Dee Glen Smith Spectrum · at Utah State
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | USU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects USU 89–68 · win probability USU 96%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 156.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: USU has more of the edges
WIN 1, USU 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
USU offense vs WIN defense
Offense 53rd of 366 against a defense 298th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: WIN 49.7 and allows 51.5; USU 56.3 and allows 49.7
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: WIN 34.1%, USU 32.7%. Defensive: WIN 72.3%, USU 67.2%
Context
Schedule so far
WIN has played the 206th-hardest schedule, USU the 83rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: WIN plays 72.0 a game (35th fastest), USU 68.5 (207th). Faster games mean more points
WIN offense vs USU defense
Offense 135th of 366 against a defense 56th, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: WIN 14.7%, USU 15.1%. Forced: WIN 16.6%, USU 20.2%
Home court
USU at home. This season: USU 0-0 at home, WIN 0-0 away
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: WIN 44.0, USU 38.8. Allowed: WIN 39.0, USU 39.2
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: WIN 13%, USU 26%. Transfers in: WIN 5, USU 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Three-pointers
WIN hits 33.2% and allows 32.9%; USU hits 34.3% and allows 34.5%. Threes are 44.1% and 40.8% of their shots
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | USU -20.6 | — |
| Total | — | 156.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | WIN 68.1 · USU 88.7 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | USU -12.1 | — |
| 1H total | 73.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | WIN 30.6 · USU 42.7 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 1-9 10% | 5-5 50% | |
| 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% |
Next 3 games
With how the last meeting with each opponent went
| Date | Game | Last meeting |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 14 | @ WYO | No recent meeting |
No more games listed yet.
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Winthrop
31 games played
Straight up
20-11
65% wins
Against the spread
12-19
39% covers · avg −0.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-16
48% overs · avg +0.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 81-74 | -3.5 | W +3.5 | 163.5 | U 155 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 90-96 | +9.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | O 186 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 66-72 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 165.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 105-69 | -2.5 | W +33.5 | 162.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 83-84 | +23.5 | W +22.5 | 168.5 | U 167 |
| Nov 23 | @ | W 80-62 | -10.5 | W +7.5 | 163.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 73-80 | +14.5 | W +7.5 | 166.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 101-79 | -20.5 | W +1.5 | 157.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 94-92 | -5.5 | L −3.5 | 153.5 | O 186 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 84-88 | -16.5 | L −20.5 | 153.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 88-90 | -12.5 | L −14.5 | 157.5 | O 178 |
