Savage Arena · at Toledo
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | TOL | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects TOL 78–74 · win probability TOL 61%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 151.7
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it
RMU 4, TOL 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: RMU 37.5%, TOL 29.5%. Defensive: RMU 71.2%, TOL 66.3%
Turnovers
Turnover rate: RMU 18.6%, TOL 14.7%. Forced: RMU 15.8%, TOL 17.9%
Free throws
Free throw rate: RMU 28.0, TOL 30.5. Allowed: RMU 40.1, TOL 26.6
Shooting
Effective FG%: RMU 54.9 and allows 50.0; TOL 54.5 and allows 54.3
Context
Schedule so far
RMU has played the 280th-hardest schedule, TOL the 172nd. A record against a soft schedule means less
TOL offense vs RMU defense
Offense 121st of 366 against a defense 183rd, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: RMU plays 67.5 a game (256th fastest), TOL 69.5 (146th). Faster games mean more points
RMU offense vs TOL defense
Offense 179th of 366 against a defense 234th, on the model’s ratings
Home court
TOL at home. This season: TOL 0-0 at home, RMU 0-0 away
Three-pointers
RMU hits 38.0% and allows 33.2%; TOL hits 37.0% and allows 34.4%. Threes are 40.7% and 32.5% of their shots
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: RMU 32%, TOL 43%. Transfers in: RMU 4, TOL 2. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | TOL -3.3 | — |
| Total | — | 151.7 | — |
| Projected score | — | RMU 74.2 · TOL 77.5 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | TOL -1.8 | — |
| 1H total | 70.9 | — |
| 1H projected score | RMU 34.5 · TOL 36.4 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8-2 80% | 8-2 80% | 3-7 30% | |
| 7-3 70% | 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
RMU 1–0 TOLRMU leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · RMU 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2025-26 | TOL 70 @ RMU 75 | RMU +1.5 | RMU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Robert Morris
31 games played
Straight up
20-11
65% wins
Against the spread
20-11
65% covers · avg +2.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-15
52% overs · avg +0.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 69-101 | +22.5 | L −9.5 | 136.5 | O 170 |
| Nov 6 | @ | W 81-79 | +7.5 | W +9.5 | 151.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 61-75 | +11.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 70-71 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 148.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 88-74 | +1.5 | W +15.5 | 151.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 61-54 | -8.5 | L −1.5 | 152.5 | U 115 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 80-62 | -11.5 | W +6.5 | 142.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 4 | @ | W 80-78 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 72-74 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 153.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 75-70 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 154.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 80-77 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 79-70 | -13.5 | L −4.5 | 145.5 | O 149 |
