Acrisure Arena · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | USC | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects USC 80–78 · win probability USC 56%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 158.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it
USU 2, USC 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: USU 15.1%, USC 17.4%. Forced: USU 20.2%, USC 16.4%
Free throws
Free throw rate: USU 38.8, USC 44.2. Allowed: USU 39.2, USC 33.4
Shooting
Effective FG%: USU 56.3 and allows 49.7; USC 50.4 and allows 49.7
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: USU plays 68.5 a game (207th fastest), USC 72.4 (25th). Faster games mean more points
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: USU 26%, USC 64%. Transfers in: USU 6, USC 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Schedule so far
USU has played the 83rd-hardest schedule, USC the 42nd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
USC offense vs USU defense
Offense 27th of 366 against a defense 56th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Three-pointers
USU hits 34.3% and allows 34.5%; USC hits 31.7% and allows 30.9%. Threes are 40.8% and 34.1% of their shots
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: USU 32.7%, USC 32.4%. Defensive: USU 67.2%, USC 67.8%
Even
USU offense vs USC defense
Offense 53rd of 366 against a defense 55th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | USC -1.7 | — |
| Total | — | 158.2 | — |
| Projected score | — | USU 78.2 · USC 79.9 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | USC -0.9 | — |
| 1H total | 73.9 | — |
| 1H projected score | USU 36.5 · USC 37.4 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | |
| 2-8 20% | 2-8 20% | 6-4 60% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Utah State
35 games played
Straight up
28-7
80% wins
Against the spread
16-19
46% covers · avg +1.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-16
54% overs · avg +1.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | vs | W 80-77 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 163.5 | U 157 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 83-73 | -22.5 | L −12.5 | 156.5 | U 156 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 75-51 | -16.5 | W +7.5 | 149.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 96-75 | -8.5 | W +12.5 | 151.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 94-60 | -9.5 | W +24.5 | 147.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 84-81 | -17.5 | L −14.5 | 148.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 4 | @ | L 61-74 | +2.5 | L −10.5 | 162.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 7 | @ | W 79-53 | -10.5 | W +15.5 | 139.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 83-78 | -8.5 | L −3.5 | 148.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 100-58 | -10.5 | W +31.5 | 147.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 30 | @ | W 72-63 | -14.5 | L −5.5 | 154.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 96-78 | -22.5 | L −4.5 | 151.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 6 | @ | W 99-62 | -22.5 | W +14.5 | 139.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 93-68 | -1.5 | W +23.5 | 149.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 71-62 | -13.5 | L −4.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 74-84 | -5.5 | L −15.5 | 150.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 20 | vs | L 76-86 | -15.5 | L −25.5 | 156.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 23 | @ | W 65-61 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 94-62 | -13.5 | W +18.5 | 148.