Suncoast Credit Union Arena · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | FGCU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects GAST 75–72 · win probability GAST 60%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 147.6
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: GAST has more of the edges
GAST 3, FGCU 1 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: GAST 27.7%, FGCU 31.1%. Defensive: GAST 66.4%, FGCU 71.8%
Free throws
Free throw rate: GAST 37.2, FGCU 29.1. Allowed: GAST 34.9, FGCU 38.3
GAST offense vs FGCU defense
Offense 214th of 366 against a defense 274th, on the model’s ratings
FGCU offense vs GAST defense
Offense 259th of 366 against a defense 205th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: GAST 4%, FGCU 25%. Transfers in: GAST 10, FGCU 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: GAST 44.2 and allows 50.6; FGCU 52.0 and allows 53.4
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: GAST plays 69.1 a game (176th fastest), FGCU 69.9 (122nd). Faster games mean more points
Even
Three-pointers
GAST hits 30.6% and allows 33.1%; FGCU hits 33.2% and allows 35.5%. Threes are 42.4% and 38.4% of their shots
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: GAST 15.9%, FGCU 16.0%. Forced: GAST 16.4%, FGCU 16.4%
Context
Schedule so far
GAST has played the 232nd-hardest schedule, FGCU the 231st. A record against a soft schedule means less
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | GAST -3.0 | — |
| Total | — | 147.6 | — |
| Projected score | — | GAST 75.3 · FGCU 72.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | GAST -1.9 | — |
| 1H total | 69.0 | — |
| 1H projected score | GAST 35.5 · FGCU 33.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-9 10% | 3-7 30% | 6-4 60% | |
| 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% | 3-7 30% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Georgia St
30 games played
Straight up
8-22
27% wins
Against the spread
13-17
43% covers · avg −1.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-16
47% overs · avg −2.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 49-71 | +3.5 | L −18.5 | 149.5 | U 120 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 64-74 | +29.5 | W +19.5 | 151.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 10 | vs | L 61-63 | -3.5 | L −5.5 | 141.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 17 | @ | L 62-75 | +18.5 | W +5.5 | 145.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 58-105 | +12.5 | L −34.5 | 143.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 63-78 | +5.5 | L −9.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 58-77 | +12.5 | L −6.5 | 136.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 67-78 | +10.5 | L −0.5 | 155.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 69-92 | +14.5 | L −8.5 | 158.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 77-73 | +3.5 | W +7.5 | 139.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 67-90 | +9.5 | L −13.5 | 159.5 | U 157 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 70-63 | +7.5 | W +14.5 | 137.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 80-84 | +13.5 | W +9.5 | 151.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 89-71 | +6.5 | W +24.5 | 148.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 50-52 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | U 102 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 81-73 | +4.5 | W +12.5 | 153.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 77-57 | -6.5 | W +13.5 | 155.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 69-62 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 144.