Templeton Center · at Presbyterian
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | PRES | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects PRES 76–71 · win probability PRES 68%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 146.5
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: PRES has more of the edges
MER 3, PRES 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: MER 15.0%, PRES 19.4%. Forced: MER 17.0%, PRES 15.7%
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: MER 28%, PRES 86%. Transfers in: MER 2, PRES 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Free throws
Free throw rate: MER 39.2, PRES 39.4. Allowed: MER 29.7, PRES 37.1
Context
Schedule so far
MER has played the 193rd-hardest schedule, PRES the 272nd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Three-pointers
MER hits 35.6% and allows 36.2%; PRES hits 31.6% and allows 34.7%. Threes are 39.2% and 28.0% of their shots
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: MER plays 69.5 a game (148th fastest), PRES 66.9 (283rd). Faster games mean more points
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: MER 32.6%, PRES 33.1%. Defensive: MER 66.8%, PRES 69.3%
MER offense vs PRES defense
Offense 223rd of 366 against a defense 160th, on the model’s ratings
Home court
PRES at home. This season: PRES 0-0 at home, MER 0-0 away
PRES offense vs MER defense
Offense 222nd of 366 against a defense 268th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: MER 53.1 and allows 52.5; PRES 51.0 and allows 51.2
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | PRES -5.2 | — |
| Total | — | 146.5 | — |
| Projected score | — | MER 70.6 · PRES 75.9 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | PRES -3.0 | — |
| 1H total | 68.5 | — |
| 1H projected score | MER 32.8 · PRES 35.8 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | |
| 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Mercer
29 games played
Straight up
16-13
55% wins
Against the spread
19-10
66% covers · avg +1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-15
48% overs · avg +3.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 61-76 | +28.5 | W +13.5 | 143.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 92-77 | -3.5 | W +11.5 | 157.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 69-105 | +2.5 | L −33.5 | 162.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 22 | @ | W 95-83 | +4.5 | W +16.5 | 163.5 | O 178 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 75-67 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 142.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 29 | @ | W 91-84 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 159.5 | O 175 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 78-67 | -10.5 | W +0.5 | 155.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 63-70 | +22.5 | W +15.5 | 152.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 63-81 | +16.5 | L −1.5 | 160.5 | U 144 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 78-84 | +7.5 | W +1.5 | 151.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 72-74 | +2.5 | W +0.5 | 154.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 71-77 | +7.5 | W +1.5 | 148.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 101-63 | -16.5 | W +21.5 | 147.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 109-97 | -3.5 | W +8.5 | 156.5 | O 206 |
| Jan 15 | @ | W 77-67 | -8.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 102-92 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 155.5 | O 194 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 88-76 | -8.5 | W +3.5 | 158.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 77-80 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 157.5 | U 157 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 95-77 | -10.5 | W +7.5 | 158.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 95-81 | -18.5 | L −4.5 | 153.5 | O 176 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 75-79 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 155.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 49-69 | -1.5 | L −21.5 | 160.5 | U 118 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 69-64 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 151.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 70-54 | -11.5 | W +4.5 | 147.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 90-94 | -10.5 | L −14.5 | 151.5 | O 184 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 89-86 | -3.5 | L −0.5 | 156.5 | O 175 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 74-78 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 156.5 | U 152 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 82-76 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 149.5 | O 158 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 73-77 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 154.5 | U 150 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
