Alex G. Spanos Center · at Pacific
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | PAC | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects PAC 73–72 · win probability PAC 54%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 145.4
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: UVU has more of the edges
UVU 4, PAC 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UVU 20.1%, PAC 20.1%. Forced: UVU 21.3%, PAC 15.1%
Context
Schedule so far
UVU has played the 254th-hardest schedule, PAC the 122nd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UVU 34.8%, PAC 35.3%. Defensive: UVU 68.7%, PAC 75.0%
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: UVU plays 70.2 a game (104th fastest), PAC 66.1 (312th). Faster games mean more points
Three-pointers
UVU hits 34.0% and allows 35.2%; PAC hits 35.8% and allows 34.7%. Threes are 32.9% and 35.4% of their shots
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UVU 44%, PAC 8%. Transfers in: UVU 3, PAC 9. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Free throws
Free throw rate: UVU 38.2, PAC 30.5. Allowed: UVU 39.1, PAC 36.3
Shooting
Effective FG%: UVU 55.0 and allows 49.4; PAC 52.2 and allows 50.0
Home court
PAC at home. This season: PAC 0-0 at home, UVU 0-0 away
Even
PAC offense vs UVU defense
Offense 195th of 366 against a defense 152nd, on the model’s ratings
Even
UVU offense vs PAC defense
Offense 161st of 366 against a defense 147th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | PAC -1.0 | — |
| Total | — | 145.4 | — |
| Projected score | — | UVU 72.2 · PAC 73.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | PAC -0.5 | — |
| 1H total | 68.0 | — |
| 1H projected score | UVU 33.8 · PAC 34.2 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 2-8 20% | 6-4 60% | |
| 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% |
Next 3 games
With how the last meeting with each opponent went
No more games listed yet.
| Date | Game | Last meeting |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 15 | @ NMSU | No recent meeting |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Utah Valley
31 games played
Straight up
22-9
71% wins
Against the spread
13-18
42% covers · avg −0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-14
55% overs · avg +1.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | L 77-101 | +12.5 | L −11.5 | 151.5 | O 178 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 74-75 | -4.5 | L −5.5 | 156.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 79-72 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 149.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 75-52 | -1.5 | W +21.5 | 151.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 89-45 | -7.5 | W +36.5 | 148.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 66-77 | +8.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 82-71 | -1.5 | W +9.5 | 144.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 73-69 | -9.5 | L −5.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 68-53 | -5.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 90-74 | -15.5 | W +0.5 | 148.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 73-66 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 148.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 1 | @ | W 91-85 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 144.5 | O 176 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 68-85 | -7.5 | L −24.5 | 139.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 89-72 | -18.5 | L −1.5 | 154.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 92-76 | -13.5 | W +2.5 | 149.