Alico Arena · at FGCU
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | FGCU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects FIU 77–75 · win probability FIU 59%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 152.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: FGCU has more of the edges
FIU 2, FGCU 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Free throws
Free throw rate: FIU 38.6, FGCU 29.1. Allowed: FIU 35.9, FGCU 38.3
FIU offense vs FGCU defense
Offense 144th of 366 against a defense 274th, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: FIU 33.9%, FGCU 31.1%. Defensive: FIU 65.2%, FGCU 71.8%
Context
Schedule so far
FIU has played the 151st-hardest schedule, FGCU the 231st. A record against a soft schedule means less
Home court
FGCU at home. This season: FGCU 0-0 at home, FIU 0-0 away
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: FIU plays 72.4 a game (26th fastest), FGCU 69.9 (122nd). Faster games mean more points
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: FIU 0%, FGCU 25%. Transfers in: FIU 6, FGCU 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
FGCU offense vs FIU defense
Offense 259th of 366 against a defense 217th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: FIU 50.6 and allows 52.9; FGCU 52.0 and allows 53.4
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: FIU 17.8%, FGCU 16.0%. Forced: FIU 20.0%, FGCU 16.4%
Even
Three-pointers
FIU hits 34.7% and allows 36.2%; FGCU hits 33.2% and allows 35.5%. Threes are 32.8% and 38.4% of their shots
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | FIU -2.5 | — |
| Total | — | 152.2 | — |
| Projected score | — | FIU 77.4 · FGCU 74.8 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | FIU -1.6 | — |
| 1H total | 71.1 | — |
| 1H projected score | FIU 36.4 · FGCU 34.7 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | 3-7 30% | |
| 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% | 3-7 30% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
FIU 2–3 FGCUFGCU leads · 5 games since 2021-22 · FIU 3-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2025-26 | FGCU 83 @ FIU 89 | FIU +1.5 | FIU W |
| Nov 24, 2024-25 | FIU 59 @ FGCU 60 | FGCU -4.5 | FIU W |
| Nov 29, 2023-24 | FGCU 68 @ FIU 65 | FIU -2.5 | FGCU W |
| Dec 4, 2022-23 | FIU 65 @ FGCU 74 | FGCU -7.5 | FGCU W |
| Dec 1, 2021-22 | FGCU 61 @ FIU 77 | FIU -3 | FIU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
FIU
29 games played
Straight up
12-17
41% wins
Against the spread
16-13
55% covers · avg +1.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-15
48% overs · avg +1.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | L 66-96 | +21.5 | L −8.5 | 156.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 13 | @ | L 81-98 | +21.5 | W +4.5 | 158.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 72-80 | -2.5 | L −10.5 | 155.5 | U 152 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 74-61 | -4.5 | W +8.5 | 157.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 89-83 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 154.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 88-65 | -5.5 | W +17.5 | 145.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 81-98 | +22.5 | W +5.5 | 161.5 | O 179 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 86-79 | -6.5 | W +0.5 | 161.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 28 | vs | L 94-97 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | O 191 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 89-74 | +1.5 | W +16.5 | 157.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 76-64 | -6.5 | W +5.5 | 152.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 64-71 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 71-79 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 153.