First National Bank Arena · at Arkansas St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | ARST | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects ARST 80–73 · win probability ARST 71%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 152.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: ARST has more of the edges
MOST 1, ARST 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: MOST 32.0%, ARST 38.2%. Defensive: MOST 68.0%, ARST 73.0%
Turnovers
Turnover rate: MOST 16.7%, ARST 19.8%. Forced: MOST 16.9%, ARST 14.9%
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: MOST plays 67.4 a game (261st fastest), ARST 73.4 (16th). Faster games mean more points
ARST offense vs MOST defense
Offense 122nd of 366 against a defense 219th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: MOST 51.1 and allows 52.0; ARST 51.7 and allows 50.3
Home court
ARST at home. This season: ARST 0-0 at home, MOST 0-0 away
Three-pointers
MOST hits 33.0% and allows 34.4%; ARST hits 32.9% and allows 32.9%. Threes are 41.3% and 44.9% of their shots
Context
Schedule so far
MOST has played the 180th-hardest schedule, ARST the 221st. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: MOST 25%, ARST 6%. Transfers in: MOST 0, ARST 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
MOST offense vs ARST defense
Offense 275th of 366 against a defense 252nd, on the model’s ratings
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: MOST 43.8, ARST 39.1. Allowed: MOST 40.2, ARST 37.0
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | ARST -6.4 | — |
| Total | — | 152.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | MOST 73.2 · ARST 79.6 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | ARST -3.7 | — |
| 1H total | 71.4 | — |
| 1H projected score | MOST 33.9 · ARST 37.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 6-4 60% | 7-3 70% | |
| 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
MOST 0–1 ARSTARST leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · MOST 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11, 2025-26 | ARST 86 @ MOST 85 | MOST -1.5 | ARST W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Missouri St
31 games played
Straight up
13-18
42% wins
Against the spread
18-13
58% covers · avg −0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-12
61% overs · avg +3.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11 | vs | L 85-86 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 152.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 49-67 | +3.5 | L −14.5 | 143.5 | U 116 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 74-67 | -3.5 | W +3.5 | 149.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 61-75 | -4.5 | L −18.5 | 145.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 74-98 | +7.5 | L −16.5 | 142.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 12 | @ | L 57-75 | +18.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 63-62 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 23 | vs | W 70-65 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 29 | @ | W 61-43 | -1.5 | W +16.5 | 131.5 | U 104 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 79-55 | -3.5 | W +20.5 | 131.5 | O 134 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 89-82 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 134.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 80-90 | +6.5 | L −3.5 | 152.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 79-71 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 153.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 72-87 | +6.5 | L −8.5 | 148.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 87-90 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 137.5 | O 177 |
| Jan 22 | @ | W 84-75 | +6.5 | W +15.5 | 144.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 62-57 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 139.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 71-80 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 148.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 74-67 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 135.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 76-79 | +9.5 | W +6.5 | 140.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 78-79 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 136.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 67-76 | -9.5 | L −18.5 | 135.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 87-91 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 152.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 67-70 | +3.5 | W +0.5 | 154.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 70-72 | +2.5 | W +0.5 | 138.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 81-86 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 87-74 | +1.5 | W +14.5 | 152.5 | O 161 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 63-75 | -2.5 | L −14.5 | 145.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 75-72 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | U 147 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 77-69 | +4.5 | W +12.5 | 142.5 | O 146 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 66-69 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 134.5 | O 135 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