TENN
L 61-76
+13.5
9
vs
LIP
W 92-77
+11.5
15
@
WIN
L 69-105
−33.5
22
@
EKU
W 95-83
+16.5
26
vs
APP
W 75-67
+1.5
29
@
ELON
W 91-84
+9.5
2
vs
GAST
W 78-67
+0.5
13
@
CLEM
L 63-70
+15.5
17
@
UCF
L 63-81
−1.5
20
@
WSU
L 78-84
+1.5
31
@
FUR
L 72-74
+0.5
3
@
ETSU
L 71-77
+1.5
7
vs
CIT
W 101-63
+21.5
10
vs
WOF
W 109-97
+8.5
15
@
VMI
W 77-67
+1.5
17
@
UNCG
W 102-92
+4.5
21
vs
WCU
W 88-76
+3.5
24
@
WOF
L 77-80
−5.5
29
vs
UNCG
W 95-77
+7.5
31
vs
VMI
W 95-81
−4.5
5
@
UTC
L 75-79
−8.5
7
@
SAM
L 49-69
−21.5
11
vs
FUR
W 69-64
+1.5
14
@
CIT
W 70-54
+4.5
19
vs
UTC
L 90-94
−14.5
21
vs
SAM
W 89-86
−0.5
25
@
WCU
L 74-78
−5.5
28
vs
ETSU
W 82-76
+4.5
7
vs
WCU
L 73-77
−5.5
covered 19didn’t cover 10avg +1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
TENN
L 61-76
−6.5
9
vs
LIP
W 92-77
+11.5
15
@
WIN
L 69-105
+11.5
22
@
EKU
W 95-83
+14.5
26
vs
APP
W 75-67
−0.5
29
@
ELON
W 91-84
+15.5
2
vs
GAST
W 78-67
−10.5
13
@
CLEM
L 63-70
−19.5
17
@
UCF
L 63-81
−16.5
20
@
WSU
L 78-84
+10.5
31
@
FUR
L 72-74
−8.5
3
@
ETSU
L 71-77
−0.5
7
vs
CIT
W 101-63
+16.5
10
vs
WOF
W 109-97
+49.5
15
@
VMI
W 77-67
−9.5
17
@
UNCG
W 102-92
+38.5
21
vs
WCU
W 88-76
+5.5
24
@
WOF
L 77-80
−0.5
29
vs
UNCG
W 95-77
+13.5
31
vs
VMI
W 95-81
+22.5
5
@
UTC
L 75-79
−1.5
7
@
SAM
L 49-69
−42.5
11
vs
FUR
W 69-64
−18.5
14
@
CIT
W 70-54
−23.5
19
vs
UTC
L 90-94
+32.5
21
vs
SAM
W 89-86
+18.5
25
@
WCU
L 74-78
−4.5
28
vs
ETSU
W 82-76
+8.5
7
vs
WCU
L 73-77
−4.5
over 14under 15avg +3.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Presbyterian
30 games played
Straight up
12-18
40% wins
Against the spread
17-13
57% covers · avg +0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-14
53% overs · avg +1.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 55-76 | +3.5 | L −17.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 68-64 | +6.5 | W +10.5 | 141.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 10 | @ | W 63-61 | +3.5 | W +5.5 | 141.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 61-81 | +16.5 | L −3.5 | 137.5 | O 142 |
| Nov 16 | @ | L 62-64 | +6.5 | W +4.5 | 150.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 57-67 | +10.5 | W +0.5 | 124.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 46-86 | +25.5 | L −14.5 | 131.5 | O 132 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 69-41 | -8.5 | W +19.5 | 133.5 | U 110 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 56-63 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 138.5 | U 119 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 80-72 | -7.5 | W +0.5 | 134.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 53-74 | +4.5 | L −16.5 | 131.5 | U 127 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 81-87 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 138.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 86-77 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 137.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 61-80 | +6.5 | L −12.5 | 147.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 70-77 | +3.5 | L −3.5 | 139.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 71-70 | +2.5 | W +3.5 | 138.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 92-55 | -8.5 | W +28.5 | 145.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 87-83 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 72-82 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 146.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 81-84 | +14.5 | W +11.5 | 149.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 84-93 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 151.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 68-62 | -17.5 | L −11.5 | 145.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 67-84 | +1.5 | L −15.5 | 146.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 58-57 | +5.5 | W +6.5 | 137.5 | U 115 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 72-65 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 74-76 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 26 | vs | L 73-79 | +12.5 | W +6.5 | 151.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 70-74 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 150.5 | U 144 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 91-85 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | O 176 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 71-73 | +7.5 | W +5.5 | 145.5 | U 144 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
NAVY
L 55-76
−17.5
8
vs
ETSU
W 68-64
+10.5