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 86-74 | -11.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 70-84 | -12.5 | L −26.5 | 160.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 71-78 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 29 | @ | W 83-55 | -6.5 | W +21.5 | 154.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 68-55 | -14.5 | L −1.5 | 145.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 81-60 | -12.5 | W +8.5 | 141.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 77-81 | -9.5 | L −13.5 | 148.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 65-46 | -8.5 | W +10.5 | 142.5 | U 111 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 66-54 | -6.5 | W +5.5 | 137.5 | U 120 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 79-72 | -17.5 | L −10.5 | 141.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 74-67 | -14.5 | L −7.5 | 140.5 | O 141 |
| Mar 5 | @ | W 92-88 | -9.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | O 180 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 104-101 | -8.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | O 205 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 67-65 | -8.5 | L −6.5 | 136.5 | U 132 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 61-63 | -2.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | U 124 |
| Mar 18 | vs | L 78-79 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 152.5 | O 157 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
BOIS
L 77-101
−11.5
15
@
FRES
L 74-75
−5.5
19
vs
UCI
W 79-72
+4.5
25
vs
SDST
W 75-52
+21.5
26
vs
SAM
W 89-45
+36.5
3
@
SDSU
L 66-77
−2.5
6
@
BGSU
W 82-71
+9.5
10
vs
IDST
W 73-69
−5.5
13
vs
UCSB
W 68-53
+9.5
17
vs
WEB
W 90-74
+0.5
29
vs
CBU
W 73-66
−0.5
1
@
TAR
W 91-85
+0.5
3
@
ACU
L 68-85
−24.5
8
vs
SUU
W 89-72
−1.5
10
vs
UTU
W 92-76
+2.5
17
vs
UTA
W 86-74
+0.5
21
@
SUU
L 70-84
−26.5
24
@
CBU
L 71-78
−5.5
29
@
TAR
W 83-55
+21.5
5
vs
ACU
W 68-55
−1.5
7
vs
UTA
W 81-60
+8.5
12
@
UTU
L 77-81
−13.5
19
vs
CBU
W 65-46
+10.5
21
@
UTA
W 66-54
+5.5
26
vs
TAR
W 79-72
−10.5
28
vs
ACU
W 74-67
−7.5
5
@
SUU
W 92-88
−5.5
7
@
UTU
W 104-101
−5.5
13
vs
UTA
W 67-65
−6.5
14
vs
CBU
L 61-63
−4.5
18
vs
GW
L 78-79
−2.5
covered 13didn’t cover 18avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
BOIS
L 77-101
+26.5
15
@
FRES
L 74-75
−7.5
19
vs
UCI
W 79-72
+1.5
25
vs
SDST
W 75-52
−24.5
26
vs
SAM
W 89-45
−14.5
3
@
SDSU
L 66-77
−1.5
6
@
BGSU
W 82-71
+8.5
10
vs
IDST
W 73-69
+0.5
13
vs
UCSB
W 68-53
−25.5
17
vs
WEB
W 90-74
+15.5
29
vs
CBU
W 73-66
−9.5
1
@
TAR
W 91-85
+31.5
3
@
ACU
L 68-85
+13.5
8
vs
SUU
W 89-72
+6.5
10
vs
UTU
W 92-76
+18.5
17
vs
UTA
W 86-74
+16.5
21
@
SUU
L 70-84
−6.5
24
@
CBU
L 71-78
+1.5
29
@
TAR
W 83-55
−16.5
5
vs
ACU
W 68-55
−22.5
7
vs
UTA
W 81-60
−0.5
12
@
UTU
L 77-81
+9.5
19
vs
CBU
W 65-46
−31.5
21
@
UTA
W 66-54
−17.5
26
vs
TAR
W 79-72
+9.5
28
vs
ACU
W 74-67
+0.5
5
@
SUU
W 92-88
+29.5
7
@
UTU
W 104-101
+57.5
13
vs
UTA
W 67-65
−4.5
14
vs
CBU
L 61-63
−15.5
18
vs
GW
L 78-79
+4.5
over 17under 14avg +1.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Pacific
31 games played
Straight up
16-15
52% wins
Against the spread
17-14
55% covers · avg +2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
11-20
