Mabee Center · at Oral Roberts
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | ORU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects UL 71–71 · win probability UL 51%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 142.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: UL has more of the edges
UL 3, ORU 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UL 16.8%, ORU 18.4%. Forced: UL 18.3%, ORU 14.7%
ORU offense vs UL defense
Offense 279th of 366 against a defense 157th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: UL plays 64.1 a game (359th fastest), ORU 69.7 (134th). Faster games mean more points
Free throws
Free throw rate: UL 28.7, ORU 34.8. Allowed: UL 45.8, ORU 39.1
Three-pointers
UL hits 33.6% and allows 35.6%; ORU hits 32.0% and allows 37.4%. Threes are 40.5% and 45.6% of their shots
Home court
ORU at home. This season: ORU 0-0 at home, UL 0-0 away
Even
UL offense vs ORU defense
Offense 292nd of 366 against a defense 326th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
UL has played the 226th-hardest schedule, ORU the 246th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: UL 47.1 and allows 52.6; ORU 49.6 and allows 53.6
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UL 28.4%, ORU 28.4%. Defensive: UL 67.7%, ORU 68.2%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UL 59%, ORU 54%. Transfers in: UL 3, ORU 2. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | UL -0.3 | — |
| Total | — | 142.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | UL 71.3 · ORU 71 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UL -0.3 | — |
| 1H total | 66.6 | — |
| 1H projected score | UL 33.5 · ORU 33.1 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | |
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% |
Next 3 games
With how the last meeting with each opponent went
No more games listed yet.
No more games listed yet.
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Louisiana
33 games played
Straight up
11-22
33% wins
Against the spread
15-18
45% covers · avg −0.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-18
45% overs · avg −0.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 64-75 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 141.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 58-52 | -3.5 | W +2.5 | 135.5 | U 110 |
| Nov 11 | vs | L 62-66 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 135.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 62-88 | +15.5 | L −10.5 | 134.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 66-93 | +20.5 | L −6.5 | 139.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 43-80 | +19.5 | L −17.5 | 140.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 24 | @ | L 56-77 | +9.5 | L −11.5 | 136.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 45-51 | -5.5 | L −11.5 | 136.5 | U 96 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 55-65 | +10.5 | W +0.5 | 129.5 | U 120 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 63-70 | +12.5 | W +5.5 | 130.5 | O 133 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 44-65 | +9.5 | L −11.5 | 126.5 | U 109 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 54-62 | +11.5 | W +3.5 | 132.5 | U 116 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 76-62 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 136.5 | O 138 |
