Beasley Coliseum · at Washington St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | WSU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects WSU 78–72 · win probability WSU 71%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 149.5
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: NDSU has more of the edges
NDSU 4, WSU 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: NDSU 15.6%, WSU 18.5%. Forced: NDSU 18.7%, WSU 14.5%
Context
Schedule so far
NDSU has played the 315th-hardest schedule, WSU the 100th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: NDSU 32.9%, WSU 29.5%. Defensive: NDSU 74.5%, WSU 71.8%
WSU offense vs NDSU defense
Offense 130th of 366 against a defense 209th, on the model’s ratings
Free throws
Free throw rate: NDSU 30.6, WSU 30.2. Allowed: NDSU 29.2, WSU 33.0
Home court
WSU at home. This season: WSU 0-0 at home, NDSU 0-0 away
NDSU offense vs WSU defense
Offense 212th of 366 against a defense 166th, on the model’s ratings
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: NDSU 25%, WSU 1%. Transfers in: NDSU 4, WSU 8. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Three-pointers
NDSU hits 35.4% and allows 33.9%; WSU hits 36.5% and allows 35.4%. Threes are 42.8% and 44.8% of their shots
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: NDSU plays 69.2 a game (169th fastest), WSU 68.9 (183rd). Faster games mean more points
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: NDSU 53.2 and allows 52.0; WSU 54.7 and allows 52.6
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | WSU -6.3 | — |
| Total | — | 149.5 | — |
| Projected score | — | NDSU 71.6 · WSU 77.9 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | WSU -3.6 | — |
| 1H total | 69.9 | — |
| 1H projected score | NDSU 33.1 · WSU 36.8 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8-2 80% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% | |
| 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
N Dakota St
32 games played
Straight up
24-8
75% wins
Against the spread
18-14
56% covers · avg +2.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-17
47% overs · avg +0.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 65-67 | +9.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 5 | @ | L 68-80 | +1.5 | L −10.5 | 142.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 90-68 | -4.5 | W +17.5 | 156.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 92-85 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 153.5 | O 177 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 56-43 | -3.5 | W +9.5 | 142.5 | U 99 |
| Nov 28 | @ | L 80-85 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 160.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 3 | @ | W 81-72 | +3.5 | W +12.5 | 153.5 | U 153 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 69-68 | -12.5 | L −11.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 11 | @ | W 80-69 | -7.5 | W +3.5 | 149.5 | U 149 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 99-94 | +5.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | O 193 |
| Dec 21 | vs | L 73-74 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | O 147 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 66-76 | -2.5 | L −12.5 | 139.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 84-61 | -11.5 | W +11.5 | 164.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 79-77 | -13.5 | L −11.5 | 146.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 97-73 | -9.5 | W +14.5 | 144.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 78-76 | -5.5 | L −3.5 | 147.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 76-65 | -5.5 | W +5.5 | 151.