Baha Mar Convention Center · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MUR | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects NCSU 86–74 · win probability NCSU 86%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 159.6
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: NCSU has more of the edges
NCSU 4, MUR 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
NCSU offense vs MUR defense
Offense 42nd of 366 against a defense 197th, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: NCSU 13.1%, MUR 16.4%. Forced: NCSU 18.2%, MUR 15.7%
Context
Schedule so far
NCSU has played the 51st-hardest schedule, MUR the 165th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Free throws
Free throw rate: NCSU 35.1, MUR 38.6. Allowed: NCSU 36.9, MUR 32.2
Three-pointers
NCSU hits 38.8% and allows 35.5%; MUR hits 35.0% and allows 36.2%. Threes are 43.4% and 44.8% of their shots
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: NCSU 28.2%, MUR 32.6%. Defensive: NCSU 69.5%, MUR 68.7%
MUR offense vs NCSU defense
Offense 110th of 366 against a defense 58th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: NCSU plays 70.2 a game (103rd fastest), MUR 72.3 (30th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: NCSU 55.0 and allows 52.7; MUR 53.8 and allows 52.4
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: NCSU 28%, MUR 28%. Transfers in: NCSU 8, MUR 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | NCSU -12.5 | — |
| Total | — | 159.6 | — |
| Projected score | — | NCSU 86.1 · MUR 73.6 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | NCSU -7.5 | — |
| 1H total | 74.6 | — |
| 1H projected score | NCSU 41.1 · MUR 33.5 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 2-8 20% | 6-4 60% | |
| 4-6 40% | 2-8 20% | 6-4 60% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
NC State
34 games played
Straight up
20-14
59% wins
Against the spread
15-19
44% covers · avg −1.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
21-13
62% overs · avg +6 pts vs the total
Against the spread
15-1944%
2 straight misses ATS1 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 114-66 | -31.5 | W +16.5 | 145.5 | O 180 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 94-70 | -19.5 | W +4.5 | 162.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 110-64 | -30.5 | W +15.5 | 153.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 85-79 | -11.5 | L −5.5 | 164.5 | U 164 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 74-85 | -7.5 | L −18.5 | 143.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 81-70 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 152.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 97-102 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 161.5 | O 199 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 73-83 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 162.5 | U 156 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 75-63 | -28.5 | L −16.5 | 155.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 85-45 | -12.5 | W +27.5 | 149.5 | U 130 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 76-77 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 148.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 108-72 | -34.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 76-62 | -7.5 | W +6.5 | 148.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 70-57 | -10.5 | W +2.5 | 159.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 61-76 | -4.5 | L −19.5 | 151.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 6 | @ | W 79-71 | -11.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 113-69 | -4.5 | W +39.5 | 160.5 | O 182 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 74-78 | -17.5 | L −21.5 | 154.