Lenovo Center · at NC State
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | NCSU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects NCSU 86–68 · win probability NCSU 94%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 154.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: NCSU has more of the edges
TROY 2, NCSU 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: TROY 17.3%, NCSU 13.1%. Forced: TROY 16.7%, NCSU 18.2%
NCSU offense vs TROY defense
Offense 42nd of 366 against a defense 162nd, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
TROY has played the 166th-hardest schedule, NCSU the 51st. A record against a soft schedule means less
Free throws
Free throw rate: TROY 36.2, NCSU 35.1. Allowed: TROY 31.4, NCSU 36.9
TROY offense vs NCSU defense
Offense 143rd of 366 against a defense 58th, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: TROY 34.5%, NCSU 28.2%. Defensive: TROY 68.3%, NCSU 69.5%
Home court
NCSU at home. This season: NCSU 0-0 at home, TROY 0-0 away
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: TROY 11%, NCSU 28%. Transfers in: TROY 6, NCSU 8. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: TROY plays 69.6 a game (141st fastest), NCSU 70.2 (103rd). Faster games mean more points
Even
Three-pointers
TROY hits 33.0% and allows 31.6%; NCSU hits 38.8% and allows 35.5%. Threes are 45.9% and 43.4% of their shots
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: TROY 51.5 and allows 50.2; NCSU 55.0 and allows 52.7
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | NCSU -18.1 | — |
| Total | — | 154.0 | — |
| Projected score | — | TROY 68 · NCSU 86 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | NCSU -10.6 | — |
| 1H total | 72.0 | — |
| 1H projected score | TROY 30.7 · NCSU 41.3 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | 2-8 20% | |
| 2-8 20% | 2-8 20% | 6-4 60% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Troy
32 games played
Straight up
20-12
63% wins
Against the spread
18-14
56% covers · avg −1.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-18
44% overs · avg +2.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | W 103-97 | +3.5 | W +9.5 | 142.5 | O 200 |
| Nov 7 | @ | W 64-61 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 152.5 | U 125 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 63-74 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 140.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 16 | @ | L 85-94 | -4.5 | L −13.5 | 157.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 18 | @ | W 108-107 | +14.5 | W +15.5 | 137.5 | O 215 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 106-107 | +18.5 | W +17.5 | 159.5 | O 213 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 68-75 | -2.5 | L −9.5 | 159.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 74-64 | -21.5 | L −11.5 | 151.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 1 | vs | L 89-93 | -17.5 | L −21.5 | 150.5 | O 182 |
| Dec 14 | @ | W 86-85 | +6.5 | W +7.5 | 155.5 | O 171 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 70-63 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 155.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 100-80 | -8.5 | W +11.5 | 145.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 59-49 | -9.5 | W +0.5 | 148.5 | U 108 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 74-86 | +4.5 | L −7.5 | 160.5 | U 160 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 90-70 | -9.5 | W +10.5 | 136.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 91-65 | -8.5 | W +17.5 | 145.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 99-74 | -3.5 | W +21.5 | 165.5 | O 173 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 83-77 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 152.