Acrisure Arena · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | USU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects USU 78–77 · win probability USU 53%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 155.4
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it
SMU 2, USU 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: SMU 15.8%, USU 15.1%. Forced: SMU 16.8%, USU 20.2%
Three-pointers
SMU hits 37.1% and allows 34.1%; USU hits 34.3% and allows 34.5%. Threes are 35.9% and 40.8% of their shots
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: SMU plays 71.1 a game (68th fastest), USU 68.5 (207th). Faster games mean more points
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: SMU 35.4%, USU 32.7%. Defensive: SMU 68.4%, USU 67.2%
Shooting
Effective FG%: SMU 55.6 and allows 51.6; USU 56.3 and allows 49.7
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: SMU 30.4, USU 38.8. Allowed: SMU 32.1, USU 39.2
Even
USU offense vs SMU defense
Offense 53rd of 366 against a defense 69th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
SMU has played the 70th-hardest schedule, USU the 83rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
SMU offense vs USU defense
Offense 45th of 366 against a defense 56th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: SMU 20%, USU 26%. Transfers in: SMU 7, USU 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | USU -0.8 | — |
| Total | — | 155.4 | — |
| Projected score | — | SMU 77.3 · USU 78.1 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | USU -0.3 | — |
| 1H total | 72.6 | — |
| 1H projected score | SMU 36.2 · USU 36.5 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | |
| 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
SMU 1–0 USUSMU leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · SMU 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2022-23 | SMU 77 vs USU 74 | USU -12.5 | SMU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
SMU
34 games played
Straight up
20-14
59% wins
Against the spread
15-19
44% covers · avg +0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
20-14
59% overs · avg +2.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 96-76 | -21.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 6 | vs | W 69-58 | -23.5 | L −12.5 | 160.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 102-91 | -10.5 | W +0.5 | 164.5 | O 193 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 87-85 | -7.5 | L −5.5 | 163.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 106-60 | -35.5 | W +10.5 | 168.5 | U 166 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 100-69 | -14.5 | W +16.5 | 172.5 | U 169 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 89-72 | -23.5 | L −6.5 | 165.5 | U 161 |
| Nov 28 | @ | W 87-81 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 162.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 69-88 | +10.5 | L −8.5 | 165.5 | U 157 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 93-80 | +1.5 | W +14.5 | 164.5 | O 173 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 77-89 | +1.5 | L −10.5 | 158.5 | O 166 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 99-82 | -24.5 | L −7.5 | 156.5 | O 181 |
| Dec 28 | vs | W 110-63 | -21.5 | W +25.5 | 170.5 | O 173 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 97-83 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 155.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 70-74 | +3.5 | L −0.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 75-82 | +15.5 | W +8.5 | 155.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 77-76 | -8.5 | L −7.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 68-72 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 20 | @ | W 91-79 | +1.5 | W +13.5 | 157.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 83-80 | -11.5 | L −8.5 | 163.5 | U 163 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 74-88 | +9.5 | L −4.5 | 163.5 | U 162 |