| Dec 28 | @ | L 57-87 | +17.5 | L −12.5 | 163.5 | U 144 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 70-82 | -7.5 | L −19.5 | 161.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 88-77 | -23.5 | L −12.5 | 164.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 81-77 | -8.5 | L −4.5 | 166.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 71-50 | -5.5 | W +15.5 | 157.5 | U 121 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 92-75 | +2.5 | W +19.5 | 162.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 69-67 | -5.5 | L −3.5 | 152.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 76-75 | -9.5 | L −8.5 | 165.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 82-72 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 146.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 84-71 | -9.5 | W +3.5 | 147.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 80-78 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 161.5 | U 158 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 79-74 | -10.5 | L −5.5 | 153.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 103-85 | -20.5 | L −2.5 | 156.5 | O 188 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 68-64 | -13.5 | L −9.5 | 158.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 87-89 | +9.5 | W +7.5 | 166.5 | O 176 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 84-86 | -8.5 | L −10.5 | 164.5 | O 170 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 74-70 | -7.5 | L −3.5 | 150.5 | U 144 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 86-81 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 164.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 73-71 | -7.5 | L −5.5 | 145.5 | U 144 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 76-91 | +6.5 | L −8.5 | 157.5 | O 167 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
QUC
W 81-74
+3.5
7
@
GMU
L 90-96
+3.5
11
@
CCU
L 66-72
−8.5
15
vs
MER
W 105-69
+33.5
18
@
ARK
L 83-84
+22.5
23
@
JKST
W 80-62
+7.5
25
@
NEB
L 73-80
+7.5
29
vs
SCST
W 101-79
+1.5
2
@
LIU
W 94-92
−3.5
6
vs
CCU
L 84-88
−20.5
18
@
UND
L 88-90
−14.5
28
@
TTU
L 57-87
−12.5
31
@
LONG
L 70-82
−19.5
3
vs
GWEB
W 88-77
−12.5
7
vs
CHSO
W 81-77
−4.5
10
@
UPST
W 71-50
+15.5
14
vs
HPU
W 92-75
+19.5
17
@
UNCA
W 69-67
−3.5
21
vs
RAD
W 76-75
−8.5
24
@
PRES
W 82-72
+4.5
31
vs
UNCA
W 84-71
+3.5
4
@
RAD
W 80-78
−2.5
7
vs
LONG
W 79-74
−5.5
12
@
GWEB
W 103-85
−2.5
19
vs
UPST
W 68-64
−9.5
21
@
HPU
L 87-89
+7.5
26
@
CHSO
L 84-86
−10.5
28
vs
PRES
W 74-70
−3.5
6
vs
CHSO
W 86-81
−1.5
7
vs
PRES
W 73-71
−5.5
8
vs
HPU
L 76-91
−8.5
covered 12didn’t cover 19avg −0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
QUC
W 81-74
−8.5
7
@
GMU
L 90-96
+39.5
11
@
CCU
L 66-72
−27.5
15
vs
MER
W 105-69
+11.5
18
@
ARK
L 83-84
−1.5
23
@
JKST
W 80-62
−21.5
25
@
NEB
L 73-80
−13.5
29
vs
SCST
W 101-79
+22.5
2
@
LIU
W 94-92
+32.5
6
vs
CCU
L 84-88
+18.5
18
@
UND
L 88-90
+20.5
28
@
TTU
L 57-87
−19.5
31
@
LONG
L 70-82
−9.5
3
vs
GWEB
W 88-77
+0.5
7
vs
CHSO
W 81-77
−8.5
10
@
UPST
W 71-50
−36.5
14
vs
HPU
W 92-75
+4.5
17
@
UNCA
W 69-67
−16.5
21
vs
RAD
W 76-75
−14.5
24
@
PRES
W 82-72
+7.5
31
vs
UNCA
W 84-71
+7.5
4
@
RAD
W 80-78
−3.5
7
vs
LONG
W 79-74
−0.5
12
@
GWEB
W 103-85
+31.5
19
vs
UPST
W 68-64
−26.5
21
@
HPU
L 87-89
+9.5
26
@
CHSO
L 84-86
+5.5
28
vs
PRES
W 74-70
−6.5
6
vs
CHSO
W 86-81
+2.5
7
vs
PRES
W 73-71
−1.5
8
vs
HPU
L 76-91
+9.5
over 15under 16avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Utah State
35 games played
Straight up
28-7
80% wins
Against the spread
16-19
46% covers · avg +1.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-16
