Ellis T. Johnson Arena · at Morehead St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MORE | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects BELL 76–75 · win probability BELL 53%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 150.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: BELL has more of the edges
BELL 4, MORE 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: BELL 22.4%, MORE 35.8%. Defensive: BELL 65.8%, MORE 64.2%
Context
Schedule so far
BELL has played the 229th-hardest schedule, MORE the 346th. A record against a soft schedule means less
BELL offense vs MORE defense
Offense 239th of 366 against a defense 333rd, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: BELL 15.4%, MORE 18.1%. Forced: BELL 15.1%, MORE 15.4%
Three-pointers
BELL hits 38.1% and allows 40.4%; MORE hits 32.0% and allows 34.5%. Threes are 41.2% and 30.5% of their shots
Home court
MORE at home. This season: MORE 0-0 at home, BELL 0-0 away
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: BELL 56%, MORE 29%. Transfers in: BELL 1, MORE 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: BELL 59.4 and allows 59.4; MORE 49.1 and allows 50.2
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: BELL plays 66.7 a game (288th fastest), MORE 67.4 (262nd). Faster games mean more points
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: BELL 35.0, MORE 37.7. Allowed: BELL 34.3, MORE 35.6
Even
MORE offense vs BELL defense
Offense 349th of 366 against a defense 345th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | BELL -0.9 | — |
| Total | — | 150.0 | — |
| Projected score | — | BELL 75.5 · MORE 74.5 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | BELL -0.7 | — |
| 1H total | 70.2 | — |
| 1H projected score | BELL 35.4 · MORE 34.7 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | 7-3 70% | |
| 8-2 80% | 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
BELL 0–2 MOREMORE leads · 2 games since 2021-22 · MORE has won the last 2 meetings · BELL 0-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2023-24 | MORE 64 @ BELL 51 | BELL -4.5 | MORE W |
| Nov 12, 2022-23 | BELL 55 @ MORE 62 | MORE -2.5 | MORE W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Bellarmine
30 games played
Straight up
11-19
37% wins
Against the spread
19-11
63% covers · avg +2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
20-10
67% overs · avg +9.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 59-104 | +23.5 | L −21.5 | 150.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 71-98 | +28.5 | W +1.5 | 168.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 86-94 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 156.5 | O 180 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 79-86 | +24.5 | W +17.5 | 150.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 24 | @ | W 70-58 | -3.5 | W +8.5 | 156.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 74-69 | +2.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 68-81 | +16.5 | W +3.5 | 157.5 | U 149 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 76-80 | +4.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 79-64 | +1.5 | W +16.5 | 146.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 23 | @ | L 85-99 | +34.5 | W +20.5 | 152.5 | O 184 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 85-87 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 151.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 76-98 | +7.5 | L −14.5 | 169.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 84-78 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 73-82 | -4.5 | L −13.5 | 146.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 71-81 | +11.5 | W +1.5 | 154.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 69-89 | +5.5 | L −14.5 | 156.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 22 | @ | W 77-70 | +4.5 | W +11.5 | 138.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 114-117 | -3.5 | L −6.5 | 164.5 | O 231 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 77-74 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 78-75 | +5.5 | W +8.5 | 163.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 92-71 | -4.5 | W +16.5 | 148.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 81-65 | +2.5 | W +18.5 | 151.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 76-84 | +8.5 | W +0.5 | 150.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 70-90 | +9.5 | L −10.5 | 153.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 72-75 | +3.5 | W +0.5 | 154.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 92-95 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | O 187 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 68-73 | -2.5 | L −7.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 111-97 | +5.5 | W +19.5 | 153.5 | O 208 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 82-79 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | O 161 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 73-86 | +6.5 | L −6.5 | 154.5 | O 159 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