| Feb 3 | vs | L 83-84 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 159.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 86-67 | -4.5 | W +14.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 10 | vs | W 89-81 | -10.5 | L −2.5 | 154.5 | O 170 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 78-79 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 157.5 | U 157 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 95-85 | +4.5 | W +14.5 | 168.5 | O 180 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 94-70 | -15.5 | W +8.5 | 150.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 69-73 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 163.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 75-95 | -1.5 | L −21.5 | 155.5 | O 170 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 69-77 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 156.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 78-91 | +1.5 | L −11.5 | 158.5 | O 169 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 86-69 | -3.5 | W +13.5 | 154.5 | O 155 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 58-62 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 164.5 | U 120 |
| Mar 18 | vs | L 79-89 | -6.5 | L −16.5 | 162.5 | O 168 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
TAR
W 96-76
−1.5
6
vs
AMCC
W 69-58
−12.5
11
vs
MUR
W 102-91
+0.5
15
vs
BTLR
W 87-85
−5.5
18
vs
UAPB
W 106-60
+10.5
21
vs
ARST
W 100-69
+16.5
24
vs
RAD
W 89-72
−6.5
28
@
MSST
W 87-81
+7.5
3
@
VAN
L 69-88
−8.5
7
vs
TA&M
W 93-80
+14.5
13
vs
LSU
L 77-89
−10.5
21
vs
CARK
W 99-82
−7.5
28
vs
CSUF
W 110-63
+25.5
3
vs
UNC
W 97-83
+12.5
7
@
CLEM
L 70-74
−0.5
10
@
DUKE
L 75-82
+8.5
14
vs
VT
W 77-76
−7.5
17
vs
UVA
L 68-72
−1.5
20
@
WAKE
W 91-79
+13.5
24
vs
FSU
W 83-80
−8.5
31
@
LOU
L 74-88
−4.5
3
vs
NCSU
L 83-84
+0.5
7
@
PITT
W 86-67
+14.5
10
vs
ND
W 89-81
−2.5
14
@
SYR
L 78-79
−2.5
17
vs
LOU
W 95-85
+14.5
21
vs
BC
W 94-70
+8.5
25
@
CAL
L 69-73
−8.5
28
@
STAN
L 75-95
−21.5
4
vs
MIA
L 69-77
−9.5
7
@
FSU
L 78-91
−11.5
10
vs
SYR
W 86-69
+13.5
11
vs
LOU
L 58-62
+3.5
18
vs
M-OH
L 79-89
−16.5
covered 15didn’t cover 19avg +0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
TAR
W 96-76
+27.5
6
vs
AMCC
W 69-58
−33.5
11
vs
MUR
W 102-91
+28.5
15
vs
BTLR
W 87-85
+8.5
18
vs
UAPB
W 106-60
−2.5
21
vs
ARST
W 100-69
−3.5
24
vs
RAD
W 89-72
−4.5
28
@
MSST
W 87-81
+5.5
3
@
VAN
L 69-88
−8.5
7
vs
TA&M
W 93-80
+8.5
13
vs
LSU
L 77-89
+7.5
21
vs
CARK
W 99-82
+24.5
28
vs
CSUF
W 110-63
+2.5
3
vs
UNC
W 97-83
+24.5
7
@
CLEM
L 70-74
−5.5
10
@
DUKE
L 75-82
+1.5
14
vs
VT
W 77-76
−2.5
17
vs
UVA
L 68-72
−13.5
20
@
WAKE
W 91-79
+12.5
24
vs
FSU
W 83-80
−0.5
31
@
LOU
L 74-88
−1.5
3
vs
NCSU
L 83-84
+7.5
7
@
PITT
W 86-67
+5.5
10
vs
ND
W 89-81
+15.5
14
@
SYR
L 78-79
−0.5
17
vs
LOU
W 95-85
+11.5
21
vs
BC
W 94-70
+13.5
25
@
CAL
L 69-73
−21.5
28
@
STAN
L 75-95
+14.5
4
vs
MIA
L 69-77
−10.5
7
@
FSU
L 78-91
+10.5
10
vs
SYR
W 86-69
+0.5
11
vs
LOU
L 58-62
−44.5
18
vs
M-OH
L 79-89
+5.5
over 20under 14avg +2.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Utah State
35 games played
Straight up
28-7
80% wins
Against the spread
16-19
46% covers · avg +1.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-16
