Bud Walton Arena · at Arkansas
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | ARK | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects ARK 93–63 · win probability ARK 100%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 155.5
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: ARK has more of the edges
UTA 1, ARK 7 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
UTA has played the 268th-hardest schedule, ARK the 8th. A record against a soft schedule means less
UTA offense vs ARK defense
Offense 289th of 366 against a defense 47th, on the model’s ratings
ARK offense vs UTA defense
Offense 6th of 366 against a defense 211th, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
UTA hits 29.1% and allows 26.9%; ARK hits 38.2% and allows 31.8%. Threes are 30.7% and 33.0% of their shots
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: UTA plays 67.3 a game (265th fastest), ARK 73.8 (12th). Faster games mean more points
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UTA 20.7%, ARK 12.2%. Forced: UTA 18.0%, ARK 15.5%
Shooting
Effective FG%: UTA 47.2 and allows 47.5; ARK 56.4 and allows 51.8
Home court
ARK at home. This season: ARK 0-0 at home, UTA 0-0 away
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UTA 34.9%, ARK 32.0%. Defensive: UTA 69.9%, ARK 69.1%
Free throws
Free throw rate: UTA 42.5, ARK 35.9. Allowed: UTA 40.9, ARK 31.2
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UTA 7%, ARK 19%. Transfers in: UTA 5, ARK 2. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | ARK -30.2 | — |
| Total | — | 155.5 | — |
| Projected score | — | UTA 62.7 · ARK 92.8 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | ARK -17.8 | — |
| 1H total | 72.7 | — |
| 1H projected score | UTA 27.4 · ARK 45.2 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | 1-9 10% | |
| 8-2 80% | 5-5 50% | 8-2 80% |
Next 3 games
With how the last meeting with each opponent went
No more games listed yet.
No more games listed yet.
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
UT Arlington
30 games played
Straight up
16-14
53% wins
Against the spread
17-13
57% covers · avg +1.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
7-23
23% overs · avg −4.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | L 56-74 | +13.5 | L −4.5 | 145.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 67-49 | -3.5 | W +14.5 | 143.5 | U 116 |
| Nov 18 | @ | W 84-76 | +2.5 | W +10.5 | 138.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 67-71 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 151.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 22 | @ | W 74-73 | +2.5 | W +3.5 | 149.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 66-61 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 138.5 | U 127 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 63-83 | +5.5 | L −14.5 | 151.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 11 | @ | W 58-50 | +4.5 | W +12.5 | 145.5 | U 108 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 60-76 | +10.5 | L −5.5 | 139.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 22 | @ | W 69-57 | -3.5 | W +8.5 | 136.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 29 | vs | L 63-69 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 136.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 63-51 | +2.5 | W +14.5 | 134.5 | U 114 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 86-77 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 138.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 82-72 | -3.5 | W +6.5 | 134.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 15 | @ | W 56-52 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 141.5 | U 108 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 74-86 | +11.5 | L −0.5 | 143.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 71-64 | -3.5 | W +3.