Dee Glen Smith Spectrum · at Utah State
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | USU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects USU 88–64 · win probability USU 98%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 151.6
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: USU has more of the edges
MONT 2, USU 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: MONT 19.5%, USU 15.1%. Forced: MONT 14.3%, USU 20.2%
USU offense vs MONT defense
Offense 53rd of 366 against a defense 294th, on the model’s ratings
MONT offense vs USU defense
Offense 256th of 366 against a defense 56th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
MONT has played the 250th-hardest schedule, USU the 83rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Three-pointers
MONT hits 36.6% and allows 32.3%; USU hits 34.3% and allows 34.5%. Threes are 41.8% and 40.8% of their shots
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: MONT plays 71.1 a game (72nd fastest), USU 68.5 (207th). Faster games mean more points
Free throws
Free throw rate: MONT 36.8, USU 38.8. Allowed: MONT 32.6, USU 39.2
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: MONT 20.7%, USU 32.7%. Defensive: MONT 70.4%, USU 67.2%
Home court
USU at home. This season: USU 0-0 at home, MONT 0-0 away
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: MONT 39%, USU 26%. Transfers in: MONT 0, USU 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: MONT 55.8 and allows 50.5; USU 56.3 and allows 49.7
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | USU -23.9 | — |
| Total | — | 151.6 | — |
| Projected score | — | MONT 63.8 · USU 87.7 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | USU -14.1 | — |
| 1H total | 70.9 | — |
| 1H projected score | MONT 28.4 · USU 42.5 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | |
| 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
MONT 0–1 USUUSU leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · MONT 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2024-25 | MONT 83 @ USU 95 | USU -16.5 | MONT W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Montana
30 games played
Straight up
15-15
50% wins
Against the spread
16-14
53% covers · avg −0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-16
47% overs · avg −0.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | L 68-91 | +12.5 | L −10.5 | 150.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 11 | @ | W 102-93 | +10.5 | W +19.5 | 157.5 | O 195 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 90-82 | -7.5 | W +0.5 | 168.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 81-86 | +17.5 | W +12.5 | 164.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 63-68 | -4.5 | L −9.5 | 148.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 87-95 | -4.5 | L −12.5 | 162.5 | O 182 |
| Dec 3 | vs | L 72-81 | -3.5 | L −12.5 | 153.5 | U 153 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 79-75 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 154.5 | U 154 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 54-94 | +30.5 | L −9.5 | 166.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 78-64 | -5.5 | W +8.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 88-79 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 161.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 79-73 | +4.5 | W +10.5 | 154.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 65-66 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 161.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 67-76 | +5.5 | L −3.5 | 150.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 19 | @ | W 98-72 | -3.5 | W +22.5 | 146.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 81-65 | -4.5 | W +11.5 | 157.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 69-60 | -4.5 | W +4.5 | 148.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 29 | @ | W 64-60 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 143.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 79-86 | -3.5 | L −10.5 | 155.5 | O 165 |