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 71-66 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 86-66 | +1.5 | W +21.5 | 156.5 | U 152 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 85-83 | -9.5 | L −7.5 | 149.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 10 | vs | W 91-78 | -21.5 | L −8.5 | 152.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 99-75 | -13.5 | W +10.5 | 155.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 75-56 | -9.5 | W +9.5 | 151.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 77-80 | -5.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 72-89 | -1.5 | L −18.5 | 146.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 74-69 | -9.5 | L −4.5 | 147.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 65-92 | -7.5 | L −34.5 | 156.5 | O 157 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 94-90 | -7.5 | L −3.5 | 155.5 | O 184 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 80-60 | -8.5 | W +11.5 | 156.5 | U 140 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 79-66 | -6.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 73-62 | -2.5 | W +8.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 20 | vs | W 86-76 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | O 162 |
| Mar 22 | vs | L 66-78 | +11.5 | L −0.5 | 153.5 | U 144 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
vs
VCU
W 80-77
+0.5
12
vs
WEB
W 83-73
−12.5
15
vs
UTEP
W 75-51
+7.5
21
vs
TULN
W 96-75
+12.5
23
vs
DAV
W 94-60
+24.5
29
vs
MTST
W 84-81
−14.5
4
@
USF
L 61-74
−10.5
7
@
CLT
W 79-53
+15.5
13
vs
ILST
W 83-78
−3.5
20
vs
CSU
W 100-58
+31.5
30
@
FRES
W 72-63
−5.5
3
vs
SJSU
W 96-78
−4.5
6
@
AF
W 99-62
+14.5
10
@
BOIS
W 93-68
+23.5
14
vs
NEV
W 71-62
−4.5
17
@
GCU
L 74-84
−15.5
20
vs
UNLV
L 76-86
−25.5
23
@
CSU
W 65-61
−1.5
28
vs
WYO
W 94-62
+18.5
31
vs
SDSU
W 71-66
−1.5
4
@
UNM
W 86-66
+21.5
7
@
WYO
W 85-83
−7.5
10
vs
FRES
W 91-78
−8.5
14
vs
MEM
W 99-75
+10.5
18
vs
BOIS
W 75-56
+9.5
21
@
NEV
L 77-80
−8.5
25
@
SDSU
L 72-89
−18.5
28
vs
GCU
W 74-69
−4.5
3
@
UNLV
L 65-92
−34.5
7
vs
UNM
W 94-90
−3.5
12
vs
UNLV
W 80-60
+11.5
13
vs
NEV
W 79-66
+6.5
14
vs
SDSU
W 73-62
+8.5
20
vs
VILL
W 86-76
+8.5
22
vs
ARIZ
L 66-78
−0.5
covered 16didn’t cover 19avg +1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
vs
VCU
W 80-77
−6.5
12
vs
WEB
W 83-73
−0.5
15
vs
UTEP
W 75-51
−23.5
21
vs
TULN
W 96-75
+19.5
23
vs
DAV
W 94-60
+6.5
29
vs
MTST
W 84-81
+16.5
4
@
USF
L 61-74
−27.5
7
@
CLT
W 79-53
−7.5
13
vs
ILST
W 83-78
+12.5
20
vs
CSU
W 100-58
+10.5
30
@
FRES
W 72-63
−19.5
3
vs
SJSU
W 96-78
+22.5
6
@
AF
W 99-62
+21.5
10
@
BOIS
W 93-68
+11.5
14
vs
NEV
W 71-62
−14.5
17
@
GCU
L 74-84
+7.5
20
vs
UNLV
L 76-86
+5.5
23
@
CSU
W 65-61
−23.5
28
vs
WYO
W 94-62
+7.5
31
vs
SDSU
W 71-66
−10.5
4
@
UNM
W 86-66
−4.5
7
@
WYO
W 85-83
+18.5
10
vs
FRES
W 91-78
+16.5
14
vs
MEM
W 99-75
+18.5
18
vs
BOIS
W 75-56
−20.5
21
@
NEV
L 77-80
+10.5
25
@
SDSU
L 72-89
+14.5
28
vs
GCU
W 74-69
−4.5
3
@
UNLV
L 65-92
+0.5
7
vs
UNM
W 94-90
+28.5
12
vs
UNLV
W 80-60
−16.5
13
vs
NEV
W 79-66
−0.5
14
vs
SDSU
W 73-62
−10.5
20
vs
VILL
W 86-76
+15.5
22
vs
ARIZ
L 66-78
−9.5
over 19under 16avg +1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
USC
31 games played
Straight up
17-14
55% wins
Against the spread
13-18
42% covers · avg −3.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-14