10
@
GAST
W 63-61
+5.5
12
@
SC
L 61-81
−3.5
16
@
SAC
L 62-64
+4.5
18
@
CAL
L 57-67
+0.5
21
@
UCLA
L 46-86
−14.5
30
vs
CIT
W 69-41
+19.5
3
@
WOF
L 56-63
−2.5
6
vs
MORE
W 80-72
+0.5
17
@
ECU
L 53-74
−16.5
21
@
MAN
L 81-87
−8.5
3
vs
UPST
W 86-77
+7.5
7
@
RAD
L 61-80
−12.5
10
@
LONG
L 70-77
−3.5
14
vs
UNCA
W 71-70
+3.5
17
@
GWEB
W 92-55
+28.5
21
vs
CHSO
W 87-83
+5.5
24
vs
WIN
L 72-82
−4.5
29
@
HPU
L 81-84
+11.5
31
vs
RAD
L 84-93
−10.5
7
vs
GWEB
W 68-62
−11.5
12
@
CHSO
L 67-84
−15.5
14
@
UNCA
W 58-57
+6.5
19
vs
LONG
W 72-65
+4.5
21
@
UPST
L 74-76
−3.5
26
vs
HPU
L 73-79
+6.5
28
@
WIN
L 70-74
+3.5
6
vs
RAD
W 91-85
+8.5
7
vs
WIN
L 71-73
+5.5
covered 17didn’t cover 13avg +0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
NAVY
L 55-76
−10.5
8
vs
ETSU
W 68-64
−9.5
10
@
GAST
W 63-61
−17.5
12
@
SC
L 61-81
+4.5
16
@
SAC
L 62-64
−24.5
18
@
CAL
L 57-67
−0.5
21
@
UCLA
L 46-86
+0.5
30
vs
CIT
W 69-41
−23.5
3
@
WOF
L 56-63
−19.5
6
vs
MORE
W 80-72
+17.5
17
@
ECU
L 53-74
−4.5
21
@
MAN
L 81-87
+29.5
3
vs
UPST
W 86-77
+25.5
7
@
RAD
L 61-80
−6.5
10
@
LONG
L 70-77
+7.5
14
vs
UNCA
W 71-70
+2.5
17
@
GWEB
W 92-55
+1.5
21
vs
CHSO
W 87-83
+22.5
24
vs
WIN
L 72-82
+7.5
29
@
HPU
L 81-84
+15.5
31
vs
RAD
L 84-93
+25.5
7
vs
GWEB
W 68-62
−15.5
12
@
CHSO
L 67-84
+4.5
14
@
UNCA
W 58-57
−22.5
19
vs
LONG
W 72-65
−2.5
21
@
UPST
L 74-76
+8.5
26
vs
HPU
L 73-79
+0.5
28
@
WIN
L 70-74
−6.5
6
vs
RAD
W 91-85
+29.5
7
vs
WIN
L 71-73
−1.5
over 16under 14avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Presbyterian has the better starters
Position by position: Mercer 0, Presbyterian 2, even 3
MercerBetterPresbyterian
G B. Shoulders9.5 pts · 6.6 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 41
→PRESSmall
G C. Parrish14.7 pts · 2.9 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 56
G Q. Perkins8.7 pts · 1.4 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 22
→PRESSmall
G T. Wilson11.6 pts · 3.3 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 52
F K. Steele TR8 pts · 4.4 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 62
=No call
G E. Taylor5.6 pts · 1.8 reb · 3.6 ast
Not ranked
F M. Mabor Makoi TR1.4 pts · 2.4 reb · 0.1 ast
Score 10
=Even
G I. King3.7 pts · 2.7 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 2
F P. Padegimas NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
F J. Peterson11 pts · 7.2 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 71
MercerBetterPresbyterian
MER offense223rd of 366 · -6.8
→PRESSmall
PRES defense160th of 366 · -3.5
MER defense268th of 366 · -6.8
=Even
PRES offense222nd of 366 · -6.8
Backcourt-3.4 · 2 players
←MERSmall
Backcourt-4.4 · 4 players
Frontcourt-0.6 · 3 players
→PRESSmall
Frontcourt+1.1 · 1 player
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench-1.6 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestMER betterPRES betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
B. Shoulders32 minQ. Perkins24 minM. KoveosNewD. BarrNewH. LyttleNewK. LamonteNew
Forwards
K. Steele21 min · TRM. Mabor Makoi8 min · TRP. PadegimasNewS. MayhughNewD. KovacevicNew
Guards
C. Parrish35 minT. Wilson32 minE. Taylor21 minI. King19 minK. Hudson11 minJ. Bowden8 min
Forwards
J. Peterson30 minC. Chiakwelu11 minA. AyelyineNewL. HackworthNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 80.1 #65 | Points per game | 70.0 #286 |
| 1.15 #55 | Points per possession | 1.05 #249 |
| 69.5 #148 | Pace (possessions) | 66.9 #283 |
| Shooting | ||
| 53.1 #98 | Effective FG% | 51.0 #196 |
| 35.6 #87 | 3-point % | 31.6 #302 |
| 39.2 #188 | 3-point attempt rate | 28.0 #360 |
| 39.2 #74 | Free throw rate | 39.4 #71 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.0 #67 | Turnover rate | 19.4 #335 |
| 32.6 #102 | Offensive rebound rate | 33.1 #86 |
| 12.7 #240 | Assists per game | 12.4 #260 |
| Defense | ||
| 77.8 #263 | Points allowed | 73.1 #133 |
| 1.12 #273 | Points allowed per possession | 1.09 #192 |
| 52.5 #242 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.2 #170 |
| 36.2 #311 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.7 #235 |
| 17.0 #155 | Turnovers forced | 15.7 #237 |
| 66.8 #303 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.3 #188 |
| 7.1 #115 | Steals per game | 5.5 #303 |
| 3.2 #186 | Blocks per game | 4.5 #35 |
Mercer
16-13 in 2025-26 overall · 11-8 in conference · Southern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs W Carolina73–77
- Wvs ETSU82–76
- L@ W Carolina74–78
- Wvs Samford89–86
- Lvs Chattanooga90–94
A week or more of rest.
Presbyterian
12-18 in 2025-26 overall · 8-10 in conference · Big South Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Winthrop71–73
- Wvs Radford91–85
- L@ Winthrop70–74
- Lvs High Point73–79
- L@ SC Upstate74–76
A week or more of rest.