Simmons Bank Arena · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | ARK | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects ARK 95–65 · win probability ARK 100%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 160.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: ARK has more of the edges
ORU 1, ARK 7 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
ARK offense vs ORU defense
Offense 6th of 366 against a defense 326th, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
ORU hits 32.0% and allows 37.4%; ARK hits 38.2% and allows 31.8%. Threes are 45.6% and 33.0% of their shots
Context
Schedule so far
ORU has played the 246th-hardest schedule, ARK the 8th. A record against a soft schedule means less
ORU offense vs ARK defense
Offense 279th of 366 against a defense 47th, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: ORU 18.4%, ARK 12.2%. Forced: ORU 14.7%, ARK 15.5%
Shooting
Effective FG%: ORU 49.6 and allows 53.6; ARK 56.4 and allows 51.8
Free throws
Free throw rate: ORU 34.8, ARK 35.9. Allowed: ORU 39.1, ARK 31.2
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: ORU 28.4%, ARK 32.0%. Defensive: ORU 68.2%, ARK 69.1%
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: ORU 54%, ARK 19%. Transfers in: ORU 2, ARK 2. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 72 possessions: ORU plays 69.7 a game (134th fastest), ARK 73.8 (12th). Faster games mean more points
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | ARK -29.9 | — |
| Total | — | 160.0 | — |
| Projected score | — | ORU 65.1 · ARK 94.9 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | ARK -17.6 | — |
| 1H total | 74.7 | — |
| 1H projected score | ORU 28.5 · ARK 46.2 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | |
| 8-2 80% | 5-5 50% | 8-2 80% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Oral Roberts
30 games played
Straight up
7-23
23% wins
Against the spread
14-16
47% covers · avg −1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-17
43% overs · avg −1.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 71-95 | +20.5 | L −3.5 | 165.5 | O 166 |
| Nov 12 | vs | L 87-88 | +5.5 | W +4.5 | 160.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 60-83 | +7.5 | L −15.5 | 171.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 71-95 | +24.5 | W +0.5 | 166.5 | U 166 |
| Nov 24 | @ | L 88-93 | +11.5 | W +6.5 | 153.5 | O 181 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 91-83 | +8.5 | W +16.5 | 166.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 62-81 | +5.5 | L −13.5 | 150.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 66-92 | +7.5 | L −18.5 | 157.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 72-68 | +6.5 | W +10.5 | 150.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 62-63 | +4.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 53-72 | +23.5 | W +4.5 | 147.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 22 | vs | L 57-69 | +3.5 | L −8.5 | 136.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 61-72 | +1.5 | L −9.5 | 148.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 77-79 | +13.5 | W +11.5 | 146.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 71-82 | +8.5 | L −2.5 | 152.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 87-98 | +6.5 | L −4.5 | 156.5 | O 185 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 62-73 | -1.5 | L −12.5 | 149.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 22 | vs | L 62-79 | -1.5 | L −18.5 | 149.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 58-86 | +10.5 | L −17.5 | 151.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 69-77 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 154.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 72-95 | +13.5 | L −9.5 | 150.