Truist Arena · at N Kentucky
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | NKU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects NKU 82–67 · win probability NKU 91%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 149.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: NKU has more of the edges
SCST 1, NKU 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
NKU offense vs SCST defense
Offense 209th of 366 against a defense 351st, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: SCST 46.8 and allows 53.9; NKU 53.2 and allows 54.2
Three-pointers
SCST hits 34.0% and allows 33.5%; NKU hits 33.6% and allows 36.6%. Threes are 33.3% and 44.9% of their shots
Turnovers
Turnover rate: SCST 20.8%, NKU 16.3%. Forced: SCST 18.8%, NKU 18.6%
SCST offense vs NKU defense
Offense 341st of 366 against a defense 249th, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: SCST 31.4%, NKU 32.2%. Defensive: SCST 62.4%, NKU 68.4%
Home court
NKU at home. This season: NKU 0-0 at home, SCST 0-0 away
Context
Schedule so far
SCST has played the 317th-hardest schedule, NKU the 289th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: SCST plays 70.3 a game (102nd fastest), NKU 71.5 (55th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: SCST 34%, NKU 26%. Transfers in: SCST 1, NKU 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: SCST 41.0, NKU 35.9. Allowed: SCST 51.9, NKU 37.2
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | NKU -15.1 | — |
| Total | — | 149.2 | — |
| Projected score | — | SCST 67 · NKU 82.1 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | NKU -8.8 | — |
| 1H total | 69.8 | — |
| 1H projected score | SCST 30.5 · NKU 39.3 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | |
| 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | 7-3 70% |
Next 3 games
With how the last meeting with each opponent went
No more games listed yet.
| Date | Game | Last meeting |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 15 | @ ETSU | L63–75LU |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
SCST 0–1 NKUNKU leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · SCST 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2024-25 | SCST 47 @ NKU 58 | NKU -8.5 | NKU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
SC State
30 games played
Straight up
8-22
27% wins
Against the spread
13-17
43% covers · avg −0.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-15
50% overs · avg +0.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 45-104 | +35.5 | L −23.5 | 159.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 72-82 | +14.5 | W +4.5 | 154.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 10 | @ | L 62-85 | +2.5 | L −20.5 | 159.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 61-88 | +18.5 | L −8.5 | 156.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 19 | vs | L 66-78 | +11.5 | L −0.5 | 154.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 81-82 | +15.5 | W +14.5 | 160.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 66-98 | +34.5 | W +2.5 | 160.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 79-101 | +20.5 | L −1.5 | 157.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 5 | @ | L 59-80 | +13.5 | L −7.5 | 148.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 8 | @ | L 44-84 | +12.5 | L −27.5 | 156.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 12 | @ | L 78-102 | +18.5 | L −5.5 | 157.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 16 | vs | L 72-78 | +10.5 | W +4.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 70-95 | +31.5 | W +6.5 | 149.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 54-105 | +44.5 | L −6.5 | 147.