University Credit Union Pavilion · at Saint Mary's
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | SMC | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects SMC 76–65 · win probability SMC 83%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 141.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: SMC has more of the edges
NMSU 1, SMC 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Free throws
Free throw rate: NMSU 34.9, SMC 35.5. Allowed: NMSU 44.2, SMC 25.7
Three-pointers
NMSU hits 32.4% and allows 32.4%; SMC hits 38.7% and allows 31.4%. Threes are 38.7% and 36.4% of their shots
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: NMSU 32.5%, SMC 37.5%. Defensive: NMSU 69.7%, SMC 76.1%
Shooting
Effective FG%: NMSU 48.5 and allows 48.7; SMC 52.8 and allows 46.8
NMSU offense vs SMC defense
Offense 151st of 366 against a defense 44th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
NMSU has played the 174th-hardest schedule, SMC the 93rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Home court
SMC at home. This season: SMC 0-0 at home, NMSU 0-0 away
Turnovers
Turnover rate: NMSU 15.0%, SMC 16.9%. Forced: NMSU 14.7%, SMC 15.1%
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: NMSU plays 68.1 a game (224th fastest), SMC 66.2 (305th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: NMSU 22%, SMC 32%. Transfers in: NMSU 6, SMC 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
SMC offense vs NMSU defense
Offense 129th of 366 against a defense 125th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | SMC -11.1 | — |
| Total | — | 141.2 | — |
| Projected score | — | NMSU 65.1 · SMC 76.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | SMC -6.5 | — |
| 1H total | 66.1 | — |
| 1H projected score | NMSU 29.8 · SMC 36.3 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | |
| 8-2 80% | 7-3 70% | 3-7 30% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
NMSU 0–1 SMCSMC leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · NMSU 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2022-23 | NMSU 68 @ SMC 81 | SMC -13.5 | NMSU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
New Mexico St
29 games played
Straight up
13-16
45% wins
Against the spread
14-15
48% covers · avg −1.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-13
55% overs · avg +2.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15 | vs | W 76-68 | +3.5 | W +11.5 | 139.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 81-72 | -8.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 57-45 | +2.5 | W +14.5 | 139.5 | U 102 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 77-58 | -12.5 | W +6.5 | 136.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 2 | vs | L 75-77 | -2.5 | L −4.5 | 135.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 69-77 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 131.5 | O 146 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 70-83 | +4.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 87-78 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 153.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 74-89 | -1.5 | L −16.5 | 157.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 82-89 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 134.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 80-64 | -2.5 | W +13.5 | 154.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 55-59 | -3.5 | L −7.5 | 144.5 | U 114 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 71-73 | +8.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 97-68 | -4.5 | W +24.5 | 134.