The Pit · at New Mexico
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UNM | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects UNM 75–71 · win probability UNM 65%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 146.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it
SMC 2, UNM 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: SMC 16.9%, UNM 14.9%. Forced: SMC 15.1%, UNM 19.0%
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: SMC plays 66.2 a game (305th fastest), UNM 70.7 (87th). Faster games mean more points
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: SMC 37.5%, UNM 30.6%. Defensive: SMC 76.1%, UNM 72.3%
Free throws
Free throw rate: SMC 35.5, UNM 35.8. Allowed: SMC 25.7, UNM 33.3
Home court
UNM at home. This season: UNM 0-0 at home, SMC 0-0 away
Even
Three-pointers
SMC hits 38.7% and allows 31.4%; UNM hits 35.6% and allows 30.5%. Threes are 36.4% and 41.9% of their shots
Even
UNM offense vs SMC defense
Offense 72nd of 366 against a defense 44th, on the model’s ratings
Even
SMC offense vs UNM defense
Offense 129th of 366 against a defense 103rd, on the model’s ratings
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: SMC 52.8 and allows 46.8; UNM 53.5 and allows 49.5
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: SMC 32%, UNM 42%. Transfers in: SMC 5, UNM 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Schedule so far
SMC has played the 93rd-hardest schedule, UNM the 97th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | UNM -4.5 | — |
| Total | — | 146.2 | — |
| Projected score | — | SMC 70.8 · UNM 75.4 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UNM -2.6 | — |
| 1H total | 68.4 | — |
| 1H projected score | SMC 32.9 · UNM 35.5 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8-2 80% | 7-3 70% | 3-7 30% | |
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% |
Next 3 games
With how the last meeting with each opponent went
No more games listed yet.
| Date | Game | Last meeting |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 15 | vs MER | No recent meeting |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
SMC 1–1 UNMSeries tied · 2 games since 2021-22 · SMC 1-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2023-24 | UNM 58 @ SMC 72 | SMC -8.5 | SMC W |
| Nov 30, 2022-23 | UNM 69 @ SMC 65 | SMC -9.5 | UNM W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Saint Mary's
32 games played
Straight up
26-6
81% wins
Against the spread
19-13
59% covers · avg +1.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-18
44% overs · avg −1.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 84-58 | -13.5 | W +12.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 87-66 | -15.5 | W +5.5 | 145.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 90-60 | -17.5 | W +12.5 | 144.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 80-49 | -14.5 | W +16.5 | 128.5 | O 129 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 85-72 | -20.5 | L −7.5 | 149.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 70-65 | -9.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 77-66 | -5.5 | W +5.5 | 144.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 71-96 | +4.5 | L −20.5 | 149.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 7 | @ | W 70-61 | -8.5 | W +0.5 | 137.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 14 | vs | L 67-68 | -2.5 | L −3.5 | 139.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 19 | vs | W 88-75 | -13.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 63-58 | -11.5 | L −6.5 | 132.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 28 | @ | W 78-73 | -9.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 30 | @ | W 72-45 | -19.5 | W +7.5 | 141.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 78-57 | -18.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 93-76 | -11.5 | W +5.5 | 139.