The Pit · at New Mexico
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UNM | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects UNM 86–68 · win probability UNM 95%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 154.4
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: UNM has more of the edges
MER 1, UNM 7 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
UNM offense vs MER defense
Offense 72nd of 366 against a defense 268th, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
MER hits 35.6% and allows 36.2%; UNM hits 35.6% and allows 30.5%. Threes are 39.2% and 41.9% of their shots
MER offense vs UNM defense
Offense 223rd of 366 against a defense 103rd, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
MER has played the 193rd-hardest schedule, UNM the 97th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Shooting
Effective FG%: MER 53.1 and allows 52.5; UNM 53.5 and allows 49.5
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: MER 32.6%, UNM 30.6%. Defensive: MER 66.8%, UNM 72.3%
Free throws
Free throw rate: MER 39.2, UNM 35.8. Allowed: MER 29.7, UNM 33.3
Turnovers
Turnover rate: MER 15.0%, UNM 14.9%. Forced: MER 17.0%, UNM 19.0%
Home court
UNM at home. This season: UNM 0-0 at home, MER 0-0 away
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: MER plays 69.5 a game (148th fastest), UNM 70.7 (87th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: MER 28%, UNM 42%. Transfers in: MER 2, UNM 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | UNM -18.3 | — |
| Total | — | 154.4 | — |
| Projected score | — | MER 68 · UNM 86.4 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UNM -10.8 | — |
| 1H total | 72.2 | — |
| 1H projected score | MER 30.7 · UNM 41.5 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | |
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% |
Next 3 games
With how the last meeting with each opponent went
No more games listed yet.
No more games listed yet.
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Mercer
29 games played
Straight up
16-13
55% wins
Against the spread
19-10
66% covers · avg +1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-15
48% overs · avg +3.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 61-76 | +28.5 | W +13.5 | 143.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 92-77 | -3.5 | W +11.5 | 157.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 69-105 | +2.5 | L −33.5 | 162.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 22 | @ | W 95-83 | +4.5 | W +16.5 | 163.5 | O 178 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 75-67 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 142.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 29 | @ | W 91-84 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 159.5 | O 175 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 78-67 | -10.5 | W +0.5 | 155.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 63-70 | +22.5 | W +15.5 | 152.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 63-81 | +16.5 | L −1.5 | 160.5 | U 144 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 78-84 | +7.5 | W +1.5 | 151.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 72-74 | +2.5 | W +0.5 | 154.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 71-77 | +7.5 | W +1.5 | 148.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 101-63 | -16.5 | W +21.5 | 147.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 109-97 | -3.5 | W +8.5 | 156.5 | O 206 |
