, 2022-23 | MOST 77 @ ORU 80 | ORU -8.5 | MOST W |
| Dec 11, 2021-22 | ORU 60 @ MOST 69 | MOST -7.5 | MOST W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Missouri St
31 games played
Straight up
13-18
42% wins
Against the spread
18-13
58% covers · avg −0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-12
61% overs · avg +3.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11 | vs | L 85-86 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 152.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 49-67 | +3.5 | L −14.5 | 143.5 | U 116 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 74-67 | -3.5 | W +3.5 | 149.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 61-75 | -4.5 | L −18.5 | 145.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 74-98 | +7.5 | L −16.5 | 142.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 12 | @ | L 57-75 | +18.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 63-62 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 23 | vs | W 70-65 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 29 | @ | W 61-43 | -1.5 | W +16.5 | 131.5 | U 104 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 79-55 | -3.5 | W +20.5 | 131.5 | O 134 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 89-82 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 134.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 80-90 | +6.5 | L −3.5 | 152.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 79-71 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 153.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 72-87 | +6.5 | L −8.5 | 148.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 87-90 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 137.5 | O 177 |
| Jan 22 | @ | W 84-75 | +6.5 | W +15.5 | 144.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 62-57 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 139.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 71-80 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 148.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 74-67 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 135.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 76-79 | +9.5 | W +6.5 | 140.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 78-79 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 136.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 67-76 | -9.5 | L −18.5 | 135.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 87-91 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 152.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 67-70 | +3.5 | W +0.5 | 154.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 70-72 | +2.5 | W +0.5 | 138.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 81-86 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 87-74 | +1.5 | W +14.5 | 152.5 | O 161 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 63-75 | -2.5 | L −14.5 | 145.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 75-72 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | U 147 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 77-69 | +4.5 | W +12.5 | 142.5 | O 146 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 66-69 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 134.5 | O 135 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
11
vs
ARST
L 85-86
−2.5
15
@
UTA
L 49-67
−14.5
22
vs
RGV
W 74-67
+3.5
24
vs
LIU
L 61-75
−18.5
6
@
TLSA
L 74-98
−16.5
12
@
XAV
L 57-75
+0.5
16
vs
ORU
W 63-62
−3.5
23
vs
LIN
W 70-65
+1.5
29
@
DEL
W 61-43
+16.5
2
vs
UTEP
W 79-55
+20.5
4
vs
NMSU
W 89-82
+5.5
7
@
KENN
L 80-90
−3.5
10
vs
FIU
W 79-71
+5.5
14
@
WKU
L 72-87
−8.5
17
@
MTSU
L 87-90
+2.5
22
@
NMSU
W 84-75
+15.5
24
@
UTEP
W 62-57
+3.5
28
vs
SHSU
L 71-80
−10.5
31
vs
JXST
W 74-67
+2.5
7
@
LIB
L 76-79
+6.5
12
vs
LT
L 78-79
−4.5
14
vs
DEL
L 67-76
−18.5
18
vs
KENN
L 87-91
−5.5
21
@
FIU
L 67-70
+0.5
26
@
LT
L 70-72
+0.5
28
@
SHSU
L 81-86
+1.5
5
vs
WKU
W 87-74
+14.5
7
vs
MTSU
L 63-75
−14.5
10
vs
FIU
W 75-72
+1.5
11
vs
LIB
W 77-69
+12.5
13
vs
LT
L 66-69
−4.5
covered 18didn’t cover 13avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
11
vs
ARST
L 85-86
+18.5
15