54% overs · avg +1.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | vs | W 80-77 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 163.5 | U 157 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 83-73 | -22.5 | L −12.5 | 156.5 | U 156 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 75-51 | -16.5 | W +7.5 | 149.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 96-75 | -8.5 | W +12.5 | 151.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 94-60 | -9.5 | W +24.5 | 147.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 84-81 | -17.5 | L −14.5 | 148.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 4 | @ | L 61-74 | +2.5 | L −10.5 | 162.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 7 | @ | W 79-53 | -10.5 | W +15.5 | 139.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 83-78 | -8.5 | L −3.5 | 148.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 100-58 | -10.5 | W +31.5 | 147.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 30 | @ | W 72-63 | -14.5 | L −5.5 | 154.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 96-78 | -22.5 | L −4.5 | 151.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 6 | @ | W 99-62 | -22.5 | W +14.5 | 139.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 93-68 | -1.5 | W +23.5 | 149.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 71-62 | -13.5 | L −4.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 74-84 | -5.5 | L −15.5 | 150.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 20 | vs | L 76-86 | -15.5 | L −25.5 | 156.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 23 | @ | W 65-61 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 94-62 | -13.5 | W +18.5 | 148.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 71-66 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 86-66 | +1.5 | W +21.5 | 156.5 | U 152 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 85-83 | -9.5 | L −7.5 | 149.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 10 | vs | W 91-78 | -21.5 | L −8.5 | 152.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 99-75 | -13.5 | W +10.5 | 155.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 75-56 | -9.5 | W +9.5 | 151.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 77-80 | -5.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 72-89 | -1.5 | L −18.5 | 146.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 74-69 | -9.5 | L −4.5 | 147.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 65-92 | -7.5 | L −34.5 | 156.5 | O 157 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 94-90 | -7.5 | L −3.5 | 155.5 | O 184 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 80-60 | -8.5 | W +11.5 | 156.5 | U 140 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 79-66 | -6.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 73-62 | -2.5 | W +8.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 20 | vs | W 86-76 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | O 162 |
| Mar 22 | vs | L 66-78 | +11.5 | L −0.5 | 153.5 | U 144 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
vs
VCU
W 80-77
+0.5
12
vs
WEB
W 83-73
−12.5
15
vs
UTEP
W 75-51
+7.5
21
vs
TULN
W 96-75
+12.5
23
vs
DAV
W 94-60
+24.5
29
vs
MTST
W 84-81
−14.5
4
@
USF
L 61-74
−10.5
7
@
CLT
W 79-53
+15.5
13
vs
ILST
W 83-78
−3.5
20
vs
CSU
W 100-58
+31.5
30
@
FRES
W 72-63
−5.5
3
vs
SJSU
W 96-78
−4.5
6
@
AF
W 99-62
+14.5
10
@
BOIS
W 93-68
+23.5
14
vs
NEV
W 71-62
−4.5
17
@
GCU
L 74-84
−15.5
20
vs
UNLV
L 76-86
−25.5
23
@
CSU
W 65-61
−1.5
28
vs
WYO
W 94-62
+18.5
31
vs
SDSU
W 71-66
−1.5
4
@
UNM
W 86-66
+21.5
7
@
WYO
W 85-83
−7.5
10
vs
FRES
W 91-78
−8.5
14
vs
MEM
W 99-75
+10.5
18
vs
BOIS
W 75-56
+9.5
21
@
NEV
L 77-80
−8.5
25
@
SDSU
L 72-89
−18.5
28
vs
GCU
W 74-69
−4.5
3
@
UNLV
L 65-92
−34.5
7
vs
UNM
W 94-90
−3.5
12
vs
UNLV
W 80-60
+11.5
13
vs
NEV
W 79-66
+6.5
14
vs
SDSU
W 73-62
+8.5
20
vs
VILL
W 86-76
+8.5
22
vs
ARIZ
L 66-78
−0.5
covered 16didn’t cover 19avg +1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
vs
VCU
W 80-77
−6.5
12
vs
WEB
W 83-73
−0.5
15
vs
UTEP
W 75-51
−23.5
21
vs
TULN
W 96-75
+19.5
23
vs
DAV
W 94-60
+6.5
29
vs
MTST
W 84-81
+16.5
4
@
USF
L 61-74
−27.5
7
@
CLT
W 79-53
−7.5
13
vs
ILST
W 83-78
+12.5
20
vs
CSU
W 100-58
+10.5
30
@
FRES
W 72-63
−19.5
3
vs
SJSU
W 96-78
+22.5
6
@
AF
W 99-62
+21.5
10
@
BOIS