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 88-82 | -15.5 | L −9.5 | 143.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 13 | @ | W 82-68 | -5.5 | W +8.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 54-62 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 152.5 | U 116 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 81-51 | -19.5 | W +10.5 | 142.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 75-69 | -14.5 | L −8.5 | 144.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 65-73 | +8.5 | W +0.5 | 144.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 87-60 | -20.5 | W +6.5 | 148.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 79-54 | -11.5 | W +13.5 | 142.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 88-60 | -24.5 | W +3.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 72-61 | -7.5 | W +3.5 | 135.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 72-70 | -9.5 | L −7.5 | 133.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 83-67 | -8.5 | W +7.5 | 149.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 86-67 | -5.5 | W +13.5 | 153.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 70-59 | +2.5 | W +13.5 | 143.5 | U 129 |
| Mar 9 | vs | L 71-76 | -4.5 | L −9.5 | 150.5 | U 147 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 50-63 | -2.5 | L −15.5 | 149.5 | U 113 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
STMN
W 84-58
+12.5
7
vs
UTC
W 87-66
+5.5
11
vs
OHIO
W 90-60
+12.5
14
vs
UNT
W 80-49
+16.5
19
vs
ARST
W 85-72
−7.5
26
vs
WICH
W 70-65
−4.5
27
vs
VT
W 77-66
+5.5
28
vs
VAN
L 71-96
−20.5
7
@
DAV
W 70-61
+0.5
14
vs
BOIS
L 67-68
−3.5
19
vs
FAU
W 88-75
−0.5
22
vs
UNI
W 63-58
−6.5
28
@
LMU
W 78-73
−4.5
30
@
PEPP
W 72-45
+7.5
2
vs
PORT
W 78-57
+2.5
4
vs
SEA
W 93-76
+5.5
10
vs
WSU
W 88-82
−9.5
13
@
SF
W 82-68
+8.5
17
@
SCU
L 54-62
−6.5
21
vs
ORST
W 81-51
+10.5
24
@
PORT
W 75-69
−8.5
31
@
GONZ
L 65-73
+0.5
4
vs
USD
W 87-60
+6.5
7
vs
SF
W 79-54
+13.5
11
vs
PEPP
W 88-60
+3.5
14
@
PAC
W 72-61
+3.5
18
@
SEA
W 72-70
−7.5
21
@
WSU
W 83-67
+7.5
25
vs
SCU
W 86-67
+13.5
28
vs
GONZ
W 70-59
+13.5
9
vs
SCU
L 71-76
−9.5
19
vs
TA&M
L 50-63
−15.5
covered 19didn’t cover 13avg +1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
STMN
W 84-58
+0.5
7
vs
UTC
W 87-66
+7.5
11
vs
OHIO
W 90-60
+5.5
14
vs
UNT
W 80-49
+0.5
19
vs
ARST
W 85-72
+7.5
26
vs
WICH
W 70-65
−4.5
27
vs
VT
W 77-66
−1.5
28
vs
VAN
L 71-96
+17.5
7
@
DAV
W 70-61
−6.5
14
vs
BOIS
L 67-68
−4.5
19
vs
FAU
W 88-75
+17.5
22
vs
UNI
W 63-58
−11.5
28
@
LMU
W 78-73
+7.5
30
@
PEPP
W 72-45
−24.5
2
vs
PORT
W 78-57
−11.5
4
vs
SEA
W 93-76
+29.5
10
vs
WSU
W 88-82
+26.5
13
@
SF
W 82-68
+8.5
17
@
SCU
L 54-62
−36.5
21
vs
ORST
W 81-51
−10.5
24
@
PORT
W 75-69
−0.5
31
@
GONZ
L 65-73
−6.5
4
vs
USD
W 87-60
−1.5
7
vs
SF
W 79-54
−9.5
11
vs
PEPP
W 88-60
+3.5
14
@
PAC
W 72-61
−2.5
18
@
SEA
W 72-70
+8.5
21
@
WSU
W 83-67
+0.5
25
vs
SCU
W 86-67
−0.5
28
vs
GONZ
W 70-59
−14.5
9
vs
SCU
L 71-76
−3.5
19
vs
TA&M
L 50-63
−36.5
over 14under 18avg −1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
New Mexico
36 games played
Straight up
25-11
69% wins
Against the spread
20-16
56% covers · avg +2.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
23-13
64% overs · avg +1.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | vs | W 76-54 | -22.5 | L −0.5 | 143.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 74-56 | -13.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 82-68 | -19.5 | L −5.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 68-76 | -3.5 | L −11.5 | 139.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 20 | vs | L 72-84 | +8.5 | L −3.5 | 151.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 80-78 | +6.5 | W +8.5 | 151.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 93-87 | -19.5 | L −13.5 | 148.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 98-71 | -1.5 | W +25.5 | 153.