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 86-89 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 175.5 | U 175 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 63-76 | -2.5 | L −15.5 | 168.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 77-83 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 151.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 81-78 | +7.5 | W +10.5 | 159.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 74-78 | -3.5 | L −7.5 | 148.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 88-84 | +5.5 | W +9.5 | 154.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 70-80 | +4.5 | L −5.5 | 159.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 66-68 | -8.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 77-64 | -3.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 89-90 | +9.5 | W +8.5 | 152.5 | O 179 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 70-67 | -3.5 | L −0.5 | 154.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 67-100 | +6.5 | L −26.5 | 161.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 84-76 | +2.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | O 160 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 67-73 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 153.5 | U 140 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 92-67 | +1.5 | W +26.5 | 160.5 | U 159 |
| Mar 10 | vs | L 72-75 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 152.5 | U 147 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
NEB
L 66-96
−8.5
13
@
LSU
L 81-98
+4.5
24
vs
JMU
L 72-80
−10.5
26
vs
OMA
W 74-61
+8.5
3
vs
FGCU
W 89-83
+7.5
6
vs
JAX
W 88-65
+17.5
16
@
MIA
L 81-98
+5.5
20
vs
LIU
W 86-79
+0.5
28
vs
LIB
L 94-97
+1.5
2
vs
NMSU
W 89-74
+16.5
4
vs
UTEP
W 76-64
+5.5
7
@
JXST
L 64-71
−5.5
10
@
MOST
L 71-79
−5.5
14
@
KENN
L 86-89
+2.5
17
vs
SHSU
L 63-76
−15.5
22
@
UTEP
L 77-83
−7.5
24
@
NMSU
W 81-78
+10.5
28
vs
JXST
L 74-78
−7.5
4
@
MTSU
W 88-84
+9.5
7
@
WKU
L 70-80
−5.5
12
vs
DEL
L 66-68
−10.5
14
vs
LT
W 77-64
+9.5
19
@
LIB
L 89-90
+8.5
21
vs
MOST
W 70-67
−0.5
26
@
SHSU
L 67-100
−26.5
28
@
LT
W 84-76
+10.5
5
vs
MTSU
L 67-73
−7.5
7
vs
WKU
W 92-67
+26.5
10
vs
MOST
L 72-75
−1.5
covered 16didn’t cover 13avg +1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
NEB
L 66-96
+5.5
13
@
LSU
L 81-98
+20.5
24
vs
JMU
L 72-80
−3.5
26
vs
OMA
W 74-61
−22.5
3
vs
FGCU
W 89-83
+17.5
6
vs
JAX
W 88-65
+7.5
16
@
MIA
L 81-98
+17.5
20
vs
LIU
W 86-79
+3.5
28
vs
LIB
L 94-97
+38.5
2
vs
NMSU
W 89-74
+5.5
4
vs
UTEP
W 76-64
−12.5
7
@
JXST
L 64-71
−15.5
10
@
MOST
L 71-79
−3.5
14
@
KENN
L 86-89
−0.5
17
vs
SHSU
L 63-76
−29.5
22
@
UTEP
L 77-83
+8.5
24
@
NMSU
W 81-78
−0.5
28
vs
JXST
L 74-78
+3.5
4
@
MTSU
W 88-84
+17.5
7
@
WKU
L 70-80
−9.5
12
vs
DEL
L 66-68
−13.5
14
vs
LT
W 77-64
−5.5
19
@
LIB
L 89-90
+26.5
21
vs
MOST
W 70-67
−17.5
26
@
SHSU
L 67-100
+5.5
28
@
LT
W 84-76
+14.5
5
vs
MTSU
L 67-73
−13.5
7
vs
WKU
W 92-67
−1.5
10
vs
MOST
L 72-75
−5.5
over 14under 15avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
FGCU
32 games played
Straight up
14-18
44% wins
Against the spread
9-23
28% covers · avg −1.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-17
47% overs · avg +1.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ | L 70-113 | +29.5 | L −13.5 | 160.5 | O 183 |
