Truist Arena · at N Kentucky
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | NKU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects NKU 81–73 · win probability NKU 75%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 154.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: NKU has more of the edges
BELL 2, NKU 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: BELL 22.4%, NKU 32.2%. Defensive: BELL 65.8%, NKU 68.4%
NKU offense vs BELL defense
Offense 209th of 366 against a defense 345th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: BELL plays 66.7 a game (288th fastest), NKU 71.5 (55th). Faster games mean more points
Turnovers
Turnover rate: BELL 15.4%, NKU 16.3%. Forced: BELL 15.1%, NKU 18.6%
Three-pointers
BELL hits 38.1% and allows 40.4%; NKU hits 33.6% and allows 36.6%. Threes are 41.2% and 44.9% of their shots
Context
Schedule so far
BELL has played the 229th-hardest schedule, NKU the 289th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: BELL 56%, NKU 26%. Transfers in: BELL 1, NKU 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Home court
NKU at home. This season: NKU 0-0 at home, BELL 0-0 away
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: BELL 35.0, NKU 35.9. Allowed: BELL 34.3, NKU 37.2
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: BELL 59.4 and allows 59.4; NKU 53.2 and allows 54.2
Even
BELL offense vs NKU defense
Offense 239th of 366 against a defense 249th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | NKU -7.5 | — |
| Total | — | 154.2 | — |
| Projected score | — | BELL 73.3 · NKU 80.9 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | NKU -4.4 | — |
| 1H total | 72.1 | — |
| 1H projected score | BELL 33.9 · NKU 38.2 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | 7-3 70% | |
| 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | 7-3 70% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
BELL 0–2 NKUNKU leads · 2 games since 2021-22 · NKU has won the last 2 meetings · BELL 1-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2025-26 | NKU 80 @ BELL 76 | BELL +4.5 | BELL W |
| Nov 30, 2024-25 | BELL 70 @ NKU 86 | NKU -10.5 | NKU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Bellarmine
30 games played
Straight up
11-19
37% wins
Against the spread
19-11
63% covers · avg +2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
20-10
67% overs · avg +9.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 59-104 | +23.5 | L −21.5 | 150.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 71-98 | +28.5 | W +1.5 | 168.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 86-94 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 156.5 | O 180 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 79-86 | +24.5 | W +17.5 | 150.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 24 | @ | W 70-58 | -3.5 | W +8.5 | 156.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 74-69 | +2.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 68-81 | +16.5 | W +3.5 | 157.5 | U 149 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 76-80 | +4.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 79-64 | +1.5 | W +16.5 | 146.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 23 | @ | L 85-99 | +34.5 | W +20.5 | 152.5 | O 184 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 85-87 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 151.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 76-98 | +7.5 | L −14.5 | 169.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 84-78 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 73-82 | -4.5 | L −13.5 | 146.