11
vs
ARST
L 85-86
−2.5
15
@
UTA
L 49-67
−14.5
22
vs
RGV
W 74-67
+3.5
24
vs
LIU
L 61-75
−18.5
6
@
TLSA
L 74-98
−16.5
12
@
XAV
L 57-75
+0.5
16
vs
ORU
W 63-62
−3.5
23
vs
LIN
W 70-65
+1.5
29
@
DEL
W 61-43
+16.5
2
vs
UTEP
W 79-55
+20.5
4
vs
NMSU
W 89-82
+5.5
7
@
KENN
L 80-90
−3.5
10
vs
FIU
W 79-71
+5.5
14
@
WKU
L 72-87
−8.5
17
@
MTSU
L 87-90
+2.5
22
@
NMSU
W 84-75
+15.5
24
@
UTEP
W 62-57
+3.5
28
vs
SHSU
L 71-80
−10.5
31
vs
JXST
W 74-67
+2.5
7
@
LIB
L 76-79
+6.5
12
vs
LT
L 78-79
−4.5
14
vs
DEL
L 67-76
−18.5
18
vs
KENN
L 87-91
−5.5
21
@
FIU
L 67-70
+0.5
26
@
LT
L 70-72
+0.5
28
@
SHSU
L 81-86
+1.5
5
vs
WKU
W 87-74
+14.5
7
vs
MTSU
L 63-75
−14.5
10
vs
FIU
W 75-72
+1.5
11
vs
LIB
W 77-69
+12.5
13
vs
LT
L 66-69
−4.5
covered 18didn’t cover 13avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
11
vs
ARST
L 85-86
+18.5
15
@
UTA
L 49-67
−27.5
22
vs
RGV
W 74-67
−8.5
24
vs
LIU
L 61-75
−9.5
6
@
TLSA
L 74-98
+29.5
12
@
XAV
L 57-75
−19.5
16
vs
ORU
W 63-62
−21.5
23
vs
LIN
W 70-65
−10.5
29
@
DEL
W 61-43
−27.5
2
vs
UTEP
W 79-55
+2.5
4
vs
NMSU
W 89-82
+36.5
7
@
KENN
L 80-90
+17.5
10
vs
FIU
W 79-71
−3.5
14
@
WKU
L 72-87
+10.5
17
@
MTSU
L 87-90
+39.5
22
@
NMSU
W 84-75
+14.5
24
@
UTEP
W 62-57
−20.5
28
vs
SHSU
L 71-80
+2.5
31
vs
JXST
W 74-67
+5.5
7
@
LIB
L 76-79
+14.5
12
vs
LT
L 78-79
+20.5
14
vs
DEL
L 67-76
+7.5
18
vs
KENN
L 87-91
+25.5
21
@
FIU
L 67-70
−17.5
26
@
LT
L 70-72
+3.5
28
@
SHSU
L 81-86
+14.5
5
vs
WKU
W 87-74
+8.5
7
vs
MTSU
L 63-75
−7.5
10
vs
FIU
W 75-72
−5.5
11
vs
LIB
W 77-69
+3.5
13
vs
LT
L 66-69
+0.5
over 19under 12avg +3.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Arkansas St
30 games played
Straight up
18-12
60% wins
Against the spread
15-15
50% covers · avg −0.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-15
50% overs · avg +2.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | W 89-85 | +3.5 | W +7.5 | 159.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 65-90 | -1.5 | L −26.5 | 155.5 | U 155 |
| Nov 11 | @ | W 86-85 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 152.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 72-85 | +20.5 | W +7.5 | 149.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 69-100 | +14.5 | L −16.5 | 172.5 | U 169 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 74-63 | -4.5 | W +6.5 | 155.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 85-80 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 160.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 83-63 | -5.5 | W +14.5 | 151.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 90-78 | -9.5 | W +2.5 | 147.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 76-77 | -2.5 | L −3.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
| Dec 17 | @ | W 89-70 | -4.5 | W +14.5 | 151.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 93-86 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 155.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 74-78 | -10.5 | L −14.5 | 158.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 86-74 | -4.5 | W +7.5 | 160.5 | U 160 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 83-82 | -11.5 | L −10.5 | 156.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 87-91 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 154.5 | O 178 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 74-99 | +3.5 | L −21.5 | 165.5 | O 173 |
| Jan 22 | @ | W 85-68 | -1.5 | W +15.5 | 172.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 81-82 | -4.5 | L −5.5 | 157.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 71-75 | -9.5 | L −13.5 | 159.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 61-70 | -3.5 | L −12.5 | 165.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 70-66 | -4.5 | L −0.5 | 151.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 91-54 | -2.5 | W +34.5 | 154.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 103-70 | -20.5 | W +12.5 | 162.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 88-92 | -8.5 | L −12.5 | 149.5 | O 180 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 79-62 | -8.5 | W +8.5 | 144.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 102-94 | -15.5 | L −7.5 | 165.5 | O 196 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 89-84 | -9.5 | L −4.5 | 158.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 27 | vs | W 81-58 | -13.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 77-80 | -7.5 | L −10.5 | 165.5 | U 157 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
