Jenny Craig Pavilion · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UCLA | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects UCLA 74–66 · win probability UCLA 78%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 140.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it
SMC 2, UCLA 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: SMC 37.5%, UCLA 31.1%. Defensive: SMC 76.1%, UCLA 66.7%
Turnovers
Turnover rate: SMC 16.9%, UCLA 13.4%. Forced: SMC 15.1%, UCLA 18.5%
SMC offense vs UCLA defense
Offense 129th of 366 against a defense 14th, on the model’s ratings
Free throws
Free throw rate: SMC 35.5, UCLA 33.1. Allowed: SMC 25.7, UCLA 34.4
Context
Schedule so far
SMC has played the 93rd-hardest schedule, UCLA the 22nd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: SMC 52.8 and allows 46.8; UCLA 53.4 and allows 50.4
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: SMC 32%, UCLA 50%. Transfers in: SMC 5, UCLA 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Three-pointers
SMC hits 38.7% and allows 31.4%; UCLA hits 37.9% and allows 32.0%. Threes are 36.4% and 35.5% of their shots
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Context
Tempo
About 66 possessions: SMC plays 66.2 a game (305th fastest), UCLA 66.5 (297th). Faster games mean more points
Even
UCLA offense vs SMC defense
Offense 47th of 366 against a defense 44th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | UCLA -8.7 | — |
| Total | — | 140.1 | — |
| Projected score | — | SMC 65.7 · UCLA 74.4 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UCLA -5.0 | — |
| 1H total | 65.6 | — |
| 1H projected score | SMC 30.3 · UCLA 35.3 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8-2 80% | 7-3 70% | 3-7 30% | |
| 7-3 70% | 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
SMC 0–1 UCLAUCLA leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · SMC 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2021-22 | SMC 56 vs UCLA 72 | UCLA -3 | UCLA W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Saint Mary's
32 games played
Straight up
26-6
81% wins
Against the spread
19-13
59% covers · avg +1.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-18
44% overs · avg −1.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 84-58 | -13.5 | W +12.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 87-66 | -15.5 | W +5.5 | 145.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 90-60 | -17.5 | W +12.5 | 144.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 80-49 | -14.5 | W +16.5 | 128.5 | O 129 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 85-72 | -20.5 | L −7.5 | 149.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 70-65 | -9.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 77-66 | -5.5 | W +5.5 | 144.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 71-96 | +4.5 | L −20.5 | 149.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 7 | @ | W 70-61 | -8.5 | W +0.5 | 137.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 14 | vs | L 67-68 | -2.5 | L −3.5 | 139.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 19 | vs | W 88-75 | -13.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 63-58 | -11.5 | L −6.5 | 132.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 28 | @ | W 78-73 | -9.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 30 | @ | W 72-45 | -19.5 | W +7.5 | 141.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 78-57 | -18.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 93-76 | -11.5 | W +5.5 | 139.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 88-82 | -15.5 | L −9.5 | 143.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 13 | @ | W 82-68 | -5.5 | W +8.