| Dec 29 | vs | L 77-79 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 149.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 2 | @ | W 85-77 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 148.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 73-96 | +1.5 | L −21.5 | 161.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 11 | vs | L 74-79 | -4.5 | L −9.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 93-96 | -5.5 | L −8.5 | 160.5 | O 189 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 92-89 | +7.5 | W +10.5 | 153.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 88-76 | -4.5 | W +7.5 | 152.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 67-71 | -6.5 | L −10.5 | 142.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 74-58 | -8.5 | W +7.5 | 162.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 71-83 | +2.5 | L −9.5 | 145.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 72-66 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 72-66 | +3.5 | W +9.5 | 143.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 85-68 | -3.5 | W +13.5 | 154.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 15 | vs | W 93-69 | -1.5 | W +22.5 | 156.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 22 | @ | W 81-68 | +4.5 | W +17.5 | 146.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 73-62 | -8.5 | W +2.5 | 150.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 83-64 | -12.5 | W +6.5 | 157.5 | U 147 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 68-53 | -3.5 | W +11.5 | 143.5 | U 121 |
| Mar 9 | vs | L 64-70 | -4.5 | L −10.5 | 146.5 | U 134 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
IOWA
L 69-101
−9.5
6
@
DRKE
W 81-79
+9.5
20
@
SBU
L 61-75
−2.5
23
@
MONM
L 70-71
+1.5
26
vs
UIC
W 88-74
+15.5
28
vs
SUU
W 61-54
−1.5
30
vs
STET
W 80-62
+6.5
4
@
GB
W 80-78
+0.5
6
@
MILW
L 72-74
+2.5
13
vs
TOL
W 75-70
+6.5
17
vs
YSU
W 80-77
+0.5
20
@
SFPA
W 79-70
−4.5
29
vs
NKU
L 77-79
−0.5
2
@
DETM
W 85-77
+4.5
4
@
OAK
L 73-96
−21.5
11
vs
PFW
L 74-79
−9.5
15
@
IUIN
L 93-96
−8.5
17
@
NKU
W 92-89
+10.5
22
vs
MILW
W 88-76
+7.5
24
vs
GB
L 67-71
−10.5
28
vs
IUIN
W 74-58
+7.5
31
@
PFW
L 71-83
−9.5
4
vs
WRST
W 72-66
+7.5
7
@
YSU
W 72-66
+9.5
12
@
CLE
W 85-68
+13.5
15
vs
OAK
W 93-69
+22.5
22
@
WRST
W 81-68
+17.5
25
vs
DETM
W 73-62
+2.5
28
vs
CLE
W 83-64
+6.5
4
vs
YSU
W 68-53
+11.5
9
vs
DETM
L 64-70
−10.5
covered 20didn’t cover 11avg +2.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
IOWA
L 69-101
+33.5
6
@
DRKE
W 81-79
+8.5
20
@
SBU
L 61-75
−10.5
23
@
MONM
L 70-71
−7.5
26
vs
UIC
W 88-74
+10.5
28
vs
SUU
W 61-54
−37.5
30
vs
STET
W 80-62
−0.5
4
@
GB
W 80-78
+17.5
6
@
MILW
L 72-74
−7.5
13
vs
TOL
W 75-70
−9.5
17
vs
YSU
W 80-77
+16.5
20
@
SFPA
W 79-70
+3.5
29
vs
NKU
L 77-79
+6.5
2
@
DETM
W 85-77
+13.5
4
@
OAK
L 73-96
+7.5
11
vs
PFW
L 74-79
+6.5
15
@
IUIN
L 93-96
+28.5
17
@
NKU
W 92-89
+27.5
22
vs
MILW
W 88-76
+11.5
24
vs
GB
L 67-71
−4.5
28
vs
IUIN
W 74-58
−30.5
31
@
PFW
L 71-83
+8.5
4
vs
WRST
W 72-66
−9.5
7
@
YSU
W 72-66
−5.5
12
@
CLE
W 85-68
−1.5
15
vs
OAK
W 93-69
+5.5
22
@
WRST
W 81-68
+2.5
25
vs
DETM
W 73-62
−15.5
28
vs
CLE
W 83-64
−10.5
4
vs
YSU
W 68-53
−22.5
9
vs
DETM
L 64-70
−12.5
over 16under 15avg +0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Toledo
32 games played
Straight up
17-15
53% wins
Against the spread
19-13
59% covers · avg +2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-19
41% overs · avg −0.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 74-76 | -2.5 | L −4.5 | 150.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 8 | vs | L 73-85 | -2.5 | L −14.5 | 160.5 | U 158 |
