Pauley Pavilion · at UCLA · Conference game
Closing line
UCLA -1.5✓ UCLA covered by 18.5
Closing total144.5Under by 20.5
| This season | UCLA | |
|---|---|---|
| 25-4 | Record | 19-10 |
| 16-13 | ATS | 12-17 |
| 9-20 | O/U | 15-14 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: NEB 72–71 UCLA · ✗ NEB (52%) lost
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| NEB | 24 | 28 | 52 |
| UCLA | 37 | 35 | 72 |
1st half: NEB 24, UCLA 37 (UCLA by 13). The model had NEB by 0.5 and a total of 67.2 (actual 61).
Team stats
| NEB | UCLA | |
|---|---|---|
| 19-49 39% | Field goals | 28-60 47% |
| 5-24 21% | 3-pointers | 10-29 34% |
| 9-18 50% | Free throws | 6-10 60% |
| 34 11 off | Rebounds | 36 11 off |
| 12 | Assists | 17 |
| 6 | Steals | 8 |
| 1 | Blocks | 1 |
| 13 | Turnovers | 8 |
| 10 | Fouls | 18 |
| 18 | Points in paint | 26 |
| 5 | Fast-break points | 5 |
Players
| NEB | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pryce Sandfort F | 37 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 3-9 | 2-7 |
| Sam Hoiberg G | 34 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 4-5 | 2-2 |
| Rienk Mast F | 29 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 4-7 | 0-1 |
| Jamarques Lawrence G | 27 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 1-8 | 0-3 |
| Berke Buyuktuncel C | 19 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-1 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Cale Jacobsen G | 22 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 4-7 | 1-4 |
| Braden Frager F | 22 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1-7 | 0-5 |
| Jared Garcia F | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-1 |
| Kendall Blue G | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Leo Curtis, Justin Bolis, Quentin Rhymes, Will Cooper, Ugnius Jarusevicius, Connor Essegian, Henry Burt
| UCLA | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trent Perry G | 38 | 20 | 7 | 4 | 8-15 | 3-6 |
| Eric Dailey Jr. F | 31 | 14 | 8 | 2 | 6-9 | 1-3 |
| Donovan Dent G | 31 | 4 | 1 | 8 | 2-8 | 0-2 |
| Skyy Clark G | 30 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 3-9 | 2-8 |
| Tyler Bilodeau F | 28 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 3-9 | 2-5 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Eric Freeny G | 18 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-1 |
| Brandon Williams F | 12 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| Xavier Booker C | 9 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 3-3 | 2-2 |
| Jamar Brown G | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-2 |
Did not play: Jack Seidler, Steven Jamerson II, Anthony Peoples Jr., Markell Alston, Christian Horry, Evan Manjikian
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenNEB -1.5
3 → UCLA
CloseUCLA -1.5
3 pts toward UCLA
Total
Open142.5
▲ 2
Close144.5
Up 2 since the open
Moneyline
NEB -108 · UCLA -112
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened NEB -1.5 · closed UCLA -1.5 · moved 3 toward UCLAmodel NEB -0.5
model NEB -0.5
Opened 142.5 · closed 144.5 · moved 2 upmodel 143.5
model 143.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | UCLA -1.5 | NEB -0.6 | NEB +2.1 | L UCLA covered |
| Total | 144.5 | 143.5 | Under 1.0 | W Under |
| Projected score | — | NEB 72 · UCLA 71.4 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | NEB -0.5 | UCLA -13.0 |
| 1H total | 67.2 | 61 |
| 1H projected score | NEB 33.8 · UCLA 33.3 | NEB 24 · UCLA 37 |
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | |
| 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
NEB 1–0 UCLANEB leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · NEB 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2024-25 | UCLA 58 @ NEB 66 | NEB -2.5 | NEB W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Nebraska
29 games played
Straight up
25-4
86% wins
Against the spread
16-13
55% covers · avg +3.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
9-20
