Kansas Jayhawks at UConn Huskies: Model Line and Edge

Sat, Dec 12, 8:00 PM ETM&T Bank Center at Gampel Pavilion · at UConn

#16KUKansas AP #17

#6CONNUConn AP #4

LineNo line yet

Total—

Season records: Kansas and UConn
KU	This season	CONN
0-0	Record	0-0
0-0	ATS	0-0
0-0	O/U	0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects CONN 77–70 · win probability CONN 73%

Pick this game

Your picksMy picks ›

Winner

Line

—

no line yet

Total

—

model 146.4

Model edge

—

No market line yet

Public

—

No split yet for this game

The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it: CONN has more of the edges

KU 1, CONN 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games

KUBig

Free throws

Free throw rate: KU 32.2, CONN 29.9. Allowed: KU 27.4, CONN 40.7

CONNBig

Rebounding

Offensive rebound rate: KU 29.3%, CONN 35.7%. Defensive: KU 70.1%, CONN 71.2%

CONNSmall

Turnovers

Turnover rate: KU 15.6%, CONN 16.4%. Forced: KU 13.8%, CONN 17.8%

CONNSmall

Who is back

Minutes back from last season: KU 9%, CONN 51%. Transfers in: KU 5, CONN 7. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price

CONNSmall

Shooting

Effective FG%: KU 51.2 and allows 45.0; CONN 54.3 and allows 45.7

Context

Tempo

About 67 possessions: KU plays 68.8 a game (193rd fastest), CONN 66.1 (307th). Faster games mean more points

CONNSmall

Home court

CONN at home. This season: CONN 0-0 at home, KU 0-0 away

Even

KU offense vs CONN defense

Offense 17th of 366 against a defense 2nd, on the model’s ratings

Even

CONN offense vs KU defense

Offense 25th of 366 against a defense 15th, on the model’s ratings

Even

Three-pointers

KU hits 34.6% and allows 30.6%; CONN hits 34.4% and allows 30.1%. Threes are 35.2% and 40.9% of their shots

Context

Schedule so far

KU has played the 2nd-hardest schedule, CONN the 4th. A record against a soft schedule means less

Sorted by how lopsided each matchup is, from national ranks. Reasons to look, not picks: the market already knows most of this.

Model vs market

	Market	Model	Model edge
Spread	—	CONN -6.9	—
Total	—	146.4	—
Projected score	—	KU 69.8 · CONN 76.7

1st-half model

1st-half slate ›

	Model	Actual
1H spread	CONN -4.0	—
1H total	68.5	—
1H projected score	KU 32.3 · CONN 36.2	—

The 1st-half model is fitted from the full-game model and past halves. ESPN has no 1st-half lines for college games, so there is no market to compare it with.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

ATS

2025-26 season

	Season	Cover	Venue	Role
KU WWLLW	21-14	60%	5-6	—
CONN WWWWW	17-23	43%	4-13	—

Venue/role: KU away; CONN home. Squares: last 5 games ATS (W covered, L didn’t), oldest first.

Totals

2025-26 season

	O-U	Over %	SU
KU OOUUU	11-24	31%	24-11
CONN UUOUU	19-21	48%	34-6

Squares: last 5 games (O over, U under), oldest first. Tap for the score and line.

Last 10 games

2025-26

	Straight up	Spread	Over / under
KU	5-5 50%	5-5 50%	3-7 30%
CONN	7-3 70%	7-3 70%	3-7 30%

Wins-losses (pushes last). Spread and over / under skip games without a line.

Next 3 games

With how the last meeting with each opponent went

Kansas

No more games listed yet.

UConn

Date	Game	Last meeting
Dec 15	vs DSU	W95–60WO

Last meeting: result, against the spread, over / under. Hover a result for its date.