| Feb 5 | vs | L 74-82 | -5.5 | L −13.5 | 151.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 73-68 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 152.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 71-82 | -2.5 | L −13.5 | 145.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 69-73 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 72-92 | +2.5 | L −17.5 | 152.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 81-73 | -7.5 | W +0.5 | 161.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 74-68 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Mar 2 | @ | L 57-85 | +5.5 | L −22.5 | 154.5 | U 142 |
| Mar 9 | vs | W 95-89 | +4.5 | W +10.5 | 152.5 | O 184 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 75-72 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | O 147 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 66-77 | +3.5 | L −7.5 | 147.5 | U 143 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
STAN
L 68-91
−10.5
11
@
UNLV
W 102-93
+19.5
14
vs
CP
W 90-82
+0.5
18
@
TA&M
L 81-86
+12.5
23
vs
LAM
L 63-68
−9.5
25
vs
OAK
L 87-95
−12.5
3
vs
NDSU
L 72-81
−12.5
6
@
UND
W 79-75
−1.5
20
@
LOU
L 54-94
−9.5
1
vs
NAU
W 78-64
+8.5
3
vs
UNCO
W 88-79
+10.5
8
@
IDHO
W 79-73
+10.5
10
@
EWU
L 65-66
+0.5
17
@
MTST
L 67-76
−3.5
19
@
NAU
W 98-72
+22.5
22
vs
WEB
W 81-65
+11.5
24
vs
IDST
W 69-60
+4.5
29
@
PRST
W 64-60
+8.5
31
@
SAC
L 79-86
−10.5
5
vs
EWU
L 74-82
−13.5
7
vs
IDHO
W 73-68
+3.5
14
vs
MTST
L 71-82
−13.5
19
@
IDST
L 69-73
−5.5
21
@
WEB
L 72-92
−17.5
26
vs
SAC
W 81-73
+0.5
28
vs
PRST
W 74-68
+4.5
2
@
UNCO
L 57-85
−22.5
9
vs
UNCO
W 95-89
+10.5
10
vs
PRST
W 75-72
+6.5
11
vs
IDHO
L 66-77
−7.5
covered 16didn’t cover 14avg −0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
STAN
L 68-91
+8.5
11
@
UNLV
W 102-93
+37.5
14
vs
CP
W 90-82
+3.5
18
@
TA&M
L 81-86
+2.5
23
vs
LAM
L 63-68
−17.5
25
vs
OAK
L 87-95
+19.5
3
vs
NDSU
L 72-81
−0.5
6
@
UND
W 79-75
−0.5
20
@
LOU
L 54-94
−18.5
1
vs
NAU
W 78-64
−7.5
3
vs
UNCO
W 88-79
+5.5
8
@
IDHO
W 79-73
−2.5
10
@
EWU
L 65-66
−30.5
17
@
MTST
L 67-76
−7.5
19
@
NAU
W 98-72
+23.5
22
vs
WEB
W 81-65
−11.5
24
vs
IDST
W 69-60
−19.5
29
@
PRST
W 64-60
−19.5
31
@
SAC
L 79-86
+9.5
5
vs
EWU
L 74-82
+4.5
7
vs
IDHO
W 73-68
−11.5
14
vs
MTST
L 71-82
+7.5
19
@
IDST
L 69-73
−7.5
21
@
WEB
L 72-92
+11.5
26
vs
SAC
W 81-73
−7.5
28
vs
PRST
W 74-68
+0.5
2
@
UNCO
L 57-85
−12.5
9
vs
UNCO
W 95-89
+31.5
10
vs
PRST
W 75-72
+1.5
11
vs
IDHO
L 66-77
−4.5
over 14under 16avg −0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Utah State
35 games played
Straight up
28-7
80% wins
Against the spread
16-19
46% covers · avg +1.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-16
54% overs · avg +1.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | vs | W 80-77 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 163.5 | U 157 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 83-73 | -22.5 | L −12.5 | 156.5 | U 156 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 75-51 | -16.5 | W +7.5 | 149.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 96-75 | -8.5 | W +12.5 | 151.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 94-60 | -9.5 | W +24.5 | 147.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 84-81 | -17.5 | L −14.5 | 148.