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 54-62 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 152.5 | U 116 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 81-51 | -19.5 | W +10.5 | 142.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 75-69 | -14.5 | L −8.5 | 144.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 65-73 | +8.5 | W +0.5 | 144.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 87-60 | -20.5 | W +6.5 | 148.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 79-54 | -11.5 | W +13.5 | 142.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 88-60 | -24.5 | W +3.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 72-61 | -7.5 | W +3.5 | 135.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 72-70 | -9.5 | L −7.5 | 133.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 83-67 | -8.5 | W +7.5 | 149.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 86-67 | -5.5 | W +13.5 | 153.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 70-59 | +2.5 | W +13.5 | 143.5 | U 129 |
| Mar 9 | vs | L 71-76 | -4.5 | L −9.5 | 150.5 | U 147 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 50-63 | -2.5 | L −15.5 | 149.5 | U 113 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
STMN
W 84-58
+12.5
7
vs
UTC
W 87-66
+5.5
11
vs
OHIO
W 90-60
+12.5
14
vs
UNT
W 80-49
+16.5
19
vs
ARST
W 85-72
−7.5
26
vs
WICH
W 70-65
−4.5
27
vs
VT
W 77-66
+5.5
28
vs
VAN
L 71-96
−20.5
7
@
DAV
W 70-61
+0.5
14
vs
BOIS
L 67-68
−3.5
19
vs
FAU
W 88-75
−0.5
22
vs
UNI
W 63-58
−6.5
28
@
LMU
W 78-73
−4.5
30
@
PEPP
W 72-45
+7.5
2
vs
PORT
W 78-57
+2.5
4
vs
SEA
W 93-76
+5.5
10
vs
WSU
W 88-82
−9.5
13
@
SF
W 82-68
+8.5
17
@
SCU
L 54-62
−6.5
21
vs
ORST
W 81-51
+10.5
24
@
PORT
W 75-69
−8.5
31
@
GONZ
L 65-73
+0.5
4
vs
USD
W 87-60
+6.5
7
vs
SF
W 79-54
+13.5
11
vs
PEPP
W 88-60
+3.5
14
@
PAC
W 72-61
+3.5
18
@
SEA
W 72-70
−7.5
21
@
WSU
W 83-67
+7.5
25
vs
SCU
W 86-67
+13.5
28
vs
GONZ
W 70-59
+13.5
9
vs
SCU
L 71-76
−9.5
19
vs
TA&M
L 50-63
−15.5
covered 19didn’t cover 13avg +1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
STMN
W 84-58
+0.5
7
vs
UTC
W 87-66
+7.5
11
vs
OHIO
W 90-60
+5.5
14
vs
UNT
W 80-49
+0.5
19
vs
ARST
W 85-72
+7.5
26
vs
WICH
W 70-65
−4.5
27
vs
VT
W 77-66
−1.5
28
vs
VAN
L 71-96
+17.5
7
@
DAV
W 70-61
−6.5
14
vs
BOIS
L 67-68
−4.5
19
vs
FAU
W 88-75
+17.5
22
vs
UNI
W 63-58
−11.5
28
@
LMU
W 78-73
+7.5
30
@
PEPP
W 72-45
−24.5
2
vs
PORT
W 78-57
−11.5
4
vs
SEA
W 93-76
+29.5
10
vs
WSU
W 88-82
+26.5
13
@
SF
W 82-68
+8.5
17
@
SCU
L 54-62
−36.5
21
vs
ORST
W 81-51
−10.5
24
@
PORT
W 75-69
−0.5
31
@
GONZ
L 65-73
−6.5
4
vs
USD
W 87-60
−1.5
7
vs
SF
W 79-54
−9.5
11
vs
PEPP
W 88-60
+3.5
14
@
PAC
W 72-61
−2.5
18
@
SEA
W 72-70
+8.5
21
@
WSU
W 83-67
+0.5
25
vs
SCU
W 86-67
−0.5
28
vs
GONZ
W 70-59
−14.5
9
vs
SCU
L 71-76
−3.5
19
vs
TA&M
L 50-63
−36.5
over 14under 18avg −1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
UCLA
36 games played
Straight up
24-12
67% wins
Against the spread
17-19
47% covers · avg −0.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-19
47% overs · avg +2.4 pts vs the total
Against the spread
17-1947%
2 straight misses ATS2 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 80-74 | -29.5 | L −23.5 | 149.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 74-63 | -29.5 | L −18.5 | 152.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 10 | vs | W 83-62 | -30.5 | L −9.5 | 146.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 14 | vs | L 65-69 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 153.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 79-48 | -27.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 86-46 | -25.5 | W +14.5 | 131.5 | O 132 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 72-80 | -7.5 | L −15.5 | 143.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 3 | @ | W 82-80 | -2.5 | L −0.5 | 141.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 74-63 | -8.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 72-82 | +10.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 90-77 | -9.5 | W +3.5 | 142.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 19 | vs | W 108-87 | -24.5 | L −3.5 | 161.5 | O 195 |