Recent meetings

Since 2021-22

KU 1–1 CONNSeries tied · 2 games since 2021-22 · KU 1-1 ATS

Date	Result	Line	Covered
Dec 2, 2025-26	CONN 61 @ KU 56	KU +3.5	CONN W
Dec 1, 2023-24	CONN 65 @ KU 69	KU -3	KU W

ATS History · 2025-26

WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total

Kansas

35 games played

Straight up

24-11

69% wins

Against the spread

21-14

60% covers · avg +1.3 pts vs the line

Over / Under

11-24

31% overs · avg −4.3 pts vs the total

Straight up

24-1169%

W L W W L W W W L W W W W L W L W W W W W W W W L W L W L L W W L W L

2 of last 4 wonno streak

Against the spread

21-1460%

W L W L L W W W L W W W W L L L W W W W W W L W L W L W L L W W L L W

2 of last 4 coveredno streak

Over / Under

11-2431%

U O U U U U U O U U O U O U O O U U U U O U U O U U O U U U O O U U U

3 straight unders1 of last 4 over

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 3	vsGB	W 94-51	-30.5	W +12.5	152.5	U 145
Nov 7	@UNC	L 74-87	+2.5	L −10.5	159.5	O 161
Nov 11	vsAMCC	W 77-46	-25.5	W +5.5	145.5	U 123
Nov 15	vsPRIN	W 76-57	-22.5	L −3.5	144.5	U 133
Nov 18	vsDUKE	L 66-78	+10.5	L −1.5	149.5	U 144
Nov 24	vsND	W 71-61	-5.5	W +4.5	143.5	U 132
Nov 25	vsSYR	W 71-60	-4.5	W +6.5	144.5	U 131
Nov 26	vsTENN	W 81-76	+7.5	W +12.5	140.5	O 157
Dec 2	vsCONN	L 56-61	+3.5	L −1.5	141.5	U 117
Dec 7	vsMIZ	W 80-60	-5.5	W +14.5	150.5	U 140
Dec 13	@NCSU	W 77-76	+1.5	W +2.5	148.5	O 153
Dec 16	vsTOW	W 73-49	-14.5	W +9.5	137.5	U 122
Dec 22	vsDAV	W 90-61	-14.5	W +14.5	139.5	O 151
Jan 3	@UCF	L 75-81	-4.5	L −10.5	157.5	U 156
Jan 6	vsTCU	W 104-100	-6.5	L −2.5	143.5	O 204
Jan 10	@WVU	L 75-86	-2.5	L −13.5	139.5	O 161
Jan 13	vsISU	W 84-63	+3.5	W +24.5	152.5	U 147
Jan 16	vsBAY	W 80-62	-7.5	W +10.5	156.5	U 142
Jan 20	@COLO	W 75-69	-4.5	W +1.5	155.5	U 144
Jan 24	@KSU	W 86-62	-4.5	W +19.5	158.5	U 148
Jan 31	vsBYU	W 90-82	-2.5	W +5.5	159.5	O 172
Feb 2	@TTU	W 64-61	+3.5	W +6.5	155.5	U 125
Feb 7	vsUTAH	W 71-59	-18.5	L −6.5	150.5	U 130
Feb 9	vsARIZ	W 82-78	+5.5	W +9.5	152.5	O 160
Feb 14	@ISU	L 56-74	+7.5	L −10.5	147.5	U 130
Feb 18	@OKST	W 81-69	-7.5	W +4.5	158.5	U 150
Feb 21	vsCIN	L 68-84	-8.5	L −24.5	139.5	O 152
Feb 23	vsHOU	W 69-56	+2.5	W +15.5	138.5	U 125
Feb 28	@ARIZ	L 61-84	+9.5	L −13.5	151.5	U 145
Mar 3	@ASU	L 60-70	-5.5	L −15.5	151.5	U 130
Mar 7	vsKSU	W 104-85	-17.5	W +1.5	157.5	O 189
Mar 12	vsTCU	W 78-73	-4.5	W +0.5	146.5	O 151
Mar 13	vsHOU	L 47-69	+5.5	L −16.5	139.5	U 116
Mar 20	vsCBU	W 68-60	-14.5	L −6.5	142.5	U 128
Mar 22	vsSJU	L 65-67	+3.5	W +1.5	144.5	U 132