UGA
L 59-104
−21.5
8
@
KSU
L 71-98
+1.5
15
vs
WOF
L 86-94
−4.5
19
@
ND
L 79-86
+17.5
24
@
CIT
W 70-58
+8.5
25
vs
HCU
W 74-69
+7.5
6
@
MUR
L 68-81
+3.5
13
vs
NKU
L 76-80
+0.5
17
vs
UTC
W 79-64
+16.5
23
@
UK
L 85-99
+20.5
1
@
WGA
L 85-87
−3.5
3
@
QUC
L 76-98
−14.5
8
vs
CARK
W 84-78
+8.5
10
vs
UNA
L 73-82
−13.5
15
@
LIP
L 71-81
+1.5
17
@
EKU
L 69-89
−14.5
22
@
JAX
W 77-70
+11.5
24
@
UNF
L 114-117
−6.5
28
vs
WGA
W 77-74
+0.5
31
vs
QUC
W 78-75
+8.5
5
vs
STET
W 92-71
+16.5
7
vs
FGCU
W 81-65
+18.5
11
@
CARK
L 76-84
+0.5
14
@
APSU
L 70-90
−10.5
18
vs
LIP
L 72-75
+0.5
21
vs
EKU
L 92-95
−1.5
25
@
UNA
L 68-73
−7.5
28
vs
APSU
W 111-97
+19.5
4
vs
JAX
W 82-79
+1.5
6
vs
CARK
L 73-86
−6.5
covered 19didn’t cover 11avg +2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
UGA
L 59-104
+12.5
8
@
KSU
L 71-98
+0.5
15
vs
WOF
L 86-94
+23.5
19
@
ND
L 79-86
+14.5
24
@
CIT
W 70-58
−28.5
25
vs
HCU
W 74-69
−1.5
6
@
MUR
L 68-81
−8.5
13
vs
NKU
L 76-80
+9.5
17
vs
UTC
W 79-64
−3.5
23
@
UK
L 85-99
+31.5
1
@
WGA
L 85-87
+20.5
3
@
QUC
L 76-98
+4.5
8
vs
CARK
W 84-78
+7.5
10
vs
UNA
L 73-82
+8.5
15
@
LIP
L 71-81
−2.5
17
@
EKU
L 69-89
+1.5
22
@
JAX
W 77-70
+8.5
24
@
UNF
L 114-117
+66.5
28
vs
WGA
W 77-74
−0.5
31
vs
QUC
W 78-75
−10.5
5
vs
STET
W 92-71
+14.5
7
vs
FGCU
W 81-65
−5.5
11
@
CARK
L 76-84
+9.5
14
@
APSU
L 70-90
+6.5
18
vs
LIP
L 72-75
−7.5
21
vs
EKU
L 92-95
+33.5
25
@
UNA
L 68-73
−5.5
28
vs
APSU
W 111-97
+54.5
4
vs
JAX
W 82-79
+16.5
6
vs
CARK
L 73-86
+4.5
over 20under 10avg +9.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Morehead St
30 games played
Straight up
17-13
57% wins
Against the spread
18-12
60% covers · avg +0.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-14
53% overs · avg +3.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ | L 65-81 | +22.5 | W +6.5 | 152.5 | U 146 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 81-120 | +28.5 | L −10.5 | 150.5 | O 201 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 56-83 | +29.5 | W +2.5 | 151.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 62-77 | +10.5 | L −4.5 | 144.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 83-80 | -6.5 | L −3.5 | 145.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 80-85 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 181.5 | U 165 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 52-84 | +16.5 | L −15.5 | 158.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 72-80 | +7.5 | L −0.5 | 134.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 78-64 | -2.5 | W +11.5 | 136.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 64-60 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 64-77 | +6.5 | L −6.5 | 147.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 73-72 | +4.5 | W +5.5 | 131.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 68-76 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 135.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 71-69 | +5.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 100-105 | +7.5 | W +2.5 | 148.5 | O 205 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 76-70 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 141.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 71-66 | -8.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 73-68 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 134.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 67-65 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 130.5 | O 132 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 78-79 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 148.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 70-82 | +7.5 | L −4.5 | 144.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 61-55 | +8.5 | W +14.5 | 136.5 | U 116 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 73-66 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 94-86 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 148.5 | O 180 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 73-70 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 137.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 81-59 | -8.5 | W +13.5 | 143.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 64-63 | -7.5 | L −6.5 | 142.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 26 | @ | W 76-70 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 138.5 | O 146 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 66-61 | +3.5 | W +8.5 | 139.5 | U 127 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 67-93 | +5.5 | L −20.5 | 143.5 | O 160 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@