| Jan 15 | @ | W 77-67 | -8.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 102-92 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 155.5 | O 194 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 88-76 | -8.5 | W +3.5 | 158.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 77-80 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 157.5 | U 157 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 95-77 | -10.5 | W +7.5 | 158.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 95-81 | -18.5 | L −4.5 | 153.5 | O 176 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 75-79 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 155.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 49-69 | -1.5 | L −21.5 | 160.5 | U 118 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 69-64 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 151.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 70-54 | -11.5 | W +4.5 | 147.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 90-94 | -10.5 | L −14.5 | 151.5 | O 184 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 89-86 | -3.5 | L −0.5 | 156.5 | O 175 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 74-78 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 156.5 | U 152 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 82-76 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 149.5 | O 158 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 73-77 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 154.5 | U 150 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
TENN
L 61-76
+13.5
9
vs
LIP
W 92-77
+11.5
15
@
WIN
L 69-105
−33.5
22
@
EKU
W 95-83
+16.5
26
vs
APP
W 75-67
+1.5
29
@
ELON
W 91-84
+9.5
2
vs
GAST
W 78-67
+0.5
13
@
CLEM
L 63-70
+15.5
17
@
UCF
L 63-81
−1.5
20
@
WSU
L 78-84
+1.5
31
@
FUR
L 72-74
+0.5
3
@
ETSU
L 71-77
+1.5
7
vs
CIT
W 101-63
+21.5
10
vs
WOF
W 109-97
+8.5
15
@
VMI
W 77-67
+1.5
17
@
UNCG
W 102-92
+4.5
21
vs
WCU
W 88-76
+3.5
24
@
WOF
L 77-80
−5.5
29
vs
UNCG
W 95-77
+7.5
31
vs
VMI
W 95-81
−4.5
5
@
UTC
L 75-79
−8.5
7
@
SAM
L 49-69
−21.5
11
vs
FUR
W 69-64
+1.5
14
@
CIT
W 70-54
+4.5
19
vs
UTC
L 90-94
−14.5
21
vs
SAM
W 89-86
−0.5
25
@
WCU
L 74-78
−5.5
28
vs
ETSU
W 82-76
+4.5
7
vs
WCU
L 73-77
−5.5
covered 19didn’t cover 10avg +1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
TENN
L 61-76
−6.5
9
vs
LIP
W 92-77
+11.5
15
@
WIN
L 69-105
+11.5
22
@
EKU
W 95-83
+14.5
26
vs
APP
W 75-67
−0.5
29
@
ELON
W 91-84
+15.5
2
vs
GAST
W 78-67
−10.5
13
@
CLEM
L 63-70
−19.5
17
@
UCF
L 63-81
−16.5
20
@
WSU
L 78-84
+10.5
31
@
FUR
L 72-74
−8.5
3
@
ETSU
L 71-77
−0.5
7
vs
CIT
W 101-63
+16.5
10
vs
WOF
W 109-97
+49.5
15
@
VMI
W 77-67
−9.5
17
@
UNCG
W 102-92
+38.5
21
vs
WCU
W 88-76
+5.5
24
@
WOF
L 77-80
−0.5
29
vs
UNCG
W 95-77
+13.5
31
vs
VMI
W 95-81
+22.5
5
@
UTC
L 75-79
−1.5
7
@
SAM
L 49-69
−42.5
11
vs
FUR
W 69-64
−18.5
14
@
CIT
W 70-54
−23.5
19
vs
UTC
L 90-94
+32.5
21
vs
SAM
W 89-86
+18.5
25
@
WCU
L 74-78
−4.5
28
vs
ETSU
W 82-76
+8.5
7
vs
WCU
L 73-77
−4.5
over 14under 15avg +3.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
New Mexico
36 games played
Straight up
25-11
69% wins
Against the spread
20-16
56% covers · avg +2.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
23-13
64% overs · avg +1.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | vs | W 76-54 | -22.5 | L −0.5 | 143.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 74-56 | -13.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 82-68 | -19.5 | L −5.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 68-76 | -3.5 | L −11.5 | 139.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 20 | vs | L 72-84 | +8.5 | L −3.5 | 151.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 80-78 | +6.5 | W +8.5 | 151.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 93-87 | -19.5 | L −13.5 | 148.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 98-71 | -1.5 | W +25.5 | 153.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 10 | @ | W 81-78 | +8.5 | W +11.5 | 157.