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

W 94-51

+12.5

UNC

L 74-87

−10.5

AMCC

W 77-46

+5.5

PRIN

W 76-57

−3.5

DUKE

L 66-78

−1.5

W 71-61

+4.5

SYR

W 71-60

+6.5

TENN

W 81-76

+12.5

CONN

L 56-61

−1.5

MIZ

W 80-60

+14.5

NCSU

W 77-76

+2.5

TOW

W 73-49

+9.5

DAV

W 90-61

+14.5

UCF

L 75-81

−10.5

TCU

W 104-100

−2.5

WVU

L 75-86

−13.5

ISU

W 84-63

+24.5

BAY

W 80-62

+10.5

COLO

W 75-69

+1.5

KSU

W 86-62

+19.5

BYU

W 90-82

+5.5

TTU

W 64-61

+6.5

UTAH

W 71-59

−6.5

ARIZ

W 82-78

+9.5

ISU

L 56-74

−10.5

OKST

W 81-69

+4.5

CIN

L 68-84

−24.5

HOU

W 69-56

+15.5

ARIZ

L 61-84

−13.5

ASU

L 60-70

−15.5

KSU

W 104-85

+1.5

TCU

W 78-73

+0.5

HOU

L 47-69

−16.5

CBU

W 68-60

−6.5

SJU

L 65-67

+1.5

covered 21didn’t cover 14avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

W 94-51

−7.5

UNC

L 74-87

+1.5

AMCC

W 77-46

−22.5

PRIN

W 76-57

−11.5

DUKE

L 66-78

−5.5

W 71-61

−11.5

SYR

W 71-60

−13.5

TENN

W 81-76

+16.5

CONN

L 56-61

−24.5

MIZ

W 80-60

−10.5

NCSU

W 77-76

+4.5

TOW

W 73-49

−15.5

DAV

W 90-61

+11.5

UCF

L 75-81

−1.5

TCU

W 104-100

+60.5

WVU

L 75-86

+21.5

ISU

W 84-63

−5.5

BAY

W 80-62

−14.5

COLO

W 75-69

−11.5

KSU

W 86-62

−10.5

BYU

W 90-82

+12.5

TTU

W 64-61

−30.5

UTAH

W 71-59

−20.5

ARIZ

W 82-78

+7.5

ISU

L 56-74

−17.5

OKST

W 81-69

−8.5

CIN

L 68-84

+12.5

HOU

W 69-56

−13.5

ARIZ

L 61-84

−6.5

ASU

L 60-70

−21.5

KSU

W 104-85

+31.5

TCU

W 78-73

+4.5

HOU

L 47-69

−23.5

CBU

W 68-60

−14.5

SJU

L 65-67

−12.5

over 11under 24avg −4.3 ptslonger = bigger margin

UConn

40 games played

Straight up

34-6

85% wins

Against the spread

17-23

43% covers · avg −1.1 pts vs the line

Over / Under

19-21

48% overs · avg −1.6 pts vs the total

Straight up

34-685%

W W W W L W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W L W W L W W W L W W L W W W W W L