| Dec 28 | vs | W 63-54 | -3.5 | W +5.5 | 126.5 | U 117 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 58-63 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 127.5 | U 121 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 67-74 | +3.5 | L −3.5 | 129.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 85-79 | -7.5 | L −1.5 | 139.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 70-90 | +9.5 | L −10.5 | 136.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 54-59 | +8.5 | W +3.5 | 133.5 | U 113 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 59-56 | +9.5 | W +12.5 | 129.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 58-72 | +9.5 | L −4.5 | 124.5 | O 130 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 82-72 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 129.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 69-60 | +2.5 | W +11.5 | 144.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 64-61 | +9.5 | W +12.5 | 132.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 85-80 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 134.5 | O 165 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 65-69 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 132.5 | O 134 |
| Feb 16 | @ | L 72-83 | +6.5 | L −4.5 | 135.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 62-79 | +8.5 | L −8.5 | 144.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 67-54 | +3.5 | W +16.5 | 134.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 59-78 | +11.5 | L −7.5 | 134.5 | O 137 |
| Feb 27 | @ | L 58-81 | +13.5 | L −9.5 | 146.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 84-75 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 134.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 72-87 | +6.5 | L −8.5 | 134.5 | O 159 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
BALL
L 64-75
−6.5
7
vs
SELA
W 58-52
+2.5
11
vs
TULN
L 62-66
+1.5
14
@
MCN
L 62-88
−10.5
18
@
STAN
L 66-93
−6.5
21
@
SCU
L 43-80
−17.5
24
@
UCD
L 56-77
−11.5
28
vs
JKST
L 45-51
−11.5
3
@
LAM
L 55-65
+0.5
6
vs
UNCW
L 63-70
+5.5
13
@
LT
L 44-65
−11.5
18
@
USM
L 54-62
+3.5
20
@
ULM
W 76-62
+12.5
28
vs
NORF
W 63-54
+5.5
31
vs
USA
L 58-63
−1.5
3
vs
USM
L 67-74
−3.5
8
vs
ULM
W 85-79
−1.5
10
vs
TROY
L 70-90
−10.5
14
@
TXST
L 54-59
+3.5
17
@
USA
W 59-56
+12.5
22
@
APP
L 58-72
−4.5
29
vs
GAST
W 82-72
+11.5
31
vs
GASO
W 69-60
+11.5
4
@
JMU
W 64-61
+12.5
7
vs
CMU
W 85-80
+2.5
12
vs
CCU
L 65-69
−2.5
16
@
ODU
L 72-83
−4.5
19
vs
ARST
L 62-79
−8.5
21
vs
TXST
W 67-54
+16.5
24
@
TROY
L 59-78
−7.5
27
@
ARST
L 58-81
−9.5
3
vs
GAST
W 84-75
+10.5
4
vs
JMU
L 72-87
−8.5
covered 15didn’t cover 18avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
BALL
L 64-75
−2.5
7
vs
SELA
W 58-52
−25.5
11
vs
TULN
L 62-66
−7.5
14
@
MCN
L 62-88
+15.5
18
@
STAN
L 66-93
+19.5
21
@
SCU
L 43-80
−17.5
24
@
UCD
L 56-77
−3.5
28
vs
JKST
L 45-51
−40.5
3
@
LAM
L 55-65
−9.5
6
vs
UNCW
L 63-70
+2.5
13
@
LT
L 44-65
−17.5
18
@
USM
L 54-62
−16.5
20
@
ULM
W 76-62
+1.5
28
vs
NORF
W 63-54
−9.5
31
vs
USA
L 58-63
−6.5
3
vs
USM
L 67-74
+11.5
8
vs
ULM
W 85-79
+24.5
10
vs
TROY
L 70-90
+23.5
14
@
TXST
L 54-59
−20.5
17
@
USA
W 59-56
−14.5
22
@
APP
L 58-72
+5.5
29
vs
GAST
W 82-72
+24.5
31
vs
GASO
W 69-60
−15.5
4
@
JMU
W 64-61
−7.5
7
vs
CMU
W 85-80
+30.5
12
vs
CCU
L 65-69
+1.5
16
@
ODU
L 72-83
+19.5
19
vs
ARST
L 62-79
−3.5
21
vs
TXST
W 67-54
−13.5
24
@
TROY
L 59-78
+2.5
27
@
ARST
L 58-81
−7.5
3
vs
GAST
W 84-75
+24.5
4
vs
JMU
L 72-87
+24.5
over 15under 18avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Oral Roberts
30 games played
Straight up
7-23
23% wins
Against the spread
14-16
47% covers · avg −1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-17
43% overs · avg −1.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 71-95 | +20.5 | L −3.5 | 165.5 | O 166 |