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 22 | vs | L 75-84 | -6.5 | L −15.5 | 144.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 78-81 | -7.5 | L −10.5 | 159.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 64-73 | -13.5 | L −22.5 | 137.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 53-76 | +3.5 | L −19.5 | 159.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 72-63 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 135.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 88-91 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 138.5 | O 179 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 75-77 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 79-70 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 139.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 67-63 | -7.5 | L −3.5 | 142.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 70-93 | +4.5 | L −18.5 | 151.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 85-86 | +5.5 | W +4.5 | 148.5 | O 171 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 77-75 | -6.5 | L −4.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 79-76 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 157.5 | U 155 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 68-63 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 61-69 | +4.5 | L −3.5 | 154.5 | U 130 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
15
vs
UNM
W 76-68
+11.5
21
vs
SAM
W 81-72
+0.5
25
vs
UCI
W 57-45
+14.5
26
vs
GAST
W 77-58
+6.5
2
vs
USA
L 75-77
−4.5
6
@
ACU
L 69-77
−9.5
13
vs
TLSA
L 70-83
−8.5
21
vs
SHSU
W 87-78
+3.5
2
@
FIU
L 74-89
−16.5
4
@
MOST
L 82-89
−5.5
8
vs
WKU
W 80-64
+13.5
10
vs
MTSU
L 55-59
−7.5
15
@
LIB
L 71-73
+6.5
17
@
DEL
W 97-68
+24.5
22
vs
MOST
L 75-84
−15.5
24
vs
FIU
L 78-81
−10.5
28
vs
DEL
L 64-73
−22.5
31
@
KENN
L 53-76
−19.5
4
@
LT
W 72-63
+10.5
7
@
UTEP
L 88-91
−4.5
11
vs
LIB
L 75-77
+1.5
14
@
JXST
W 79-70
+10.5
21
vs
UTEP
W 67-63
−3.5
26
@
WKU
L 70-93
−18.5
28
@
MTSU
L 85-86
+4.5
5
vs
JXST
W 77-75
−4.5
7
vs
KENN
W 79-76
+1.5
10
vs
JXST
W 68-63
+3.5
11
vs
SHSU
L 61-69
−3.5
covered 14didn’t cover 15avg −1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
15
vs
UNM
W 76-68
+4.5
21
vs
SAM
W 81-72
+7.5
25
vs
UCI
W 57-45
−37.5
26
vs
GAST
W 77-58
−1.5
2
vs
USA
L 75-77
+16.5
6
@
ACU
L 69-77
+14.5
13
vs
TLSA
L 70-83
+6.5
21
vs
SHSU
W 87-78
+11.5
2
@
FIU
L 74-89
+5.5
4
@
MOST
L 82-89
+36.5
8
vs
WKU
W 80-64
−10.5
10
vs
MTSU
L 55-59
−30.5
15
@
LIB
L 71-73
−1.5
17
@
DEL
W 97-68
+30.5
22
vs
MOST
L 75-84
+14.5
24
vs
FIU
L 78-81
−0.5
28
vs
DEL
L 64-73
−0.5
31
@
KENN
L 53-76
−30.5
4
@
LT
W 72-63
−0.5
7
@
UTEP
L 88-91
+40.5
11
vs
LIB
L 75-77
+7.5
14
@
JXST
W 79-70
+9.5
21
vs
UTEP
W 67-63
−12.5
26
@
WKU
L 70-93
+11.5
28
@
MTSU
L 85-86
+22.5
5
vs
JXST
W 77-75
+6.5
7
vs
KENN
W 79-76
−2.5
10
vs
JXST
W 68-63
−10.5
11
vs
SHSU
L 61-69
−24.5
over 16under 13avg +2.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Saint Mary's
32 games played
Straight up
26-6
81% wins
Against the spread
19-13
59% covers · avg +1.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-18