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 4 | @ | L 61-74 | +2.5 | L −10.5 | 162.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 7 | @ | W 79-53 | -10.5 | W +15.5 | 139.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 83-78 | -8.5 | L −3.5 | 148.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 100-58 | -10.5 | W +31.5 | 147.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 30 | @ | W 72-63 | -14.5 | L −5.5 | 154.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 96-78 | -22.5 | L −4.5 | 151.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 6 | @ | W 99-62 | -22.5 | W +14.5 | 139.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 93-68 | -1.5 | W +23.5 | 149.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 71-62 | -13.5 | L −4.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 74-84 | -5.5 | L −15.5 | 150.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 20 | vs | L 76-86 | -15.5 | L −25.5 | 156.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 23 | @ | W 65-61 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 94-62 | -13.5 | W +18.5 | 148.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 71-66 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 86-66 | +1.5 | W +21.5 | 156.5 | U 152 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 85-83 | -9.5 | L −7.5 | 149.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 10 | vs | W 91-78 | -21.5 | L −8.5 | 152.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 99-75 | -13.5 | W +10.5 | 155.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 75-56 | -9.5 | W +9.5 | 151.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 77-80 | -5.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 72-89 | -1.5 | L −18.5 | 146.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 74-69 | -9.5 | L −4.5 | 147.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 65-92 | -7.5 | L −34.5 | 156.5 | O 157 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 94-90 | -7.5 | L −3.5 | 155.5 | O 184 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 80-60 | -8.5 | W +11.5 | 156.5 | U 140 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 79-66 | -6.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 73-62 | -2.5 | W +8.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 20 | vs | W 86-76 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | O 162 |
| Mar 22 | vs | L 66-78 | +11.5 | L −0.5 | 153.5 | U 144 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
vs
VCU
W 80-77
+0.5
12
vs
WEB
W 83-73
−12.5
15
vs
UTEP
W 75-51
+7.5
21
vs
TULN
W 96-75
+12.5
23
vs
DAV
W 94-60
+24.5
29
vs
MTST
W 84-81
−14.5
4
@
USF
L 61-74
−10.5
7
@
CLT
W 79-53
+15.5
13
vs
ILST
W 83-78
−3.5
20
vs
CSU
W 100-58
+31.5
30
@
FRES
W 72-63
−5.5
3
vs
SJSU
W 96-78
−4.5
6
@
AF
W 99-62
+14.5
10
@
BOIS
W 93-68
+23.5
14
vs
NEV
W 71-62
−4.5
17
@
GCU
L 74-84
−15.5
20
vs
UNLV
L 76-86
−25.5
23
@
CSU
W 65-61
−1.5
28
vs
WYO
W 94-62
+18.5
31
vs
SDSU
W 71-66
−1.5
4
@
UNM
W 86-66
+21.5
7
@
WYO
W 85-83
−7.5
10
vs
FRES
W 91-78
−8.5
14
vs
MEM
W 99-75
+10.5
18
vs
BOIS
W 75-56
+9.5
21
@
NEV
L 77-80
−8.5
25
@
SDSU
L 72-89
−18.5
28
vs
GCU
W 74-69
−4.5
3
@
UNLV
L 65-92
−34.5
7
vs
UNM
W 94-90
−3.5
12
vs
UNLV
W 80-60
+11.5
13
vs
NEV
W 79-66
+6.5
14
vs
SDSU
W 73-62
+8.5
20
vs
VILL
W 86-76
+8.5
22
vs
ARIZ
L 66-78
−0.5
covered 16didn’t cover 19avg +1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
vs
VCU
W 80-77
−6.5
12
vs
WEB
W 83-73
−0.5
15
vs
UTEP
W 75-51
−23.5
21
vs
TULN
W 96-75
+19.5
23
vs
DAV
W 94-60
+6.5
29
vs
MTST
W 84-81
+16.5
4
@
USF
L 61-74
−27.5
7
@
CLT
W 79-53
−7.5
13
vs
ILST
W 83-78
+12.5
20
vs
CSU
W 100-58
+10.5
30
@
FRES
W 72-63
−19.5
3
vs
SJSU
W 96-78
+22.5
6
@
AF