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 20 | @ | W 80-76 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 142.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 81-72 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 144.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 88-68 | -10.5 | W +9.5 | 151.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 96-78 | -5.5 | W +12.5 | 156.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 3 | @ | W 84-83 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 159.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 82-73 | -10.5 | L −1.5 | 154.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 9 | @ | L 77-118 | +6.5 | L −34.5 | 161.5 | O 195 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 76-77 | -5.5 | L −6.5 | 157.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 82-58 | -8.5 | W +15.5 | 156.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 61-90 | +6.5 | L −22.5 | 151.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 90-96 | -6.5 | L −12.5 | 153.5 | O 186 |
| Mar 2 | vs | L 64-93 | +8.5 | L −20.5 | 150.5 | O 157 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 84-85 | -9.5 | L −10.5 | 152.5 | O 169 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 98-88 | -8.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | O 186 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 74-81 | +6.5 | L −0.5 | 153.5 | O 155 |
| Mar 17 | vs | L 66-68 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 157.5 | U 134 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
NCCU
W 114-66
+16.5
7
vs
UAB
W 94-70
+4.5
12
vs
UNCG
W 110-64
+15.5
17
vs
VCU
W 85-79
−5.5
24
vs
HALL
L 74-85
−18.5
25
vs
BOIS
W 81-70
+4.5
26
vs
TEX
L 97-102
−6.5
3
@
AUB
L 73-83
−4.5
6
vs
UNCA
W 75-63
−16.5
10
vs
LIB
W 85-45
+27.5
13
vs
KU
L 76-77
−2.5
17
vs
TXSO
W 108-72
+1.5
21
vs
MISS
W 76-62
+6.5
31
vs
WAKE
W 70-57
+2.5
3
vs
UVA
L 61-76
−19.5
6
@
BC
W 79-71
−3.5
10
@
FSU
W 113-69
+39.5
17
vs
GT
L 74-78
−21.5
20
@
CLEM
W 80-76
+6.5
24
@
PITT
W 81-72
+2.5
27
vs
SYR
W 88-68
+9.5
31
@
WAKE
W 96-78
+12.5
3
@
SMU
W 84-83
−0.5
7
vs
VT
W 82-73
−1.5
9
@
LOU
L 77-118
−34.5
14
vs
MIA
L 76-77
−6.5
17
vs
UNC
W 82-58
+15.5
24
@
UVA
L 61-90
−22.5
28
@
ND
L 90-96
−12.5
2
vs
DUKE
L 64-93
−20.5
7
vs
STAN
L 84-85
−10.5
11
vs
PITT
W 98-88
+1.5
12
vs
UVA
L 74-81
−0.5
17
vs
TEX
L 66-68
−3.5
covered 15didn’t cover 19avg −1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
NCCU
W 114-66
+34.5
7
vs
UAB
W 94-70
+1.5
12
vs
UNCG
W 110-64
+20.5
17
vs
VCU
W 85-79
−0.5
24
vs
HALL
L 74-85
+15.5
25
vs
BOIS
W 81-70
−1.5
26
vs
TEX
L 97-102
+37.5
3
@
AUB
L 73-83
−6.5
6
vs
UNCA
W 75-63
−17.5
10
vs
LIB
W 85-45
−19.5
13
vs
KU
L 76-77
+4.5
17
vs
TXSO
W 108-72
+27.5
21
vs
MISS
W 76-62
−10.5
31
vs
WAKE
W 70-57
−32.5
3
vs
UVA
L 61-76
−14.5
6
@
BC
W 79-71
+8.5
10
@
FSU
W 113-69
+21.5
17
vs
GT
L 74-78
−2.5
20
@
CLEM
W 80-76
+13.5
24
@
PITT
W 81-72
+8.5
27
vs
SYR
W 88-68
+4.5
31
@
WAKE
W 96-78
+17.5
3
@
SMU
W 84-83
+7.5
7
vs
VT
W 82-73
+0.5
9
@
LOU
L 77-118
+33.5
14
vs
MIA
L 76-77
−4.5
17
vs
UNC
W 82-58
−16.5
24
@
UVA
L 61-90
−0.5
28
@
ND
L 90-96
+32.5
2
vs
DUKE
L 64-93
+6.5
7
vs
STAN
L 84-85
+16.5
11
vs
PITT
W 98-88
+41.5
12
vs
UVA
L 74-81
+1.5
17
vs
TEX
L 66-68
−23.5
over 21under 13avg +6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Murray St
33 games played
Straight up
20-13
61% wins
Against the spread
14-19
42% covers · avg −2.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-14
58% overs · avg +4.9 pts vs the total
Against the spread
14-1942%