44% overs · avg −1.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 84-58 | -13.5 | W +12.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 87-66 | -15.5 | W +5.5 | 145.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 90-60 | -17.5 | W +12.5 | 144.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 80-49 | -14.5 | W +16.5 | 128.5 | O 129 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 85-72 | -20.5 | L −7.5 | 149.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 70-65 | -9.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 77-66 | -5.5 | W +5.5 | 144.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 71-96 | +4.5 | L −20.5 | 149.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 7 | @ | W 70-61 | -8.5 | W +0.5 | 137.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 14 | vs | L 67-68 | -2.5 | L −3.5 | 139.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 19 | vs | W 88-75 | -13.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 63-58 | -11.5 | L −6.5 | 132.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 28 | @ | W 78-73 | -9.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 30 | @ | W 72-45 | -19.5 | W +7.5 | 141.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 78-57 | -18.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 93-76 | -11.5 | W +5.5 | 139.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 88-82 | -15.5 | L −9.5 | 143.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 13 | @ | W 82-68 | -5.5 | W +8.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 54-62 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 152.5 | U 116 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 81-51 | -19.5 | W +10.5 | 142.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 75-69 | -14.5 | L −8.5 | 144.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 65-73 | +8.5 | W +0.5 | 144.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 87-60 | -20.5 | W +6.5 | 148.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 79-54 | -11.5 | W +13.5 | 142.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 88-60 | -24.5 | W +3.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 72-61 | -7.5 | W +3.5 | 135.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 72-70 | -9.5 | L −7.5 | 133.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 83-67 | -8.5 | W +7.5 | 149.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 86-67 | -5.5 | W +13.5 | 153.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 70-59 | +2.5 | W +13.5 | 143.5 | U 129 |
| Mar 9 | vs | L 71-76 | -4.5 | L −9.5 | 150.5 | U 147 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 50-63 | -2.5 | L −15.5 | 149.5 | U 113 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
STMN
W 84-58
+12.5
7
vs
UTC
W 87-66
+5.5
11
vs
OHIO
W 90-60
+12.5
14
vs
UNT
W 80-49
+16.5
19
vs
ARST
W 85-72
−7.5
26
vs
WICH
W 70-65
−4.5
27
vs
VT
W 77-66
+5.5
28
vs
VAN
L 71-96
−20.5
7
@
DAV
W 70-61
+0.5
14
vs
BOIS
L 67-68
−3.5
19
vs
FAU
W 88-75
−0.5
22
vs
UNI
W 63-58
−6.5
28
@
LMU
W 78-73
−4.5
30
@
PEPP
W 72-45
+7.5
2
vs
PORT
W 78-57
+2.5
4
vs
SEA
W 93-76
+5.5
10
vs
WSU
W 88-82
−9.5
13
@
SF
W 82-68
+8.5
17
@
SCU
L 54-62
−6.5
21
vs
ORST
W 81-51
+10.5
24
@
PORT
W 75-69
−8.5
31
@
GONZ
L 65-73
+0.5
4
vs
USD
W 87-60
+6.5
7
vs
SF
W 79-54
+13.5
11
vs
PEPP
W 88-60
+3.5
14
@
PAC
W 72-61
+3.5
18
@
SEA
W 72-70
−7.5
21
@
WSU
W 83-67
+7.5
25
vs
SCU
W 86-67
+13.5
28
vs
GONZ
W 70-59
+13.5
9
vs
SCU
L 71-76
−9.5
19
vs
TA&M
L 50-63
−15.5
covered 19didn’t cover 13avg +1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
STMN
W 84-58
+0.5
7
vs
UTC
W 87-66
+7.5
11
vs
OHIO
W 90-60
+5.5
14
vs
UNT
W 80-49
+0.5
19
vs
ARST
W 85-72
+7.5
26
vs
WICH
W 70-65
−4.5
27
vs
VT
W 77-66
−1.5
28
vs
VAN
L 71-96
+17.5
7
@
DAV
W 70-61
−6.5
14
vs
BOIS
L 67-68
−4.5
19
vs
FAU
W 88-75
+17.5
22
vs
UNI
W 63-58
−11.5
28
@
LMU
W 78-73
+7.5
30
@
PEPP
W 72-45
−24.5
2
vs
PORT
W 78-57
−11.5
4
vs
SEA
W 93-76
+29.5
10
vs
WSU
W 88-82
+26.5
13
@
SF
W 82-68
+8.5
17
@
SCU
L 54-62
−36.5
21
vs
ORST
W 81-51
−10.5
24
@
PORT
W 75-69
−0.5
31
@
GONZ
L 65-73