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 71-81 | +11.5 | W +1.5 | 154.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 69-89 | +5.5 | L −14.5 | 156.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 22 | @ | W 77-70 | +4.5 | W +11.5 | 138.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 114-117 | -3.5 | L −6.5 | 164.5 | O 231 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 77-74 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 78-75 | +5.5 | W +8.5 | 163.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 92-71 | -4.5 | W +16.5 | 148.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 81-65 | +2.5 | W +18.5 | 151.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 76-84 | +8.5 | W +0.5 | 150.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 70-90 | +9.5 | L −10.5 | 153.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 72-75 | +3.5 | W +0.5 | 154.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 92-95 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | O 187 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 68-73 | -2.5 | L −7.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 111-97 | +5.5 | W +19.5 | 153.5 | O 208 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 82-79 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | O 161 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 73-86 | +6.5 | L −6.5 | 154.5 | O 159 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
UGA
L 59-104
−21.5
8
@
KSU
L 71-98
+1.5
15
vs
WOF
L 86-94
−4.5
19
@
ND
L 79-86
+17.5
24
@
CIT
W 70-58
+8.5
25
vs
HCU
W 74-69
+7.5
6
@
MUR
L 68-81
+3.5
13
vs
NKU
L 76-80
+0.5
17
vs
UTC
W 79-64
+16.5
23
@
UK
L 85-99
+20.5
1
@
WGA
L 85-87
−3.5
3
@
QUC
L 76-98
−14.5
8
vs
CARK
W 84-78
+8.5
10
vs
UNA
L 73-82
−13.5
15
@
LIP
L 71-81
+1.5
17
@
EKU
L 69-89
−14.5
22
@
JAX
W 77-70
+11.5
24
@
UNF
L 114-117
−6.5
28
vs
WGA
W 77-74
+0.5
31
vs
QUC
W 78-75
+8.5
5
vs
STET
W 92-71
+16.5
7
vs
FGCU
W 81-65
+18.5
11
@
CARK
L 76-84
+0.5
14
@
APSU
L 70-90
−10.5
18
vs
LIP
L 72-75
+0.5
21
vs
EKU
L 92-95
−1.5
25
@
UNA
L 68-73
−7.5
28
vs
APSU
W 111-97
+19.5
4
vs
JAX
W 82-79
+1.5
6
vs
CARK
L 73-86
−6.5
covered 19didn’t cover 11avg +2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
UGA
L 59-104
+12.5
8
@
KSU
L 71-98
+0.5
15
vs
WOF
L 86-94
+23.5
19
@
ND
L 79-86
+14.5
24
@
CIT
W 70-58
−28.5
25
vs
HCU
W 74-69
−1.5
6
@
MUR
L 68-81
−8.5
13
vs
NKU
L 76-80
+9.5
17
vs
UTC
W 79-64
−3.5
23
@
UK
L 85-99
+31.5
1
@
WGA
L 85-87
+20.5
3
@
QUC
L 76-98
+4.5
8
vs
CARK
W 84-78
+7.5
10
vs
UNA
L 73-82
+8.5
15
@
LIP
L 71-81
−2.5
17
@
EKU
L 69-89
+1.5
22
@
JAX
W 77-70
+8.5
24
@
UNF
L 114-117
+66.5
28
vs
WGA
W 77-74
−0.5
31
vs
QUC
W 78-75
−10.5
5
vs
STET
W 92-71
+14.5
7
vs
FGCU
W 81-65
−5.5
11
@
CARK
L 76-84
+9.5
14
@
APSU
L 70-90
+6.5
18
vs
LIP
L 72-75
−7.5
21
vs
EKU
L 92-95
+33.5
25
@
UNA
L 68-73
−5.5
28
vs
APSU
W 111-97
+54.5
4
vs
JAX
W 82-79
+16.5
6
vs
CARK
L 73-86
+4.5
over 20under 10avg +9.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
N Kentucky
31 games played
Straight up
17-14
55% wins
Against the spread
13-18
42% covers · avg −0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
21-10
68% overs · avg +5.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | L 56-95 | +27.5 | L −11.5 | 137.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 63-75 | +6.5 | L −5.5 | 142.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 20 | @ | W 90-66 | +4.5 | W +28.5 | 146.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 82-71 | -4.5 | W +6.5 | 156.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 93-83 | -3.5 | W +6.5 | 149.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 74-65 | -7.5 | W +1.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 95-80 | -14.5 | W +0.5 | 158.5 | O 175 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 77-79 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 153.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 80-76 | -4.5 | L −0.5 | 146.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 17 | vs | L 77-82 | -3.5 | L −8.5 | 163.5 | U 159 |