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 58-57 | +8.5 | W +9.5 | 144.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 67-72 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 12 | @ | W 74-72 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 140.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 82-89 | +5.5 | L −1.5 | 139.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 26 | vs | W 70-64 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 135.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 63-54 | +3.5 | W +12.5 | 133.5 | U 117 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 57-85 | +14.5 | L −13.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 16 | vs | L 57-59 | -4.5 | L −6.5 | 138.5 | U 116 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 85-72 | +2.5 | W +15.5 | 136.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 71-90 | +10.5 | L −8.5 | 140.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 25 | vs | L 83-90 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 153.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 57-69 | +5.5 | L −6.5 | 132.5 | U 126 |
| Mar 2 | @ | W 61-59 | +3.5 | W +5.5 | 134.5 | U 120 |
| Mar 5 | @ | W 80-64 | +7.5 | W +23.5 | 140.5 | O 144 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 88-82 | +7.5 | W +13.5 | 144.5 | O 170 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 61-78 | +15.5 | L −1.5 | 145.5 | U 139 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
LOU
L 45-104
−23.5
7
@
SAM
L 72-82
+4.5
10
@
NCAT
L 62-85
−20.5
14
@
COFC
L 61-88
−8.5
19
vs
UTC
L 66-78
−0.5
23
@
SDAK
L 81-82
+14.5
25
@
MIZ
L 66-98
+2.5
29
@
WIN
L 79-101
−1.5
5
@
BCU
L 59-80
−7.5
8
@
CHSO
L 44-84
−27.5
12
@
QUC
L 78-102
−5.5
16
vs
UPST
L 72-78
+4.5
22
@
SC
L 70-95
+6.5
30
@
TENN
L 54-105
−6.5
3
vs
HOW
W 58-57
+9.5
10
@
MORG
L 67-72
−0.5
12
@
COPP
W 74-72
+3.5
17
vs
NORF
L 82-89
−1.5
26
vs
DSU
W 70-64
+4.5
4
vs
UMES
W 63-54
+12.5
7
@
HOW
L 57-85
−13.5
16
vs
COPP
L 57-59
−6.5
18
vs
NCCU
W 85-72
+15.5
21
@
NORF
L 71-90
−8.5
25
vs
MORG
L 83-90
−5.5
28
@
UMES
L 57-69
−6.5
2
@
DSU
W 61-59
+5.5
5
@
NCCU
W 80-64
+23.5
12
vs
NORF
W 88-82
+13.5
13
vs
HOW
L 61-78
−1.5
covered 13didn’t cover 17avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
LOU
L 45-104
−10.5
7
@
SAM
L 72-82
−0.5
10
@
NCAT
L 62-85
−12.5
14
@
COFC
L 61-88
−7.5
19
vs
UTC
L 66-78
−10.5
23
@
SDAK
L 81-82
+2.5
25
@
MIZ
L 66-98
+3.5
29
@
WIN
L 79-101
+22.5
5
@
BCU
L 59-80
−9.5
8
@
CHSO
L 44-84
−28.5
12
@
QUC
L 78-102
+22.5
16
vs
UPST
L 72-78
+2.5
22
@
SC
L 70-95
+15.5
30
@
TENN
L 54-105
+11.5
3
vs
HOW
W 58-57
−29.5
10
@
MORG
L 67-72
−8.5
12
@
COPP
W 74-72
+5.5
17
vs
NORF
L 82-89
+31.5
26
vs
DSU
W 70-64
−1.5
4
vs
UMES
W 63-54
−16.5
7
@
HOW
L 57-85
+0.5
16
vs
COPP
L 57-59
−22.5
18
vs
NCCU
W 85-72
+20.5
21
@
NORF
L 71-90
+20.5
25
vs
MORG
L 83-90
+19.5
28
@
UMES
L 57-69
−6.5
2
@
DSU
W 61-59
−14.5
5
@
NCCU
W 80-64
+3.5
12
vs
NORF
W 88-82
+25.5
13
vs
HOW
L 61-78
−6.5
over 15under 15avg +0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
N Kentucky
31 games played
Straight up
17-14
55% wins
Against the spread
13-18
42% covers · avg −0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
21-10