OHIO
W 89-85
+7.5
7
@
SFA
L 65-90
−26.5
11
@
MOST
W 86-85
+2.5
19
@
SMC
L 72-85
+7.5
21
@
SMU
L 69-100
−16.5
24
vs
JXST
W 74-63
+6.5
28
vs
NDSU
W 85-80
+1.5
2
vs
UTA
W 83-63
+14.5
6
@
LR
W 90-78
+2.5
13
@
RICE
L 76-77
−3.5
17
@
TXST
W 89-70
+14.5
20
@
USM
W 93-86
+5.5
3
vs
JMU
L 74-78
−14.5
7
vs
TROY
W 86-74
+7.5
10
vs
TXST
W 83-82
−10.5
15
@
USA
L 87-91
−8.5
17
@
TROY
L 74-99
−21.5
22
@
GASO
W 85-68
+15.5
24
@
GAST
L 81-82
−5.5
28
vs
ODU
L 71-75
−13.5
31
vs
MRSH
L 61-70
−12.5
4
@
CCU
W 70-66
−0.5
7
vs
BGSU
W 91-54
+34.5
11
vs
ULM
W 103-70
+12.5
14
vs
USA
L 88-92
−12.5
19
@
UL
W 79-62
+8.5
21
@
ULM
W 102-94
−7.5
24
vs
USM
W 89-84
−4.5
27
vs
UL
W 81-58
+9.5
5
vs
GASO
L 77-80
−10.5
covered 15didn’t cover 15avg −0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
OHIO
W 89-85
+14.5
7
@
SFA
L 65-90
−0.5
11
@
MOST
W 86-85
+18.5
19
@
SMC
L 72-85
+7.5
21
@
SMU
L 69-100
−3.5
24
vs
JXST
W 74-63
−18.5
28
vs
NDSU
W 85-80
+4.5
2
vs
UTA
W 83-63
−5.5
6
@
LR
W 90-78
+20.5
13
@
RICE
L 76-77
−2.5
17
@
TXST
W 89-70
+7.5
20
@
USM
W 93-86
+23.5
3
vs
JMU
L 74-78
−6.5
7
vs
TROY
W 86-74
−0.5
10
vs
TXST
W 83-82
+8.5
15
@
USA
L 87-91
+23.5
17
@
TROY
L 74-99
+7.5
22
@
GASO
W 85-68
−19.5
24
@
GAST
L 81-82
+5.5
28
vs
ODU
L 71-75
−13.5
31
vs
MRSH
L 61-70
−34.5
4
@
CCU
W 70-66
−15.5
7
vs
BGSU
W 91-54
−9.5
11
vs
ULM
W 103-70
+10.5
14
vs
USA
L 88-92
+30.5
19
@
UL
W 79-62
−3.5
21
@
ULM
W 102-94
+30.5
24
vs
USM
W 89-84
+14.5
27
vs
UL
W 81-58
−7.5
5
vs
GASO
L 77-80
−8.5
over 15under 15avg +2.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Arkansas St has the better starters
Position by position: Missouri St 0, Arkansas St 1, even 4
Missouri StBetterArkansas St
G T. Williams9.2 pts · 1.9 reb · 3.2 ast
Score 34
→ARSTBig
G J. Pyke TR12.3 pts · 5.1 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 83
G M. Cunningham3.1 pts · 2 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 43
=Even
G L. Taylor TR8 pts · 2.7 reb · 3.2 ast
Score 45
F C. Boone1.3 pts · 1.4 reb · 0.1 ast
Score 19
=Even
G R. Blue Smith4.8 pts · 1.5 reb · 1 ast
Score 33
F M. Gray NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
F A. Doumbia TR3.1 pts · 3.9 reb · 0.2 ast
Score 36
F C. Thompson NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
F D. Muon NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
Missouri StBetterArkansas St
MOST offense275th of 366 · -8.4
=Even
ARST defense252nd of 366 · -6.6
MOST defense219th of 366 · -5.7
→ARSTSmall
ARST offense122nd of 366 · -3.2
Backcourt-2.2 · 2 players
→ARSTSmall
Backcourt-0.1 · 3 players
Frontcourt-0.6 · 3 players
=Even
Frontcourt-0.6 · 2 players
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
BenchNo numbers yet
Score, worst to bestMOST betterARST betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Williams31 minM. Cunningham12 minK. StubblefieldNewJ. BlairNewD. RoweNew
Forwards
C. Boone8 minM. GrayNewC. ThompsonNewN. RueyNewL. RolleNewI. MedinaNew
Centers
A. AcimovicNew
Guards
J. Pyke26 min · TRL. Taylor25 min · TRR. Blue Smith13 minC. WatsonNewT. FergusonNewC. GeathersNew
Forwards
A. Doumbia14 min · TRD. MuonNewG. BennettNewA. MaigaNewR. OmedNewM. SyNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 73.1 #223 | Points per game | 81.8 #33 |
| 1.09 #169 | Points per possession | 1.11 #117 |
| 67.4 #261 | Pace (possessions) | 73.4 #16 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.1 #191 | Effective FG% | 51.7 #164 |
| 33.0 #236 | 3-point % | 32.9 #240 |
| 41.3 #144 | 3-point attempt rate | 44.9 #70 |
| 43.8 #12 | Free throw rate | 39.1 #78 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.7 #180 | Turnover rate | 19.8 #344 |
| 32.0 #124 | Offensive rebound rate | 38.2 #6 |
| 13.9 #155 | Assists per game | 15.3 #77 |
| Defense | ||
| 74.3 #166 | Points allowed | 78.0 #268 |
| 1.10 #222 | Points allowed per possession | 1.07 #121 |
| 52.0 #217 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.3 #117 |
| 34.4 #209 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.9 #115 |
| 16.9 #158 | Turnovers forced | 14.9 #298 |
| 68.0 #261 | Defensive rebound rate | 73.0 #36 |
| 6.7 #152 | Steals per game | 7.2 #110 |
| 3.0 #215 | Blocks per game | 2.8 #268 |
Missouri St
13-18 in 2025-26 overall · 10-13 in conference · Conference USA
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Louisiana Tech66–69
- Wvs Liberty77–69
- Wvs FIU75–72
- Lvs MTSU63–75
- Wvs Western KY87–74
A week or more of rest.
Arkansas St
18-12 in 2025-26 overall · 11-8 in conference · Sun Belt Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs GA Southern77–80
- Wvs Louisiana81–58
- Wvs Southern Miss89–84
- W@ UL Monroe102–94
- W@ Louisiana79–62
A week or more of rest.