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 80-61 | -9.5 | W +9.5 | 144.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 77-87 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 134.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 84-87 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 139.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 60-81 | +12.5 | L −8.5 | 141.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 63-67 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 134.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 73-78 | -8.5 | L −13.5 | 143.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 63-50 | -4.5 | W +8.5 | 140.5 | U 113 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 54-66 | +6.5 | L −5.5 | 137.5 | U 120 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 56-68 | +6.5 | L −5.5 | 134.5 | U 124 |
| Mar 5 | @ | W 65-60 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 136.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 64-57 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 131.5 | U 121 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 69-63 | -4.5 | W +1.5 | 141.5 | U 132 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 65-67 | +8.5 | W +6.5 | 136.5 | U 132 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
UNM
L 56-74
−4.5
15
vs
MOST
W 67-49
+14.5
18
@
EVAN
W 84-76
+10.5
21
vs
CAM
L 67-71
−2.5
22
@
WEB
W 74-73
+3.5
29
vs
SFA
W 66-61
+3.5
2
@
ARST
L 63-83
−14.5
11
@
RGV
W 58-50
+12.5
17
@
STAN
L 60-76
−5.5
22
@
ORU
W 69-57
+8.5
29
vs
TAR
L 63-69
−8.5
1
vs
CBU
W 63-51
+14.5
3
@
SUU
W 86-77
+3.5
10
vs
ACU
W 82-72
+6.5
15
@
UTU
W 56-52
+5.5
17
@
UVU
L 74-86
−0.5
21
vs
TAR
W 71-64
+3.5
29
vs
SUU
W 80-61
+9.5
31
vs
CBU
L 77-87
−8.5
5
@
UTU
L 84-87
−1.5
7
@
UVU
L 60-81
−8.5
12
@
ACU
L 63-67
−2.5
14
vs
SUU
L 73-78
−13.5
19
vs
UTU
W 63-50
+8.5
21
vs
UVU
L 54-66
−5.5
26
@
CBU
L 56-68
−5.5
5
@
TAR
W 65-60
+6.5
7
@
ACU
W 64-57
+8.5
12
vs
SUU
W 69-63
+1.5
13
vs
UVU
L 65-67
+6.5
covered 17didn’t cover 13avg +1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
UNM
L 56-74
−15.5
15
vs
MOST
W 67-49
−27.5
18
@
EVAN
W 84-76
+21.5
21
vs
CAM
L 67-71
−13.5
22
@
WEB
W 74-73
−2.5
29
vs
SFA
W 66-61
−11.5
2
@
ARST
L 63-83
−5.5
11
@
RGV
W 58-50
−37.5
17
@
STAN
L 60-76
−3.5
22
@
ORU
W 69-57
−10.5
29
vs
TAR
L 63-69
−4.5
1
vs
CBU
W 63-51
−20.5
3
@
SUU
W 86-77
+24.5
10
vs
ACU
W 82-72
+19.5
15
@
UTU
W 56-52
−33.5
17
@
UVU
L 74-86
+16.5
21
vs
TAR
W 71-64
−7.5
29
vs
SUU
W 80-61
−3.5
31
vs
CBU
L 77-87
+29.5
5
@
UTU
L 84-87
+31.5
7
@
UVU
L 60-81
−0.5
12
@
ACU
L 63-67
−4.5
14
vs
SUU
L 73-78
+7.5
19
vs
UTU
W 63-50
−27.5
21
vs
UVU
L 54-66
−17.5
26
@
CBU
L 56-68
−10.5
5
@
TAR
W 65-60
−11.5
7
@
ACU
W 64-57
−10.5
12
vs
SUU
W 69-63
−9.5
13
vs
UVU
L 65-67
−4.5
over 7under 23avg −4.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Arkansas
37 games played
Straight up
28-9
76% wins
Against the spread
23-14
62% covers · avg +1.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
22-15
59% overs · avg +8.1 pts vs the total
Against the spread
23-1462%
2 straight misses ATS2 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 109-77 | -26.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | O 186 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 66-69 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 155.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 93-56 | -35.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 79-75 | -24.5 | L −20.5 | 158.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 84-83 | -23.5 | L −22.5 | 168.5 | U 167 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 115-61 | -29.5 | W +24.5 | 159.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 71-80 | +12.5 | W +3.5 | 159.5 | U 151 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 89-80 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 166.