35% overs · avg −2.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | L 77-78 | +13.5 | W +12.5 | 139.5 | O 155 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 69-66 | -12.5 | L −9.5 | 141.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 15 | @ | W 85-73 | -6.5 | W +5.5 | 159.5 | U 158 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 59-82 | +7.5 | L −15.5 | 154.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 86-58 | -4.5 | W +23.5 | 145.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 68-53 | -2.5 | W +12.5 | 135.5 | U 121 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 68-54 | -10.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 3 | @ | W 80-65 | -5.5 | W +9.5 | 134.5 | O 145 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 61-67 | +7.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 57-93 | +23.5 | L −12.5 | 149.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 95-82 | -8.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 28 | @ | L 54-66 | -2.5 | L −14.5 | 150.5 | U 120 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 71-80 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 139.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 84-53 | -4.5 | W +26.5 | 137.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 74-69 | -11.5 | L −6.5 | 138.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 89-90 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 144.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 77-70 | -8.5 | L −1.5 | 147.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 69-85 | +12.5 | L −3.5 | 154.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 81-64 | +1.5 | W +18.5 | 139.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 56-54 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 137.5 | U 110 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 74-51 | -8.5 | W +14.5 | 142.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 82-87 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 138.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 56-71 | +6.5 | L −8.5 | 151.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 92-59 | -7.5 | W +25.5 | 142.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 65-59 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 141.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 61-72 | +7.5 | L −3.5 | 135.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 70-87 | +2.5 | L −14.5 | 144.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 62-71 | +22.5 | W +13.5 | 144.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 61-72 | -3.5 | L −14.5 | 142.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 61-58 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 129.5 | U 119 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 68-76 | +9.5 | W +1.5 | 148.5 | U 144 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
NEV
L 77-78
+12.5
12
vs
LBSU
W 69-66
−9.5
15
@
CSUF
W 85-73
+5.5
20
@
FAU
L 59-82
−15.5
24
vs
STBK
W 86-58
+23.5
25
vs
JAX
W 68-53
+12.5
29
vs
SAC
W 68-54
+3.5
3
@
AF
W 80-65
+9.5
6
@
CAL
L 61-67
+1.5
16
@
BYU
L 57-93
−12.5
21
vs
NICH
W 95-82
+4.5
28
@
USD
L 54-66
−14.5
30
@
LMU
L 71-80
−5.5
2
vs
ORST
W 84-53
+26.5
4
vs
PEPP
W 74-69
−6.5
8
@
PORT
L 89-90
−4.5
10
vs
USD
W 77-70
−1.5
14
@
SCU
L 69-85
−3.5
17
@
ORST
W 81-64
+18.5
24
vs
SEA
W 56-54
+0.5
28
vs
PORT
W 74-51
+14.5
31
@
SF
L 82-87
−0.5
4
vs
SCU
L 56-71
−8.5
7
@
PEPP
W 92-59
+25.5
11
vs
LMU
W 65-59
+0.5
14
vs
SMC
L 61-72
−3.5
18
@
WSU
L 70-87
−14.5
21
@
GONZ
L 62-71
+13.5
28
vs
SF
L 61-72
−14.5
7
vs
SEA
W 61-58
+1.5
8
vs
SCU
L 68-76
+1.5
covered 17didn’t cover 14avg +2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
NEV
L 77-78
+15.5
12
vs
LBSU
W 69-66
−6.5
15
@
CSUF
W 85-73
−1.5
20
@
FAU
L 59-82
−13.5
24
vs
STBK
W 86-58
−1.5
25
vs
JAX
W 68-53
−14.5
29
vs
SAC
W 68-54
−24.5
3
@
AF
W 80-65
+10.5
6
@
CAL
L 61-67
−16.5
16
@
BYU
L 57-93
+0.5
21
vs
NICH
W 95-82
+37.5
28
@
USD
L 54-66
−30.5
30
@
LMU
L 71-80
+11.5
2
vs
ORST
W 84-53
−0.5
4
vs
PEPP
W 74-69
+4.5
8
@
PORT
L 89-90
+34.5
10
vs
USD
W 77-70
−0.5
14
@