| Nov 12 | vs | L 87-88 | +5.5 | W +4.5 | 160.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 60-83 | +7.5 | L −15.5 | 171.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 71-95 | +24.5 | W +0.5 | 166.5 | U 166 |
| Nov 24 | @ | L 88-93 | +11.5 | W +6.5 | 153.5 | O 181 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 91-83 | +8.5 | W +16.5 | 166.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 62-81 | +5.5 | L −13.5 | 150.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 66-92 | +7.5 | L −18.5 | 157.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 72-68 | +6.5 | W +10.5 | 150.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 62-63 | +4.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 53-72 | +23.5 | W +4.5 | 147.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 22 | vs | L 57-69 | +3.5 | L −8.5 | 136.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 61-72 | +1.5 | L −9.5 | 148.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 77-79 | +13.5 | W +11.5 | 146.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 71-82 | +8.5 | L −2.5 | 152.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 87-98 | +6.5 | L −4.5 | 156.5 | O 185 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 62-73 | -1.5 | L −12.5 | 149.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 22 | vs | L 62-79 | -1.5 | L −18.5 | 149.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 58-86 | +10.5 | L −17.5 | 151.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 69-77 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 154.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 72-95 | +13.5 | L −9.5 | 150.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 75-92 | +15.5 | L −1.5 | 151.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 69-60 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 150.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 69-87 | +5.5 | L −12.5 | 147.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 71-80 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 151.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 67-62 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 151.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 102-80 | +2.5 | W +24.5 | 156.5 | O 182 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 94-70 | -3.5 | W +20.5 | 149.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 84-62 | -8.5 | W +13.5 | 149.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 65-76 | +12.5 | W +1.5 | 147.5 | U 141 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
OKST
L 71-95
−3.5
12
vs
TLSA
L 87-88
+4.5
15
vs
BEL
L 60-83
−15.5
20
@
OU
L 71-95
+0.5
24
@
FGCU
L 88-93
+6.5
25
vs
KENN
W 91-83
+16.5
26
vs
RICE
L 62-81
−13.5
3
@
WEB
L 66-92
−18.5
6
vs
MTST
W 72-68
+10.5
16
@
MOST
L 62-63
+3.5
18
@
TCU
L 53-72
+4.5
22
vs
UTA
L 57-69
−8.5
1
@
UND
L 61-72
−9.5
3
@
NDSU
L 77-79
+11.5
10
vs
STMN
L 71-82
−2.5
14
@
DEN
L 87-98
−4.5
17
vs
OMA
L 62-73
−12.5
22
vs
UND
L 62-79
−18.5
24
vs
NDSU
L 58-86
−17.5
29
@
SDAK
L 69-77
−4.5
31
@
SDST
L 72-95
−9.5
7
@
STMN
L 75-92
−1.5
12
vs
KC
W 69-60
+2.5
14
vs
SDST
L 69-87
−12.5
18
@
OMA
L 71-80
−2.5
21
vs
SDAK
W 67-62
+3.5
26
vs
DEN
W 102-80
+24.5
28
@
KC
W 94-70
+20.5
4
vs
KC
W 84-62
+13.5
5
vs
NDSU
L 65-76
+1.5
covered 14didn’t cover 16avg −1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
OKST
L 71-95
+0.5
12
vs
TLSA
L 87-88
+14.5
15
vs
BEL
L 60-83
−28.5
20
@
OU
L 71-95
−0.5
24
@
FGCU
L 88-93
+27.5
25
vs
KENN
W 91-83
+7.5
26
vs
RICE
L 62-81
−7.5
3
@
WEB
L 66-92
+0.5
6
vs
MTST
W 72-68
−10.5
16
@
MOST
L 62-63
−21.5
18
@
TCU
L 53-72
−22.5
22
vs
UTA
L 57-69
−10.5
1
@
UND
L 61-72
−15.5
3
@
NDSU