| Nov 11 | vs | L 94-95 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 163.5 | O 189 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 91-73 | +1.5 | W +19.5 | 152.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 19 | @ | W 77-62 | +5.5 | W +20.5 | 154.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 93-88 | -11.5 | L −6.5 | 153.5 | O 181 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 78-63 | -5.5 | W +9.5 | 149.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 100-102 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 160.5 | O 202 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 83-89 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 154.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 7 | vs | L 76-81 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 150.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 14 | @ | L 59-75 | +15.5 | L −0.5 | 159.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 80-102 | +17.5 | L −4.5 | 161.5 | O 182 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 83-85 | -2.5 | L −4.5 | 156.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 72-55 | -2.5 | W +14.5 | 147.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 71-82 | -3.5 | L −14.5 | 153.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 77-84 | -2.5 | L −9.5 | 157.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 15 | vs | L 74-85 | -1.5 | L −12.5 | 166.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 90-72 | -9.5 | W +8.5 | 152.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 62-83 | +6.5 | L −14.5 | 155.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 23 | @ | L 71-86 | +5.5 | L −9.5 | 153.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 72-64 | -9.5 | L −1.5 | 147.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 68-49 | +1.5 | W +20.5 | 136.5 | U 117 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 74-76 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 154.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 65-81 | -2.5 | L −18.5 | 151.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 90-81 | -13.5 | L −4.5 | 163.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 78-76 | -11.5 | L −9.5 | 148.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 86-84 | -6.5 | L −4.5 | 136.5 | O 170 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 75-71 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 152.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 70-76 | -6.5 | L −12.5 | 160.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 63-78 | -5.5 | L −20.5 | 150.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 69-58 | -8.5 | W +2.5 | 139.5 | U 127 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 77-53 | +3.5 | W +27.5 | 150.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 63-73 | +4.5 | L −5.5 | 144.5 | U 136 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@
ILL
L 70-113
−13.5
11
vs
GASO
L 94-95
−4.5
15
vs
UTC
W 91-73
+19.5
19
@
SAM
W 77-62
+20.5
24
vs
ORU
W 93-88
−6.5
25
vs
RICE
W 78-63
+9.5
26
vs
KENN
L 100-102
−3.5
3
@
FIU
L 83-89
−7.5
7
vs
FAU
L 76-81
−2.5
14
@
UNM
L 59-75
−0.5
20
@
UCF
L 80-102
−4.5
1
@
CARK
L 83-85
−4.5
3
@
UNA
W 72-55
+14.5
8
vs
APSU
L 71-82
−14.5
10
vs
LIP
L 77-84
−9.5
15
vs
QUC
L 74-85
−12.5
17
vs
WGA
W 90-72
+8.5
22
@
APSU
L 62-83
−14.5
23
@
LIP
L 71-86
−9.5
29
vs
UNA
W 72-64
−1.5
31
@
JAX
W 68-49
+20.5
5
@
EKU
L 74-76
−0.5
7
@
BELL
L 65-81
−18.5
11
vs
UNF
W 90-81
−4.5
14
vs
STET
W 78-76
−9.5
18
vs
JAX
W 86-84
−4.5
21
vs
CARK
W 75-71
+5.5
26
@
UNF
L 70-76
−12.5
28
@
STET
L 63-78
−20.5
4
vs
UNA
W 69-58
+2.5
6
vs
LIP
W 77-53
+27.5
7
vs
CARK
L 63-73
−5.5
covered 9didn’t cover 23avg −1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@
ILL
L 70-113
+22.5
11
vs
GASO
L 94-95
+25.5
15
vs
UTC
W 91-73
+11.5
19
@
SAM
W 77-62
−15.5
24
vs
ORU
W 93-88
+27.5
25
vs
RICE
W 78-63
−8.5
26
vs
KENN
L 100-102
+41.5
3
@
FIU
L 83-89
+17.5
7
vs
FAU
L 76-81
+6.5
14
@
UNM
L 59-75
−25.5
20
@
UCF
L 80-102
+20.5
1
@
CARK
L 83-85
+11.5
3
@
UNA
W 72-55
−20.5
8
vs
APSU
L 71-82
−0.5
10
vs
LIP
L 77-84