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 68-65 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 22 | @ | W 82-77 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 160.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 86-58 | -10.5 | W +17.5 | 151.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 89-84 | -8.5 | L −3.5 | 154.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 5 | vs | L 71-78 | -12.5 | L −19.5 | 156.5 | U 149 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 92-84 | -9.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | O 176 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 83-66 | -5.5 | W +11.5 | 149.5 | U 149 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 74-66 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 146.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 95-59 | -19.5 | W +16.5 | 148.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 62-84 | +3.5 | L −18.5 | 155.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 96-63 | -11.5 | W +21.5 | 152.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 76-65 | -12.5 | L −1.5 | 147.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 74-50 | -8.5 | W +15.5 | 146.5 | U 124 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 70-62 | -11.5 | L −3.5 | 147.5 | U 132 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 67-92 | +16.5 | L −8.5 | 144.5 | O 159 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
ORST
L 65-67
+7.5
5
@
UCD
L 68-80
−10.5
11
vs
CSUN
W 90-68
+17.5
17
vs
SIU
W 92-85
+5.5
26
vs
JXST
W 56-43
+9.5
28
@
ARST
L 80-85
−1.5
3
@
MONT
W 81-72
+12.5
6
vs
NAU
W 69-68
−11.5
11
@
CSUB
W 80-69
+3.5
13
@
DRKE
W 99-94
+10.5
21
vs
UCI
L 73-74
−2.5
22
@
UTEP
L 66-76
−12.5
31
vs
SDAK
W 84-61
+11.5
3
vs
ORU
W 79-77
−11.5
8
@
KC
W 97-73
+14.5
10
@
OMA
W 78-76
−3.5
14
vs
SDST
W 76-65
+5.5
17
vs
STMN
W 68-65
+0.5
22
@
DEN
W 82-77
+0.5
24
@
ORU
W 86-58
+17.5
31
@
SDAK
W 89-84
−3.5
5
vs
DEN
L 71-78
−19.5
7
vs
OMA
W 92-84
−1.5
14
@
UND
W 83-66
+11.5
18
@
SDST
W 74-66
+6.5
21
vs
KC
W 95-59
+16.5
26
@
STMN
L 62-84
−18.5
28
vs
UND
W 96-63
+21.5
5
vs
ORU
W 76-65
−1.5
7
vs
OMA
W 74-50
+15.5
8
vs
UND
W 70-62
−3.5
19
vs
MSU
L 67-92
−8.5
covered 18didn’t cover 14avg +2.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
ORST
L 65-67
−12.5
5
@
UCD
L 68-80
+5.5
11
vs
CSUN
W 90-68
+1.5
17
vs
SIU
W 92-85
+23.5
26
vs
JXST
W 56-43
−43.5
28
@
ARST
L 80-85
+4.5
3
@
MONT
W 81-72
−0.5
6
vs
NAU
W 69-68
−10.5
11
@
CSUB
W 80-69
−0.5
13
@
DRKE
W 99-94
+47.5
21
vs
UCI
L 73-74
+0.5
22
@
UTEP
L 66-76
+2.5
31
vs
SDAK
W 84-61
−19.5
3
vs
ORU
W 79-77
+9.5
8
@
KC
W 97-73
+25.5
10
@
OMA
W 78-76
+6.5
14
vs
SDST
W 76-65
−10.5
17
vs
STMN
W 68-65
−18.5
22
@
DEN
W 82-77
−1.5
24
@
ORU
W 86-58
−7.5
31
@
SDAK
W 89-84
+18.5
5
vs
DEN
L 71-78
−7.5
7
vs
OMA
W 92-84
+29.5
14
@
UND
W 83-66
−0.5
18
@
SDST
W 74-66
−6.5
21
vs
KC
W 95-59
+5.5
26
@
STMN
L 62-84
−9.5
28
vs
UND
W 96-63
+6.5
5
vs
ORU
W 76-65
−6.5
7
vs
OMA
W 74-50
−22.5
8
vs
UND
W 70-62
−15.5
19
vs
MSU
L 67-92
+14.5
over 15under 17avg +0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Washington St
31 games played
Straight up
11-20
35% wins
Against the spread
15-16
48% covers · avg −0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-15
52% overs · avg +2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 81-83 | -7.5 | L −9.5 | 154.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 69-85 | +4.5 | L −11.5 | 153.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 10 | vs | W 81-71 | -2.5 | W +7.5 | 157.5 | U 152 |