WAKE
L 65-81
+6.5
9
@
UGA
L 81-120
−10.5
11
@
CLEM
L 56-83
+2.5
21
@
ETSU
L 62-77
−4.5
22
vs
ULM
W 83-80
−3.5
29
@
IUIN
L 80-85
−1.5
2
@
MUR
L 52-84
−15.5
6
@
PRES
L 72-80
−0.5
16
vs
LR
W 78-64
+11.5
20
@
USI
W 64-60
+2.5
1
@
LIN
L 64-77
−6.5
3
@
SIUE
W 73-72
+5.5
8
vs
UTM
L 68-76
−5.5
10
vs
SEMO
W 71-69
+7.5
15
@
TNST
L 100-105
+2.5
17
@
TNTC
W 76-70
+7.5
22
vs
WIU
W 71-66
−3.5
24
vs
EIU
W 73-68
+0.5
29
vs
SIUE
W 67-65
+0.5
31
vs
LIN
L 78-79
+0.5
5
@
SEMO
L 70-82
−4.5
7
@
UTM
W 61-55
+14.5
12
vs
TNTC
W 73-66
+2.5
14
vs
TNST
W 94-86
+9.5
19
@
EIU
W 73-70
+1.5
21
@
WIU
W 81-59
+13.5
24
vs
USI
W 64-63
−6.5
26
@
LR
W 76-70
+8.5
6
vs
SEMO
W 66-61
+8.5
7
vs
TNST
L 67-93
−20.5
covered 18didn’t cover 12avg +0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@
WAKE
L 65-81
−6.5
9
@
UGA
L 81-120
+50.5
11
@
CLEM
L 56-83
−12.5
21
@
ETSU
L 62-77
−5.5
22
vs
ULM
W 83-80
+17.5
29
@
IUIN
L 80-85
−16.5
2
@
MUR
L 52-84
−22.5
6
@
PRES
L 72-80
+17.5
16
vs
LR
W 78-64
+5.5
20
@
USI
W 64-60
−21.5
1
@
LIN
L 64-77
−6.5
3
@
SIUE
W 73-72
+13.5
8
vs
UTM
L 68-76
+8.5
10
vs
SEMO
W 71-69
−4.5
15
@
TNST
L 100-105
+56.5
17
@
TNTC
W 76-70
+4.5
22
vs
WIU
W 71-66
−1.5
24
vs
EIU
W 73-68
+6.5
29
vs
SIUE
W 67-65
+1.5
31
vs
LIN
L 78-79
+8.5
5
@
SEMO
L 70-82
+7.5
7
@
UTM
W 61-55
−20.5
12
vs
TNTC
W 73-66
−4.5
14
vs
TNST
W 94-86
+31.5
19
@
EIU
W 73-70
+5.5
21
@
WIU
W 81-59
−3.5
24
vs
USI
W 64-63
−15.5
26
@
LR
W 76-70
+7.5
6
vs
SEMO
W 66-61
−12.5
7
vs
TNST
L 67-93
+16.5
over 16under 14avg +3.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Bellarmine has the better starters
Position by position: Bellarmine 2, Morehead St 0, even 3
BellarmineBetterMorehead St
G K. Goodin11.7 pts · 2.8 reb · 2 ast
Score 31
=Even
G C. Dawson8.1 pts · 1.4 reb · 2.7 ast
Score 22
G T. Doyle10 pts · 2.9 reb · 4 ast
Score 35
←BELLSmall
G V. Dawson3.3 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 7
F S. Donald6.5 pts · 3.3 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 12
=No call
G J. Winkleman1 pts · 0 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
F J. Wassler3.4 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 4
=No call
G I. Day NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
F T. Tornatta TR3 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 26
←BELLSmall
F C. Parker2.7 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 1
BellarmineBetterMorehead St
BELL offense239th of 366 · -7.3
←BELLSmall
MORE defense333rd of 366 · -8.7
BELL defense345th of 366 · -9.2
=Even
MORE offense349th of 366 · -12.3
Backcourt-3.8 · 2 players
=Even
Backcourt-4.4 · 4 players
Frontcourt-4.9 · 3 players
→MORESmall
Frontcourt-2.7 · 1 player
Bench-1.5 · 3 players
=No call
BenchNo numbers yet
Score, worst to bestBELL betterMORE betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
K. Goodin33 minT. Doyle28 minG. Whitaker7 minG. Neal3 minT. Clark2 minJ. GizziNew
Forwards
S. Donald27 minJ. Wassler12 minT. Tornatta9 min · TRA. McAfeeNewB. KlopfensteinNewE. HarrellNew
Guards
C. Dawson26 minV. Dawson16 minJ. Winkleman1 minI. DayNewK. CarbonNewK. ShawNew
Forwards
C. Parker16 minD. AlexanderNewL. BassNewT. TangioraNewJ. PriesterNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 78.9 #80 | Points per game | 72.0 #243 |
| 1.18 #34 | Points per possession | 1.07 #202 |
| 66.7 #288 | Pace (possessions) | 67.4 #262 |
| Shooting | ||
| 59.4 #3 | Effective FG% | 49.1 #285 |
| 38.1 #17 | 3-point % | 32.0 #281 |
| 41.2 #145 | 3-point attempt rate | 30.5 #349 |
| 35.0 #178 | Free throw rate | 37.7 #109 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.4 #100 | Turnover rate | 18.1 #275 |
| 22.4 #354 | Offensive rebound rate | 35.8 #27 |
| 14.8 #98 | Assists per game | 12.0 #285 |
| Defense | ||
| 83.3 #350 | Points allowed | 75.5 #205 |
| 1.25 #365 | Points allowed per possession | 1.12 #264 |
| 59.4 #365 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.2 #109 |
| 40.4 #364 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.5 #221 |
| 15.1 #277 | Turnovers forced | 15.4 #259 |
| 65.8 #320 | Defensive rebound rate | 64.2 #351 |
| 5.8 #255 | Steals per game | 6.0 #234 |
| 1.7 #356 | Blocks per game | 3.0 #213 |
Bellarmine
11-19 in 2025-26 overall · 8-12 in conference · Atlantic Sun Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs C Arkansas73–86
- Wvs Jacksonville82–79
- Wvs Austin Peay111–97
- L@ North Alabama68–73
- Lvs E Kentucky92–95
A week or more of rest.
Morehead St
17-13 in 2025-26 overall · 16-6 in conference · Ohio Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Tennessee St67–93
- Wvs SE Missouri66–61
- W@ Little Rock76–70
- Wvs Southern Indiana Screaming Eagles64–63
- W@ W Illinois81–59
A week or more of rest.