McCarthey Athletic Center · at Gonzaga · Conference game
Closing line
GONZ -22.5✓ PAC covered by 13.5
Closing total144.5Under by 11.5
| This season | GONZ | |
|---|---|---|
| 15-12 | Record | 26-2 |
| 14-13 | ATS | 16-12 |
| 11-16 | O/U | 11-17 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: PAC 62–85 GONZ · ✓ GONZ (97%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PAC | 29 | 33 | 62 |
| GONZ | 29 | 42 | 71 |
1st half: PAC 29, GONZ 29 (tied). The model had GONZ by 13.1 and a total of 68.7 (actual 58).
Team stats
| PAC | GONZ | |
|---|---|---|
| 23-49 47% | Field goals | 24-56 43% |
| 5-13 38% | 3-pointers | 5-19 26% |
| 11-16 69% | Free throws | 18-29 62% |
| 36 10 off | Rebounds | 32 13 off |
| 10 | Assists | 7 |
| 2 | Steals | 5 |
| 2 | Blocks | 7 |
| 15 | Turnovers | 4 |
| 23 | Fouls | 14 |
| 34 | Points in paint | 20 |
| 9 | Fast-break points | 7 |
Players
| PAC | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin Rochelin G | 40 | 12 | 14 | 0 | 4-7 | 1-2 |
| Jaden Clayton G | 34 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 3-10 | 1-4 |
| TJ Wainwright G | 31 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 3-8 | 2-4 |
| Elias Ralph F | 30 | 12 | 6 | 1 | 4-10 | 1-1 |
| Isaac Jack F | 17 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| KC Ibekwe C | 23 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 4-7 | 0-0 |
| Kajus Kublickas G | 15 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2-4 | 0-2 |
| Jaion Pitt F | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Alexis Marmolejos, Kris Keinys, Augustas Brazdeikis, Emmanuel Manyuon, Eyal Harel, Clayton Mpiana, Noah Budu, Kellen Hampton, Dominic Capriotti, Carlsheon Young
| GONZ | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emmanuel Innocenti G | 34 | 13 | 4 | 0 | 4-6 | 2-3 |
| Graham Ike F | 32 | 20 | 5 | 0 | 8-21 | 0-6 |
| Mario Saint-Supery G | 25 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 1-7 | 0-1 |
| Jalen Warley G | 18 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| Adam Miller G | 12 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1-3 | 1-3 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Davis Fogle G | 28 | 18 | 2 | 1 | 4-5 | 1-1 |
| Tyon Grant-Foster G | 28 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4-10 | 1-4 |
| Braeden Smith G | 15 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1-2 | 0-1 |
| Ismaila Diagne C | 8 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Noah Haaland, Alonzo Metz, Parker Jefferson, Cade Orness, Joaquim ArauzMoore, Braden Huff, Steele Venters
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenGONZ -17.5
5 → GONZ
CloseGONZ -22.5
5 pts toward GONZ
Total
Open143.5
▲ 1
Close144.5
Up 1 since the open
Moneyline
PAC +1800 · GONZ -5000
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened GONZ -17.5 · closed GONZ -22.5 · moved 5 toward GONZmodel GONZ -22
model GONZ -22
Opened 143.5 · closed 144.5 · moved 1 upmodel 147
model 147
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | GONZ -22.5 | GONZ -22.1 | PAC +0.4 | W PAC covered |
| Total | 144.5 | 146.9 | Over 2.4 | L Under |
| Projected score | — | PAC 62.4 · GONZ 84.5 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | GONZ -13.1 | PK |
| 1H total | 68.7 | 58 |
| 1H projected score | PAC 27.8 · GONZ 40.9 | PAC 29 · GONZ 29 |
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% | |
| 9-1 90% | 6-4 60% | 2-8 20% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
PAC 0–5 GONZGONZ leads · 5 games since 2021-22 · GONZ has won the last 5 meetings · PAC 4-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2024-25 | GONZ 78 @ PAC 61 | PAC +25.5 | PAC W |
| Feb 17, 2023-24 | PAC 76 @ GONZ 102 | GONZ -30.5 | PAC W |
| Jan 27, 2023-24 | GONZ 82 @ PAC 73 | PAC +24.5 | PAC W |
| Jan 21, 2022-23 | GONZ 99 @ PAC 90 | PAC +18.5 | PAC W |
| Feb 10, 2021-22 | PAC 51 @ GONZ 89 | GONZ -32 | GONZ W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Pacific
27 games played
Straight up
15-12
56% wins
Against the spread
14-13
52% covers · avg +2.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
11-16