54% overs · avg +1.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | vs | W 80-77 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 163.5 | U 157 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 83-73 | -22.5 | L −12.5 | 156.5 | U 156 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 75-51 | -16.5 | W +7.5 | 149.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 96-75 | -8.5 | W +12.5 | 151.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 94-60 | -9.5 | W +24.5 | 147.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 84-81 | -17.5 | L −14.5 | 148.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 4 | @ | L 61-74 | +2.5 | L −10.5 | 162.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 7 | @ | W 79-53 | -10.5 | W +15.5 | 139.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 83-78 | -8.5 | L −3.5 | 148.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 100-58 | -10.5 | W +31.5 | 147.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 30 | @ | W 72-63 | -14.5 | L −5.5 | 154.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 96-78 | -22.5 | L −4.5 | 151.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 6 | @ | W 99-62 | -22.5 | W +14.5 | 139.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 93-68 | -1.5 | W +23.5 | 149.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 71-62 | -13.5 | L −4.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 74-84 | -5.5 | L −15.5 | 150.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 20 | vs | L 76-86 | -15.5 | L −25.5 | 156.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 23 | @ | W 65-61 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 94-62 | -13.5 | W +18.5 | 148.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 71-66 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 86-66 | +1.5 | W +21.5 | 156.5 | U 152 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 85-83 | -9.5 | L −7.5 | 149.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 10 | vs | W 91-78 | -21.5 | L −8.5 | 152.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 99-75 | -13.5 | W +10.5 | 155.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 75-56 | -9.5 | W +9.5 | 151.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 77-80 | -5.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 72-89 | -1.5 | L −18.5 | 146.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 74-69 | -9.5 | L −4.5 | 147.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 65-92 | -7.5 | L −34.5 | 156.5 | O 157 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 94-90 | -7.5 | L −3.5 | 155.5 | O 184 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 80-60 | -8.5 | W +11.5 | 156.5 | U 140 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 79-66 | -6.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 73-62 | -2.5 | W +8.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 20 | vs | W 86-76 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | O 162 |
| Mar 22 | vs | L 66-78 | +11.5 | L −0.5 | 153.5 | U 144 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
vs
VCU
W 80-77
+0.5
12
vs
WEB
W 83-73
−12.5
15
vs
UTEP
W 75-51
+7.5
21
vs
TULN
W 96-75
+12.5
23
vs
DAV
W 94-60
+24.5
29
vs
MTST
W 84-81
−14.5
4
@
USF
L 61-74
−10.5
7
@
CLT
W 79-53
+15.5
13
vs
ILST
W 83-78
−3.5
20
vs
CSU
W 100-58
+31.5
30
@
FRES
W 72-63
−5.5
3
vs
SJSU
W 96-78
−4.5
6
@
AF
W 99-62
+14.5
10
@
BOIS
W 93-68
+23.5
14
vs
NEV
W 71-62
−4.5
17
@
GCU
L 74-84
−15.5
20
vs
UNLV
L 76-86
−25.5
23
@
CSU
W 65-61
−1.5
28
vs
WYO
W 94-62
+18.5
31
vs
SDSU
W 71-66
−1.5
4
@
UNM
W 86-66
+21.5
7
@
WYO
W 85-83
−7.5
10
vs
FRES
W 91-78
−8.5
14
vs
MEM
W 99-75
+10.5
18
vs
BOIS
W 75-56
+9.5
21
@
NEV
L 77-80
−8.5
25
@
SDSU
L 72-89
−18.5
28
vs
GCU
W 74-69
−4.5
3
@
UNLV
L 65-92
−34.5
7
vs
UNM
W 94-90
−3.5
12
vs
UNLV
W 80-60
+11.5
13
vs
NEV
W 79-66
+6.5
14
vs
SDSU
W 73-62
+8.5
20
vs
VILL
W 86-76
+8.5
22
vs
ARIZ
L 66-78
−0.5
covered 16didn’t cover 19avg +1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
vs
VCU
W 80-77
−6.5
12
vs
WEB
W 83-73
−0.5
15
vs
UTEP
W 75-51
−23.5
21
vs
TULN
W 96-75
+19.5
23
vs
DAV
W 94-60
+6.5
29
vs
MTST
W 84-81
+16.5
4
@
USF
L 61-74
−27.5
7
@
CLT
W 79-53
−7.5
13
vs
ILST
W 83-78
+12.5
20
vs
CSU