8 straight misses ATS0 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 85-77 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 153.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 108-60 | -38.5 | W +9.5 | 159.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 91-102 | +10.5 | L −0.5 | 164.5 | O 193 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 99-79 | -14.5 | W +5.5 | 157.5 | O 178 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 89-68 | -13.5 | W +7.5 | 153.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 87-90 | -6.5 | L −9.5 | 161.5 | O 177 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 60-73 | +2.5 | L −10.5 | 158.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 96-95 | +7.5 | W +8.5 | 167.5 | O 191 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 84-52 | -16.5 | W +15.5 | 158.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 81-68 | -16.5 | L −3.5 | 157.5 | U 149 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 115-100 | +4.5 | W +19.5 | 168.5 | O 215 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 81-72 | -7.5 | W +1.5 | 156.5 | U 153 |
| Dec 21 | @ | W 85-79 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 155.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 84-81 | -6.5 | L −3.5 | 165.5 | U 165 |
| Jan 1 | @ | W 81-77 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 159.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 86-66 | -5.5 | W +14.5 | 162.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 79-69 | -8.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 92-79 | -12.5 | W +0.5 | 152.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 85-81 | -11.5 | L −7.5 | 167.5 | U 166 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 90-101 | -4.5 | L −15.5 | 156.5 | O 191 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 76-81 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 65-70 | -3.5 | L −8.5 | 159.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 86-103 | +3.5 | L −13.5 | 163.5 | O 189 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 81-74 | -6.5 | W +0.5 | 157.5 | U 155 |
| Feb 6 | @ | W 91-81 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 157.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 9 | vs | L 60-89 | -4.5 | L −33.5 | 145.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 74-72 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 163.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 15 | vs | L 70-87 | +1.5 | L −15.5 | 166.5 | U 157 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 61-78 | +2.5 | L −14.5 | 158.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 88-75 | -15.5 | L −2.5 | 153.5 | O 163 |
| Mar 1 | @ | L 78-87 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 157.5 | O 165 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 79-92 | +1.5 | L −11.5 | 150.5 | O 171 |
| Mar 18 | @ | L 75-89 | +8.5 | L −5.5 | 159.5 | O 164 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
OMA
W 85-77
+2.5
7
vs
MVSU
W 108-60
+9.5
11
@
SMU
L 91-102
−0.5
15
vs
NICH
W 99-79
+5.5
18
vs
LR
W 89-68
+7.5
23
vs
MTSU
L 87-90
−9.5
24
vs
MCN
L 60-73
−10.5
25
vs
GW
W 96-95
+8.5
2
vs
MORE
W 84-52
+15.5
6
vs
BELL
W 81-68
−3.5
13
vs
AKR
W 115-100
+19.5
18
vs
DRKE
W 81-72
+1.5
21
@
VAL
W 85-79
+0.5
29
vs
SIU
W 84-81
−3.5
1
@
UIC
W 81-77
−1.5
4
vs
BRAD
W 86-66
+14.5
7
@
EVAN
W 79-69
+1.5
10
vs
VAL
W 92-79
+0.5
17
vs
INST
W 85-81
−7.5
21
@
DRKE
L 90-101
−15.5
24
@
UNI
L 76-81
−6.5
28
vs
ILST
L 65-70
−8.5
31
@
BEL
L 86-103
−13.5
3
vs
UIC
W 81-74
+0.5
6
@
SIU
W 91-81
+8.5
9
vs
UNI
L 60-89
−33.5
12
@
INST
W 74-72
−1.5
15
vs
BEL
L 70-87
−15.5
18
@
ILST
L 61-78
−14.5
21
vs
EVAN
W 88-75
−2.5
1
@
BRAD
L 78-87
−5.5
6
vs
UIC
L 79-92
−11.5
18
@
NEV
L 75-89
−5.5
covered 14didn’t cover 19avg −2.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
OMA
W 85-77
+8.5
7
vs
MVSU
W 108-60
+8.5
11
@
SMU
L 91-102
+28.5
15
vs
NICH
W 99-79
+20.5
18
vs
LR
W 89-68
+3.5
23
vs
MTSU
L 87-90
+15.5
24
vs
MCN
L 60-73
−25.5
25
vs
GW
W 96-95
+23.5
2
vs
MORE
W 84-52
−22.5
6
vs
BELL
W 81-68
−8.5
13