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 82-58 | -19.5 | W +4.5 | 161.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 93-86 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 155.5 | O 179 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 108-80 | -23.5 | W +4.5 | 169.5 | O 188 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 85-94 | +5.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | O 179 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 103-74 | -23.5 | W +5.5 | 159.5 | O 177 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 86-75 | +1.5 | W +12.5 | 158.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 94-87 | -3.5 | W +3.5 | 153.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 73-95 | +2.5 | L −19.5 | 169.5 | U 168 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 108-74 | -12.5 | W +21.5 | 155.5 | O 182 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 76-90 | +2.5 | L −11.5 | 181.5 | U 166 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 93-68 | -1.5 | W +23.5 | 173.5 | U 161 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 85-81 | -10.5 | L −6.5 | 163.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 27 | @ | W 83-79 | -3.5 | W +0.5 | 167.5 | U 162 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 77-85 | -6.5 | L −14.5 | 159.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 88-68 | -5.5 | W +14.5 | 163.5 | U 156 |
| Feb 10 | @ | W 91-62 | -4.5 | W +24.5 | 159.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 88-75 | -7.5 | W +5.5 | 165.5 | U 163 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 115-117 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 181.5 | O 232 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 94-86 | -9.5 | L −1.5 | 159.5 | O 180 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 99-84 | -7.5 | W +7.5 | 170.5 | O 183 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 77-111 | +9.5 | L −24.5 | 169.5 | O 188 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 105-85 | -6.5 | W +13.5 | 163.5 | O 190 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 88-84 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 163.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 82-79 | -6.5 | L −3.5 | 166.5 | U 161 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 93-90 | -8.5 | L −5.5 | 159.5 | O 183 |
| Mar 15 | vs | W 86-75 | +2.5 | W +13.5 | 165.5 | U 161 |
| Mar 19 | vs | W 97-78 | -14.5 | W +4.5 | 158.5 | O 175 |
| Mar 21 | vs | W 94-88 | -12.5 | L −6.5 | 171.5 | O 182 |
| Mar 26 | vs | L 88-109 | +8.5 | L −12.5 | 166.5 | O 197 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
SOU
W 109-77
+5.5
8
@
MSU
L 66-69
−0.5
11
vs
CARK
W 93-56
+1.5
14
vs
SAM
W 79-75
−20.5
18
vs
WIN
W 84-83
−22.5
21
vs
JKST
W 115-61
+24.5
27
vs
DUKE
L 71-80
+3.5
3
vs
LOU
W 89-80
+10.5
6
vs
FRES
W 82-58
+4.5
13
vs
TTU
W 93-86
+9.5
16
vs
QUC
W 108-80
+4.5
20
vs
HOU
L 85-94
−3.5
29
vs
JMU
W 103-74
+5.5
3
vs
TENN
W 86-75
+12.5
7
@
MISS
W 94-87
+3.5
10
@
AUB
L 73-95
−19.5
14
vs
SC
W 108-74
+21.5
17
@
UGA
L 76-90
−11.5
20
vs
VAN
W 93-68
+23.5
24
vs
LSU
W 85-81
−6.5
27
@
OU
W 83-79
+0.5
31
vs
UK
L 77-85
−14.5
7
@
MSST
W 88-68
+14.5
10
@
LSU
W 91-62
+24.5
14
vs
AUB
W 88-75
+5.5
18
@
ALA
L 115-117
+1.5
21
vs
MIZ
W 94-86
−1.5
25
vs
TA&M
W 99-84
+7.5
28
@
FLA
L 77-111
−24.5
4
vs
TEX
W 105-85
+13.5
7
@
MIZ
W 88-84
+6.5
13
vs
OU
W 82-79
−3.5
14
vs
MISS
W 93-90
−5.5
15
vs
VAN
W 86-75
+13.5
19
vs
HAW
W 97-78
+4.5
21
vs
HPU
W 94-88
−6.5
26
vs
ARIZ
L 88-109
−12.5
covered 23didn’t cover 14avg +1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
SOU
W 109-77
+35.5
8
@
MSU
L 66-69
−20.5
11
vs
CARK
W 93-56
−9.5
14
vs
SAM
W 79-75
−4.5
18
vs
WIN
W 84-83
−1.5
21
vs
JKST
W 115-61
+16.5
27
vs
DUKE
L 71-80
−8.5
3
vs
LOU
W 89-80
+2.5
6
vs
FRES
W 82-58