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 82-81 | +4.5 | W +5.5 | 157.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 72-82 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 129.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 67-69 | +5.5 | W +3.5 | 140.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 63-74 | +6.5 | L −4.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 74-75 | -4.5 | L −5.5 | 143.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 79-81 | +5.5 | W +3.5 | 144.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 55-78 | +3.5 | L −19.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 66-64 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 154.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 65-80 | +2.5 | L −12.5 | 142.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 24 | vs | L 71-76 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 27 | vs | L 73-81 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 149.5 | O 154 |
| Mar 3 | vs | L 75-84 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 134.5 | O 159 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
EMU
L 49-71
−18.5
7
@
CIN
L 64-74
+19.5
10
vs
PRES
L 61-63
−5.5
17
@
ASU
L 62-75
+5.5
21
@
SDST
L 58-105
−34.5
25
vs
SAM
L 63-78
−9.5
26
vs
NMSU
L 58-77
−6.5
2
@
MER
L 67-78
−0.5
6
@
KENN
L 69-92
−8.5
13
vs
JXST
W 77-73
+7.5
18
@
GASO
L 67-90
−13.5
20
@
APP
W 70-63
+14.5
31
@
MRSH
L 80-84
+9.5
3
@
CCU
W 89-71
+24.5
8
vs
APP
L 50-52
−0.5
10
vs
MRSH
W 81-73
+12.5
17
@
ULM
W 77-57
+13.5
22
vs
USM
W 69-62
+5.5
24
vs
ARST
W 82-81
+5.5
29
@
UL
L 72-82
−11.5
31
@
USA
L 67-69
+3.5
4
vs
TROY
L 63-74
−4.5
7
vs
NIU
L 74-75
−5.5
12
@
JMU
L 79-81
+3.5
14
@
ODU
L 55-78
−19.5
19
vs
GASO
W 66-64
+3.5
21
vs
JMU
L 65-80
−12.5
24
vs
CCU
L 71-76
−3.5
27
vs
ODU
L 73-81
−6.5
3
vs
UL
L 75-84
−10.5
covered 13didn’t cover 17avg −1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
EMU
L 49-71
−29.5
7
@
CIN
L 64-74
−13.5
10
vs
PRES
L 61-63
−17.5
17
@
ASU
L 62-75
−8.5
21
@
SDST
L 58-105
+19.5
25
vs
SAM
L 63-78
−5.5
26
vs
NMSU
L 58-77
−1.5
2
@
MER
L 67-78
−10.5
6
@
KENN
L 69-92
+2.5
13
vs
JXST
W 77-73
+10.5
18
@
GASO
L 67-90
−2.5
20
@
APP
W 70-63
−4.5
31
@
MRSH
L 80-84
+12.5
3
@
CCU
W 89-71
+11.5
8
vs
APP
L 50-52
−38.5
10
vs
MRSH
W 81-73
+0.5
17
@
ULM
W 77-57
−21.5
22
vs
USM
W 69-62
−13.5
24
vs
ARST
W 82-81
+5.5
29
@
UL
L 72-82
+24.5
31
@
USA
L 67-69
−4.5
4
vs
TROY
L 63-74
−7.5
7
vs
NIU
L 74-75
+5.5
12
@
JMU
L 79-81
+15.5
14
@
ODU
L 55-78
−14.5
19
vs
GASO
W 66-64
−24.5
21
vs
JMU
L 65-80
+2.5
24
vs
CCU
L 71-76
+5.5
27
vs
ODU
L 73-81
+4.5
3
vs
UL
L 75-84
+24.5
over 14under 16avg −2.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
FGCU
32 games played
Straight up
14-18
44% wins
Against the spread
9-23
28% covers · avg −1.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-17
47% overs · avg +1.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ | L 70-113 | +29.5 | L −13.5 | 160.5 | O 183 |
| Nov 11 | vs | L 94-95 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 163.5 | O 189 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 91-73 | +1.5 | W +19.5 | 152.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 19 | @ | W 77-62 | +5.5 | W +20.5 | 154.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 93-88 | -11.5 | L −6.5 | 153.5 | O 181 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 78-63 | -5.5 | W +9.5 | 149.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 100-102 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 160.5 | O 202 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 83-89 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 154.