SCU
L 69-85
−0.5
17
@
ORST
W 81-64
+5.5
24
vs
SEA
W 56-54
−27.5
28
vs
PORT
W 74-51
−17.5
31
@
SF
L 82-87
+30.5
4
vs
SCU
L 56-71
−24.5
7
@
PEPP
W 92-59
+8.5
11
vs
LMU
W 65-59
−17.5
14
vs
SMC
L 61-72
−2.5
18
@
WSU
L 70-87
+12.5
21
@
GONZ
L 62-71
−11.5
28
vs
SF
L 61-72
−9.5
7
vs
SEA
W 61-58
−10.5
8
vs
SCU
L 68-76
−4.5
over 11under 20avg −2.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Utah Valley 2, Pacific 2, even 1
Utah ValleyBetterPacific
G T. Davis TR7.2 pts · 3.1 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 35
→PACBig
G J. Winston TR15.5 pts · 3 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 74
G B. Housley4.9 pts · 2.8 reb · 2.7 ast
Score 5
→PACSmall
G C. Amundsen TR9.4 pts · 2 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 34
G S. Weatherspoon4.9 pts · 1.8 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 20
=Even
G C. Jones TR3.6 pts · 1.8 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 17
F I. Davis10.7 pts · 3.9 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 83
←UVUBig
F G. Ripp TR3.9 pts · 2.4 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 10
F I. Hawkins7 pts · 3.3 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 94
←UVUBig
F J. Pitt4.4 pts · 3.7 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 57
Utah ValleyBetterPacific
UVU offense161st of 366 · -4.8
=Even
PAC defense147th of 366 · -3.2
UVU defense152nd of 366 · -3.3
=Even
PAC offense195th of 366 · -6.1
Backcourt-6.7 · 3 players
→PACBig
Backcourt-2.4 · 3 players
Frontcourt+3.3 · 2 players
←UVUBig
Frontcourt-1.7 · 2 players
Bench-0.6 · 4 players
=Even
Bench-1.2 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestUVU betterPAC betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Davis27 min · TRB. Housley26 minS. Weatherspoon16 minD. Nelson8 min · TRJ. Barnes5 min · TRM. BabraitisNew
Forwards
I. Davis19 minI. Hawkins14 minT. Weaver8 minT. Medaris5 minO. MowafakNewD. DengNew
Guards
J. Winston36 min · TRC. Amundsen30 min · TRC. Jones17 min · TRA. Nyorha10 min · TRD. Harris6 min · TRN. BuduNew
Forwards
G. Ripp17 min · TRJ. Pitt17 minJ. Thompson11 min · TRV. OsazeeNewJ. CarotNew
Centers
J. McFarland3 min · TRI. Matlekovic2 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 77.7 #101 | Points per game | 71.3 #262 |
| 1.11 #126 | Points per possession | 1.08 #176 |
| 70.2 #104 | Pace (possessions) | 66.1 #312 |
| Shooting | ||
| 55.0 #38 | Effective FG% | 52.2 #140 |
| 34.0 #170 | 3-point % | 35.8 #65 |
| 32.9 #317 | 3-point attempt rate | 35.4 #266 |
| 38.2 #98 | Free throw rate | 30.5 #297 |
| Possessions | ||
| 20.1 #349 | Turnover rate | 20.1 #350 |
| 34.8 #51 | Offensive rebound rate | 35.3 #42 |
| 17.5 #14 | Assists per game | 14.9 #93 |
| Defense | ||
| 70.8 #72 | Points allowed | 69.8 #60 |
| 1.01 #32 | Points allowed per possession | 1.05 #93 |
| 49.4 #78 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.0 #101 |
| 35.2 #260 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.7 #233 |
| 21.3 #7 | Turnovers forced | 15.1 #281 |
| 68.7 #221 | Defensive rebound rate | 75.0 #8 |
| 9.3 #6 | Steals per game | 5.4 #309 |
| 5.1 #14 | Blocks per game | 2.2 #332 |
Utah Valley
22-9 in 2025-26 overall · 15-5 in conference · Big West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs G Washington78–79
- Lvs CA Baptist61–63
- Wvs UT Arlington67–65
- W@ Utah Tech104–101
- W@ Southern Utah92–88
A week or more of rest.
Pacific
16-15 in 2025-26 overall · 9-11 in conference · West Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Santa Clara68–76
- Wvs Seattle U61–58
- Lvs San Francisco61–72
- L@ Gonzaga62–71
- L@ Washington St70–87
A week or more of rest.