−21.5
13
vs
TTU
W 93-86
+23.5
16
vs
QUC
W 108-80
+18.5
20
vs
HOU
L 85-94
+32.5
29
vs
JMU
W 103-74
+17.5
3
vs
TENN
W 86-75
+2.5
7
@
MISS
W 94-87
+27.5
10
@
AUB
L 73-95
−1.5
14
vs
SC
W 108-74
+26.5
17
@
UGA
L 76-90
−15.5
20
vs
VAN
W 93-68
−12.5
24
vs
LSU
W 85-81
+2.5
27
@
OU
W 83-79
−5.5
31
vs
UK
L 77-85
+2.5
7
@
MSST
W 88-68
−7.5
10
@
LSU
W 91-62
−6.5
14
vs
AUB
W 88-75
−2.5
18
@
ALA
L 115-117
+50.5
21
vs
MIZ
W 94-86
+20.5
25
vs
TA&M
W 99-84
+12.5
28
@
FLA
L 77-111
+18.5
4
vs
TEX
W 105-85
+26.5
7
@
MIZ
W 88-84
+8.5
13
vs
OU
W 82-79
−5.5
14
vs
MISS
W 93-90
+23.5
15
vs
VAN
W 86-75
−4.5
19
vs
HAW
W 97-78
+16.5
21
vs
HPU
W 94-88
+10.5
26
vs
ARIZ
L 88-109
+30.5
over 22under 15avg +8.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Arkansas has the better starters
Position by position: UT Arlington 0, Arkansas 1, even 4
UT ArlingtonBetterArkansas
G M. Panoam TR0.9 pts · 0.9 reb · 0.7 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G B. Richmond11.2 pts · 4.3 reb · 2 ast
Score 85
F T. McDaniels TR12 pts · 6.1 reb · 1 ast
Score 68
→ARKSmall
G J. Wilkinson TR17.4 pts · 2 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 98
F M. Goodman3.2 pts · 2.5 reb · 0.1 ast
Score 11
=No call
G A. Brown0.1 pts · 0 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
F B. McGlothin TR0 pts · 0.5 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F C. Bowser TR13.7 pts · 5.8 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 91
F N. Bundalo TR0.5 pts · 0.5 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F I. Sealy2.9 pts · 1.3 reb · 0.6 ast
Not ranked
UT ArlingtonBetterArkansas
UTA offense289th of 366 · -8.9
→ARKBig
ARK defense47th of 366 · +2.2
UTA defense211th of 366 · -5.4
→ARKBig
ARK offense6th of 366 · +10.8
Backcourt-0.3 · 1 player
→ARKBig
Backcourt+5.9 · 3 players
Frontcourt-0.8 · 4 players
→ARKBig
Frontcourt+3.7 · 2 players
Bench+0.0 · 1 player
=Even
Bench-0.0 · 1 player
Score, worst to bestUTA betterARK betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
M. Panoam6 min · TRN. Shelby3 min · TRJ. SmithNewT. HankinsNewK. MikalauskasNewJ. ParkerNew
Forwards
T. McDaniels27 min · TRM. Goodman13 minB. McGlothin5 min · TRN. Bundalo3 min · TRT. SimicNewS. HadnotNew
Guards
B. Richmond28 minJ. Wilkinson26 min · TRA. Brown2 minA. Kelley2 minJ. SmithNewD. ThompsonNew
Forwards
C. Bowser30 min · TRI. Sealy7 minP. SemedoNewM. MakerNewJ. AndrewsNewM. MuurinenNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67.7 #320 | Points per game | 90.2 #2 |
| 1.01 #319 | Points per possession | 1.23 #3 |
| 67.3 #265 | Pace (possessions) | 73.8 #12 |
| Shooting | ||
| 47.2 #332 | Effective FG% | 56.4 #16 |
| 29.1 #352 | 3-point % | 38.2 #16 |
| 30.7 #345 | 3-point attempt rate | 33.0 #315 |
| 42.5 #24 | Free throw rate | 35.9 #155 |
| Possessions | ||
| 20.7 #354 | Turnover rate | 12.2 #1 |
| 34.9 #50 | Offensive rebound rate | 32.0 #121 |
| 10.7 #345 | Assists per game | 17.2 #20 |
| Defense | ||
| 67.8 #29 | Points allowed | 81.0 #333 |
| 1.01 #30 | Points allowed per possession | 1.09 #213 |
| 47.5 #29 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.8 #201 |
| 26.9 #1 | Opponent 3-point % | 31.8 #54 |
| 18.0 #93 | Turnovers forced | 15.5 #246 |
| 69.9 #166 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.1 #197 |
| 7.3 #97 | Steals per game | 7.3 #96 |
| 3.5 #148 | Blocks per game | 5.2 #12 |
UT Arlington
16-14 in 2025-26 overall · 10-10 in conference · United Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Utah Valley65–67
- Wvs Southern Utah69–63
- W@ Abilene Chrstn64–57
- W@ Tarleton St65–60
- L@ CA Baptist56–68
A week or more of rest.
Arkansas
28-9 in 2025-26 overall · 16-5 in conference · Southeastern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Arizona88–109
- Wvs High Point94–88
- Wvs Hawai'i97–78
- Wvs Vanderbilt86–75
- Wvs Ole Miss93–90
A week or more of rest.