31% overs · avg −7.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 86-53 | -24.5 | W +8.5 | 153.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 96-66 | -21.5 | W +8.5 | 156.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 69-50 | -35.5 | L −16.5 | 146.5 | U 119 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 105-99 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 163.5 | O 204 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 84-72 | -8.5 | W +3.5 | 151.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 86-85 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 168.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 80-73 | -14.5 | L −7.5 | 166.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 72-63 | -25.5 | L −16.5 | 157.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 71-50 | -5.5 | W +15.5 | 155.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 90-60 | -1.5 | W +28.5 | 158.5 | U 150 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 83-80 | +9.5 | W +12.5 | 156.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 78-55 | -29.5 | L −6.5 | 151.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 30 | vs | W 86-55 | -31.5 | L −0.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 58-56 | -2.5 | L −0.5 | 146.5 | U 114 |
| Jan 5 | @ | W 72-69 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 155.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 83-77 | +4.5 | W +10.5 | 150.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 90-55 | -10.5 | W +24.5 | 146.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 77-58 | -4.5 | W +14.5 | 149.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 76-66 | -10.5 | L −0.5 | 152.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 76-57 | -4.5 | W +14.5 | 140.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 72-75 | +11.5 | W +8.5 | 157.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 1 | vs | L 69-78 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 154.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 80-68 | -12.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 10 | vs | L 77-80 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 146.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 68-49 | -13.5 | W +5.5 | 146.5 | U 117 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 52-57 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 139.5 | U 109 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 87-64 | -17.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 74-61 | -16.5 | L −3.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 82-67 | -5.5 | W +9.5 | 149.5 | U 149 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
WGA
W 86-53
+8.5
8
vs
FIU
W 96-66
+8.5
11
vs
UMES
W 69-50
−16.5
15
vs
OU
W 105-99
+4.5
20
vs
UNM
W 84-72
+3.5
21
vs
KSU
W 86-85
−0.5
25
vs
WIN
W 80-73
−7.5
29
vs
UPST
W 72-63
−16.5
7
vs
CREI
W 71-50
+15.5
10
vs
WIS
W 90-60
+28.5
13
@
ILL
W 83-80
+12.5
21
vs
UND
W 78-55
−6.5
30
vs
UNH
W 86-55
−0.5
2
vs
MSU
W 58-56
−0.5
5
@
OSU
W 72-69
+5.5
10
@
IU
W 83-77
+10.5
13
vs
ORE
W 90-55
+24.5
17
@
NU
W 77-58
+14.5
21
vs
WASH
W 76-66
−0.5
24
@
MINN
W 76-57
+14.5
27
@
MICH
L 72-75
+8.5
1
vs
ILL
L 69-78
−10.5
7
@
RUTG
W 80-68
−0.5
10
vs
PUR
L 77-80
−5.5
14
vs
NU
W 68-49
+5.5
17
@
IOWA
L 52-57
−3.5
21
vs
PSU
W 87-64
+5.5
25
vs
MD
W 74-61
−3.5
28
@
USC
W 82-67
+9.5
covered 16didn’t cover 13avg +3.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
WGA
W 86-53
−14.5
8
vs
FIU
W 96-66
+5.5
11
vs
UMES
W 69-50
−27.5
15
vs
OU
W 105-99
+40.5
20
vs
UNM
W 84-72
+4.5
21
vs
KSU
W 86-85
+2.5
25
vs
WIN
W 80-73
−13.5
29
vs
UPST
W 72-63
−22.5
7
vs
CREI
W 71-50
−34.5
10
vs
WIS
W 90-60
−8.5
13
@
ILL
W 83-80
+6.5
21
vs
UND
W 78-55
−18.5
30
vs
UNH
W 86-55
−5.5
2
vs
MSU
W 58-56
−32.5
5
@
OSU
W 72-69
−14.5
10
@
IU
W 83-77
+9.5
13
vs
ORE
W 90-55
−1.5
17
@
NU
W 77-58
−14.5
21
vs
WASH
W 76-66
−10.5
24
@
MINN
W 76-57
−7.5
27
@
MICH
L 72-75
−10.5
1
vs
ILL
L 69-78
−7.5
7
@
RUTG
W 80-68
+2.5
10
vs
PUR
L 77-80
+10.5
14
vs
NU
W 68-49
−29.5
17
@
IOWA
L 52-57
−30.5
21
vs
PSU
W 87-64
+3.5
25
vs
MD
W 74-61
−7.5
28
@
USC
W 82-67
−0.5
over 9under 20avg −7.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
UCLA
29 games played
Straight up
19-10
66% wins
Against the spread
12-17
41% covers · avg −1.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-14