3 of last 4 wonno streak

Against the spread

17-2343%

L W L L L L W W L L L W W W L L L L L L L W W L L L L W W L L W W L L W W W W W

5 straight covers4 of last 4 covered

Over / Under

19-2148%

U O U O U U U U O O U U U O U O U O U O O O O O O O O U U O U O U U O U U O U U

2 straight unders1 of last 4 over

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 3	vsNHVN	W 79-55	-42.5	L −18.5	145.5	U 134
Nov 7	vsUML	W 110-47	-36.5	W +26.5	151.5	O 157
Nov 10	vsCOLU	W 89-62	-32.5	L −5.5	155.5	U 151
Nov 15	vsBYU	W 86-84	-6.5	L −4.5	156.5	O 170
Nov 19	vsARIZ	L 67-71	-4.5	L −8.5	156.5	U 138
Nov 23	vsBRY	W 72-49	-36.5	L −13.5	147.5	U 121
Nov 28	vsILL	W 74-61	-4.5	W +8.5	150.5	U 135
Dec 2	@KU	W 61-56	-3.5	W +1.5	141.5	U 117
Dec 5	vsETAM	W 83-59	-36.5	L −12.5	141.5	O 142
Dec 9	vsFLA	W 77-73	-4.5	L −0.5	145.5	O 150
Dec 12	vsTEX	W 71-63	-11.5	L −3.5	145.5	U 134
Dec 16	vsBTLR	W 79-60	-15.5	W +3.5	144.5	U 139
Dec 21	@DEP	W 72-54	-12.5	W +5.5	133.5	U 126
Dec 31	@XAV	W 90-67	-11.5	W +11.5	144.5	O 157
Jan 4	vsMARQ	W 73-57	-17.5	L −1.5	144.5	U 130
Jan 7	@PROV	W 103-98	-9.5	L −4.5	152.5	O 201
Jan 10	vsDEP	W 72-60	-19.5	L −7.5	137.5	U 132
Jan 13	@HALL	W 69-64	-6.5	L −1.5	132.5	O 133
Jan 17	@GTWN	W 64-62	-11.5	L −9.5	141.5	U 126
Jan 24	vsVILL	W 75-67	-11.5	L −3.5	137.5	O 142
Jan 27	vsPROV	W 87-81	-15.5	L −9.5	152.5	O 168
Jan 31	@CREI	W 85-58	-6.5	W +20.5	142.5	O 143
Feb 3	vsXAV	W 92-60	-16.5	W +15.5	147.5	O 152
Feb 6	@SJU	L 72-81	-1.5	L −10.5	143.5	O 153
Feb 11	@BTLR	W 80-70	-11.5	L −1.5	143.5	O 150
Feb 14	vsGTWN	W 79-75	-16.5	L −12.5	138.5	O 154
Feb 18	vsCREI	L 84-91	-15.5	L −22.5	143.5	O 175
Feb 21	@VILL	W 73-63	-3.5	W +6.5	141.5	U 136
Feb 25	vsSJU	W 72-40	-5.5	W +26.5	145.5	U 112
Feb 28	vsHALL	W 71-67	-12.5	L −8.5	130.5	O 138
Mar 7	@MARQ	L 62-68	-9.5	L −15.5	143.5	U 130
Mar 12	vsXAV	W 93-68	-17.5	W +7.5	150.5	O 161
Mar 13	vsGTWN	W 67-51	-14.5	W +1.5	138.5	U 118
Mar 14	@SJU	L 52-72	-2.5	L −22.5	139.5	U 124
Mar 20	vsFUR	W 82-71	-20.5	L −9.5	133.5	O 153
Mar 22	vsUCLA	W 73-57	-5.5	W +10.5	135.5	U 130
Mar 27	vsMSU	W 67-63	-2.5	W +1.5	136.5	U 130
Mar 29	vsDUKE	W 73-72	+4.5	W +5.5	135.5	O 145
Apr 4	vsILL	W 71-62	+1.5	W +10.5	139.5	U 133
Apr 6	vsMICH	L 63-69	+6.5	W +0.5	146.5	U 132

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

NHVN

W 79-55

−18.5

UML

W 110-47

+26.5

COLU

W 89-62

−5.5

BYU

W 86-84

−4.5

ARIZ

L 67-71

−8.5

BRY

W 72-49

−13.5

ILL

W 74-61

+8.5

W 61-56

+1.5

ETAM

W 83-59

−12.5

FLA

W 77-73

−0.5

TEX

W 71-63

−3.5

BTLR

W 79-60

+3.5

DEP

W 72-54

+5.5

XAV

W 90-67

+11.5

MARQ

W 73-57

−1.5

PROV

W 103-98

−4.5

DEP

W 72-60

−7.5

HALL

W 69-64

−1.5

GTWN

W 64-62

−9.5

VILL

W 75-67

−3.5

PROV

W 87-81

−9.5

CREI

W 85-58

+20.5

XAV

W 92-60

+15.5

SJU

L 72-81

−10.5

BTLR

W 80-70

−1.5

GTWN

W 79-75

−12.5

CREI

L 84-91

−22.5

VILL

W 73-63

+6.5

SJU

W 72-40

+26.5

HALL

W 71-67

−8.5

MARQ

L 62-68

−15.5

XAV

W 93-68

+7.5

GTWN

W 67-51

+1.5

SJU

L 52-72

−22.5

FUR

W 82-71

−9.5

UCLA

W 73-57

+10.5

MSU

W 67-63

+1.5

DUKE

W 73-72

+5.5

ILL

W 71-62

+10.5

MICH

L 63-69

+0.5

covered 17didn’t cover 23avg −1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