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 83-78 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 159.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 29 | vs | L 64-73 | -9.5 | L −18.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 44-66 | -7.5 | L −29.5 | 137.5 | U 110 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 74-63 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 79-69 | +2.5 | W +12.5 | 157.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 62-74 | -5.5 | L −17.5 | 140.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 65-69 | -5.5 | L −9.5 | 144.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 77-76 | -17.5 | L −16.5 | 153.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 54-65 | -2.5 | L −13.5 | 142.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 78-59 | -11.5 | W +7.5 | 134.5 | O 137 |
| Feb 27 | vs | W 80-65 | -18.5 | L −3.5 | 153.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 78-70 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 142.5 | O 148 |
| Mar 9 | vs | W 77-61 | -5.5 | W +10.5 | 152.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 47-76 | +13.5 | L −15.5 | 139.5 | U 123 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
KENT
W 103-97
+9.5
7
@
FUR
W 64-61
+5.5
14
@
LMU
L 63-74
−6.5
16
@
CSUN
L 85-94
−13.5
18
@
SDSU
W 108-107
+15.5
20
@
USC
L 106-107
+17.5
24
vs
TOL
L 68-75
−9.5
26
vs
SFPA
W 74-64
−11.5
1
vs
WGA
L 89-93
−21.5
14
@
UAB
W 86-85
+7.5
20
vs
MRSH
W 70-63
+2.5
31
vs
TXST
W 100-80
+11.5
3
vs
USA
W 59-49
+0.5
7
@
ARST
L 74-86
−7.5
10
@
UL
W 90-70
+10.5
14
vs
USM
W 91-65
+17.5
17
vs
ARST
W 99-74
+21.5
21
@
ODU
W 83-77
+0.5
24
@
GASO
W 83-78
+0.5
29
vs
JMU
L 64-73
−18.5
31
vs
APP
L 44-66
−29.5
4
@
GAST
W 74-63
+4.5
7
vs
AKR
W 79-69
+12.5
11
@
TXST
L 62-74
−17.5
14
@
USM
L 65-69
−9.5
18
@
ULM
W 77-76
−16.5
21
@
USA
L 54-65
−13.5
24
vs
UL
W 78-59
+7.5
27
vs
ULM
W 80-65
−3.5
8
vs
USM
W 78-70
+2.5
9
vs
GASO
W 77-61
+10.5
19
vs
NEB
L 47-76
−15.5
covered 18didn’t cover 14avg −1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
KENT
W 103-97
+57.5
7
@
FUR
W 64-61
−27.5
14
@
LMU
L 63-74
−3.5
16
@
CSUN
L 85-94
+21.5
18
@
SDSU
W 108-107
+77.5
20
@
USC
L 106-107
+53.5
24
vs
TOL
L 68-75
−16.5
26
vs
SFPA
W 74-64
−13.5
1
vs
WGA
L 89-93
+31.5
14
@
UAB
W 86-85
+15.5
20
vs
MRSH
W 70-63
−22.5
31
vs
TXST
W 100-80
+34.5
3
vs
USA
W 59-49
−40.5
7
@
ARST
L 74-86
−0.5
10
@
UL
W 90-70
+23.5
14
vs
USM
W 91-65
+10.5
17
vs
ARST
W 99-74
+7.5
21
@
ODU
W 83-77
+7.5
24
@
GASO
W 83-78
+1.5
29
vs
JMU
L 64-73
−10.5
31
vs
APP
L 44-66
−27.5
4
@
GAST
W 74-63
−7.5
7
vs
AKR
W 79-69
−9.5
11
@
TXST
L 62-74
−4.5
14
@
USM
L 65-69
−10.5
18
@
ULM
W 77-76
−0.5
21
@
USA
L 54-65
−23.5
24
vs
UL
W 78-59
+2.5
27
vs
ULM
W 80-65
−8.5
8
vs
USM
W 78-70
+5.5
9
vs
GASO
W 77-61
−14.5
19
vs
NEB
L 47-76
−16.5
over 14under 18avg +2.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
NC State
34 games played
Straight up
20-14
59% wins
Against the spread
15-19
44% covers · avg −1.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
21-13
62% overs · avg +6 pts vs the total
Against the spread
15-1944%
2 straight misses ATS1 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 114-66 | -31.5 | W +16.5 | 145.5 | O 180 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 94-70 | -19.5 | W +4.5 | 162.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 110-64 | -30.5 | W +15.5 | 153.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 85-79 | -11.5 | L −5.5 | 164.5 | U 164 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 74-85 | -7.5 | L −18.5 | 143.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 81-70 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 152.