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 7 | vs | L 76-81 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 150.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 14 | @ | L 59-75 | +15.5 | L −0.5 | 159.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 80-102 | +17.5 | L −4.5 | 161.5 | O 182 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 83-85 | -2.5 | L −4.5 | 156.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 72-55 | -2.5 | W +14.5 | 147.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 71-82 | -3.5 | L −14.5 | 153.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 77-84 | -2.5 | L −9.5 | 157.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 15 | vs | L 74-85 | -1.5 | L −12.5 | 166.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 90-72 | -9.5 | W +8.5 | 152.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 62-83 | +6.5 | L −14.5 | 155.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 23 | @ | L 71-86 | +5.5 | L −9.5 | 153.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 72-64 | -9.5 | L −1.5 | 147.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 68-49 | +1.5 | W +20.5 | 136.5 | U 117 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 74-76 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 154.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 65-81 | -2.5 | L −18.5 | 151.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 90-81 | -13.5 | L −4.5 | 163.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 78-76 | -11.5 | L −9.5 | 148.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 86-84 | -6.5 | L −4.5 | 136.5 | O 170 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 75-71 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 152.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 70-76 | -6.5 | L −12.5 | 160.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 63-78 | -5.5 | L −20.5 | 150.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 69-58 | -8.5 | W +2.5 | 139.5 | U 127 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 77-53 | +3.5 | W +27.5 | 150.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 63-73 | +4.5 | L −5.5 | 144.5 | U 136 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@
ILL
L 70-113
−13.5
11
vs
GASO
L 94-95
−4.5
15
vs
UTC
W 91-73
+19.5
19
@
SAM
W 77-62
+20.5
24
vs
ORU
W 93-88
−6.5
25
vs
RICE
W 78-63
+9.5
26
vs
KENN
L 100-102
−3.5
3
@
FIU
L 83-89
−7.5
7
vs
FAU
L 76-81
−2.5
14
@
UNM
L 59-75
−0.5
20
@
UCF
L 80-102
−4.5
1
@
CARK
L 83-85
−4.5
3
@
UNA
W 72-55
+14.5
8
vs
APSU
L 71-82
−14.5
10
vs
LIP
L 77-84
−9.5
15
vs
QUC
L 74-85
−12.5
17
vs
WGA
W 90-72
+8.5
22
@
APSU
L 62-83
−14.5
23
@
LIP
L 71-86
−9.5
29
vs
UNA
W 72-64
−1.5
31
@
JAX
W 68-49
+20.5
5
@
EKU
L 74-76
−0.5
7
@
BELL
L 65-81
−18.5
11
vs
UNF
W 90-81
−4.5
14
vs
STET
W 78-76
−9.5
18
vs
JAX
W 86-84
−4.5
21
vs
CARK
W 75-71
+5.5
26
@
UNF
L 70-76
−12.5
28
@
STET
L 63-78
−20.5
4
vs
UNA
W 69-58
+2.5
6
vs
LIP
W 77-53
+27.5
7
vs
CARK
L 63-73
−5.5
covered 9didn’t cover 23avg −1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@
ILL
L 70-113
+22.5
11
vs
GASO
L 94-95
+25.5
15
vs
UTC
W 91-73
+11.5
19
@
SAM
W 77-62
−15.5
24
vs
ORU
W 93-88
+27.5
25
vs
RICE
W 78-63
−8.5
26
vs
KENN
L 100-102
+41.5
3
@
FIU
L 83-89
+17.5
7
vs
FAU
L 76-81
+6.5
14
@
UNM
L 59-75
−25.5
20
@
UCF
L 80-102
+20.5
1
@
CARK
L 83-85
+11.5
3
@
UNA
W 72-55
−20.5
8
vs
APSU
L 71-82
−0.5
10
vs
LIP
L 77-84
+3.5
15
vs
QUC
L 74-85
−7.5
17
vs
WGA
W 90-72
+9.5
22
@
APSU
L 62-83
−10.5
23
@
LIP
L 71-86
+3.5
29
vs
UNA
W 72-64
−11.5
31
@
JAX
W 68-49
−19.5
5
@
EKU
L 74-76
−4.5
7
@
BELL
L 65-81
−5.5
11
vs
UNF
W 90-81
+7.5