+3.5
15
vs
QUC
L 74-85
−7.5
17
vs
WGA
W 90-72
+9.5
22
@
APSU
L 62-83
−10.5
23
@
LIP
L 71-86
+3.5
29
vs
UNA
W 72-64
−11.5
31
@
JAX
W 68-49
−19.5
5
@
EKU
L 74-76
−4.5
7
@
BELL
L 65-81
−5.5
11
vs
UNF
W 90-81
+7.5
14
vs
STET
W 78-76
+5.5
18
vs
JAX
W 86-84
+33.5
21
vs
CARK
W 75-71
−6.5
26
@
UNF
L 70-76
−14.5
28
@
STET
L 63-78
−9.5
4
vs
UNA
W 69-58
−12.5
6
vs
LIP
W 77-53
−20.5
7
vs
CARK
L 63-73
−8.5
over 15under 17avg +1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
FIU has the better starters
Position by position: FIU 2, FGCU 0, even 3
FIUBetterFGCU
G T. Saine TR18.1 pts · 2.3 reb · 4.4 ast
Score 91
←FIUBig
G E. Brooks TR12.3 pts · 4.5 reb · 3.1 ast
Score 47
G C. Caulker TR7.9 pts · 2.4 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 22
=Even
G D. Williams6.1 pts · 2 reb · 1 ast
Score 21
G H. Cuevas TR2.6 pts · 1 reb · 0.6 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G G. Washington2.6 pts · 0.2 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
F J. Colonel TR4.6 pts · 7.3 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 52
=No call
F G. Tanner2.5 pts · 1.2 reb · 0.8 ast
Not ranked
F R. Seals TR7.5 pts · 4 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 61
←FIUBig
C T. Guillouette2.9 pts · 2.6 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 26
FIUBetterFGCU
FIU offense144th of 366 · -4.3
←FIUBig
FGCU defense274th of 366 · -6.9
FIU defense217th of 366 · -5.7
=Even
FGCU offense259th of 366 · -8.0
Backcourt-0.8 · 3 players
←FIUBig
Backcourt-4.1 · 3 players
Frontcourt-0.0 · 2 players
←FIUSmall
Frontcourt-1.2 · 2 players
Bench-0.9 · 1 player
=Even
Bench-0.7 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestFIU betterFGCU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Saine34 min · TRC. Caulker31 min · TRH. Cuevas13 min · TRN. MendyNewM. BlazerNewC. HallNew
Forwards
J. Colonel26 min · TRR. Seals18 min · TRJ. Payne7 min · TRG. GiceviciusNewC. RingNewS. N'DiayeNew
Guards
E. Brooks30 min · TRD. Williams19 minG. Washington8 minM. McCarthy2 minB. WashingtonNewN. SermpezisNew
Forwards
G. Tanner8 minC. Outlaw2 min · TRB. LucasNewE. BarlowNewC. KoniecznyNewT. WestercampNew
Centers
T. Guillouette13 minJ. Houser6 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 77.7 #100 | Points per game | 76.6 #130 |
| 1.08 #197 | Points per possession | 1.10 #138 |
| 72.4 #26 | Pace (possessions) | 69.9 #122 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.6 #210 | Effective FG% | 52.0 #147 |
| 34.7 #137 | 3-point % | 33.2 #219 |
| 32.8 #321 | 3-point attempt rate | 38.4 #202 |
| 38.6 #87 | Free throw rate | 29.1 #331 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.8 #258 | Turnover rate | 16.0 #135 |
| 33.9 #69 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.1 #161 |
| 13.6 #173 | Assists per game | 14.5 #115 |
| Defense | ||
| 79.1 #301 | Points allowed | 78.0 #266 |
| 1.09 #194 | Points allowed per possession | 1.11 #254 |
| 52.9 #264 | Opponent effective FG% | 53.4 #280 |
| 36.2 #313 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.5 #275 |
| 20.0 #22 | Turnovers forced | 16.4 #191 |
| 65.2 #335 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.8 #73 |
| 8.8 #12 | Steals per game | 7.7 #66 |
| 4.4 #43 | Blocks per game | 3.4 #153 |
FIU
12-17 in 2025-26 overall · 8-13 in conference · Conference USA
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Missouri St72–75
- Wvs Western KY92–67
- Lvs MTSU67–73
- W@ Louisiana Tech84–76
- L@ Sam Houston67–100
A week or more of rest.
FGCU
14-18 in 2025-26 overall · 10-11 in conference · Atlantic Sun Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs C Arkansas63–73
- Wvs Lipscomb77–53
- Wvs North Alabama69–58
- L@ Stetson63–78
- L@ North Florida70–76
A week or more of rest.