68% overs · avg +5.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | L 56-95 | +27.5 | L −11.5 | 137.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 63-75 | +6.5 | L −5.5 | 142.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 20 | @ | W 90-66 | +4.5 | W +28.5 | 146.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 82-71 | -4.5 | W +6.5 | 156.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 93-83 | -3.5 | W +6.5 | 149.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 74-65 | -7.5 | W +1.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 95-80 | -14.5 | W +0.5 | 158.5 | O 175 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 77-79 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 153.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 80-76 | -4.5 | L −0.5 | 146.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 17 | vs | L 77-82 | -3.5 | L −8.5 | 163.5 | U 159 |
| Dec 21 | vs | L 74-85 | -5.5 | L −16.5 | 153.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 29 | @ | W 79-77 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 149.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 81-72 | -13.5 | L −4.5 | 176.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 94-79 | -4.5 | W +10.5 | 146.5 | O 173 |
| Jan 9 | @ | W 85-67 | +1.5 | W +19.5 | 157.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 11 | @ | L 78-80 | -4.5 | L −6.5 | 144.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 96-71 | -10.5 | W +14.5 | 159.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 89-92 | -7.5 | L −10.5 | 153.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 80-88 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 155.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 30 | @ | L 77-90 | -5.5 | L −18.5 | 161.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 1 | @ | L 65-76 | +3.5 | L −7.5 | 166.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 84-87 | -7.5 | L −10.5 | 149.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 67-62 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 156.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 84-81 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 164.5 | O 165 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 87-71 | -5.5 | W +10.5 | 153.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 22 | @ | L 58-64 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 152.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 81-70 | -8.5 | W +2.5 | 166.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 91-92 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 153.5 | O 183 |
| Mar 4 | @ | W 85-84 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 161.5 | O 169 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 96-76 | -3.5 | W +16.5 | 146.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 9 | vs | L 90-103 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 157.5 | O 193 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
TENN
L 56-95
−11.5
12
@
ETSU
L 63-75
−5.5
20
@
CMU
W 90-66
+28.5
24
vs
EKU
W 82-71
+6.5
26
vs
WOF
W 93-83
+6.5
29
vs
BU
W 74-65
+1.5
3
vs
CLE
W 95-80
+0.5
6
@
PFW
L 77-79
−0.5
13
@
BELL
W 80-76
−0.5
17
vs
OAK
L 77-82
−8.5
21
vs
COFC
L 74-85
−16.5
29
@
RMU
W 79-77
+0.5
1
vs
IUIN
W 81-72
−4.5
4
vs
YSU
W 94-79
+10.5
9
@
MILW
W 85-67
+19.5
11
@
GB
L 78-80
−6.5
15
vs
DETM
W 96-71
+14.5
17
vs
RMU
L 89-92
−10.5
24
@
WRST
L 80-88
−6.5
30
@
DETM
L 77-90
−18.5
1
@
OAK
L 65-76
−7.5
4
vs
GB
L 84-87
−10.5
7
vs
MILW
W 67-62
−1.5
12
@
IUIN
W 84-81
−2.5
18
vs
PFW
W 87-71
+10.5
22
@
YSU
L 58-64
−3.5
25
@
CLE
W 81-70
+2.5
28
vs
WRST
L 91-92
−4.5
4
@
OAK
W 85-84
+2.5
8
vs
GB
W 96-76
+16.5
9
vs
WRST
L 90-103
−14.5
covered 13didn’t cover 18avg −0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
TENN
L 56-95
+13.5
12
@
ETSU
L 63-75
−4.5
20
@
CMU
W 90-66
+9.5
24
vs
EKU
W 82-71
−3.5
26
vs
WOF
W 93-83
+26.5
29
vs
BU
W 74-65
−4.5
3
vs
CLE
W 95-80
+16.5
6
@
PFW
L 77-79
+2.5
13
@
BELL
W 80-76
+9.5
17
vs
OAK
L 77-82
−4.5
21
vs
COFC
L 74-85
+5.5
29
@
RMU
W 79-77
+6.5
1
vs
IUIN
W 81-72
−23.5
4
vs
YSU
W 94-79