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 10 | @ | W 81-78 | +8.5 | W +11.5 | 157.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 75-59 | -15.5 | W +0.5 | 159.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 88-65 | -16.5 | W +6.5 | 152.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 53-62 | +5.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 78-58 | -7.5 | W +12.5 | 151.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 6 | @ | W 80-70 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 143.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 91-49 | -16.5 | W +25.5 | 138.5 | O 140 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 87-64 | -6.5 | W +16.5 | 146.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 79-83 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 148.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 83-74 | -15.5 | L −6.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 80-73 | -8.5 | L −1.5 | 150.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 27 | @ | W 89-61 | -3.5 | W +24.5 | 155.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 90-80 | -15.5 | L −5.5 | 148.5 | O 170 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 66-86 | -1.5 | L −21.5 | 156.5 | U 152 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 90-91 | -4.5 | L −5.5 | 152.5 | O 181 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 70-64 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 148.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 98-61 | -28.5 | W +8.5 | 148.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 80-78 | -9.5 | L −7.5 | 156.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 60-67 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 148.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 81-76 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 150.5 | O 157 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 74-82 | -8.5 | L −16.5 | 150.5 | O 156 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 90-94 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 155.5 | O 184 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 93-77 | -16.5 | L −0.5 | 154.5 | O 170 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 62-64 | +2.5 | W +0.5 | 150.5 | U 126 |
| Mar 18 | vs | W 107-83 | -11.5 | W +12.5 | 162.5 | O 190 |
| Mar 22 | vs | W 86-61 | -6.5 | W +18.5 | 161.5 | U 147 |
| Mar 24 | vs | W 84-69 | -10.5 | W +4.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
| Apr 2 | vs | L 69-74 | -2.5 | L −7.5 | 161.5 | U 143 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
vs
ETAM
W 76-54
−0.5
8
vs
UTA
W 74-56
+4.5
11
vs
UCR
W 82-68
−5.5
15
@
NMSU
L 68-76
−11.5
20
vs
NEB
L 72-84
−3.5
21
vs
MSST
W 80-78
+8.5
26
vs
ALST
W 93-87
−13.5
6
vs
SCU
W 98-71
+25.5
10
@
VCU
W 81-78
+11.5
14
vs
FGCU
W 75-59
+0.5
20
vs
SJSU
W 88-65
+6.5
30
@
BOIS
L 53-62
−3.5
3
vs
WYO
W 78-58
+12.5
6
@
CSU
W 80-70
+8.5
10
@
AF
W 91-49
+25.5
13
vs
GCU
W 87-64
+16.5
17
@
SDSU
L 79-83
+1.5
21
vs
FRES
W 83-74
−6.5
24
vs
NEV
W 80-73
−1.5
27
@
UNLV
W 89-61
+24.5
31
@
SJSU
W 90-80
−5.5
4
vs
USU
L 66-86
−21.5
7
vs
BOIS
L 90-91
−5.5
11
@
GCU
W 70-64
+7.5
17
vs
AF
W 98-61
+8.5
21
@
FRES
W 80-78
−7.5
24
@
NEV
L 60-67
−5.5
28
vs
SDSU
W 81-76
+3.5
4
vs
CSU
L 74-82
−16.5
7
@
USU
L 90-94
+3.5
12
vs
SJSU
W 93-77
−0.5
13
vs
SDSU
L 62-64
+0.5
18
vs
SHSU
W 107-83
+12.5
22
vs
GW
W 86-61
+18.5
24
vs
JOES
W 84-69
+4.5
2
vs
TLSA
L 69-74
−7.5
covered 20didn’t cover 16avg +2.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
vs
ETAM
W 76-54
−13.5
8
vs
UTA
W 74-56
−15.5
11
vs
UCR
W 82-68
+8.5
15
@
NMSU
L 68-76
+4.5
20
vs
NEB
L 72-84
+4.5
21
vs
MSST
W 80-78
+6.5
26
vs
ALST
W 93-87
+31.5
6
vs
SCU
W 98-71
+15.5
10
@
VCU
W 81-78
+1.5
14
vs
FGCU
W 75-59
−25.5
20
vs
SJSU
W 88-65
+0.5
30
@
BOIS
L 53-62
−31.5
3
vs
WYO
W 78-58
−15.5