vs
AKR
W 115-100
+46.5
18
vs
DRKE
W 81-72
−3.5
21
@
VAL
W 85-79
+8.5
29
vs
SIU
W 84-81
−0.5
1
@
UIC
W 81-77
−1.5
4
vs
BRAD
W 86-66
−10.5
7
@
EVAN
W 79-69
−5.5
10
vs
VAL
W 92-79
+18.5
17
vs
INST
W 85-81
−1.5
21
@
DRKE
L 90-101
+34.5
24
@
UNI
L 76-81
+11.5
28
vs
ILST
L 65-70
−24.5
31
@
BEL
L 86-103
+25.5
3
vs
UIC
W 81-74
−2.5
6
@
SIU
W 91-81
+14.5
9
vs
UNI
L 60-89
+3.5
12
@
INST
W 74-72
−17.5
15
vs
BEL
L 70-87
−9.5
18
@
ILST
L 61-78
−19.5
21
vs
EVAN
W 88-75
+9.5
1
@
BRAD
L 78-87
+7.5
6
vs
UIC
L 79-92
+20.5
18
@
NEV
L 75-89
+4.5
over 19under 14avg +4.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
NC State has the better starters
Position by position: NC State 3, Murray St 0, even 2
NC StateBetterMurray St
G P. Edmead TR16.5 pts · 3.6 reb · 4.3 ast
Score 83
←NCSUSmall
G C. Jones TR10 pts · 3 reb · 3.1 ast
Score 61
G C. Hammond TR15.7 pts · 2.8 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 87
=Even
G R. Domon14.2 pts · 5.2 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 95
G P. McNeil13.8 pts · 3.6 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 90
←NCSUBig
G M. Courbon4.6 pts · 2 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 31
F K. Evans TR11.8 pts · 8.8 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 95
←NCSUBig
F S. Tupuola TR6.3 pts · 5.8 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 55
F E. Yalaho TR10.1 pts · 5.6 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 58
=Even
F B. Rogers TR6.7 pts · 3.6 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 67
NC StateBetterMurray St
NCSU offense42nd of 366 · +4.6
←NCSUBig
MUR defense197th of 366 · -4.8
NCSU defense58th of 366 · +1.3
=Even
MUR offense110th of 366 · -1.8
Backcourt+6.7 · 3 players
←NCSUBig
Backcourt+2.2 · 3 players
Frontcourt+4.6 · 2 players
←NCSUBig
Frontcourt+0.4 · 2 players
Bench+2.9 · 5 players
←NCSUBig
Bench-1.0 · 2 players
Score, worst to bestNCSU betterMUR betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
P. Edmead35 min · TRC. Hammond30 min · TRP. McNeil29 minD. Adams26 min · TRR. Keene23 min · TRJ. Brim5 min · TR
Forwards
K. Evans30 min · TRE. Yalaho29 min · TRV. Lubin28 minC. Emuobor19 min · TRR. JurkovicNewS. HallNew
Guards
C. Jones26 min · TRR. Domon25 minM. Courbon16 minB. Shorter15 minK. Magwood11 min · TRB. ShtolzbergNew
Forwards
S. Tupuola25 min · TRB. Rogers18 min · TRP. NikolicNewJ. BoulefaaNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 83.2 #25 | Points per game | 83.1 #26 |
| 1.18 #30 | Points per possession | 1.15 #56 |
| 70.2 #103 | Pace (possessions) | 72.3 #30 |
| Shooting | ||
| 55.0 #35 | Effective FG% | 53.8 #70 |
| 38.8 #6 | 3-point % | 35.0 #120 |
| 43.4 #104 | 3-point attempt rate | 44.8 #72 |
| 35.1 #175 | Free throw rate | 38.6 #86 |
| Possessions | ||
| 13.1 #7 | Turnover rate | 16.4 #160 |
| 28.2 #258 | Offensive rebound rate | 32.6 #100 |
| 15.4 #70 | Assists per game | 13.7 #165 |
| Defense | ||
| 76.3 #224 | Points allowed | 80.2 #323 |
| 1.09 #186 | Points allowed per possession | 1.11 #233 |
| 52.7 #256 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.4 #236 |
| 35.5 #281 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.2 #310 |
| 18.2 #90 | Turnovers forced | 15.7 #234 |
| 69.5 #181 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.7 #214 |
| 8.1 #37 | Steals per game | 5.9 #248 |
| 3.4 #159 | Blocks per game | 4.1 #69 |
NC State
20-14 in 2025-26 overall · 11-9 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Texas66–68
- Lvs Virginia74–81
- Wvs Pitt98–88
- Lvs Stanford84–85
- Lvs Duke64–93
A week or more of rest.
Murray St
20-13 in 2025-26 overall · 12-9 in conference · Missouri Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Nevada75–89
- Lvs UIC79–92
- L@ Bradley78–87
- Wvs Evansville88–75
- L@ Illinois St61–78
A week or more of rest.