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 75-92 | +15.5 | L −1.5 | 151.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 69-60 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 150.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 69-87 | +5.5 | L −12.5 | 147.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 71-80 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 151.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 67-62 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 151.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 102-80 | +2.5 | W +24.5 | 156.5 | O 182 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 94-70 | -3.5 | W +20.5 | 149.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 84-62 | -8.5 | W +13.5 | 149.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 65-76 | +12.5 | W +1.5 | 147.5 | U 141 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
OKST
L 71-95
−3.5
12
vs
TLSA
L 87-88
+4.5
15
vs
BEL
L 60-83
−15.5
20
@
OU
L 71-95
+0.5
24
@
FGCU
L 88-93
+6.5
25
vs
KENN
W 91-83
+16.5
26
vs
RICE
L 62-81
−13.5
3
@
WEB
L 66-92
−18.5
6
vs
MTST
W 72-68
+10.5
16
@
MOST
L 62-63
+3.5
18
@
TCU
L 53-72
+4.5
22
vs
UTA
L 57-69
−8.5
1
@
UND
L 61-72
−9.5
3
@
NDSU
L 77-79
+11.5
10
vs
STMN
L 71-82
−2.5
14
@
DEN
L 87-98
−4.5
17
vs
OMA
L 62-73
−12.5
22
vs
UND
L 62-79
−18.5
24
vs
NDSU
L 58-86
−17.5
29
@
SDAK
L 69-77
−4.5
31
@
SDST
L 72-95
−9.5
7
@
STMN
L 75-92
−1.5
12
vs
KC
W 69-60
+2.5
14
vs
SDST
L 69-87
−12.5
18
@
OMA
L 71-80
−2.5
21
vs
SDAK
W 67-62
+3.5
26
vs
DEN
W 102-80
+24.5
28
@
KC
W 94-70
+20.5
4
vs
KC
W 84-62
+13.5
5
vs
NDSU
L 65-76
+1.5
covered 14didn’t cover 16avg −1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
OKST
L 71-95
+0.5
12
vs
TLSA
L 87-88
+14.5
15
vs
BEL
L 60-83
−28.5
20
@
OU
L 71-95
−0.5
24
@
FGCU
L 88-93
+27.5
25
vs
KENN
W 91-83
+7.5
26
vs
RICE
L 62-81
−7.5
3
@
WEB
L 66-92
+0.5
6
vs
MTST
W 72-68
−10.5
16
@
MOST
L 62-63
−21.5
18
@
TCU
L 53-72
−22.5
22
vs
UTA
L 57-69
−10.5
1
@
UND
L 61-72
−15.5
3
@
NDSU
L 77-79
+9.5
10
vs
STMN
L 71-82
+0.5
14
@
DEN
L 87-98
+28.5
17
vs
OMA
L 62-73
−14.5
22
vs
UND
L 62-79
−8.5
24
vs
NDSU
L 58-86
−7.5
29
@
SDAK
L 69-77
−8.5
31
@
SDST
L 72-95
+16.5
7
@
STMN
L 75-92
+15.5
12
vs
KC
W 69-60
−21.5
14
vs
SDST
L 69-87
+8.5
18
@
OMA
L 71-80
−0.5
21
vs
SDAK
W 67-62
−22.5
26
vs
DEN
W 102-80
+25.5
28
@
KC
W 94-70
+14.5
4
vs
KC
W 84-62
−3.5
5
vs
NDSU
L 65-76
−6.5
over 13under 17avg −1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Arkansas
37 games played
Straight up
28-9
76% wins
Against the spread
23-14
62% covers · avg +1.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
22-15
59% overs · avg +8.1 pts vs the total
Against the spread
23-1462%
2 straight misses ATS2 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 109-77 | -26.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | O 186 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 66-69 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 155.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 93-56 | -35.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 79-75 | -24.5 | L −20.5 | 158.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 84-83 | -23.5 | L −22.5 | 168.5 | U 167 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 115-61 | -29.5 | W +24.5 | 159.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 71-80 | +12.5 | W +3.5 | 159.5 | U 151 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 89-80 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 166.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 82-58 | -19.5 | W +4.5 | 161.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 93-86 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 155.5 | O 179 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 108-80 | -23.5 | W +4.5 | 169.5 | O 188 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 85-94 | +5.