| Nov 11 | @ | W 81-71 | +5.5 | W +15.5 | 159.5 | U 152 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 90-83 | -10.5 | L −3.5 | 159.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 92-75 | -1.5 | W +15.5 | 160.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 75-68 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 159.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 72-87 | +4.5 | L −10.5 | 163.5 | U 159 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 97-98 | +4.5 | W +3.5 | 166.5 | O 195 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 70-75 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 154.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 69-92 | +23.5 | W +0.5 | 150.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 30 | vs | W 84-79 | -10.5 | L −5.5 | 160.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 78-75 | -7.5 | L −4.5 | 158.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 6 | @ | W 75-61 | -7.5 | W +6.5 | 161.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 9 | vs | L 73-87 | -1.5 | L −15.5 | 166.5 | U 160 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 101-85 | -2.5 | W +13.5 | 161.5 | O 186 |
| Jan 16 | @ | L 84-87 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 168.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 20 | @ | L 82-84 | +2.5 | W +0.5 | 164.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 73-72 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 155.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 81-91 | +12.5 | W +2.5 | 168.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 73-55 | -8.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 3 | vs | L 72-75 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 161.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 71-73 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 153.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 90-79 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 154.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 70-80 | +3.5 | L −6.5 | 150.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 94-75 | -8.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 79-69 | -12.5 | L −2.5 | 150.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 79-67 | +1.5 | W +13.5 | 158.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 72-74 | +7.5 | W +5.5 | 162.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 99-78 | -5.5 | W +15.5 | 155.5 | O 177 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 77-76 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 150.5 | O 153 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 77-67 | -2.5 | W +7.5 | 158.5 | U 144 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 76-79 | +7.5 | W +4.5 | 157.5 | U 155 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
USA
L 74-76
−4.5
8
vs
MRSH
L 73-85
−14.5
11
@
WRST
W 81-71
+15.5
15
vs
DETM
W 90-83
−3.5
19
vs
YSU
W 92-75
+15.5
24
vs
TROY
W 75-68
+9.5
26
vs
BEL
L 72-87
−10.5
6
@
OAK
L 97-98
+3.5
13
@
RMU
L 70-75
−6.5
16
@
MSU
L 69-92
+0.5
30
vs
WMU
W 84-79
−5.5
3
@
CMU
W 78-75
−4.5
6
@
NIU
W 75-61
+6.5
9
vs
M-OH
L 73-87
−15.5
13
vs
OHIO
W 101-85
+13.5
16
@
KENT
L 84-87
+2.5
20
@
MASS
L 82-84
+0.5
24
vs
BGSU
W 73-72
+2.5
27
@
AKR
L 81-91
+2.5
31
vs
BALL
W 73-55
+9.5
3
vs
KENT
L 72-75
−1.5
7
@
JMU
L 71-73
−3.5
11
@
WMU
W 90-79
+4.5
14
@
BGSU
L 70-80
−6.5
21
vs
EMU
W 94-75
+10.5
24
vs
NIU
W 79-69
−2.5
28
@
OHIO
W 79-67
+13.5
3
@
M-OH
L 72-74
+5.5
6
vs
BUF
W 99-78
+15.5
12
vs
BGSU
W 77-76
−0.5
13
vs
MASS
W 77-67
+7.5
14
vs
AKR
L 76-79
+4.5
covered 19didn’t cover 13avg +2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
USA
L 74-76
−0.5
8
vs
MRSH
L 73-85
−2.5
11
@
WRST
W 81-71
−7.5
15
vs
DETM
W 90-83
+13.5
19
vs
YSU
W 92-75
+6.5
24
vs
TROY
W 75-68
−16.5
26
vs
BEL
L 72-87
−4.5
6
@
OAK
L 97-98
+28.5
13
@
RMU
L 70-75
−9.5
16
@
MSU
L 69-92
+10.5
30
vs
WMU
W 84-79
+2.5
3
@
CMU
W 78-75
−5.5
6
@
NIU
W 75-61
−25.5
9
vs
M-OH
L 73-87
−6.5
13
vs
OHIO
W 101-85
+24.5
16
@
KENT
L 84-87
+2.5
20
@
MASS
L 82-84