52% overs · avg +3.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 80-74 | -29.5 | L −23.5 | 149.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 74-63 | -29.5 | L −18.5 | 152.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 10 | vs | W 83-62 | -30.5 | L −9.5 | 146.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 14 | vs | L 65-69 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 153.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 79-48 | -27.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 86-46 | -25.5 | W +14.5 | 131.5 | O 132 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 72-80 | -7.5 | L −15.5 | 143.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 3 | @ | W 82-80 | -2.5 | L −0.5 | 141.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 74-63 | -8.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 72-82 | +10.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 90-77 | -9.5 | W +3.5 | 142.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 19 | vs | W 108-87 | -24.5 | L −3.5 | 161.5 | O 195 |
| Dec 23 | vs | W 97-65 | -24.5 | W +7.5 | 148.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 61-74 | +6.5 | L −6.5 | 140.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 6 | @ | L 72-80 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 152.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 67-55 | -13.5 | L −1.5 | 147.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 71-60 | -4.5 | W +6.5 | 148.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 74-86 | +4.5 | L −7.5 | 146.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 69-67 | +5.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 71-64 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 143.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 73-57 | -4.5 | W +11.5 | 136.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 97-98 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 144.5 | O 195 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 98-66 | -13.5 | W +18.5 | 142.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 77-73 | -4.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 56-86 | +15.5 | L −14.5 | 156.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 59-82 | +8.5 | L −14.5 | 139.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 95-94 | +6.5 | W +7.5 | 146.5 | O 189 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 81-62 | -6.5 | W +12.5 | 150.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 73-78 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 136.5 | O 151 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
EWU
W 80-74
−23.5
7
vs
PEPP
W 74-63
−18.5
10
vs
WGA
W 83-62
−9.5
14
vs
ARIZ
L 65-69
−2.5
18
vs
SAC
W 79-48
+3.5
21
vs
PRES
W 86-46
+14.5
25
vs
CAL
L 72-80
−15.5
3
@
WASH
W 82-80
−0.5
6
vs
ORE
W 74-63
+2.5
13
vs
GONZ
L 72-82
+0.5
17
vs
ASU
W 90-77
+3.5
19
vs
CP
W 108-87
−3.5
23
vs
UCR
W 97-65
+7.5
3
@
IOWA
L 61-74
−6.5
6
@
WIS
L 72-80
−4.5
10
vs
MD
W 67-55
−1.5
14
@
PSU
W 71-60
+6.5
17
@
OSU
L 74-86
−7.5
20
vs
PUR
W 69-67
+7.5
24
vs
NU
W 71-64
−0.5
28
@
ORE
W 73-57
+11.5
31
vs
IU
L 97-98
−4.5
3
vs
RUTG
W 98-66
+18.5
7
vs
WASH
W 77-73
−0.5
14
@
MICH
L 56-86
−14.5
17
@
MSU
L 59-82
−14.5
21
vs
ILL
W 95-94
+7.5
24
vs
USC
W 81-62
+12.5
28
@
MINN
L 73-78
−6.5
covered 12didn’t cover 17avg −1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
EWU
W 80-74
+4.5
7
vs
PEPP
W 74-63
−15.5
10
vs
WGA
W 83-62
−1.5
14
vs
ARIZ
L 65-69
−19.5
18
vs
SAC
W 79-48
−19.5
21
vs
PRES
W 86-46
+0.5
25
vs
CAL
L 72-80
+8.5
3
@
WASH
W 82-80
+20.5
6
vs
ORE
W 74-63
−9.5
13
vs
GONZ
L 72-82
+6.5
17
vs
ASU
W 90-77
+24.5
19
vs
CP
W 108-87
+33.5
23
vs
UCR
W 97-65
+13.5
3
@
IOWA
L 61-74
−5.5
6
@
WIS
L 72-80
−0.5
10
vs
MD
W 67-55
−25.5
14
@
PSU
W 71-60
−17.5
17
@
OSU
L 74-86
+13.5
20
vs
PUR
W 69-67
−11.5
24
vs
NU
W 71-64
−8.5
28
@
ORE
W 73-57
−6.5
31
vs
IU
L 97-98
+50.5
3
vs
RUTG
W 98-66
+21.5
7
vs
WASH
W 77-73
+5.5
14
@
MICH
L 56-86
−14.5
17
@
MSU
L 59-82
+1.5
21
vs
ILL
W 95-94
+42.5
24
vs
USC
W 81-62
−7.5
28
@
MINN
L 73-78
+14.5
over 15under 14avg +3.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Nebraska
25-4 overall · 14-4 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- W@ USC82–67
- Wvs Maryland74–61
- Wvs Penn State87–64
- L@ Iowa52–57
- Wvs Northwestern68–49
3 days since their last game.
UCLA
19-10 overall · 11-7 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Minnesota73–78
- Wvs USC81–62
- Wvs Illinois95–94
- L@ Michigan St59–82
- L@ Michigan56–86
3 days since their last game.