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | O 179 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 103-74 | -23.5 | W +5.5 | 159.5 | O 177 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 86-75 | +1.5 | W +12.5 | 158.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 94-87 | -3.5 | W +3.5 | 153.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 73-95 | +2.5 | L −19.5 | 169.5 | U 168 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 108-74 | -12.5 | W +21.5 | 155.5 | O 182 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 76-90 | +2.5 | L −11.5 | 181.5 | U 166 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 93-68 | -1.5 | W +23.5 | 173.5 | U 161 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 85-81 | -10.5 | L −6.5 | 163.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 27 | @ | W 83-79 | -3.5 | W +0.5 | 167.5 | U 162 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 77-85 | -6.5 | L −14.5 | 159.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 88-68 | -5.5 | W +14.5 | 163.5 | U 156 |
| Feb 10 | @ | W 91-62 | -4.5 | W +24.5 | 159.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 88-75 | -7.5 | W +5.5 | 165.5 | U 163 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 115-117 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 181.5 | O 232 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 94-86 | -9.5 | L −1.5 | 159.5 | O 180 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 99-84 | -7.5 | W +7.5 | 170.5 | O 183 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 77-111 | +9.5 | L −24.5 | 169.5 | O 188 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 105-85 | -6.5 | W +13.5 | 163.5 | O 190 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 88-84 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 163.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 82-79 | -6.5 | L −3.5 | 166.5 | U 161 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 93-90 | -8.5 | L −5.5 | 159.5 | O 183 |
| Mar 15 | vs | W 86-75 | +2.5 | W +13.5 | 165.5 | U 161 |
| Mar 19 | vs | W 97-78 | -14.5 | W +4.5 | 158.5 | O 175 |
| Mar 21 | vs | W 94-88 | -12.5 | L −6.5 | 171.5 | O 182 |
| Mar 26 | vs | L 88-109 | +8.5 | L −12.5 | 166.5 | O 197 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
SOU
W 109-77
+5.5
8
@
MSU
L 66-69
−0.5
11
vs
CARK
W 93-56
+1.5
14
vs
SAM
W 79-75
−20.5
18
vs
WIN
W 84-83
−22.5
21
vs
JKST
W 115-61
+24.5
27
vs
DUKE
L 71-80
+3.5
3
vs
LOU
W 89-80
+10.5
6
vs
FRES
W 82-58
+4.5
13
vs
TTU
W 93-86
+9.5
16
vs
QUC
W 108-80
+4.5
20
vs
HOU
L 85-94
−3.5
29
vs
JMU
W 103-74
+5.5
3
vs
TENN
W 86-75
+12.5
7
@
MISS
W 94-87
+3.5
10
@
AUB
L 73-95
−19.5
14
vs
SC
W 108-74
+21.5
17
@
UGA
L 76-90
−11.5
20
vs
VAN
W 93-68
+23.5
24
vs
LSU
W 85-81
−6.5
27
@
OU
W 83-79
+0.5
31
vs
UK
L 77-85
−14.5
7
@
MSST
W 88-68
+14.5
10
@
LSU
W 91-62
+24.5
14
vs
AUB
W 88-75
+5.5
18
@
ALA
L 115-117
+1.5
21
vs
MIZ
W 94-86
−1.5
25
vs
TA&M
W 99-84
+7.5
28
@
FLA
L 77-111
−24.5
4
vs
TEX
W 105-85
+13.5
7
@
MIZ
W 88-84
+6.5
13
vs
OU
W 82-79
−3.5
14
vs
MISS
W 93-90
−5.5
15
vs
VAN
W 86-75
+13.5
19
vs
HAW
W 97-78
+4.5
21
vs
HPU
W 94-88
−6.5
26
vs
ARIZ
L 88-109
−12.5
covered 23didn’t cover 14avg +1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
SOU
W 109-77
+35.5
8
@
MSU
L 66-69
−20.5
11
vs
CARK
W 93-56
−9.5
14
vs
SAM
W 79-75
−4.5
18
vs
WIN
W 84-83
−1.5
21
vs
JKST
W 115-61
+16.5
27
vs
DUKE
L 71-80
−8.5
3
vs
LOU
W 89-80
+2.5
6
vs
FRES
W 82-58
−21.5
13
vs
TTU
W 93-86
+23.5
16
vs
QUC
W 108-80
+18.5
20
vs
HOU
L 85-94
+32.5
29
vs
JMU
W 103-74
+17.5
3
vs
TENN
W 86-75
+2.5
7
@
MISS
W 94-87
+27.5
10
@
AUB
L 73-95
−1.5
14
vs
SC
W 108-74
+26.5
17
@
UGA