| Dec 21 | vs | L 74-85 | -5.5 | L −16.5 | 153.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 29 | @ | W 79-77 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 149.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 81-72 | -13.5 | L −4.5 | 176.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 94-79 | -4.5 | W +10.5 | 146.5 | O 173 |
| Jan 9 | @ | W 85-67 | +1.5 | W +19.5 | 157.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 11 | @ | L 78-80 | -4.5 | L −6.5 | 144.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 96-71 | -10.5 | W +14.5 | 159.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 89-92 | -7.5 | L −10.5 | 153.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 80-88 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 155.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 30 | @ | L 77-90 | -5.5 | L −18.5 | 161.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 1 | @ | L 65-76 | +3.5 | L −7.5 | 166.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 84-87 | -7.5 | L −10.5 | 149.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 67-62 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 156.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 84-81 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 164.5 | O 165 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 87-71 | -5.5 | W +10.5 | 153.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 22 | @ | L 58-64 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 152.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 81-70 | -8.5 | W +2.5 | 166.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 91-92 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 153.5 | O 183 |
| Mar 4 | @ | W 85-84 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 161.5 | O 169 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 96-76 | -3.5 | W +16.5 | 146.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 9 | vs | L 90-103 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 157.5 | O 193 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
TENN
L 56-95
−11.5
12
@
ETSU
L 63-75
−5.5
20
@
CMU
W 90-66
+28.5
24
vs
EKU
W 82-71
+6.5
26
vs
WOF
W 93-83
+6.5
29
vs
BU
W 74-65
+1.5
3
vs
CLE
W 95-80
+0.5
6
@
PFW
L 77-79
−0.5
13
@
BELL
W 80-76
−0.5
17
vs
OAK
L 77-82
−8.5
21
vs
COFC
L 74-85
−16.5
29
@
RMU
W 79-77
+0.5
1
vs
IUIN
W 81-72
−4.5
4
vs
YSU
W 94-79
+10.5
9
@
MILW
W 85-67
+19.5
11
@
GB
L 78-80
−6.5
15
vs
DETM
W 96-71
+14.5
17
vs
RMU
L 89-92
−10.5
24
@
WRST
L 80-88
−6.5
30
@
DETM
L 77-90
−18.5
1
@
OAK
L 65-76
−7.5
4
vs
GB
L 84-87
−10.5
7
vs
MILW
W 67-62
−1.5
12
@
IUIN
W 84-81
−2.5
18
vs
PFW
W 87-71
+10.5
22
@
YSU
L 58-64
−3.5
25
@
CLE
W 81-70
+2.5
28
vs
WRST
L 91-92
−4.5
4
@
OAK
W 85-84
+2.5
8
vs
GB
W 96-76
+16.5
9
vs
WRST
L 90-103
−14.5
covered 13didn’t cover 18avg −0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
TENN
L 56-95
+13.5
12
@
ETSU
L 63-75
−4.5
20
@
CMU
W 90-66
+9.5
24
vs
EKU
W 82-71
−3.5
26
vs
WOF
W 93-83
+26.5
29
vs
BU
W 74-65
−4.5
3
vs
CLE
W 95-80
+16.5
6
@
PFW
L 77-79
+2.5
13
@
BELL
W 80-76
+9.5
17
vs
OAK
L 77-82
−4.5
21
vs
COFC
L 74-85
+5.5
29
@
RMU
W 79-77
+6.5
1
vs
IUIN
W 81-72
−23.5
4
vs
YSU
W 94-79
+26.5
9
@
MILW
W 85-67
−5.5
11
@