NHVN

W 79-55

−11.5

UML

W 110-47

+5.5

COLU

W 89-62

−4.5

BYU

W 86-84

+13.5

ARIZ

L 67-71

−18.5

BRY

W 72-49

−26.5

ILL

W 74-61

−15.5

W 61-56

−24.5

ETAM

W 83-59

+0.5

FLA

W 77-73

+4.5

TEX

W 71-63

−11.5

BTLR

W 79-60

−5.5

DEP

W 72-54

−7.5

XAV

W 90-67

+12.5

MARQ

W 73-57

−14.5

PROV

W 103-98

+48.5

DEP

W 72-60

−5.5

HALL

W 69-64

+0.5

GTWN

W 64-62

−15.5

VILL

W 75-67

+4.5

PROV

W 87-81

+15.5

CREI

W 85-58

+0.5

XAV

W 92-60

+4.5

SJU

L 72-81

+9.5

BTLR

W 80-70

+6.5

GTWN

W 79-75

+15.5

CREI

L 84-91

+31.5

VILL

W 73-63

−5.5

SJU

W 72-40

−33.5

HALL

W 71-67

+7.5

MARQ

L 62-68

−13.5

XAV

W 93-68

+10.5

GTWN

W 67-51

−20.5

SJU

L 52-72

−15.5

FUR

W 82-71

+19.5

UCLA

W 73-57

−5.5

MSU

W 67-63

−6.5

DUKE

W 73-72

+9.5

ILL

W 71-62

−6.5

MICH

L 63-69

−14.5

over 19under 21avg −1.6 ptslonger = bigger margin

Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.

Kansas has the better starters

Position by position: Kansas 1, UConn 0, even 4

KansasBetterUConn

G L. Blyden TR16.5 pts · 4.1 reb · 4.5 ast Score 85

Even

G N. Machowski TR17.8 pts · 5.9 reb · 2.6 ast Score 80

G D. Parker TR18.6 pts · 5.9 reb · 1.3 ast Score 94

Even

G S. Demary10.1 pts · 4.5 reb · 5.9 ast Score 98

F K. Dawes TR12.5 pts · 8.8 reb · 2.2 ast Score 91

Even

G S. Ball12.8 pts · 3 reb · 1.5 ast Score 87

F T. Kaufman-Renn TR14.2 pts · 8.3 reb · 2.5 ast Score 98

Even

G B. Mullins12 pts · 3.5 reb · 1.4 ast Score 88

C C. Reeves TR11 pts · 7.8 reb · 0.4 ast Score 94

KUBig

G J. Nash TR5.2 pts · 2.9 reb · 4.1 ast Score 26

KansasBetterUConn

KU offense17th of 366 · +8.6

Even

CONN defense2nd of 366 · +11.5

KU defense15th of 366 · +6.3

Even

CONN offense25th of 366 · +7.1

Backcourt+5.7 · 2 players

CONNSmall

Backcourt+8.5 · 5 players

Frontcourt+13.0 · 3 players

No call

FrontcourtNo numbers yet

Bench+0.1 · 3 players

CONNBig

Bench+3.4 · 5 players

Score, worst to bestKU betterCONN betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Projected starters: college teams publish no depth chart, so these come from minutes played, and a freshman or a new starter can change them. The score is the share of ranked players at the position that player is ahead of. Numbers are this season's once a player has 30 minutes, 2025-26's before that. Bench is the next five by minutes. Tap a player for the full numbers.