L 76-90
−15.5
20
vs
VAN
W 93-68
−12.5
24
vs
LSU
W 85-81
+2.5
27
@
OU
W 83-79
−5.5
31
vs
UK
L 77-85
+2.5
7
@
MSST
W 88-68
−7.5
10
@
LSU
W 91-62
−6.5
14
vs
AUB
W 88-75
−2.5
18
@
ALA
L 115-117
+50.5
21
vs
MIZ
W 94-86
+20.5
25
vs
TA&M
W 99-84
+12.5
28
@
FLA
L 77-111
+18.5
4
vs
TEX
W 105-85
+26.5
7
@
MIZ
W 88-84
+8.5
13
vs
OU
W 82-79
−5.5
14
vs
MISS
W 93-90
+23.5
15
vs
VAN
W 86-75
−4.5
19
vs
HAW
W 97-78
+16.5
21
vs
HPU
W 94-88
+10.5
26
vs
ARIZ
L 88-109
+30.5
over 22under 15avg +8.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Arkansas has the better starters
Position by position: Oral Roberts 0, Arkansas 3, even 2
Oral RobertsBetterArkansas
G C. Dow12.9 pts · 4.1 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 50
→ARKBig
G B. Richmond11.2 pts · 4.3 reb · 2 ast
Score 85
G C. Furnish3.7 pts · 2.4 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 10
→ARKBig
G J. Wilkinson TR17.4 pts · 2 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 98
G C. Martin2.7 pts · 3.5 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 8
=No call
G A. Brown0.1 pts · 0 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
G M. Kilups3.9 pts · 2.2 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 9
→ARKBig
F C. Bowser TR13.7 pts · 5.8 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 91
F L. Gray7.7 pts · 3.3 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 57
=No call
F I. Sealy2.9 pts · 1.3 reb · 0.6 ast
Not ranked
Oral RobertsBetterArkansas
ORU offense279th of 366 · -8.5
→ARKBig
ARK defense47th of 366 · +2.2
ORU defense326th of 366 · -8.4
→ARKBig
ARK offense6th of 366 · +10.8
Backcourt-7.9 · 4 players
→ARKBig
Backcourt+5.9 · 3 players
Frontcourt0.0 · 1 player
→ARKBig
Frontcourt+3.7 · 2 players
Bench-1.5 · 2 players
→ARKSmall
Bench-0.0 · 1 player
Score, worst to bestORU betterARK betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
C. Dow33 minC. Furnish21 minC. Martin20 minM. Kilups18 minC. Haffner13 min · TRA. Robinson9 min · TR
Forwards
L. Gray17 minT. ZorbasNewM. PavlovicNewM. GavazovNewA. BlancoNew
Guards
B. Richmond28 minJ. Wilkinson26 min · TRA. Brown2 minA. Kelley2 minJ. SmithNewD. ThompsonNew
Forwards
C. Bowser30 min · TRI. Sealy7 minP. SemedoNewM. MakerNewJ. AndrewsNewM. MuurinenNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 71.8 #250 | Points per game | 90.2 #2 |
| 1.03 #291 | Points per possession | 1.23 #3 |
| 69.7 #134 | Pace (possessions) | 73.8 #12 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.6 #256 | Effective FG% | 56.4 #16 |
| 32.0 #282 | 3-point % | 38.2 #16 |
| 45.6 #56 | 3-point attempt rate | 33.0 #315 |
| 34.8 #187 | Free throw rate | 35.9 #155 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.4 #293 | Turnover rate | 12.2 #1 |
| 28.4 #249 | Offensive rebound rate | 32.0 #121 |
| 11.5 #312 | Assists per game | 17.2 #20 |
| Defense | ||
| 79.7 #312 | Points allowed | 81.0 #333 |
| 1.15 #319 | Points allowed per possession | 1.09 #213 |
| 53.6 #289 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.8 #201 |
| 37.4 #348 | Opponent 3-point % | 31.8 #54 |
| 14.7 #310 | Turnovers forced | 15.5 #246 |
| 68.2 #247 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.1 #197 |
| 5.7 #268 | Steals per game | 7.3 #96 |
| 3.4 #154 | Blocks per game | 5.2 #12 |
Oral Roberts
7-23 in 2025-26 overall · 5-13 in conference · Summit League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs N Dakota St65–76
- Wvs Kansas City84–62
- W@ Kansas City94–70
- Wvs Denver102–80
- Wvs South Dakota67–62
A week or more of rest.
Arkansas
28-9 in 2025-26 overall · 16-5 in conference · Southeastern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Arizona88–109
- Wvs High Point94–88
- Wvs Hawai'i97–78
- Wvs Vanderbilt86–75
- Wvs Ole Miss93–90
A week or more of rest.