@
UTA
L 49-67
−27.5
22
vs
RGV
W 74-67
−8.5
24
vs
LIU
L 61-75
−9.5
6
@
TLSA
L 74-98
+29.5
12
@
XAV
L 57-75
−19.5
16
vs
ORU
W 63-62
−21.5
23
vs
LIN
W 70-65
−10.5
29
@
DEL
W 61-43
−27.5
2
vs
UTEP
W 79-55
+2.5
4
vs
NMSU
W 89-82
+36.5
7
@
KENN
L 80-90
+17.5
10
vs
FIU
W 79-71
−3.5
14
@
WKU
L 72-87
+10.5
17
@
MTSU
L 87-90
+39.5
22
@
NMSU
W 84-75
+14.5
24
@
UTEP
W 62-57
−20.5
28
vs
SHSU
L 71-80
+2.5
31
vs
JXST
W 74-67
+5.5
7
@
LIB
L 76-79
+14.5
12
vs
LT
L 78-79
+20.5
14
vs
DEL
L 67-76
+7.5
18
vs
KENN
L 87-91
+25.5
21
@
FIU
L 67-70
−17.5
26
@
LT
L 70-72
+3.5
28
@
SHSU
L 81-86
+14.5
5
vs
WKU
W 87-74
+8.5
7
vs
MTSU
L 63-75
−7.5
10
vs
FIU
W 75-72
−5.5
11
vs
LIB
W 77-69
+3.5
13
vs
LT
L 66-69
+0.5
over 19under 12avg +3.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Oral Roberts
30 games played
Straight up
7-23
23% wins
Against the spread
14-16
47% covers · avg −1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-17
43% overs · avg −1.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 71-95 | +20.5 | L −3.5 | 165.5 | O 166 |
| Nov 12 | vs | L 87-88 | +5.5 | W +4.5 | 160.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 60-83 | +7.5 | L −15.5 | 171.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 71-95 | +24.5 | W +0.5 | 166.5 | U 166 |
| Nov 24 | @ | L 88-93 | +11.5 | W +6.5 | 153.5 | O 181 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 91-83 | +8.5 | W +16.5 | 166.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 62-81 | +5.5 | L −13.5 | 150.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 66-92 | +7.5 | L −18.5 | 157.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 72-68 | +6.5 | W +10.5 | 150.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 62-63 | +4.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 53-72 | +23.5 | W +4.5 | 147.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 22 | vs | L 57-69 | +3.5 | L −8.5 | 136.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 61-72 | +1.5 | L −9.5 | 148.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 77-79 | +13.5 | W +11.5 | 146.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 71-82 | +8.5 | L −2.5 | 152.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 87-98 | +6.5 | L −4.5 | 156.5 | O 185 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 62-73 | -1.5 | L −12.5 | 149.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 22 | vs | L 62-79 | -1.5 | L −18.5 | 149.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 58-86 | +10.5 | L −17.5 | 151.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 69-77 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 154.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 72-95 | +13.5 | L −9.5 | 150.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 75-92 | +15.5 | L −1.5 | 151.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 69-60 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 150.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 69-87 | +5.5 | L −12.5 | 147.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 71-80 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 151.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 67-62 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 151.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 102-80 | +2.5 | W +24.5 | 156.5 | O 182 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 94-70 | -3.5 | W +20.5 | 149.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 84-62 | -8.5 | W +13.5 | 149.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 65-76 | +12.5 | W +1.5 | 147.5 | U 141 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
OKST
L 71-95
−3.5
12
vs
TLSA
L 87-88
+4.5
15
vs
BEL
L 60-83
−15.5
20
@
OU
L 71-95
+0.5
24
@
FGCU
L 88-93
+6.5
25
vs
KENN
W 91-83
+16.5
26
vs
RICE
L 62-81
−13.5
3
@
WEB
L 66-92
−18.5
6
vs
MTST
W 72-68
+10.5
16
@
MOST
L 62-63
+3.5
18
@
TCU
L 53-72
+4.5
22
vs
UTA
L 57-69
−8.5
1
@
UND
L 61-72
−9.5
3
@
NDSU
L 77-79
+11.5
10
vs
STMN
L 71-82
−2.5
14
@
DEN
L 87-98
−4.5
17
vs
OMA
L 62-73
−12.5
22
vs
UND
L 62-79
−18.5
24
vs
NDSU
L 58-86
−17.5
29
@
SDAK
L 69-77
−4.5
31
@
SDST
L 72-95
−9.5
7
@
STMN
L 75-92
−1.5
12
vs
KC
W 69-60
+2.5
14
vs
SDST