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 75-59 | -15.5 | W +0.5 | 159.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 88-65 | -16.5 | W +6.5 | 152.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 53-62 | +5.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 78-58 | -7.5 | W +12.5 | 151.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 6 | @ | W 80-70 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 143.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 91-49 | -16.5 | W +25.5 | 138.5 | O 140 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 87-64 | -6.5 | W +16.5 | 146.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 79-83 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 148.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 83-74 | -15.5 | L −6.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 80-73 | -8.5 | L −1.5 | 150.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 27 | @ | W 89-61 | -3.5 | W +24.5 | 155.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 90-80 | -15.5 | L −5.5 | 148.5 | O 170 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 66-86 | -1.5 | L −21.5 | 156.5 | U 152 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 90-91 | -4.5 | L −5.5 | 152.5 | O 181 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 70-64 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 148.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 98-61 | -28.5 | W +8.5 | 148.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 80-78 | -9.5 | L −7.5 | 156.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 60-67 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 148.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 81-76 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 150.5 | O 157 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 74-82 | -8.5 | L −16.5 | 150.5 | O 156 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 90-94 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 155.5 | O 184 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 93-77 | -16.5 | L −0.5 | 154.5 | O 170 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 62-64 | +2.5 | W +0.5 | 150.5 | U 126 |
| Mar 18 | vs | W 107-83 | -11.5 | W +12.5 | 162.5 | O 190 |
| Mar 22 | vs | W 86-61 | -6.5 | W +18.5 | 161.5 | U 147 |
| Mar 24 | vs | W 84-69 | -10.5 | W +4.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
| Apr 2 | vs | L 69-74 | -2.5 | L −7.5 | 161.5 | U 143 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
vs
ETAM
W 76-54
−0.5
8
vs
UTA
W 74-56
+4.5
11
vs
UCR
W 82-68
−5.5
15
@
NMSU
L 68-76
−11.5
20
vs
NEB
L 72-84
−3.5
21
vs
MSST
W 80-78
+8.5
26
vs
ALST
W 93-87
−13.5
6
vs
SCU
W 98-71
+25.5
10
@
VCU
W 81-78
+11.5
14
vs
FGCU
W 75-59
+0.5
20
vs
SJSU
W 88-65
+6.5
30
@
BOIS
L 53-62
−3.5
3
vs
WYO
W 78-58
+12.5
6
@
CSU
W 80-70
+8.5
10
@
AF
W 91-49
+25.5
13
vs
GCU
W 87-64
+16.5
17
@
SDSU
L 79-83
+1.5
21
vs
FRES
W 83-74
−6.5
24
vs
NEV
W 80-73
−1.5
27
@
UNLV
W 89-61
+24.5
31
@
SJSU
W 90-80
−5.5
4
vs
USU
L 66-86
−21.5
7
vs
BOIS
L 90-91
−5.5
11
@
GCU
W 70-64
+7.5
17
vs
AF
W 98-61
+8.5
21
@
FRES
W 80-78
−7.5
24
@
NEV
L 60-67
−5.5
28
vs
SDSU
W 81-76
+3.5
4
vs
CSU
L 74-82
−16.5
7
@
USU
L 90-94
+3.5
12
vs
SJSU
W 93-77
−0.5
13
vs
SDSU
L 62-64
+0.5
18
vs
SHSU
W 107-83
+12.5
22
vs
GW
W 86-61
+18.5
24
vs
JOES
W 84-69
+4.5
2
vs
TLSA
L 69-74
−7.5
covered 20didn’t cover 16avg +2.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
vs
ETAM
W 76-54
−13.5
8
vs
UTA
W 74-56
−15.5
11
vs
UCR
W 82-68
+8.5
15
@
NMSU
L 68-76
+4.5
20
vs
NEB
L 72-84
+4.5
21
vs
MSST
W 80-78
+6.5
26
vs
ALST
W 93-87
+31.5
6
vs
SCU
W 98-71
+15.5
10
@
VCU
W 81-78
+1.5
14
vs
FGCU
W 75-59
−25.5
20
vs
SJSU
W 88-65
+0.5
30
@
BOIS
L 53-62
−31.5
3
vs
WYO
W 78-58
−15.5
6
@
CSU
W 80-70
+6.5