L 77-79
+9.5
10
vs
STMN
L 71-82
+0.5
14
@
DEN
L 87-98
+28.5
17
vs
OMA
L 62-73
−14.5
22
vs
UND
L 62-79
−8.5
24
vs
NDSU
L 58-86
−7.5
29
@
SDAK
L 69-77
−8.5
31
@
SDST
L 72-95
+16.5
7
@
STMN
L 75-92
+15.5
12
vs
KC
W 69-60
−21.5
14
vs
SDST
L 69-87
+8.5
18
@
OMA
L 71-80
−0.5
21
vs
SDAK
W 67-62
−22.5
26
vs
DEN
W 102-80
+25.5
28
@
KC
W 94-70
+14.5
4
vs
KC
W 84-62
−3.5
5
vs
NDSU
L 65-76
−6.5
over 13under 17avg −1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Louisiana 1, Oral Roberts 1, even 3
LouisianaBetterOral Roberts
G D. Lavergne9.9 pts · 3.3 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 40
=Even
G C. Dow12.9 pts · 4.1 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 50
G M. Cooper5.9 pts · 2.7 reb · 3.5 ast
Score 1
=Even
G C. Furnish3.7 pts · 2.4 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 10
G T. Middleton TR12.4 pts · 3.5 reb · 3 ast
Score 49
←ULBig
G C. Martin2.7 pts · 3.5 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 8
G J. Keller17 pts · 2 reb · 3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G M. Kilups3.9 pts · 2.2 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 9
F J. Harris TR9.3 pts · 6.3 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 34
→ORUSmall
F L. Gray7.7 pts · 3.3 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 57
LouisianaBetterOral Roberts
UL offense292nd of 366 · -9.0
=Even
ORU defense326th of 366 · -8.4
UL defense157th of 366 · -3.4
←ULSmall
ORU offense279th of 366 · -8.5
Backcourt-6.4 · 4 players
←ULSmall
Backcourt-7.9 · 4 players
Frontcourt-1.2 · 1 player
→ORUSmall
Frontcourt0.0 · 1 player
Bench-0.5 · 4 players
=Even
Bench-1.5 · 2 players
Score, worst to bestUL betterORU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
D. Lavergne30 minM. Cooper30 minT. Middleton30 min · TRJ. Keller30 minL. Myers2 minD. WareNew
Forwards
J. Harris27 min · TRD. Pounds18 min · TRT. Jones17 minJ. Evans11 minR. OlajuwonNewT. DuncanNew
Guards
C. Dow33 minC. Furnish21 minC. Martin20 minM. Kilups18 minC. Haffner13 min · TRA. Robinson9 min · TR
Forwards
L. Gray17 minT. ZorbasNewM. PavlovicNewM. GavazovNewA. BlancoNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63.7 #354 | Points per game | 71.8 #250 |
| 0.99 #333 | Points per possession | 1.03 #291 |
| 64.1 #359 | Pace (possessions) | 69.7 #134 |
| Shooting | ||
| 47.1 #334 | Effective FG% | 49.6 #256 |
| 33.6 #189 | 3-point % | 32.0 #282 |
| 40.5 #160 | 3-point attempt rate | 45.6 #56 |
| 28.7 #334 | Free throw rate | 34.8 #187 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.8 #185 | Turnover rate | 18.4 #293 |
| 28.4 #251 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.4 #249 |
| 10.3 #354 | Assists per game | 11.5 #312 |
| Defense | ||
| 70.7 #69 | Points allowed | 79.7 #312 |
| 1.10 #227 | Points allowed per possession | 1.15 #319 |
| 52.6 #247 | Opponent effective FG% | 53.6 #289 |
| 35.6 #286 | Opponent 3-point % | 37.4 #348 |
| 18.3 #85 | Turnovers forced | 14.7 #310 |
| 67.7 #272 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.2 #247 |
| 5.8 #257 | Steals per game | 5.7 #268 |
| 3.5 #141 | Blocks per game | 3.4 #154 |
Louisiana
11-22 in 2025-26 overall · 8-12 in conference · Sun Belt Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs James Madison72–87
- Wvs Georgia St84–75
- L@ Arkansas St58–81
- L@ Troy59–78
- Wvs Texas St67–54
A week or more of rest.
Oral Roberts
7-23 in 2025-26 overall · 5-13 in conference · Summit League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs N Dakota St65–76
- Wvs Kansas City84–62
- W@ Kansas City94–70
- Wvs Denver102–80
- Wvs South Dakota67–62
A week or more of rest.