41% overs · avg −1.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | L 77-78 | +13.5 | W +12.5 | 139.5 | O 155 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 69-66 | -12.5 | L −9.5 | 141.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 15 | @ | W 85-73 | -6.5 | W +5.5 | 159.5 | U 158 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 59-82 | +7.5 | L −15.5 | 154.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 86-58 | -4.5 | W +23.5 | 145.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 68-53 | -2.5 | W +12.5 | 135.5 | U 121 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 68-54 | -10.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 3 | @ | W 80-65 | -5.5 | W +9.5 | 134.5 | O 145 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 61-67 | +7.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 57-93 | +23.5 | L −12.5 | 149.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 95-82 | -8.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 28 | @ | L 54-66 | -2.5 | L −14.5 | 150.5 | U 120 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 71-80 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 139.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 84-53 | -4.5 | W +26.5 | 137.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 74-69 | -11.5 | L −6.5 | 138.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 89-90 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 144.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 77-70 | -8.5 | L −1.5 | 147.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 69-85 | +12.5 | L −3.5 | 154.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 81-64 | +1.5 | W +18.5 | 139.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 56-54 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 137.5 | U 110 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 74-51 | -8.5 | W +14.5 | 142.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 82-87 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 138.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 56-71 | +6.5 | L −8.5 | 151.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 92-59 | -7.5 | W +25.5 | 142.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 65-59 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 141.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 61-72 | +7.5 | L −3.5 | 135.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 70-87 | +2.5 | L −14.5 | 144.5 | O 157 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
NEV
L 77-78
+12.5
12
vs
LBSU
W 69-66
−9.5
15
@
CSUF
W 85-73
+5.5
20
@
FAU
L 59-82
−15.5
24
vs
STBK
W 86-58
+23.5
25
vs
JAX
W 68-53
+12.5
29
vs
SAC
W 68-54
+3.5
3
@
AF
W 80-65
+9.5
6
@
CAL
L 61-67
+1.5
16
@
BYU
L 57-93
−12.5
21
vs
NICH
W 95-82
+4.5
28
@
USD
L 54-66
−14.5
30
@
LMU
L 71-80
−5.5
2
vs
ORST
W 84-53
+26.5
4
vs
PEPP
W 74-69
−6.5
8
@
PORT
L 89-90
−4.5
10
vs
USD
W 77-70
−1.5
14
@
SCU
L 69-85
−3.5
17
@
ORST
W 81-64
+18.5
24
vs
SEA
W 56-54
+0.5
28
vs
PORT
W 74-51
+14.5
31
@
SF
L 82-87
−0.5
4
vs
SCU
L 56-71
−8.5
7
@
PEPP
W 92-59
+25.5
11
vs
LMU
W 65-59
+0.5
14
vs
SMC
L 61-72
−3.5
18
@
WSU
L 70-87
−14.5
covered 14didn’t cover 13avg +2.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
NEV
L 77-78
+15.5
12
vs
LBSU
W 69-66
−6.5
15
@
CSUF
W 85-73
−1.5
20
@
FAU
L 59-82
−13.5
24
vs
STBK
W 86-58
−1.5
25
vs
JAX
W 68-53
−14.5
29
vs
SAC
W 68-54
−24.5
3
@
AF
W 80-65
+10.5
6
@
CAL
L 61-67
−16.5
16
@
BYU
L 57-93
+0.5
21
vs
NICH
W 95-82
+37.5
28
@
USD
L 54-66
−30.5
30
@
LMU
L 71-80
+11.5
2
vs
ORST
W 84-53
−0.5
4
vs
PEPP
W 74-69
+4.5
8
@
PORT
L 89-90
+34.5
10
vs
USD
W 77-70
−0.5
14
@
SCU
L 69-85
−0.5
17
@
ORST
W 81-64
+5.5
24
vs
SEA
W 56-54
−27.5
28
vs
PORT
W 74-51
−17.5
31
@
SF
L 82-87
+30.5
4
vs
SCU
L 56-71
−24.5
7
@
PEPP
W 92-59
+8.5
11
vs
LMU
W 65-59
−17.5
14
vs
SMC
L 61-72
−2.5
18
@
WSU
L 70-87
+12.5
over 11under 16avg −1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Gonzaga
28 games played
Straight up
26-2
93% wins
Against the spread
16-12
57% covers · avg +1.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
11-17
