Burns Arena · at Utah Tech · Conference game
Closing line
UTU -1.5✓ UTA covered by 5.5
UTU -1.5✓ UTA covered by 5.5Closing total141.5Under by 33.5
 UTA | This season | UTU |
|---|---|---|
| 9-5 | Record | 6-9 |
| 9-5 | ATS | 8-7 |
| 3-11 | O/U | 8-7 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: UTA 72–71 UTU · ✓ UTA (53%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| UTA | 27 | 29 | 56 |
| UTU | 18 | 34 | 52 |
1st half: UTA 27, UTU 18 (UTA by 9). The model had UTA by 0.6 and a total of 67.1 (actual 45).
Team stats
| UTA | UTU | |
|---|---|---|
| 18-56 32% | Field goals | 21-66 32% |
| 3-12 25% | 3-pointers | 1-15 7% |
| 17-21 81% | Free throws | 9-18 50% |
| 47 13 off | Rebounds | 42 16 off |
| 6 | Assists | 9 |
| 5 | Steals | 13 |
| 4 | Blocks | 6 |
| 16 | Turnovers | 8 |
| 16 | Fouls | 14 |
| 26 | Points in paint | 38 |
| 4 | Fast-break points | 19 |
Players
| UTA | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raysean Seamster F | 32 | 14 | 8 | 0 | 7-17 | 0-0 |
| Cash Chavis G | 31 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 1-6 | 1-1 |
| Marcell McCreary G | 25 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 1-6 | 1-5 |
| Marcus Rigsby Jr. G | 23 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2-5 | 0-2 |
| Miles Goodman F | 18 | 6 | 8 | 0 | 1-5 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Bahsil Laster G | 24 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 1-4 | 0-1 |
| Cameron Jackson F | 19 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Tyran Mason G | 12 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 4-7 | 0-0 |
| Jordan Lowery G | 9 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1-3 | 1-2 |
| Jayden Smoot G | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Amari Reed F | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Augustine Youssef, Alex Bossinakis, Stoney Hadnot
| UTU | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chance Trujillo G | 35 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3-15 | 0-6 |
| Jusaun Holt G | 35 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 1-11 | 0-1 |
| Noah Bolanga G | 34 | 7 | 9 | 1 | 3-13 | 1-5 |
| Tanner Davis G | 33 | 16 | 5 | 2 | 6-7 | 0-0 |
| Ethan Potter F | 32 | 16 | 11 | 1 | 7-13 | 0-1 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Britton Berrett G | 16 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-1 |
| Samuel Ariyibi F | 8 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-1 |
| Dario Domingos F | 7 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Hunter Schenck, Boston Harker, Preston Vandermyde, Madiba Owona, Dallin Grant, Marvel Allen
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketUTU -1.5
ModelUTA -0.8
Model edgeUTA +2.3
W UTA covered
Total
Market141.5
Model143.3
Model edgeOver 1.8
L Under
Projected score
UTA 72 · UTU 71.2
UTA 56 · UTU 52
Win probability
UTA 53%
1st half
Spread
UTA -0.6
UTA -9.0
Total
67.1
45 points
Projected score
UTA 33.9 · UTU 33.3
UTA 27 · UTU 18
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenUTU -1.5
no move
CloseUTU -1.5
No change since the open
Total
Open139.5
▲ 2
Close141.5
Up 2 since the open
Moneyline
UTA -102 · UTU -118
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened UTU -1.5 · unchangedmodel UTA -1
model UTA -1
Opened 139.5 · closed 141.5 · moved 2 upmodel 143.5
model 143.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| UTA | 7-3 70% | 7-3 70% | 2-8 20% |
| UTU | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | 7-3 70% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
UTA 4–1 UTUUTA leads · 5 games since 2021-22 · UTA 3-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2024-25 | UTU 71 @ UTA 73 | UTA -9.5 | UTU W |
| Jan 9, 2024-25 | UTA 62 @ UTU 74 | UTU +3.5 | UTU W |
| Feb 24, 2023-24 | UTU 78 @ UTA 89 | UTA -10.5 | UTA W |
| Feb 3, 2023-24 | UTA 87 @ UTU 66 | UTU +6.5 | UTA W |
| Feb 25, 2022-23 | UTU 69 @ UTA 71 | UTA -1.5 | UTA W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
UT Arlington
14 games played
Straight up
9-5
64% wins
Against the spread
9-5
64% covers · avg +3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
3-11
21% overs · avg −6.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ UNM | L 56-74 | +13.5 | L −4.5 | 145.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 15 | vs MOST | W 67-49 | -3.5 | W +14.5 | 143.5 | U 116 |
| Nov 18 | @ EVAN | W 84-76 | +2.5 | W +10.5 | 138.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 21 | vs CAM | L 67-71 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 151.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 22 | @ WEB | W 74-73 | +2.5 | W +3.5 | 149.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 29 | vs SFA | W 66-61 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 138.5 | U 127 |