6
@
CSU
W 80-70
+6.5
10
@
AF
W 91-49
+1.5
13
vs
GCU
W 87-64
+4.5
17
@
SDSU
L 79-83
+13.5
21
vs
FRES
W 83-74
+5.5
24
vs
NEV
W 80-73
+2.5
27
@
UNLV
W 89-61
−5.5
31
@
SJSU
W 90-80
+21.5
4
vs
USU
L 66-86
−4.5
7
vs
BOIS
L 90-91
+28.5
11
@
GCU
W 70-64
−14.5
17
vs
AF
W 98-61
+10.5
21
@
FRES
W 80-78
+1.5
24
@
NEV
L 60-67
−21.5
28
vs
SDSU
W 81-76
+6.5
4
vs
CSU
L 74-82
+5.5
7
@
USU
L 90-94
+28.5
12
vs
SJSU
W 93-77
+15.5
13
vs
SDSU
L 62-64
−24.5
18
vs
SHSU
W 107-83
+27.5
22
vs
GW
W 86-61
−14.5
24
vs
JOES
W 84-69
−2.5
2
vs
TLSA
L 69-74
−18.5
over 23under 13avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
New Mexico has the better starters
Position by position: Saint Mary's 0, New Mexico 3, even 2
Saint Mary'sBetterNew Mexico
G J. Dent12.8 pts · 2.5 reb · 5.7 ast
Score 83
=Even
G J. Hall16.2 pts · 3.2 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 90
G J. Dent-Smith TR8.2 pts · 1.8 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 53
→UNMSmall
G U. Tenette10.6 pts · 2.8 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 73
G R. Hawke2.5 pts · 1.2 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 21
→UNMSmall
G C. Howell6 pts · 3 reb · 3.5 ast
Score 54
F T. Ndong TR4.9 pts · 6.5 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 73
→UNMSmall
G H. Mayes TR11.1 pts · 5.6 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 93
F K. Gad1.7 pts · 1.3 reb · 0.8 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F T. Vahlberg Fasasi TR12.3 pts · 4.2 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 72
Saint Mary'sBetterNew Mexico
SMC offense129th of 366 · -3.5
=Even
UNM defense103rd of 366 · -0.9
SMC defense44th of 366 · +2.5
=Even
UNM offense72nd of 366 · +1.6
Backcourt+0.8 · 3 players
→UNMBig
Backcourt+5.6 · 4 players
Frontcourt+0.5 · 2 players
=Even
Frontcourt+1.0 · 1 player
Bench-0.6 · 4 players
→UNMSmall
Bench+0.9 · 1 player
Score, worst to bestSMC betterUNM betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Dent37 minJ. Dent-Smith20 min · TRR. Hawke11 minL. Fennell8 min · TRM. Juzenas6 minD. BivinsNew
Forwards
T. Ndong18 min · TRK. Gad10 minV. Zougris9 min · TRJ. LewisNewT. MacLeanNew
Centers
S. Altuntas8 min · TRJ. GardnerNewF. PavelyNew
Guards
J. Hall31 minU. Tenette28 minC. Howell25 minH. Mayes24 min · TRD. HallNew
Forwards
T. Vahlberg Fasasi27 min · TRR. Petraitis17 min · TRF. GraniNewI. SuljanovicNewN. MuriithiNewB. SchuchNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 76.8 #125 | Points per game | 80.8 #52 |
| 1.17 #39 | Points per possession | 1.14 #70 |
| 66.2 #305 | Pace (possessions) | 70.7 #87 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.8 #109 | Effective FG% | 53.5 #82 |
| 38.7 #7 | 3-point % | 35.6 #83 |
| 36.4 #242 | 3-point attempt rate | 41.9 #136 |
| 35.5 #162 | Free throw rate | 35.8 #160 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.9 #201 | Turnover rate | 14.9 #59 |
| 37.5 #12 | Offensive rebound rate | 30.6 #176 |
| 15.1 #82 | Assists per game | 14.8 #104 |
| Defense | ||
| 65.2 #7 | Points allowed | 71.6 #96 |
| 0.98 #14 | Points allowed per possession | 1.01 #36 |
| 46.8 #20 | Opponent effective FG% | 49.5 #84 |
| 31.4 #40 | Opponent 3-point % | 30.5 #20 |
| 15.1 #274 | Turnovers forced | 19.0 #50 |
| 76.1 #4 | Defensive rebound rate | 72.3 #57 |
| 5.5 #302 | Steals per game | 7.9 #43 |
| 3.6 #129 | Blocks per game | 2.7 #274 |
Saint Mary's
26-6 in 2025-26 overall · 16-3 in conference · West Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Texas A&M50–63
- Lvs Santa Clara71–76
- Wvs Gonzaga70–59
- Wvs Santa Clara86–67
- W@ Washington St83–67
A week or more of rest.
New Mexico
25-11 in 2025-26 overall · 14-8 in conference · Mountain West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Tulsa69–74
- Wvs Saint Joseph's84–69
- Wvs G Washington86–61
- Wvs Sam Houston107–83
- Lvs San Diego St62–64
A week or more of rest.