39% overs · avg −3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 98-43 | -29.5 | W +25.5 | 157.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 83-68 | -10.5 | W +4.5 | 166.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 90-63 | -12.5 | W +14.5 | 164.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 14 | @ | W 77-65 | -13.5 | L −1.5 | 158.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 122-50 | -35.5 | W +36.5 | 160.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 95-85 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 178.5 | O 180 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 100-61 | -14.5 | W +24.5 | 157.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 61-101 | -3.5 | L −43.5 | 165.5 | U 162 |
| Dec 5 | vs | W 94-59 | -5.5 | W +29.5 | 159.5 | U 153 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 109-58 | -42.5 | W +8.5 | 166.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 82-72 | -10.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 98-70 | -36.5 | L −8.5 | 160.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 91-82 | -12.5 | L −3.5 | 155.5 | O 173 |
| Dec 28 | @ | W 96-56 | -29.5 | W +10.5 | 152.5 | U 152 |
| Dec 30 | @ | W 99-93 | -29.5 | L −23.5 | 160.5 | O 192 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 80-72 | -24.5 | L −16.5 | 155.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 82-47 | -25.5 | W +9.5 | 154.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 89-77 | -17.5 | L −5.5 | 163.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 15 | @ | W 86-65 | -16.5 | W +4.5 | 155.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 71-50 | -9.5 | W +11.5 | 150.5 | U 121 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 84-60 | -28.5 | L −4.5 | 150.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 68-66 | -15.5 | L −13.5 | 149.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 73-65 | -8.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 80-87 | -22.5 | L −29.5 | 152.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 81-61 | -19.5 | W +0.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 10 | vs | W 83-53 | -21.5 | W +8.5 | 156.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 94-86 | -4.5 | W +3.5 | 158.5 | O 180 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 80-59 | -15.5 | W +5.5 | 151.5 | U 139 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
TXSO
W 98-43
+25.5
8
vs
OU
W 83-68
+4.5
11
vs
CREI
W 90-63
+14.5
14
@
ASU
W 77-65
−1.5
17
vs
SUU
W 122-50
+36.5
24
vs
ALA
W 95-85
+5.5
25
vs
MD
W 100-61
+24.5
26
vs
MICH
L 61-101
−43.5
5
vs
UK
W 94-59
+29.5
7
vs
UNF
W 109-58
+8.5
13
vs
UCLA
W 82-72
−0.5
17
vs
CAM
W 98-70
−8.5
21
vs
ORE
W 91-82
−3.5
28
@
PEPP
W 96-56
+10.5
30
@
USD
W 99-93
−23.5
2
vs
SEA
W 80-72
−16.5
4
vs
LMU
W 82-47
+9.5
8
vs
SCU
W 89-77
−5.5
15
@
WSU
W 86-65
+4.5
17
@
SEA
W 71-50
+11.5
21
vs
PEPP
W 84-60
−4.5
24
vs
SF
W 68-66
−13.5
31
vs
SMC
W 73-65
−0.5
4
@
PORT
L 80-87
−29.5
7
@
ORST
W 81-61
+0.5
10
vs
WSU
W 83-53
+8.5
14
@
SCU
W 94-86
+3.5
18
@
SF
W 80-59
+5.5
covered 16didn’t cover 12avg +1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
TXSO
W 98-43
−16.5
8
vs
OU
W 83-68
−15.5
11
vs
CREI
W 90-63
−11.5
14
@
ASU
W 77-65
−16.5
17
vs
SUU
W 122-50
+11.5
24
vs
ALA
W 95-85
+1.5
25
vs
MD
W 100-61
+3.5
26
vs
MICH
L 61-101
−3.5
5
vs
UK
W 94-59
−6.5
7
vs
UNF
W 109-58
+0.5
13
vs
UCLA
W 82-72
+6.5
17
vs
CAM
W 98-70
+7.5
21
vs
ORE
W 91-82
+17.5
28
@
PEPP
W 96-56
−0.5
30
@
USD
W 99-93
+31.5
2
vs
SEA
W 80-72
−3.5
4
vs
LMU
W 82-47
−25.5
8
vs
SCU
W 89-77
+2.5
15
@
WSU
W 86-65
−4.5
17
@
SEA
W 71-50
−29.5
21
vs
PEPP
W 84-60
−6.5
24
vs
SF
W 68-66
−15.5
31
vs
SMC
W 73-65
−6.5
4
@
PORT
L 80-87
+14.5
7
@
ORST
W 81-61
−7.5
10
vs
WSU
W 83-53
−20.5
14
@
SCU
W 94-86
+21.5
18
@
SF
W 80-59
−12.5
over 11under 17avg −3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Pacific
15-12 overall · 8-8 in conference · West Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Washington St70–87
- Lvs Saint Mary's61–72
- Wvs LMU65–59
- W@ Pepperdine92–59
- Lvs Santa Clara56–71
3 days since their last game.
Gonzaga
26-2 overall · 14-1 in conference · Pac-12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- W@ San Francisco80–59
- W@ Santa Clara94–86
- Wvs Washington St83–53
- W@ Oregon St81–61
- L@ Portland80–87
3 days since their last game.