L 69-87
−12.5
18
@
OMA
L 71-80
−2.5
21
vs
SDAK
W 67-62
+3.5
26
vs
DEN
W 102-80
+24.5
28
@
KC
W 94-70
+20.5
4
vs
KC
W 84-62
+13.5
5
vs
NDSU
L 65-76
+1.5
covered 14didn’t cover 16avg −1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
OKST
L 71-95
+0.5
12
vs
TLSA
L 87-88
+14.5
15
vs
BEL
L 60-83
−28.5
20
@
OU
L 71-95
−0.5
24
@
FGCU
L 88-93
+27.5
25
vs
KENN
W 91-83
+7.5
26
vs
RICE
L 62-81
−7.5
3
@
WEB
L 66-92
+0.5
6
vs
MTST
W 72-68
−10.5
16
@
MOST
L 62-63
−21.5
18
@
TCU
L 53-72
−22.5
22
vs
UTA
L 57-69
−10.5
1
@
UND
L 61-72
−15.5
3
@
NDSU
L 77-79
+9.5
10
vs
STMN
L 71-82
+0.5
14
@
DEN
L 87-98
+28.5
17
vs
OMA
L 62-73
−14.5
22
vs
UND
L 62-79
−8.5
24
vs
NDSU
L 58-86
−7.5
29
@
SDAK
L 69-77
−8.5
31
@
SDST
L 72-95
+16.5
7
@
STMN
L 75-92
+15.5
12
vs
KC
W 69-60
−21.5
14
vs
SDST
L 69-87
+8.5
18
@
OMA
L 71-80
−0.5
21
vs
SDAK
W 67-62
−22.5
26
vs
DEN
W 102-80
+25.5
28
@
KC
W 94-70
+14.5
4
vs
KC
W 84-62
−3.5
5
vs
NDSU
L 65-76
−6.5
over 13under 17avg −1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Missouri St 1, Oral Roberts 1, even 3
Missouri StBetterOral Roberts
G T. Williams9.2 pts · 1.9 reb · 3.2 ast
Score 34
→ORUSmall
G C. Dow12.9 pts · 4.1 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 50
G M. Cunningham3.1 pts · 2 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 43
←MOSTSmall
G C. Furnish3.7 pts · 2.4 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 10
F C. Boone1.3 pts · 1.4 reb · 0.1 ast
Score 19
=Even
G C. Martin2.7 pts · 3.5 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 8
F M. Gray NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
G M. Kilups3.9 pts · 2.2 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 9
F C. Thompson NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
F L. Gray7.7 pts · 3.3 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 57
Missouri StBetterOral Roberts
MOST offense275th of 366 · -8.4
=Even
ORU defense326th of 366 · -8.4
MOST defense219th of 366 · -5.7
←MOSTSmall
ORU offense279th of 366 · -8.5
Backcourt-2.2 · 2 players
←MOSTBig
Backcourt-7.9 · 4 players
Frontcourt-0.6 · 3 players
=Even
Frontcourt0.0 · 1 player
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench-1.5 · 2 players
Score, worst to bestMOST betterORU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Williams31 minM. Cunningham12 minK. StubblefieldNewJ. BlairNewD. RoweNew
Forwards
C. Boone8 minM. GrayNewC. ThompsonNewN. RueyNewL. RolleNewI. MedinaNew
Centers
A. AcimovicNew
Guards
C. Dow33 minC. Furnish21 minC. Martin20 minM. Kilups18 minC. Haffner13 min · TRA. Robinson9 min · TR
Forwards
L. Gray17 minT. ZorbasNewM. PavlovicNewM. GavazovNewA. BlancoNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 73.1 #223 | Points per game | 71.8 #250 |
| 1.09 #169 | Points per possession | 1.03 #291 |
| 67.4 #261 | Pace (possessions) | 69.7 #134 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.1 #191 | Effective FG% | 49.6 #256 |
| 33.0 #236 | 3-point % | 32.0 #282 |
| 41.3 #144 | 3-point attempt rate | 45.6 #56 |
| 43.8 #12 | Free throw rate | 34.8 #187 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.7 #180 | Turnover rate | 18.4 #293 |
| 32.0 #124 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.4 #249 |
| 13.9 #155 | Assists per game | 11.5 #312 |
| Defense | ||
| 74.3 #166 | Points allowed | 79.7 #312 |
| 1.10 #222 | Points allowed per possession | 1.15 #319 |
| 52.0 #217 | Opponent effective FG% | 53.6 #289 |
| 34.4 #209 | Opponent 3-point % | 37.4 #348 |
| 16.9 #158 | Turnovers forced | 14.7 #310 |
| 68.0 #261 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.2 #247 |
| 6.7 #152 | Steals per game | 5.7 #268 |
| 3.0 #215 | Blocks per game | 3.4 #154 |
Missouri St
13-18 in 2025-26 overall · 10-13 in conference · Conference USA
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Louisiana Tech66–69
- Wvs Liberty77–69
- Wvs FIU75–72
- Lvs MTSU63–75
- Wvs Western KY87–74
A week or more of rest.
Oral Roberts
7-23 in 2025-26 overall · 5-13 in conference · Summit League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs N Dakota St65–76
- Wvs Kansas City84–62
- W@ Kansas City94–70
- Wvs Denver102–80
- Wvs South Dakota67–62
A week or more of rest.