55% overs · avg +2.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 94-64 | -24.5 | W +5.5 | 163.5 | U 158 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 114-83 | -28.5 | W +2.5 | 155.5 | O 197 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 87-67 | -15.5 | W +4.5 | 155.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 107-106 | -18.5 | L −17.5 | 159.5 | O 213 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 70-67 | -3.5 | L −0.5 | 155.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 83-81 | -6.5 | L −4.5 | 145.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 88-75 | -4.5 | W +8.5 | 161.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 82-77 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 154.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 76-84 | -4.5 | L −12.5 | 154.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 9 | @ | W 94-81 | -14.5 | L −1.5 | 158.5 | O 175 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 68-61 | -12.5 | L −5.5 | 156.5 | U 129 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 97-70 | -25.5 | W +1.5 | 157.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 66-96 | +22.5 | L −7.5 | 173.5 | U 162 |
| Jan 5 | @ | L 51-80 | +11.5 | L −17.5 | 151.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 9 | @ | W 70-69 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 147.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 88-71 | -9.5 | W +7.5 | 150.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 64-69 | +9.5 | W +4.5 | 155.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 21 | vs | L 68-74 | -6.5 | L −12.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 25 | @ | W 73-71 | +7.5 | W +9.5 | 158.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 72-73 | +9.5 | W +8.5 | 141.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 78-75 | -11.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 81-75 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 153.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 8 | @ | W 77-75 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 157.5 | U 152 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 82-89 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 152.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 65-101 | +8.5 | L −27.5 | 151.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 70-71 | -5.5 | L −6.5 | 149.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 62-81 | +6.5 | L −12.5 | 150.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 67-82 | +5.5 | L −9.5 | 149.5 | U 149 |
| Mar 4 | @ | L 72-91 | +5.5 | L −13.5 | 150.5 | O 163 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 68-89 | +4.5 | L −16.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 79-83 | +3.5 | L −0.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
CP
W 94-64
+5.5
9
vs
MAN
W 114-83
+2.5
14
vs
ILST
W 87-67
+4.5
20
vs
TROY
W 107-106
−17.5
24
vs
BOIS
W 70-67
−0.5
25
vs
HALL
W 83-81
−4.5
26
vs
ASU
W 88-75
+8.5
2
@
ORE
W 82-77
+2.5
6
vs
WASH
L 76-84
−12.5
9
@
USD
W 94-81
−1.5
14
vs
WSU
W 68-61
−5.5
17
vs
UTSA
W 97-70
+1.5
2
@
MICH
L 66-96
−7.5
5
@
MSU
L 51-80
−17.5
9
@
MINN
W 70-69
+4.5
13
vs
MD
W 88-71
+7.5
17
vs
PUR
L 64-69
+4.5
21
vs
NU
L 68-74
−12.5
25
@
WIS
W 73-71
+9.5
28
@
IOWA
L 72-73
+8.5
31
vs
RUTG
W 78-75
−8.5
3
vs
IU
W 81-75
+7.5
8
@
PSU
W 77-75
−1.5
11
@
OSU
L 82-89
+0.5
18
vs
ILL
L 65-101
−27.5
21
vs
ORE
L 70-71
−6.5
24
@
UCLA
L 62-81
−12.5
28
vs
NEB
L 67-82
−9.5
4
@
WASH
L 72-91
−13.5
7
vs
UCLA
L 68-89
−16.5
11
vs
WASH
L 79-83
−0.5
covered 13didn’t cover 18avg −3.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
CP
W 94-64
−5.5
9
vs
MAN
W 114-83
+41.5
14
vs
ILST
W 87-67
−1.5
20
vs
TROY
W 107-106
+53.5
24
vs
BOIS
W 70-67
−18.5
25
vs
HALL
W 83-81
+18.5
26
vs
ASU
W 88-75
+1.5
2
@
ORE
W 82-77
+4.5
6
vs
WASH
L 76-84
+5.5
9
@
USD