W 100-58
+10.5
30
@
FRES
W 72-63
−19.5
3
vs
SJSU
W 96-78
+22.5
6
@
AF
W 99-62
+21.5
10
@
BOIS
W 93-68
+11.5
14
vs
NEV
W 71-62
−14.5
17
@
GCU
L 74-84
+7.5
20
vs
UNLV
L 76-86
+5.5
23
@
CSU
W 65-61
−23.5
28
vs
WYO
W 94-62
+7.5
31
vs
SDSU
W 71-66
−10.5
4
@
UNM
W 86-66
−4.5
7
@
WYO
W 85-83
+18.5
10
vs
FRES
W 91-78
+16.5
14
vs
MEM
W 99-75
+18.5
18
vs
BOIS
W 75-56
−20.5
21
@
NEV
L 77-80
+10.5
25
@
SDSU
L 72-89
+14.5
28
vs
GCU
W 74-69
−4.5
3
@
UNLV
L 65-92
+0.5
7
vs
UNM
W 94-90
+28.5
12
vs
UNLV
W 80-60
−16.5
13
vs
NEV
W 79-66
−0.5
14
vs
SDSU
W 73-62
−10.5
20
vs
VILL
W 86-76
+15.5
22
vs
ARIZ
L 66-78
−9.5
over 19under 16avg +1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
SMU has the better starters
Position by position: SMU 3, Utah State 1, even 1
SMUBetterUtah State
G R. Brumbaugh TR19.1 pts · 4.8 reb · 3.5 ast
Score 95
←SMUSmall
G A. Bates TR12.3 pts · 2.7 reb · 5.8 ast
Score 62
G D. Terrell TR13.6 pts · 3.8 reb · 4.9 ast
Score 89
=Even
G M. Falslev16.2 pts · 5.7 reb · 3.1 ast
Score 98
G O. Sellers TR10.3 pts · 2.7 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 78
←SMUSmall
G D. Hall TR5.9 pts · 3.6 reb · 4.4 ast
Score 49
G J. Patrick TR7.2 pts · 1.4 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 59
←SMUSmall
G S. Callaghan TR10.4 pts · 2 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 33
F J. Munch TR7.9 pts · 5.1 reb · 1 ast
Score 69
→USUSmall
F W. Hornseth TR11.5 pts · 4.7 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 88
SMUBetterUtah State
SMU offense45th of 366 · +4.2
=Even
USU defense56th of 366 · +1.4
SMU defense69th of 366 · +0.8
=Even
USU offense53rd of 366 · +3.3
Backcourt+8.2 · 4 players
←SMUBig
Backcourt+2.9 · 4 players
Frontcourt+0.7 · 1 player
→USUSmall
Frontcourt+2.6 · 1 player
Bench+0.3 · 5 players
→USUBig
Bench+3.8 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestSMU betterUSU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
R. Brumbaugh36 min · TRD. Terrell33 min · TRO. Sellers29 min · TRJ. Patrick20 min · TRN. Kalischer-Stork1 minG. NormandNew
Forwards
J. Munch21 min · TRJ. Toombs20 minJ. Stewart16 min · TRN. Codie16 min · TRJ. O'Neal15 minN. Walls3 min
Guards
A. Bates34 min · TRM. Falslev33 minD. Hall28 min · TRS. Callaghan28 min · TRB. BoeNewA. ReiserNew
Forwards
W. Hornseth27 min · TRC. Turnbull21 min · TRK. Templin19 minC. Mulholland17 min · TRK. TosiNew
Centers
S. FeltsNewB. RobertsNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 84.1 #19 | Points per game | 81.3 #43 |
| 1.19 #26 | Points per possession | 1.19 #24 |
| 71.1 #68 | Pace (possessions) | 68.5 #207 |
| Shooting | ||
| 55.6 #27 | Effective FG% | 56.3 #18 |
| 37.1 #27 | 3-point % | 34.3 #155 |
| 35.9 #252 | 3-point attempt rate | 40.8 #152 |
| 30.4 #301 | Free throw rate | 38.8 #83 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.8 #119 | Turnover rate | 15.1 #72 |
| 35.4 #37 | Offensive rebound rate | 32.7 #97 |
| 16.9 #27 | Assists per game | 17.1 #21 |
| Defense | ||
| 77.9 #265 | Points allowed | 71.2 #78 |
| 1.09 #199 | Points allowed per possession | 1.04 #72 |
| 51.6 #189 | Opponent effective FG% | 49.7 #87 |
| 34.1 #188 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.5 #222 |
| 16.8 #171 | Turnovers forced | 20.2 #18 |
| 68.4 #237 | Defensive rebound rate | 67.2 #290 |
| 7.0 #129 | Steals per game | 8.5 #17 |
| 3.6 #132 | Blocks per game | 2.9 #252 |
SMU
20-14 in 2025-26 overall · 9-11 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Miami OH79–89
- Lvs Louisville58–62
- Wvs Syracuse86–69
- L@ Florida St78–91
- Lvs Miami69–77
A week or more of rest.
Utah State
28-7 in 2025-26 overall · 18-5 in conference · Pac-12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Arizona66–78
- Wvs Villanova86–76
- Wvs San Diego St73–62
- Wvs Nevada79–66
- Wvs UNLV80–60
A week or more of rest.