| Nov 14 | vs | L 69-81 | +8.5 | L −3.5 | 158.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 98-74 | -12.5 | W +11.5 | 157.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 94-100 | +4.5 | L −1.5 | 157.5 | O 194 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 61-75 | +8.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 60-64 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 148.5 | U 124 |
| Dec 7 | vs | L 64-78 | -2.5 | L −16.5 | 145.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 14 | @ | L 61-68 | +12.5 | W +5.5 | 156.5 | U 129 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 78-63 | -6.5 | W +8.5 | 153.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 84-78 | -7.5 | L −1.5 | 151.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 28 | @ | W 67-62 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | U 129 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 55-69 | +6.5 | L −7.5 | 144.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 78-76 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 142.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 81-67 | -6.5 | W +7.5 | 140.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 82-88 | +15.5 | W +9.5 | 143.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 15 | vs | L 65-86 | +16.5 | L −4.5 | 155.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 18 | @ | L 80-85 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 92-96 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 152.5 | O 188 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 95-79 | -11.5 | W +4.5 | 146.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 70-58 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 142.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 104-74 | -8.5 | W +21.5 | 152.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 64-74 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 147.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 92-96 | +8.5 | W +4.5 | 160.5 | O 188 |
| Feb 10 | @ | L 53-83 | +21.5 | L −8.5 | 156.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 87-70 | -2.5 | W +14.5 | 144.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 67-83 | +8.5 | L −7.5 | 149.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 66-67 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 149.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 79-88 | -7.5 | L −16.5 | 158.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 68-74 | -5.5 | L −11.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
IDHO
L 81-83
−9.5
7
@
DAV
L 69-85
−11.5
10
vs
STMN
W 81-71
+7.5
14
vs
WASH
L 69-81
−3.5
19
vs
SUU
W 98-74
+11.5
25
vs
ASU
L 94-100
−1.5
26
vs
HALL
L 61-75
−5.5
2
@
BRAD
L 60-64
+1.5
7
vs
NEV
L 64-78
−16.5
14
@
USC
L 61-68
+5.5
17
vs
EWU
W 78-63
+8.5
20
vs
MER
W 84-78
−1.5
28
@
PORT
W 67-62
+1.5
30
@
SEA
L 55-69
−7.5
2
vs
LMU
W 78-76
−1.5
4
vs
ORST
W 81-67
+7.5
10
@
SMC
L 82-88
+9.5
15
vs
GONZ
L 65-86
−4.5
18
@
SF
L 80-85
+0.5
21
@
USD
L 92-96
−5.5
24
vs
PEPP
W 95-79
+4.5
28
vs
SEA
W 70-58
+10.5
31
vs
PORT
W 104-74
+21.5
4
@
ORST
L 64-74
−11.5
7
vs
SCU
L 92-96
+4.5
10
@
GONZ
L 53-83
−8.5
18
vs
PAC
W 87-70
+14.5
21
vs
SMC
L 67-83
−7.5
25
@
LMU
L 66-67
+0.5
28
@
PEPP
L 79-88
−16.5
6
vs
PORT
L 68-74
−11.5
covered 15didn’t cover 16avg −0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
IDHO
L 81-83
+9.5
7
@
DAV
L 69-85
+0.5
10
vs
STMN
W 81-71
−5.5
14
vs
WASH
L 69-81
−8.5
19
vs
SUU
W 98-74
+14.5
25
vs
ASU
L 94-100
+36.5
26
vs
HALL
L 61-75
−11.5
2
@
BRAD
L 60-64
−24.5
7
vs
NEV
L 64-78
−3.5
14
@
USC
L 61-68
−27.5
17
vs
EWU
W 78-63
−12.5
20
vs
MER
W 84-78
+10.5
28
@
PORT
W 67-62
−23.5
30
@
SEA
L 55-69
−20.5
2
vs
LMU
W 78-76
+11.5
4
vs
ORST
W 81-67
+7.5
10
@
SMC
L 82-88
+26.5
15
vs
GONZ
L 65-86
−4.5
18
@
SF
L 80-85
+18.5
21