W 93-68
+11.5
14
vs
NEV
W 71-62
−14.5
17
@
GCU
L 74-84
+7.5
20
vs
UNLV
L 76-86
+5.5
23
@
CSU
W 65-61
−23.5
28
vs
WYO
W 94-62
+7.5
31
vs
SDSU
W 71-66
−10.5
4
@
UNM
W 86-66
−4.5
7
@
WYO
W 85-83
+18.5
10
vs
FRES
W 91-78
+16.5
14
vs
MEM
W 99-75
+18.5
18
vs
BOIS
W 75-56
−20.5
21
@
NEV
L 77-80
+10.5
25
@
SDSU
L 72-89
+14.5
28
vs
GCU
W 74-69
−4.5
3
@
UNLV
L 65-92
+0.5
7
vs
UNM
W 94-90
+28.5
12
vs
UNLV
W 80-60
−16.5
13
vs
NEV
W 79-66
−0.5
14
vs
SDSU
W 73-62
−10.5
20
vs
VILL
W 86-76
+15.5
22
vs
ARIZ
L 66-78
−9.5
over 19under 16avg +1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Utah State has the better starters
Position by position: Winthrop 0, Utah State 3, even 2
WinthropBetterUtah State
G M. Davis TR9.5 pts · 2.1 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 12
→USUBig
G A. Bates TR12.3 pts · 2.7 reb · 5.8 ast
Score 62
G S. Sims TR9.7 pts · 1.8 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 30
→USUBig
G M. Falslev16.2 pts · 5.7 reb · 3.1 ast
Score 98
G A. Smith TR7.6 pts · 2 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 60
=Even
G D. Hall TR5.9 pts · 3.6 reb · 4.4 ast
Score 49
G S. Hendawy5.2 pts · 4 reb · 1 ast
Score 30
=Even
G S. Callaghan TR10.4 pts · 2 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 33
F G. Natsvlishvili TR7.7 pts · 4.8 reb · 1 ast
Score 43
→USUBig
F W. Hornseth TR11.5 pts · 4.7 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 88
WinthropBetterUtah State
WIN offense135th of 366 · -3.9
→USUSmall
USU defense56th of 366 · +1.4
WIN defense298th of 366 · -7.6
→USUBig
USU offense53rd of 366 · +3.3
Backcourt-5.8 · 4 players
→USUBig
Backcourt+2.9 · 4 players
Frontcourt-0.5 · 1 player
→USUBig
Frontcourt+2.6 · 1 player
Bench-1.7 · 4 players
→USUBig
Bench+3.8 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestWIN betterUSU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
M. Davis26 min · TRS. Sims25 min · TRA. Smith18 min · TRS. Hendawy16 minK. Fisher11 min · TRH. Harrison2 min
Forwards
G. Natsvlishvili20 min · TRT. Hamilton7 minT. HarrisNewJ. CwikNew
Guards
A. Bates34 min · TRM. Falslev33 minD. Hall28 min · TRS. Callaghan28 min · TRB. BoeNewA. ReiserNew
Forwards
W. Hornseth27 min · TRC. Turnbull21 min · TRK. Templin19 minC. Mulholland17 min · TRK. TosiNew
Centers
S. FeltsNewB. RobertsNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 81.5 #40 | Points per game | 81.3 #43 |
| 1.13 #79 | Points per possession | 1.19 #24 |
| 72.0 #35 | Pace (possessions) | 68.5 #207 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.7 #250 | Effective FG% | 56.3 #18 |
| 33.2 #217 | 3-point % | 34.3 #155 |
| 44.1 #88 | 3-point attempt rate | 40.8 #152 |
| 44.0 #10 | Free throw rate | 38.8 #83 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.7 #52 | Turnover rate | 15.1 #72 |
| 34.1 #63 | Offensive rebound rate | 32.7 #97 |
| 13.6 #177 | Assists per game | 17.1 #21 |
| Defense | ||
| 77.7 #261 | Points allowed | 71.2 #78 |
| 1.08 #154 | Points allowed per possession | 1.04 #72 |
| 51.5 #182 | Opponent effective FG% | 49.7 #87 |
| 32.9 #113 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.5 #222 |
| 16.6 #174 | Turnovers forced | 20.2 #18 |
| 72.3 #55 | Defensive rebound rate | 67.2 #290 |
| 6.6 #161 | Steals per game | 8.5 #17 |
| 2.7 #281 | Blocks per game | 2.9 #252 |
Winthrop
20-11 in 2025-26 overall · 15-4 in conference · Big South Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs High Point76–91
- Wvs Presbyterian73–71
- Wvs Charleston So86–81
- Wvs Presbyterian74–70
- L@ Charleston So84–86
A week or more of rest.
Utah State
28-7 in 2025-26 overall · 18-5 in conference · Pac-12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Arizona66–78
- Wvs Villanova86–76
- Wvs San Diego St73–62
- Wvs Nevada79–66
- Wvs UNLV80–60
A week or more of rest.