| Dec 23 | vs | W 97-65 | -24.5 | W +7.5 | 148.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 61-74 | +6.5 | L −6.5 | 140.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 6 | @ | L 72-80 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 152.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 67-55 | -13.5 | L −1.5 | 147.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 71-60 | -4.5 | W +6.5 | 148.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 74-86 | +4.5 | L −7.5 | 146.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 69-67 | +5.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 71-64 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 143.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 73-57 | -4.5 | W +11.5 | 136.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 97-98 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 144.5 | O 195 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 98-66 | -13.5 | W +18.5 | 142.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 77-73 | -4.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 56-86 | +15.5 | L −14.5 | 156.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 59-82 | +8.5 | L −14.5 | 139.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 95-94 | +6.5 | W +7.5 | 146.5 | O 189 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 81-62 | -6.5 | W +12.5 | 150.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 73-78 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 136.5 | O 151 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 72-52 | -1.5 | W +18.5 | 144.5 | U 124 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 89-68 | -4.5 | W +16.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 72-59 | -10.5 | W +2.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 88-84 | +5.5 | W +9.5 | 141.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 66-73 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 20 | vs | W 75-71 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 151.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 22 | vs | L 57-73 | +5.5 | L −10.5 | 135.5 | U 130 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
EWU
W 80-74
−23.5
7
vs
PEPP
W 74-63
−18.5
10
vs
WGA
W 83-62
−9.5
14
vs
ARIZ
L 65-69
−2.5
18
vs
SAC
W 79-48
+3.5
21
vs
PRES
W 86-46
+14.5
25
vs
CAL
L 72-80
−15.5
3
@
WASH
W 82-80
−0.5
6
vs
ORE
W 74-63
+2.5
13
vs
GONZ
L 72-82
+0.5
17
vs
ASU
W 90-77
+3.5
19
vs
CP
W 108-87
−3.5
23
vs
UCR
W 97-65
+7.5
3
@
IOWA
L 61-74
−6.5
6
@
WIS
L 72-80
−4.5
10
vs
MD
W 67-55
−1.5
14
@
PSU
W 71-60
+6.5
17
@
OSU
L 74-86
−7.5
20
vs
PUR
W 69-67
+7.5
24
vs
NU
W 71-64
−0.5
28
@
ORE
W 73-57
+11.5
31
vs
IU
L 97-98
−4.5
3
vs
RUTG
W 98-66
+18.5
7
vs
WASH
W 77-73
−0.5
14
@
MICH
L 56-86
−14.5
17
@
MSU
L 59-82
−14.5
21
vs
ILL
W 95-94
+7.5
24
vs
USC
W 81-62
+12.5
28
@
MINN
L 73-78
−6.5
3
vs
NEB
W 72-52
+18.5
7
@
USC
W 89-68
+16.5
12
vs
RUTG
W 72-59
+2.5
13
vs
MSU
W 88-84
+9.5
14
vs
PUR
L 66-73
+0.5
20
vs
UCF
W 75-71
−1.5
22
vs
CONN
L 57-73
−10.5
covered 17didn’t cover 19avg −0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
EWU
W 80-74
+4.5
7
vs
PEPP
W 74-63
−15.5
10
vs
WGA
W 83-62
−1.5
14
vs
ARIZ
L 65-69
−19.5
18
vs
SAC
W 79-48
−19.5
21
vs
PRES
W 86-46
+0.5
25
vs
CAL
L 72-80
+8.5
3
@
WASH
W 82-80
+20.5
6
vs
ORE
W 74-63
−9.5
13
vs
GONZ
L 72-82
+6.5
17
vs
ASU
W 90-77
+24.5
19
vs
CP
W 108-87
+33.5
23
vs
UCR
W 97-65
+13.5
3
@
IOWA
L 61-74
−5.5
6
@
WIS
L 72-80
−0.5
10
vs
MD
W 67-55
−25.5
14
@
PSU
W 71-60
−17.5
17
@
OSU
L 74-86
+13.5
20
vs
PUR
W 69-67
−11.5
24
vs
NU