@
USD
L 92-96
+35.5
24
vs
PEPP
W 95-79
+27.5
28
vs
SEA
W 70-58
−14.5
31
vs
PORT
W 104-74
+25.5
4
@
ORST
L 64-74
−9.5
7
vs
SCU
L 92-96
+27.5
10
@
GONZ
L 53-83
−20.5
18
vs
PAC
W 87-70
+12.5
21
vs
SMC
L 67-83
+0.5
25
@
LMU
L 66-67
−16.5
28
@
PEPP
L 79-88
+8.5
6
vs
PORT
L 68-74
−7.5
over 16under 15avg +2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Washington St has the better starters
Position by position: N Dakota St 1, Washington St 2, even 2
N Dakota StBetterWashington St
G M. Bell TR8.8 pts · 4 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 19
→WSUBig
G S. Akins TR5.3 pts · 1.5 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 57
G A. Stefonowicz9.3 pts · 3 reb · 4.7 ast
Score 42
←NDSUSmall
F F. Roxburgh TR10.9 pts · 5.7 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 21
G R. Diaz TR8.1 pts · 3.6 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 79
=Even
F R. Harrison TR14.2 pts · 6.2 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 67
G C. Smith2.3 pts · 1.3 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F L. Dembele TR5.2 pts · 4.2 reb · 1.4 ast
Not ranked
F K. Poom TR8.6 pts · 3.3 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 31
→WSUSmall
F T. Kropp TR3.1 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 48
N Dakota StBetterWashington St
NDSU offense212th of 366 · -6.5
=Even
WSU defense166th of 366 · -3.7
NDSU defense209th of 366 · -5.3
→WSUSmall
WSU offense130th of 366 · -3.5
Backcourt-4.6 · 4 players
→WSUBig
Backcourt-0.2 · 1 player
Frontcourt-1.0 · 1 player
←NDSUSmall
Frontcourt-2.6 · 4 players
Bench-1.0 · 2 players
=Even
Bench-0.5 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestNDSU betterWSU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
M. Bell34 min · TRA. Stefonowicz33 minR. Diaz22 min · TRC. Smith9 minR. Massey8 minJ. Robison2 min · TR
Forwards
K. Poom20 min · TRA. NagyNewK. TateNewC. SchoenfeldNewO. JunkerNewC. StackNew
Guards
S. Akins15 min · TRJ. Phillips11 min · TRJ. Harrell9 min · TRR. Jones7 min · TRD. Blakely1 minC. JonesNew
Forwards
F. Roxburgh31 min · TRR. Harrison31 min · TRL. Dembele20 min · TRT. Kropp12 min · TRM. SankheNewB. KymanNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 78.7 #87 | Points per game | 75.7 #152 |
| 1.14 #76 | Points per possession | 1.10 #136 |
| 69.2 #169 | Pace (possessions) | 68.9 #183 |
| Shooting | ||
| 53.2 #92 | Effective FG% | 54.7 #48 |
| 35.4 #93 | 3-point % | 36.5 #40 |
| 42.8 #122 | 3-point attempt rate | 44.8 #73 |
| 30.6 #289 | Free throw rate | 30.2 #305 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.6 #108 | Turnover rate | 18.5 #295 |
| 32.9 #89 | Offensive rebound rate | 29.5 #221 |
| 14.8 #97 | Assists per game | 13.8 #163 |
| Defense | ||
| 71.4 #90 | Points allowed | 77.3 #245 |
| 1.03 #63 | Points allowed per possession | 1.12 #266 |
| 52.0 #215 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.6 #248 |
| 33.9 #173 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.4 #273 |
| 18.7 #62 | Turnovers forced | 14.5 #322 |
| 74.5 #15 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.8 #71 |
| 7.7 #64 | Steals per game | 5.5 #299 |
| 2.8 #265 | Blocks per game | 2.9 #242 |
N Dakota St
24-8 in 2025-26 overall · 17-2 in conference · Summit League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Michigan St67–92
- Wvs North Dakota70–62
- Wvs Omaha74–50
- Wvs Oral Roberts76–65
- Wvs North Dakota96–63
A week or more of rest.
Washington St
11-20 in 2025-26 overall · 7-12 in conference · Pac-12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Portland68–74
- L@ Pepperdine79–88
- L@ LMU66–67
- Lvs Saint Mary's67–83
- Wvs Pacific87–70
A week or more of rest.