+26.5
9
@
MILW
W 85-67
−5.5
11
@
GB
L 78-80
+13.5
15
vs
DETM
W 96-71
+7.5
17
vs
RMU
L 89-92
+27.5
24
@
WRST
L 80-88
+12.5
30
@
DETM
L 77-90
+5.5
1
@
OAK
L 65-76
−25.5
4
vs
GB
L 84-87
+21.5
7
vs
MILW
W 67-62
−27.5
12
@
IUIN
W 84-81
+0.5
18
vs
PFW
W 87-71
+4.5
22
@
YSU
L 58-64
−30.5
25
@
CLE
W 81-70
−15.5
28
vs
WRST
L 91-92
+29.5
4
@
OAK
W 85-84
+7.5
8
vs
GB
W 96-76
+25.5
9
vs
WRST
L 90-103
+35.5
over 21under 10avg +5.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: SC State 1, N Kentucky 1, even 3
SC StateBetterN Kentucky
G D. Jackson TR6.1 pts · 2.9 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 24
←SCSTSmall
G E. Elliott4.8 pts · 2.8 reb · 4.4 ast
Score 3
G N. Treadwell9.4 pts · 1.3 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 25
=Even
G E. Acker TR5.7 pts · 1.3 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 38
F D. Hodge2.5 pts · 2.9 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 1
→NKUBig
F N. Pagotto TR10.5 pts · 5.6 reb · 1 ast
Score 68
F C. Parker6.6 pts · 4.4 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 53
=Even
F W. Shortt TR6.6 pts · 4.4 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 51
F T. Tindal2.7 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.2 ast
Score 12
=Even
F D. Rakotonanahary3 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 25
SC StateBetterN Kentucky
SCST offense341st of 366 · -11.6
→NKUSmall
NKU defense249th of 366 · -6.5
SCST defense351st of 366 · -9.8
→NKUBig
NKU offense209th of 366 · -6.3
Backcourt-3.7 · 2 players
←SCSTSmall
Backcourt-5.4 · 2 players
Frontcourt-4.2 · 3 players
→NKUBig
Frontcourt-0.2 · 3 players
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench-2.4 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestSCST betterNKU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
D. Jackson23 min · TRN. Treadwell23 minB. JacksonNewM. TaylorNewB. HarrisNewC. BarnesNew
Forwards
D. Hodge18 minC. Parker18 minT. Tindal10 minJ. PrettyNewB. AdamsNewA. NGomabieNew
Guards
E. Elliott29 minE. Acker19 min · TRB. Davis-Ray7 min · TRB. Darbyshire6 minJ. ApathjangNewW. FosterNew
Forwards
N. Pagotto27 min · TRW. Shortt20 min · TRD. Rakotonanahary12 minR. Tolliver6 minJ. RuizNewP. Otto MaeNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67.4 #325 | Points per game | 80.9 #47 |
| 0.96 #353 | Points per possession | 1.13 #81 |
| 70.3 #102 | Pace (possessions) | 71.5 #55 |
| Shooting | ||
| 46.8 #341 | Effective FG% | 53.2 #93 |
| 34.0 #173 | 3-point % | 33.6 #193 |
| 33.3 #312 | 3-point attempt rate | 44.9 #71 |
| 41.0 #47 | Free throw rate | 35.9 #158 |
| Possessions | ||
| 20.8 #355 | Turnover rate | 16.3 #158 |
| 31.4 #146 | Offensive rebound rate | 32.2 #117 |
| 12.1 #281 | Assists per game | 15.5 #65 |
| Defense | ||
| 80.6 #327 | Points allowed | 78.7 #284 |
| 1.15 #318 | Points allowed per possession | 1.10 #225 |
| 53.9 #296 | Opponent effective FG% | 54.2 #305 |
| 33.5 #155 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.6 #333 |
| 18.8 #59 | Turnovers forced | 18.6 #66 |
| 62.4 #362 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.4 #236 |
| 6.9 #137 | Steals per game | 8.3 #25 |
| 3.8 #98 | Blocks per game | 3.5 #134 |
SC State
8-22 in 2025-26 overall · 8-8 in conference · Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Howard61–78
- Wvs Norfolk St88–82
- W@ NC Central80–64
- W@ Delaware St61–59
- L@ MD Eastern57–69
A week or more of rest.
N Kentucky
17-14 in 2025-26 overall · 12-11 in conference · Horizon League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Wright St90–103
- Wvs Green Bay96–76
- W@ Oakland85–84
- Lvs Wright St91–92
- W@ Cleveland St81–70
A week or more of rest.