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined

Kansas

Guards

L. Blyden34 min · TRD. Parker30 min · TRK. Rosario12 minW. Thengvall2 minT. StokesNewT. PerryNew

Forwards

K. Dawes31 min · TRT. Kaufman-Renn28 min · TRD. AdkinsNewA. RichmondNewG. MordiniNew

Centers

C. Reeves21 min · TRP. Mbiya5 min

UConn

Guards

N. Machowski35 min · TRS. Demary28 minS. Ball28 minB. Mullins28 minJ. Nash26 min · TRJ. CountyNew

Forwards

N. Khamenia20 min · TRI. Shaw18 min · TRJ. Ross18 minJ. RossNewC. LandrewNewE. AmosovNew

Centers

N. Hines18 min · TRO. Giltay15 min · TRE. Dzafic2 min · TR

In order of minutes, from rosters as of today. ESPN lists players only as guards, forwards or centers, and no injury report exists for college basketball, so a player who is out may still show here.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams

ChartTable

Scoring

Points per game

KU75.1 #161

CONN76.6 #129

Points per possession

KU1.09 #152

CONN1.16 #52

Pace (possessions)

KU68.8 #193

CONN66.1 #307

Shooting

Effective FG%

KU51.2 #186

CONN54.3 #59

3-point %

KU34.6 #139

CONN34.4 #150

3-point attempt rate

KU35.2 #268

CONN40.9 #149

Free throw rate

KU32.2 #255

CONN29.9 #313

Possessions

Turnover rate

KU15.6 #111

CONN16.4 #163

Offensive rebound rate

KU29.3 #227

CONN35.7 #30

Assists per game

KU13.9 #150

CONN18.1 #9

Defense

Points allowed

KU69.1 #47

CONN65.2 #6

Points allowed per possession

KU1.00 #28

CONN0.99 #17

Opponent effective FG%

KU45.0 #2

CONN45.7 #7

Opponent 3-point %

KU30.6 #24

CONN30.1 #8

Turnovers forced

KU13.8 #340

CONN17.8 #107

Defensive rebound rate

KU70.1 #152

CONN71.2 #99

Steals per game

KU5.4 #310

CONN6.8 #143

Blocks per game

KU5.8 #6

CONN5.0 #15

KU		CONN
Scoring
75.1 #161	Points per game	76.6 #129
1.09 #152	Points per possession	1.16 #52
68.8 #193	Pace (possessions)	66.1 #307
Shooting
51.2 #186	Effective FG%	54.3 #59
34.6 #139	3-point %	34.4 #150
35.2 #268	3-point attempt rate	40.9 #149
32.2 #255	Free throw rate	29.9 #313
Possessions
15.6 #111	Turnover rate	16.4 #163
29.3 #227	Offensive rebound rate	35.7 #30
13.9 #150	Assists per game	18.1 #9
Defense
69.1 #47	Points allowed	65.2 #6
1.00 #28	Points allowed per possession	0.99 #17
45.0 #2	Opponent effective FG%	45.7 #7
30.6 #24	Opponent 3-point %	30.1 #8
13.8 #340	Turnovers forced	17.8 #107
70.1 #152	Defensive rebound rate	71.2 #99
5.4 #310	Steals per game	6.8 #143
5.8 #6	Blocks per game	5.0 #15

From the box scores. A longer bar is a better national rank, on every row; the better team's bar is solid. A green rank is near the top of Division I, a red one near the bottom. Pace and 3-point rate are styles, so they have no better side.

Kansas

24-11 in 2025-26 overall · 13-7 in conference · Big 12 Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs St John's65–67
Wvs CA Baptist68–60
Lvs Houston47–69
Wvs TCU78–73
Wvs Kansas St104–85

A week or more of rest.

UConn

34-6 in 2025-26 overall · 19-4 in conference · Big East Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs Michigan63–69
Wvs Illinois71–62
Wvs Duke73–72
Wvs Michigan St67–63
Wvs UCLA73–57

A week or more of rest.

Kansas Jayhawks at UConn Huskies

What could decide it: CONN has more of the edges

Market

Model vs market

1st-half model

ATS

Totals

Last 10 games

Next 3 games

Recent meetings

ATS History · 2025-26

Kansas

UConn

Kansas has the better starters

Depth chart

Matchup stats

Kansas

UConn