W 71-64
−8.5
28
@
ORE
W 73-57
−6.5
31
vs
IU
L 97-98
+50.5
3
vs
RUTG
W 98-66
+21.5
7
vs
WASH
W 77-73
+5.5
14
@
MICH
L 56-86
−14.5
17
@
MSU
L 59-82
+1.5
21
vs
ILL
W 95-94
+42.5
24
vs
USC
W 81-62
−7.5
28
@
MINN
L 73-78
+14.5
3
vs
NEB
W 72-52
−20.5
7
@
USC
W 89-68
+5.5
12
vs
RUTG
W 72-59
−10.5
13
vs
MSU
W 88-84
+30.5
14
vs
PUR
L 66-73
−4.5
20
vs
UCF
W 75-71
−5.5
22
vs
CONN
L 57-73
−5.5
over 17under 19avg +2.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
UCLA has the better starters
Position by position: Saint Mary's 0, UCLA 2, even 3
Saint Mary'sBetterUCLA
G J. Dent12.8 pts · 2.5 reb · 5.7 ast
Score 83
=Even
G J. Petty TR9.9 pts · 3.9 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 70
G J. Dent-Smith TR8.2 pts · 1.8 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 53
→UCLABig
G T. Perry12.6 pts · 3 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 93
G R. Hawke2.5 pts · 1.2 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 21
→UCLABig
F E. Dailey11.6 pts · 5.8 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 88
F T. Ndong TR4.9 pts · 6.5 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 73
=Even
F S. Macura TR5 pts · 4.8 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 71
F K. Gad1.7 pts · 1.3 reb · 0.8 ast
Not ranked
=No call
C X. Booker7.3 pts · 3.5 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 75
Saint Mary'sBetterUCLA
SMC offense129th of 366 · -3.5
→UCLASmall
UCLA defense14th of 366 · +6.4
SMC defense44th of 366 · +2.5
=Even
UCLA offense47th of 366 · +3.8
Backcourt+0.8 · 3 players
→UCLABig
Backcourt+3.8 · 2 players
Frontcourt+0.5 · 2 players
→UCLABig
Frontcourt+5.0 · 3 players
Bench-0.6 · 4 players
=Even
Bench+0.2 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestSMC betterUCLA betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Dent37 minJ. Dent-Smith20 min · TRR. Hawke11 minL. Fennell8 min · TRM. Juzenas6 minD. BivinsNew
Forwards
T. Ndong18 min · TRK. Gad10 minV. Zougris9 min · TRJ. LewisNewT. MacLeanNew
Centers
S. Altuntas8 min · TRJ. GardnerNewF. PavelyNew
Guards
J. Petty30 min · TRT. Perry30 minA. Robinson18 min · TRE. Freeny11 minM. AlstonNewJ. HouegbanNew
Forwards
E. Dailey28 minS. Macura19 min · TRB. Williams12 minJ. PhilonNewN. KusturicaNewG. GrinvaldsNew
Centers
X. Booker20 minF. Jovic18 min · TRJ. FloydNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 76.8 #125 | Points per game | 77.0 #115 |
| 1.17 #39 | Points per possession | 1.16 #48 |
| 66.2 #305 | Pace (possessions) | 66.5 #297 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.8 #109 | Effective FG% | 53.4 #85 |
| 38.7 #7 | 3-point % | 37.9 #19 |
| 36.4 #242 | 3-point attempt rate | 35.5 #259 |
| 35.5 #162 | Free throw rate | 33.1 #237 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.9 #201 | Turnover rate | 13.4 #14 |
| 37.5 #12 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.1 #162 |
| 15.1 #82 | Assists per game | 16.1 #45 |
| Defense | ||
| 65.2 #7 | Points allowed | 71.1 #75 |
| 0.98 #14 | Points allowed per possession | 1.07 #129 |
| 46.8 #20 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.4 #120 |
| 31.4 #40 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.0 #64 |
| 15.1 #274 | Turnovers forced | 18.5 #76 |
| 76.1 #4 | Defensive rebound rate | 66.7 #304 |
| 5.5 #302 | Steals per game | 6.7 #156 |
| 3.6 #129 | Blocks per game | 3.0 #218 |
Saint Mary's
26-6 in 2025-26 overall · 16-3 in conference · West Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Texas A&M50–63
- Lvs Santa Clara71–76
- Wvs Gonzaga70–59
- Wvs Santa Clara86–67
- W@ Washington St83–67
A week or more of rest.
UCLA
24-12 in 2025-26 overall · 15-8 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs UConn57–73
- Wvs UCF75–71
- Lvs Purdue66–73
- Wvs Michigan St88–84
- Wvs Rutgers72–59
A week or more of rest.