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 97-102 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 161.5 | O 199 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 73-83 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 162.5 | U 156 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 75-63 | -28.5 | L −16.5 | 155.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 85-45 | -12.5 | W +27.5 | 149.5 | U 130 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 76-77 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 148.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 108-72 | -34.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 76-62 | -7.5 | W +6.5 | 148.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 70-57 | -10.5 | W +2.5 | 159.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 61-76 | -4.5 | L −19.5 | 151.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 6 | @ | W 79-71 | -11.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 113-69 | -4.5 | W +39.5 | 160.5 | O 182 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 74-78 | -17.5 | L −21.5 | 154.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 20 | @ | W 80-76 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 142.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 81-72 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 144.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 88-68 | -10.5 | W +9.5 | 151.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 96-78 | -5.5 | W +12.5 | 156.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 3 | @ | W 84-83 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 159.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 82-73 | -10.5 | L −1.5 | 154.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 9 | @ | L 77-118 | +6.5 | L −34.5 | 161.5 | O 195 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 76-77 | -5.5 | L −6.5 | 157.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 82-58 | -8.5 | W +15.5 | 156.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 61-90 | +6.5 | L −22.5 | 151.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 90-96 | -6.5 | L −12.5 | 153.5 | O 186 |
| Mar 2 | vs | L 64-93 | +8.5 | L −20.5 | 150.5 | O 157 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 84-85 | -9.5 | L −10.5 | 152.5 | O 169 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 98-88 | -8.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | O 186 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 74-81 | +6.5 | L −0.5 | 153.5 | O 155 |
| Mar 17 | vs | L 66-68 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 157.5 | U 134 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
NCCU
W 114-66
+16.5
7
vs
UAB
W 94-70
+4.5
12
vs
UNCG
W 110-64
+15.5
17
vs
VCU
W 85-79
−5.5
24
vs
HALL
L 74-85
−18.5
25
vs
BOIS
W 81-70
+4.5
26
vs
TEX
L 97-102
−6.5
3
@
AUB
L 73-83
−4.5
6
vs
UNCA
W 75-63
−16.5
10
vs
LIB
W 85-45
+27.5
13
vs
KU
L 76-77
−2.5
17
vs
TXSO
W 108-72
+1.5
21
vs
MISS
W 76-62
+6.5
31
vs
WAKE
W 70-57
+2.5
3
vs
UVA
L 61-76
−19.5
6
@
BC
W 79-71
−3.5
10
@
FSU
W 113-69
+39.5
17
vs
GT
L 74-78
−21.5
20
@
CLEM
W 80-76
+6.5
24
@
PITT
W 81-72
+2.5
27
vs
SYR
W 88-68
+9.5
31
@
WAKE
W 96-78
+12.5
3
@
SMU
W 84-83
−0.5
7
vs
VT
W 82-73
−1.5
9
@
LOU
L 77-118
−34.5
14
vs
MIA
L 76-77
−6.5
17
vs
UNC
W 82-58
+15.5
24
@
UVA
L 61-90
−22.5
28
@
ND
L 90-96
−12.5
2
vs
DUKE
L 64-93
−20.5
7
vs
STAN
L 84-85
−10.5
11
vs
PITT
W 98-88
+1.5
12
vs
UVA
L 74-81
−0.5
17
vs
TEX
L 66-68
−3.5
covered 15didn’t cover 19avg −1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
NCCU
W 114-66
+34.5
7
vs
UAB
W 94-70
+1.5
12
vs
UNCG
W 110-64
+20.5
17
vs
VCU
W 85-79
−0.5
24
vs
HALL
L 74-85
+15.5
25
vs
BOIS
W 81-70
−1.5
26
vs
TEX
L 97-102
+37.5
3
@
AUB
L 73-83
−6.5
6
vs
UNCA
W 75-63
−17.5
10
vs
LIB
W 85-45
−19.5
13
vs
KU
L 76-77
+4.5
17
vs
TXSO
W 108-72
+27.5
21
vs
MISS
W 76-62
−10.5
31
vs
WAKE
W 70-57
−32.5
3
vs
UVA
L 61-76
−14.5
6
@
BC
W 79-71
+8.5
10
@
FSU
W 113-69
+21.5