W 99-62
+21.5
10
@
BOIS
W 93-68
+11.5
14
vs
NEV
W 71-62
−14.5
17
@
GCU
L 74-84
+7.5
20
vs
UNLV
L 76-86
+5.5
23
@
CSU
W 65-61
−23.5
28
vs
WYO
W 94-62
+7.5
31
vs
SDSU
W 71-66
−10.5
4
@
UNM
W 86-66
−4.5
7
@
WYO
W 85-83
+18.5
10
vs
FRES
W 91-78
+16.5
14
vs
MEM
W 99-75
+18.5
18
vs
BOIS
W 75-56
−20.5
21
@
NEV
L 77-80
+10.5
25
@
SDSU
L 72-89
+14.5
28
vs
GCU
W 74-69
−4.5
3
@
UNLV
L 65-92
+0.5
7
vs
UNM
W 94-90
+28.5
12
vs
UNLV
W 80-60
−16.5
13
vs
NEV
W 79-66
−0.5
14
vs
SDSU
W 73-62
−10.5
20
vs
VILL
W 86-76
+15.5
22
vs
ARIZ
L 66-78
−9.5
over 19under 16avg +1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Montana 1, Utah State 1, even 3
MontanaBetterUtah State
G T. Thompson8.4 pts · 3.9 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 24
→USUBig
G A. Bates TR12.3 pts · 2.7 reb · 5.8 ast
Score 62
G C. Anderson5.6 pts · 1 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G M. Falslev16.2 pts · 5.7 reb · 3.1 ast
Score 98
G C. Dick1.6 pts · 1.2 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G D. Hall TR5.9 pts · 3.6 reb · 4.4 ast
Score 49
F K. Aguino8.6 pts · 4.1 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 48
←MONTSmall
G S. Callaghan TR10.4 pts · 2 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 33
F A. Jedkins0.9 pts · 0.9 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F W. Hornseth TR11.5 pts · 4.7 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 88
MontanaBetterUtah State
MONT offense256th of 366 · -7.8
→USUBig
USU defense56th of 366 · +1.4
MONT defense294th of 366 · -7.4
→USUBig
USU offense53rd of 366 · +3.3
Backcourt-3.2 · 3 players
→USUBig
Backcourt+2.9 · 4 players
Frontcourt-0.9 · 2 players
→USUBig
Frontcourt+2.6 · 1 player
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench+3.8 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestMONT betterUSU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Thompson30 minC. Anderson10 minC. Dick9 minG. DutroNewJ. BrownNewJ. ClarkNew
Forwards
K. Aguino24 minA. Jedkins5 minJ. SandersNewC. MpianaNew
Guards
A. Bates34 min · TRM. Falslev33 minD. Hall28 min · TRS. Callaghan28 min · TRB. BoeNewA. ReiserNew
Forwards
W. Hornseth27 min · TRC. Turnbull21 min · TRK. Templin19 minC. Mulholland17 min · TRK. TosiNew
Centers
S. FeltsNewB. RobertsNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 75.7 #148 | Points per game | 81.3 #43 |
| 1.06 #216 | Points per possession | 1.19 #24 |
| 71.1 #72 | Pace (possessions) | 68.5 #207 |
| Shooting | ||
| 55.8 #23 | Effective FG% | 56.3 #18 |
| 36.6 #38 | 3-point % | 34.3 #155 |
| 41.8 #138 | 3-point attempt rate | 40.8 #152 |
| 36.8 #135 | Free throw rate | 38.8 #83 |
| Possessions | ||
| 19.5 #339 | Turnover rate | 15.1 #72 |
| 20.7 #363 | Offensive rebound rate | 32.7 #97 |
| 14.3 #125 | Assists per game | 17.1 #21 |
| Defense | ||
| 77.6 #254 | Points allowed | 71.2 #78 |
| 1.09 #204 | Points allowed per possession | 1.04 #72 |
| 50.5 #129 | Opponent effective FG% | 49.7 #87 |
| 32.3 #74 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.5 #222 |
| 14.3 #326 | Turnovers forced | 20.2 #18 |
| 70.4 #143 | Defensive rebound rate | 67.2 #290 |
| 5.4 #306 | Steals per game | 8.5 #17 |
| 2.4 #313 | Blocks per game | 2.9 #252 |
Montana
15-15 in 2025-26 overall · 12-9 in conference · Big Sky Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Idaho66–77
- Wvs Portland St75–72
- Wvs N Colorado95–89
- L@ N Colorado57–85
- Wvs Portland St74–68
A week or more of rest.
Utah State
28-7 in 2025-26 overall · 18-5 in conference · Pac-12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Arizona66–78
- Wvs Villanova86–76
- Wvs San Diego St73–62
- Wvs Nevada79–66
- Wvs UNLV80–60
A week or more of rest.