GB
L 78-80
+13.5
15
vs
DETM
W 96-71
+7.5
17
vs
RMU
L 89-92
+27.5
24
@
WRST
L 80-88
+12.5
30
@
DETM
L 77-90
+5.5
1
@
OAK
L 65-76
−25.5
4
vs
GB
L 84-87
+21.5
7
vs
MILW
W 67-62
−27.5
12
@
IUIN
W 84-81
+0.5
18
vs
PFW
W 87-71
+4.5
22
@
YSU
L 58-64
−30.5
25
@
CLE
W 81-70
−15.5
28
vs
WRST
L 91-92
+29.5
4
@
OAK
W 85-84
+7.5
8
vs
GB
W 96-76
+25.5
9
vs
WRST
L 90-103
+35.5
over 21under 10avg +5.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
N Kentucky has the better starters
Position by position: Bellarmine 1, N Kentucky 2, even 2
BellarmineBetterN Kentucky
G K. Goodin11.7 pts · 2.8 reb · 2 ast
Score 31
←BELLSmall
G E. Elliott4.8 pts · 2.8 reb · 4.4 ast
Score 3
G T. Doyle10 pts · 2.9 reb · 4 ast
Score 35
=Even
G E. Acker TR5.7 pts · 1.3 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 38
F S. Donald6.5 pts · 3.3 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 12
→NKUBig
F N. Pagotto TR10.5 pts · 5.6 reb · 1 ast
Score 68
F J. Wassler3.4 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 4
→NKUBig
F W. Shortt TR6.6 pts · 4.4 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 51
F T. Tornatta TR3 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 26
=Even
F D. Rakotonanahary3 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 25
BellarmineBetterN Kentucky
BELL offense239th of 366 · -7.3
=Even
NKU defense249th of 366 · -6.5
BELL defense345th of 366 · -9.2
→NKUBig
NKU offense209th of 366 · -6.3
Backcourt-3.8 · 2 players
←BELLSmall
Backcourt-5.4 · 2 players
Frontcourt-4.9 · 3 players
→NKUBig
Frontcourt-0.2 · 3 players
Bench-1.5 · 3 players
=Even
Bench-2.4 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestBELL betterNKU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
K. Goodin33 minT. Doyle28 minG. Whitaker7 minG. Neal3 minT. Clark2 minJ. GizziNew
Forwards
S. Donald27 minJ. Wassler12 minT. Tornatta9 min · TRA. McAfeeNewB. KlopfensteinNewE. HarrellNew
Guards
E. Elliott29 minE. Acker19 min · TRB. Davis-Ray7 min · TRB. Darbyshire6 minJ. ApathjangNewW. FosterNew
Forwards
N. Pagotto27 min · TRW. Shortt20 min · TRD. Rakotonanahary12 minR. Tolliver6 minJ. RuizNewP. Otto MaeNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 78.9 #80 | Points per game | 80.9 #47 |
| 1.18 #34 | Points per possession | 1.13 #81 |
| 66.7 #288 | Pace (possessions) | 71.5 #55 |
| Shooting | ||
| 59.4 #3 | Effective FG% | 53.2 #93 |
| 38.1 #17 | 3-point % | 33.6 #193 |
| 41.2 #145 | 3-point attempt rate | 44.9 #71 |
| 35.0 #178 | Free throw rate | 35.9 #158 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.4 #100 | Turnover rate | 16.3 #158 |
| 22.4 #354 | Offensive rebound rate | 32.2 #117 |
| 14.8 #98 | Assists per game | 15.5 #65 |
| Defense | ||
| 83.3 #350 | Points allowed | 78.7 #284 |
| 1.25 #365 | Points allowed per possession | 1.10 #225 |
| 59.4 #365 | Opponent effective FG% | 54.2 #305 |
| 40.4 #364 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.6 #333 |
| 15.1 #277 | Turnovers forced | 18.6 #66 |
| 65.8 #320 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.4 #236 |
| 5.8 #255 | Steals per game | 8.3 #25 |
| 1.7 #356 | Blocks per game | 3.5 #134 |
Bellarmine
11-19 in 2025-26 overall · 8-12 in conference · Atlantic Sun Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs C Arkansas73–86
- Wvs Jacksonville82–79
- Wvs Austin Peay111–97
- L@ North Alabama68–73
- Lvs E Kentucky92–95
A week or more of rest.
N Kentucky
17-14 in 2025-26 overall · 12-11 in conference · Horizon League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Wright St90–103
- Wvs Green Bay96–76
- W@ Oakland85–84
- Lvs Wright St91–92
- W@ Cleveland St81–70
A week or more of rest.