17
vs
GT
L 74-78
−2.5
20
@
CLEM
W 80-76
+13.5
24
@
PITT
W 81-72
+8.5
27
vs
SYR
W 88-68
+4.5
31
@
WAKE
W 96-78
+17.5
3
@
SMU
W 84-83
+7.5
7
vs
VT
W 82-73
+0.5
9
@
LOU
L 77-118
+33.5
14
vs
MIA
L 76-77
−4.5
17
vs
UNC
W 82-58
−16.5
24
@
UVA
L 61-90
−0.5
28
@
ND
L 90-96
+32.5
2
vs
DUKE
L 64-93
+6.5
7
vs
STAN
L 84-85
+16.5
11
vs
PITT
W 98-88
+41.5
12
vs
UVA
L 74-81
+1.5
17
vs
TEX
L 66-68
−23.5
over 21under 13avg +6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
NC State has the better starters
Position by position: Troy 0, NC State 3, even 2
TroyBetterNC State
G R. Davis TR9.9 pts · 2.6 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 14
→NCSUBig
G P. Edmead TR16.5 pts · 3.6 reb · 4.3 ast
Score 83
G D. Oday TR18.9 pts · 3.6 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 95
=Even
G C. Hammond TR15.7 pts · 2.8 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 87
G J. Hutchinson TR12.1 pts · 3.4 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 76
=Even
G P. McNeil13.8 pts · 3.6 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 90
F C. Diggs TR10.3 pts · 3.7 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 59
→NCSUBig
F K. Evans TR11.8 pts · 8.8 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 95
F K. Kiel3.6 pts · 3.5 reb · 1 ast
Score 23
→NCSUBig
F E. Yalaho TR10.1 pts · 5.6 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 58
TroyBetterNC State
TROY offense143rd of 366 · -4.3
→NCSUSmall
NCSU defense58th of 366 · +1.3
TROY defense162nd of 366 · -3.6
→NCSUSmall
NCSU offense42nd of 366 · +4.6
Backcourt+1.4 · 3 players
→NCSUBig
Backcourt+6.7 · 3 players
Frontcourt-1.0 · 2 players
→NCSUBig
Frontcourt+4.6 · 2 players
Bench-2.0 · 4 players
→NCSUBig
Bench+2.9 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestTROY betterNCSU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
R. Davis31 min · TRD. Oday30 min · TRJ. Hutchinson29 min · TRH. Awata2 minJ. KontuniemiNewR. ValakouNew
Forwards
C. Diggs23 min · TRK. Kiel16 minM. Ikegwuruka13 min · TRS. Walters9 min · TRE. Griffin5 min
Centers
A. PachecoNew
Guards
P. Edmead35 min · TRC. Hammond30 min · TRP. McNeil29 minD. Adams26 min · TRR. Keene23 min · TRJ. Brim5 min · TR
Forwards
K. Evans30 min · TRE. Yalaho29 min · TRV. Lubin28 minC. Emuobor19 min · TRR. JurkovicNewS. HallNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 77.3 #110 | Points per game | 83.2 #25 |
| 1.11 #113 | Points per possession | 1.18 #30 |
| 69.6 #141 | Pace (possessions) | 70.2 #103 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.5 #171 | Effective FG% | 55.0 #35 |
| 33.0 #229 | 3-point % | 38.8 #6 |
| 45.9 #47 | 3-point attempt rate | 43.4 #104 |
| 36.2 #147 | Free throw rate | 35.1 #175 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.3 #226 | Turnover rate | 13.1 #7 |
| 34.5 #59 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.2 #258 |
| 15.0 #86 | Assists per game | 15.4 #70 |
| Defense | ||
| 74.5 #178 | Points allowed | 76.3 #224 |
| 1.07 #128 | Points allowed per possession | 1.09 #186 |
| 50.2 #111 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.7 #256 |
| 31.6 #47 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.5 #281 |
| 16.7 #173 | Turnovers forced | 18.2 #90 |
| 68.3 #243 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.5 #181 |
| 7.2 #107 | Steals per game | 8.1 #37 |
| 3.3 #169 | Blocks per game | 3.4 #159 |
Troy
20-12 in 2025-26 overall · 14-6 in conference · Sun Belt Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Nebraska47–76
- Wvs GA Southern77–61
- Wvs Southern Miss78–70
- Wvs UL Monroe80–65
- Wvs Louisiana78–59
A week or more of rest.
NC State
20-14 in 2025-26 overall · 11-9 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Texas66–68
- Lvs Virginia74–81
- Wvs Pitt98–88
- Lvs Stanford84–85
- Lvs Duke64–93
A week or more of rest.