−6.5
4
vs
USD
W 87-60
−1.5
7
vs
SF
W 79-54
−9.5
11
vs
PEPP
W 88-60
+3.5
14
@
PAC
W 72-61
−2.5
18
@
SEA
W 72-70
+8.5
21
@
WSU
W 83-67
+0.5
25
vs
SCU
W 86-67
−0.5
28
vs
GONZ
W 70-59
−14.5
9
vs
SCU
L 71-76
−3.5
19
vs
TA&M
L 50-63
−36.5
over 14under 18avg −1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: New Mexico St 2, Saint Mary's 2, even 1
New Mexico StBetterSaint Mary's
G J. Washington TR11.3 pts · 1.9 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 34
→SMCBig
G J. Dent12.8 pts · 2.5 reb · 5.7 ast
Score 83
G G. Warren TR12.5 pts · 4.6 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 68
←NMSUSmall
G J. Dent-Smith TR8.2 pts · 1.8 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 53
G D. Dudley TR14.2 pts · 2.8 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 65
←NMSUBig
G R. Hawke2.5 pts · 1.2 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 21
F M. Lavrenov TR10.5 pts · 7.3 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 40
→SMCSmall
F T. Ndong TR4.9 pts · 6.5 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 73
F J. Osborne6.3 pts · 4.8 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 42
=No call
F K. Gad1.7 pts · 1.3 reb · 0.8 ast
Not ranked
New Mexico StBetterSaint Mary's
NMSU offense151st of 366 · -4.6
→SMCSmall
SMC defense44th of 366 · +2.5
NMSU defense125th of 366 · -2.3
=Even
SMC offense129th of 366 · -3.5
Backcourt-1.3 · 3 players
→SMCSmall
Backcourt+0.8 · 3 players
Frontcourt-1.5 · 2 players
→SMCSmall
Frontcourt+0.5 · 2 players
Bench-2.2 · 3 players
→SMCSmall
Bench-0.6 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestNMSU betterSMC betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Washington35 min · TRG. Warren32 min · TRD. Dudley31 min · TRG. Pickens21 minK. RobinsonNewD. GrantNew
Forwards
M. Lavrenov28 min · TRJ. Osborne24 minS. Payne20 min · TRL. Levillain20 min · TRP. WoodsonNew
Centers
A. DiongueNew
Guards
J. Dent37 minJ. Dent-Smith20 min · TRR. Hawke11 minL. Fennell8 min · TRM. Juzenas6 minD. BivinsNew
Forwards
T. Ndong18 min · TRK. Gad10 minV. Zougris9 min · TRJ. LewisNewT. MacLeanNew
Centers
S. Altuntas8 min · TRJ. GardnerNewF. PavelyNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 73.8 #207 | Points per game | 76.8 #125 |
| 1.08 #179 | Points per possession | 1.17 #39 |
| 68.1 #224 | Pace (possessions) | 66.2 #305 |
| Shooting | ||
| 48.5 #302 | Effective FG% | 52.8 #109 |
| 32.4 #257 | 3-point % | 38.7 #7 |
| 38.7 #198 | 3-point attempt rate | 36.4 #242 |
| 34.9 #186 | Free throw rate | 35.5 #162 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.0 #66 | Turnover rate | 16.9 #201 |
| 32.5 #105 | Offensive rebound rate | 37.5 #12 |
| 12.5 #250 | Assists per game | 15.1 #82 |
| Defense | ||
| 73.8 #150 | Points allowed | 65.2 #7 |
| 1.08 #179 | Points allowed per possession | 0.98 #14 |
| 48.7 #52 | Opponent effective FG% | 46.8 #20 |
| 32.4 #83 | Opponent 3-point % | 31.4 #40 |
| 14.7 #311 | Turnovers forced | 15.1 #274 |
| 69.7 #175 | Defensive rebound rate | 76.1 #4 |
| 5.7 #276 | Steals per game | 5.5 #302 |
| 3.0 #221 | Blocks per game | 3.6 #129 |
New Mexico St
13-16 in 2025-26 overall · 9-13 in conference · Conference USA
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Sam Houston61–69
- Wvs Jax State68–63
- Wvs Kennesaw St79–76
- Wvs Jax State77–75
- L@ MTSU85–86
A week or more of rest.
Saint Mary's
26-6 in 2025-26 overall · 16-3 in conference · West Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Texas A&M50–63
- Lvs Santa Clara71–76
- Wvs Gonzaga70–59
- Wvs Santa Clara86–67
- W@ Washington St83–67
A week or more of rest.