14
vs
STET
W 78-76
+5.5
18
vs
JAX
W 86-84
+33.5
21
vs
CARK
W 75-71
−6.5
26
@
UNF
L 70-76
−14.5
28
@
STET
L 63-78
−9.5
4
vs
UNA
W 69-58
−12.5
6
vs
LIP
W 77-53
−20.5
7
vs
CARK
L 63-73
−8.5
over 15under 17avg +1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Georgia St has the better starters
Position by position: Georgia St 1, FGCU 0, even 4
Georgia StBetterFGCU
G J. Jackson TR12.3 pts · 4.3 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 51
=Even
G E. Brooks TR12.3 pts · 4.5 reb · 3.1 ast
Score 47
G J. Meyer TR12.4 pts · 3.9 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 51
←GASTSmall
G D. Williams6.1 pts · 2 reb · 1 ast
Score 21
G E. Parnell TR11 pts · 2.2 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 40
=No call
G G. Washington2.6 pts · 0.2 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
F T. Dixon TR9.3 pts · 4.5 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 75
=No call
F G. Tanner2.5 pts · 1.2 reb · 0.8 ast
Not ranked
F J. Sirtautas TR5.9 pts · 3.2 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 37
=Even
C T. Guillouette2.9 pts · 2.6 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 26
Georgia StBetterFGCU
GAST offense214th of 366 · -6.5
←GASTSmall
FGCU defense274th of 366 · -6.9
GAST defense205th of 366 · -5.0
←GASTSmall
FGCU offense259th of 366 · -8.0
Backcourt-2.3 · 3 players
←GASTSmall
Backcourt-4.1 · 3 players
Frontcourt+0.3 · 2 players
←GASTSmall
Frontcourt-1.2 · 2 players
Bench-3.7 · 5 players
→FGCUBig
Bench-0.7 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestGAST betterFGCU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Jackson33 min · TRJ. Meyer29 min · TRE. Parnell26 min · TRZ. Wilburn17 min · TRA. Smith15 min · TRD. Thomas14 min · TR
Forwards
T. Dixon22 min · TRJ. Sirtautas20 min · TRJ. Fredson-Cole19 min · TRO. WilsonNewK. JacksonNew
Centers
M. Nicholson4 min · TR
Guards
E. Brooks30 min · TRD. Williams19 minG. Washington8 minM. McCarthy2 minB. WashingtonNewN. SermpezisNew
Forwards
G. Tanner8 minC. Outlaw2 min · TRB. LucasNewE. BarlowNewC. KoniecznyNewT. WestercampNew
Centers
T. Guillouette13 minJ. Houser6 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 68.4 #307 | Points per game | 76.6 #130 |
| 0.99 #335 | Points per possession | 1.10 #138 |
| 69.1 #176 | Pace (possessions) | 69.9 #122 |
| Shooting | ||
| 44.2 #362 | Effective FG% | 52.0 #147 |
| 30.6 #329 | 3-point % | 33.2 #219 |
| 42.4 #129 | 3-point attempt rate | 38.4 #202 |
| 37.2 #124 | Free throw rate | 29.1 #331 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.9 #132 | Turnover rate | 16.0 #135 |
| 27.7 #278 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.1 #161 |
| 11.1 #334 | Assists per game | 14.5 #115 |
| Defense | ||
| 75.4 #203 | Points allowed | 78.0 #266 |
| 1.09 #202 | Points allowed per possession | 1.11 #254 |
| 50.6 #135 | Opponent effective FG% | 53.4 #280 |
| 33.1 #132 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.5 #275 |
| 16.4 #197 | Turnovers forced | 16.4 #191 |
| 66.4 #312 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.8 #73 |
| 6.7 #149 | Steals per game | 7.7 #66 |
| 3.0 #212 | Blocks per game | 3.4 #153 |
Georgia St
8-22 in 2025-26 overall · 7-12 in conference · Sun Belt Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Louisiana75–84
- Lvs Old Dominion73–81
- Lvs Coastal71–76
- Lvs James Madison65–80
- Wvs GA Southern66–64
A week or more of rest.
FGCU
14-18 in 2025-26 overall · 10-11 in conference · Atlantic Sun Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs C Arkansas63–73
- Wvs Lipscomb77–53
- Wvs North Alabama69–58
- L@ Stetson63–78
- L@ North Florida70–76
A week or more of rest.