| Dec 2 | @ ARST | L 63-83 | +5.5 | L −14.5 | 151.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 11 | @ RGV | W 58-50 | +4.5 | W +12.5 | 145.5 | U 108 |
| Dec 17 | @ STAN | L 60-76 | +10.5 | L −5.5 | 139.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 22 | @ ORU | W 69-57 | -3.5 | W +8.5 | 136.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 29 | vs TAR | L 63-69 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 136.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 1 | vs CBU | W 63-51 | +2.5 | W +14.5 | 134.5 | U 114 |
| Jan 3 | @ SUU | W 86-77 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 138.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 10 | vs ACU | W 82-72 | -3.5 | W +6.5 | 134.5 | O 154 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@UNM
UNML 56-74
−4.5
15
vsMOST
MOSTW 67-49
+14.5
18
@EVAN
EVANW 84-76
+10.5
21
vsCAM
CAML 67-71
−2.5
22
@WEB
WEBW 74-73
+3.5
29
vsSFA
SFAW 66-61
+3.5
2
@ARST
ARSTL 63-83
−14.5
11
@RGV
RGVW 58-50
+12.5
17
@STAN
STANL 60-76
−5.5
22
@ORU
ORUW 69-57
+8.5
29
vsTAR
TARL 63-69
−8.5
1
vsCBU
CBUW 63-51
+14.5
3
@SUU
SUUW 86-77
+3.5
10
vsACU
ACUW 82-72
+6.5
covered 9didn’t cover 5avg +3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@UNM
UNML 56-74
−15.5
15
vsMOST
MOSTW 67-49
−27.5
18
@EVAN
EVANW 84-76
+21.5
21
vsCAM
CAML 67-71
−13.5
22
@WEB
WEBW 74-73
−2.5
29
vsSFA
SFAW 66-61
−11.5
2
@ARST
ARSTL 63-83
−5.5
11
@RGV
RGVW 58-50
−37.5
17
@STAN
STANL 60-76
−3.5
22
@ORU
ORUW 69-57
−10.5
29
vsTAR
TARL 63-69
−4.5
1
vsCBU
CBUW 63-51
−20.5
3
@SUU
SUUW 86-77
+24.5
10
vsACU
ACUW 82-72
+19.5
over 3under 11avg −6.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Utah Tech
15 games played
Straight up
6-9
40% wins
Against the spread
8-7
53% covers · avg +1.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
8-7
53% overs · avg +2.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ SDAK | W 81-79 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 164.5 | U 160 |
| Nov 7 | @ ARIZ | L 67-93 | +33.5 | W +7.5 | 162.5 | U 160 |
| Nov 9 | @ ASU | L 66-81 | +12.5 | L −2.5 | 152.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 12 | vs MAN | L 75-79 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 158.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 14 | vs MVSU | W 81-75 | -26.5 | L −20.5 | 145.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 15 | @ HAW | L 62-68 | +16.5 | W +10.5 | 149.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 25 | vs PRST | L 63-68 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 29 | vs UCR | W 77-69 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | O 146 |
| Dec 3 | @ SCU | L 80-90 | +20.5 | W +10.5 | 144.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 20 | @WEB | W 82-80 | +5.5 | W +7.5 | 152.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 22 | @ CREI | L 69-92 | +19.5 | L −3.5 | 147.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 29 | vsSUU | W 80-66 | -7.5 | W +6.5 | 148.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 1 | @ACU | W 79-64 | +5.5 | W +20.5 | 139.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 8 | @CBU | L 72-84 | +7.5 | L −4.5 | 144.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 10 | @ UVU | L 76-92 | +13.5 | L −2.5 | 149.5 | O 168 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@SDAK
SDAKW 81-79
+3.5
7
@ARIZ
ARIZL 67-93
+7.5
9
@ASU
ASUL 66-81
−2.5
12
vsMAN
MANL 75-79
−6.5
14
vsMVSU
MVSUW 81-75
−20.5
15
@HAW
HAWL 62-68
+10.5
25
vsPRST
PRSTL 63-68
−3.5
29
vsUCR
UCRW 77-69
+2.5
3
@SCU
SCUL 80-90
+10.5
20
@WEB
WEBW 82-80
+7.5
22
@CREI
CREIL 69-92
−3.5
29
vsSUU
SUUW 80-66
+6.5
1
@ACU
ACUW 79-64
+20.5
8
@CBU
CBUL 72-84
−4.5
10
@UVU
UVUL 76-92
−2.5
covered 8didn’t cover 7avg +1.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@SDAK
SDAKW 81-79
−4.5
7
@ARIZ
ARIZL 67-93
−2.5
9
@ASU
ASUL 66-81
−5.5
12
vsMAN
MANL 75-79
−4.5
14
vsMVSU
MVSUW 81-75
+10.5
15
@HAW
HAWL 62-68
−19.5
25
vsPRST
PRSTL 63-68
−15.5
29
vsUCR
UCRW 77-69
+0.5
3
@SCU
SCUL 80-90
+25.5
20
@WEB
WEBW 82-80
+9.5
22
@CREI
CREIL 69-92
+13.5
29
vsSUU
SUUW 80-66
−2.5
1
@ACU
ACUW 79-64
+3.5
8
@CBU
CBUL 72-84
+11.5
10
@UVU
UVUL 76-92
+18.5
over 8under 7avg +2.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
UT Arlington
9-5 overall · 3-1 in conference · United Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Abilene Chrstn82–72
- W@ Southern Utah86–77
- Wvs CA Baptist63–51
- Lvs Tarleton St63–69
- W@ Oral Roberts69–57
5 days since their last game.
Utah Tech
6-9 overall · 2-2 in conference · Big Sky Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Utah Valley76–92
- L@ CA Baptist72–84
- W@ Abilene Chrstn79–64
- Wvs Southern Utah80–66
- L@ Creighton69–92
5 days since their last game.