W 94-81
+16.5
14
vs
WSU
W 68-61
−27.5
17
vs
UTSA
W 97-70
+9.5
2
@
MICH
L 66-96
−11.5
5
@
MSU
L 51-80
−20.5
9
@
MINN
W 70-69
−8.5
13
vs
MD
W 88-71
+8.5
17
vs
PUR
L 64-69
−22.5
21
vs
NU
L 68-74
−7.5
25
@
WIS
W 73-71
−14.5
28
@
IOWA
L 72-73
+3.5
31
vs
RUTG
W 78-75
+6.5
3
vs
IU
W 81-75
+2.5
8
@
PSU
W 77-75
−5.5
11
@
OSU
L 82-89
+18.5
18
vs
ILL
L 65-101
+14.5
21
vs
ORE
L 70-71
−8.5
24
@
UCLA
L 62-81
−7.5
28
vs
NEB
L 67-82
−0.5
4
@
WASH
L 72-91
+12.5
7
vs
UCLA
L 68-89
+5.5
11
vs
WASH
L 79-83
+7.5
over 17under 14avg +2.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
USC has the better starters
Position by position: Utah State 0, USC 3, even 2
Utah StateBetterUSC
G A. Bates TR12.3 pts · 2.7 reb · 5.8 ast
Score 62
→USCSmall
G J. Cox TR18.4 pts · 5.3 reb · 5.2 ast
Score 96
G M. Falslev16.2 pts · 5.7 reb · 3.1 ast
Score 98
=Even
G J. Jones15.5 pts · 8.8 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 86
G D. Hall TR5.9 pts · 3.6 reb · 4.4 ast
Score 49
→USCBig
G R. Rice20.3 pts · 3.3 reb · 6 ast
Score 97
G S. Callaghan TR10.4 pts · 2 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 33
→USCBig
G I. Bruns TR20.9 pts · 5.4 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 88
F W. Hornseth TR11.5 pts · 4.7 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 88
=Even
F J. Cofie9.8 pts · 6.8 reb · 2 ast
Score 77
Utah StateBetterUSC
USU offense53rd of 366 · +3.3
=Even
USC defense55th of 366 · +1.4
USU defense56th of 366 · +1.4
=Even
USC offense27th of 366 · +7.0
Backcourt+2.9 · 4 players
→USCBig
Backcourt+15.2 · 4 players
Frontcourt+2.6 · 1 player
=Even
Frontcourt+1.7 · 1 player
Bench+3.8 · 3 players
=Even
Bench+2.9 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestUSU betterUSC betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
A. Bates34 min · TRM. Falslev33 minD. Hall28 min · TRS. Callaghan28 min · TRB. BoeNewA. ReiserNew
Forwards
W. Hornseth27 min · TRC. Turnbull21 min · TRK. Templin19 minC. Mulholland17 min · TRK. TosiNew
Centers
S. FeltsNewB. RobertsNew
Guards
J. Cox35 min · TRJ. Jones35 minR. Rice34 minI. Bruns32 min · TRK. Lewis30 min · TRA. Hunkin-Claytor28 min · TR
Forwards
J. Cofie31 minJ. Hughes28 min · TRA. RatliffNewC. CollinsNew
Centers
E. Reibe14 min · TRD. RatliffNewO. Joe AguNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 81.3 #43 | Points per game | 77.8 #97 |
| 1.19 #24 | Points per possession | 1.07 #199 |
| 68.5 #207 | Pace (possessions) | 72.4 #25 |
| Shooting | ||
| 56.3 #18 | Effective FG% | 50.4 #225 |
| 34.3 #155 | 3-point % | 31.7 #299 |
| 40.8 #152 | 3-point attempt rate | 34.1 #292 |
| 38.8 #83 | Free throw rate | 44.2 #8 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.1 #72 | Turnover rate | 17.4 #228 |
| 32.7 #97 | Offensive rebound rate | 32.4 #113 |
| 17.1 #21 | Assists per game | 14.9 #92 |
| Defense | ||
| 71.2 #78 | Points allowed | 78.4 #277 |
| 1.04 #72 | Points allowed per possession | 1.08 #173 |
| 49.7 #87 | Opponent effective FG% | 49.7 #89 |
| 34.5 #222 | Opponent 3-point % | 30.9 #31 |
| 20.2 #18 | Turnovers forced | 16.4 #198 |
| 67.2 #290 | Defensive rebound rate | 67.8 #269 |
| 8.5 #17 | Steals per game | 6.2 #217 |
| 2.9 #252 | Blocks per game | 5.5 #8 |
Utah State
28-7 in 2025-26 overall · 18-5 in conference · Pac-12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Arizona66–78
- Wvs Villanova86–76
- Wvs San Diego St73–62
- Wvs Nevada79–66
- Wvs UNLV80–60
A week or more of rest.
USC
17-14 in 2025-26 overall · 7-14 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Washington79–83
- Lvs UCLA68–89
- L@ Washington72–91
- Lvs Nebraska67–82
- L@ UCLA62–81
A week or more of rest.