+1.5
24
vs
BGSU
W 73-72
−10.5
27
@
AKR
L 81-91
+3.5
31
vs
BALL
W 73-55
−18.5
3
vs
KENT
L 72-75
−14.5
7
@
JMU
L 71-73
−9.5
11
@
WMU
W 90-79
+14.5
14
@
BGSU
L 70-80
−0.5
21
vs
EMU
W 94-75
+23.5
24
vs
NIU
W 79-69
−2.5
28
@
OHIO
W 79-67
−12.5
3
@
M-OH
L 72-74
−16.5
6
vs
BUF
W 99-78
+21.5
12
vs
BGSU
W 77-76
+2.5
13
vs
MASS
W 77-67
−14.5
14
vs
AKR
L 76-79
−2.5
over 13under 19avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Robert Morris 1, Toledo 1, even 3
Robert MorrisBetterToledo
G A. Valentine TR12 pts · 4 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 71
→TOLSmall
G A. Montas TR16.8 pts · 5.1 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 89
G D. Livingston9.6 pts · 2 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 23
=No call
G S. Jones TR6.3 pts · 1.4 reb · 3.9 ast
Not ranked
G T. Smith6.7 pts · 2.2 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 30
=Even
G M. Strong5.5 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 19
F J. Dunkley TR12.4 pts · 6.7 reb · 1 ast
Score 74
←RMUBig
F J. Ouwinga6.1 pts · 3.3 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 27
F K. Ugwuakazi TR5.2 pts · 5.1 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 63
=Even
C A. Parks10.3 pts · 5.5 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 54
Robert MorrisBetterToledo
RMU offense179th of 366 · -5.5
←RMUSmall
TOL defense234th of 366 · -6.2
RMU defense183rd of 366 · -4.2
→TOLSmall
TOL offense121st of 366 · -2.8
Backcourt-2.8 · 3 players
→TOLBig
Backcourt+0.8 · 3 players
Frontcourt+1.5 · 2 players
←RMUSmall
Frontcourt-0.6 · 2 players
Bench-0.3 · 3 players
←RMUSmall
Bench-1.5 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestRMU betterTOL betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
A. Valentine33 min · TRD. Livingston26 minT. Smith19 minK. Garris16 min · TRE. Cooke9 minL. SloaneNew
Forwards
J. Dunkley29 min · TRK. Ugwuakazi19 min · TRS. Obenjo9 minD. StolbetskiyNewB. OderinloNew
Guards
A. Montas31 min · TRS. Jones21 min · TRM. Strong18 minW. James9 minM. JohnsonNewM. MattucciNew
Forwards
J. Ouwinga19 minC. Riddle13 minT. Nwokolo2 minR. BarronNewR. PorterNew
Centers
A. Parks25 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 76.8 #122 | Points per game | 79.8 #71 |
| 1.14 #67 | Points per possession | 1.15 #62 |
| 67.5 #256 | Pace (possessions) | 69.5 #146 |
| Shooting | ||
| 54.9 #39 | Effective FG% | 54.5 #50 |
| 38.0 #18 | 3-point % | 37.0 #29 |
| 40.7 #154 | 3-point attempt rate | 32.5 #323 |
| 28.0 #343 | Free throw rate | 30.5 #298 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.6 #305 | Turnover rate | 14.7 #51 |
| 37.5 #11 | Offensive rebound rate | 29.5 #220 |
| 17.6 #13 | Assists per game | 15.6 #61 |
| Defense | ||
| 73.4 #139 | Points allowed | 77.4 #250 |
| 1.08 #174 | Points allowed per possession | 1.11 #257 |
| 50.0 #100 | Opponent effective FG% | 54.3 #308 |
| 33.2 #135 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.4 #215 |
| 15.8 #230 | Turnovers forced | 17.9 #104 |
| 71.2 #98 | Defensive rebound rate | 66.3 #313 |
| 5.5 #292 | Steals per game | 7.7 #67 |
| 2.5 #308 | Blocks per game | 2.9 #247 |
Robert Morris
20-11 in 2025-26 overall · 14-8 in conference · Horizon League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Detroit Mercy64–70
- Wvs Youngstown St68–53
- Wvs Cleveland St83–64
- Wvs Detroit Mercy73–62
- W@ Wright St81–68
A week or more of rest.
Toledo
17-15 in 2025-26 overall · 13-8 in conference · Mid-American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Akron76–79
- Wvs UMass77–67
- Wvs Bowling Green77–76
- Wvs Buffalo99–78
- L@ Miami OH72–74
A week or more of rest.