10
@
AF
W 91-49
+1.5
13
vs
GCU
W 87-64
+4.5
17
@
SDSU
L 79-83
+13.5
21
vs
FRES
W 83-74
+5.5
24
vs
NEV
W 80-73
+2.5
27
@
UNLV
W 89-61
−5.5
31
@
SJSU
W 90-80
+21.5
4
vs
USU
L 66-86
−4.5
7
vs
BOIS
L 90-91
+28.5
11
@
GCU
W 70-64
−14.5
17
vs
AF
W 98-61
+10.5
21
@
FRES
W 80-78
+1.5
24
@
NEV
L 60-67
−21.5
28
vs
SDSU
W 81-76
+6.5
4
vs
CSU
L 74-82
+5.5
7
@
USU
L 90-94
+28.5
12
vs
SJSU
W 93-77
+15.5
13
vs
SDSU
L 62-64
−24.5
18
vs
SHSU
W 107-83
+27.5
22
vs
GW
W 86-61
−14.5
24
vs
JOES
W 84-69
−2.5
2
vs
TLSA
L 69-74
−18.5
over 23under 13avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
New Mexico has the better starters
Position by position: Mercer 0, New Mexico 3, even 2
MercerBetterNew Mexico
G B. Shoulders9.5 pts · 6.6 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 41
→UNMBig
G J. Hall16.2 pts · 3.2 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 90
G Q. Perkins8.7 pts · 1.4 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 22
→UNMBig
G U. Tenette10.6 pts · 2.8 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 73
F K. Steele TR8 pts · 4.4 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 62
=Even
G C. Howell6 pts · 3 reb · 3.5 ast
Score 54
F M. Mabor Makoi TR1.4 pts · 2.4 reb · 0.1 ast
Score 10
→UNMBig
G H. Mayes TR11.1 pts · 5.6 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 93
F P. Padegimas NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
F T. Vahlberg Fasasi TR12.3 pts · 4.2 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 72
MercerBetterNew Mexico
MER offense223rd of 366 · -6.8
→UNMSmall
UNM defense103rd of 366 · -0.9
MER defense268th of 366 · -6.8
→UNMBig
UNM offense72nd of 366 · +1.6
Backcourt-3.4 · 2 players
→UNMBig
Backcourt+5.6 · 4 players
Frontcourt-0.6 · 3 players
→UNMSmall
Frontcourt+1.0 · 1 player
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench+0.9 · 1 player
Score, worst to bestMER betterUNM betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
B. Shoulders32 minQ. Perkins24 minM. KoveosNewD. BarrNewH. LyttleNewK. LamonteNew
Forwards
K. Steele21 min · TRM. Mabor Makoi8 min · TRP. PadegimasNewS. MayhughNewD. KovacevicNew
Guards
J. Hall31 minU. Tenette28 minC. Howell25 minH. Mayes24 min · TRD. HallNew
Forwards
T. Vahlberg Fasasi27 min · TRR. Petraitis17 min · TRF. GraniNewI. SuljanovicNewN. MuriithiNewB. SchuchNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 80.1 #65 | Points per game | 80.8 #52 |
| 1.15 #55 | Points per possession | 1.14 #70 |
| 69.5 #148 | Pace (possessions) | 70.7 #87 |
| Shooting | ||
| 53.1 #98 | Effective FG% | 53.5 #82 |
| 35.6 #87 | 3-point % | 35.6 #83 |
| 39.2 #188 | 3-point attempt rate | 41.9 #136 |
| 39.2 #74 | Free throw rate | 35.8 #160 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.0 #67 | Turnover rate | 14.9 #59 |
| 32.6 #102 | Offensive rebound rate | 30.6 #176 |
| 12.7 #240 | Assists per game | 14.8 #104 |
| Defense | ||
| 77.8 #263 | Points allowed | 71.6 #96 |
| 1.12 #273 | Points allowed per possession | 1.01 #36 |
| 52.5 #242 | Opponent effective FG% | 49.5 #84 |
| 36.2 #311 | Opponent 3-point % | 30.5 #20 |
| 17.0 #155 | Turnovers forced | 19.0 #50 |
| 66.8 #303 | Defensive rebound rate | 72.3 #57 |
| 7.1 #115 | Steals per game | 7.9 #43 |
| 3.2 #186 | Blocks per game | 2.7 #274 |
Mercer
16-13 in 2025-26 overall · 11-8 in conference · Southern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs W Carolina73–77
- Wvs ETSU82–76
- L@ W Carolina74–78
- Wvs Samford89–86
- Lvs Chattanooga90–94
A week or more of rest.
New Mexico
25-11 in 2025-26 overall · 14-8 in conference · Mountain West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Tulsa69–74
- Wvs Saint Joseph's84–69
- Wvs G Washington86–61
- Wvs Sam Houston107–83
- Lvs San Diego St62–64
A week or more of rest.