Ocean Bank Convocation Center · at FIU
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | FIU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects FIU 82–74 · win probability FIU 75%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 156.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: FIU has more of the edges
SUU 1, FIU 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: SUU 20.3%, FIU 17.8%. Forced: SUU 14.8%, FIU 20.0%
FIU offense vs SUU defense
Offense 144th of 366 against a defense 329th, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: SUU 28.8%, FIU 33.9%. Defensive: SUU 66.4%, FIU 65.2%
Three-pointers
SUU hits 33.0% and allows 38.0%; FIU hits 34.7% and allows 36.2%. Threes are 35.5% and 32.8% of their shots
Home court
FIU at home. This season: FIU 0-0 at home, SUU 0-0 away
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: SUU 27%, FIU 0%. Transfers in: SUU 1, FIU 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Schedule so far
SUU has played the 187th-hardest schedule, FIU the 151st. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Tempo
About 72 possessions: SUU plays 71.2 a game (62nd fastest), FIU 72.4 (26th). Faster games mean more points
Even
SUU offense vs FIU defense
Offense 211th of 366 against a defense 217th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: SUU 33.1, FIU 38.6. Allowed: SUU 29.8, FIU 35.9
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: SUU 50.8 and allows 53.3; FIU 50.6 and allows 52.9
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | FIU -7.8 | — |
| Total | — | 156.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | SUU 74.3 · FIU 82.1 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | FIU -4.5 | — |
| 1H total | 73.1 | — |
| 1H projected score | SUU 34.3 · FIU 38.8 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 6-4 60% | 7-3 70% | |
| 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | 3-7 30% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
SUU 1–0 FIUSUU leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · SUU 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2024-25 | FIU 75 @ SUU 80 | SUU -6.5 | FIU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Southern Utah
29 games played
Straight up
7-22
24% wins
Against the spread
15-14
52% covers · avg +0.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-12
59% overs · avg +3.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 64-81 | +17.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 8 | vs | L 72-95 | +1.5 | L −21.5 | 160.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 85-90 | +8.5 | W +3.5 | 153.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 17 | @ | L 50-122 | +35.5 | L −36.5 | 160.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 74-98 | +12.5 | L −11.5 | 157.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 28 | @ | L 54-61 | +8.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | U 115 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 70-68 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 148.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 70-81 | +10.5 | L −0.5 | 146.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 69-105 | +25.5 | L −10.5 | 153.5 | O 174 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 57-65 | +5.5 | L −2.5 | 150.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 66-80 | +7.5 | L −6.5 | 148.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 77-86 | +5.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 72-89 | +18.5 | W +1.5 | 154.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 55-58 | +14.5 | W +11.5 | 150.5 | U 113 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 106-105 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 150.5 | O 211 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 74-52 | +3.5 | W +25.5 | 149.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 84-70 | +12.5 | W +26.5 | 160.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 91-102 | +6.5 | L −4.5 | 149.5 | O 193 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 61-80 | +9.5 | L −9.5 | 144.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 79-76 | +6.5 | W +9.5 | 150.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 59-62 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 66-83 | +5.5 | L −11.5 | 147.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 78-73 | +8.5 | W +13.5 | 143.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 74-78 | +4.5 | W +0.5 | 144.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 83-87 | +8.5 | W +4.5 | 143.5 | O 170 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 81-67 | +1.5 | W +15.5 | 156.5 | U 148 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 88-92 | +9.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | O 180 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 75-82 | +6.5 | L −0.5 | 148.5 | O 157 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 63-69 | +4.5 | L −1.5 | 141.5 | U 132 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
ASU
L 64-81
+0.5
8
vs
RGV
L 72-95
−21.5
15
@
OMA
L 85-90
+3.5
17
@
GONZ
L 50-122
−36.5
19
@
WSU
L 74-98
−11.5
28
@
RMU
L 54-61
+1.5
29
vs
STET
W 70-68
+0.5
6
@
ORST
L 70-81
−0.5
13
@
WASH
L 69-105
−10.5
18
@
NAU
L 57-65
−2.5
29
@
UTU
L 66-80
−6.5
3
vs
UTA
L 77-86
−3.5
8
@
UVU
L 72-89
+1.5
10
@
CBU
L 55-58
+11.5
15
vs
TAR
W 106-105
+4.5
17
vs
ACU
W 74-52
+25.5
21
vs
UVU
W 84-70
+26.5
24
@
UTU
L 91-102
−4.5
29
@
UTA
L 61-80
−9.5
31
@
ACU
W 79-76
+9.5
7
vs
TAR
L 59-62
−1.5
12
vs
CBU
L 66-83
−11.5
14
@
UTA
W 78-73
+13.5
19
@
TAR
L 74-78
+0.5
21
@
ACU
L 83-87
+4.5
28
vs
UTU
W 81-67
+15.5
5
vs
UVU
L 88-92
+5.5
7
vs
CBU
L 75-82
−0.5
12
vs
UTA
L 63-69
−1.5
covered 15didn’t cover 14avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
ASU
L 64-81
−6.5
8
vs
RGV
L 72-95
+6.5
15
@
OMA
L 85-90
+21.5
17
@
GONZ
L 50-122
+11.5
19
@
WSU
L 74-98
+14.5
28
@
RMU
L 54-61
−37.5
29
vs
STET
W 70-68
−10.5
6
@
ORST
L 70-81
+4.5
13
@
WASH
L 69-105
+20.5
18
@
NAU
L 57-65
−28.5
29
@
UTU
L 66-80
−2.5
3
vs
UTA
L 77-86
+24.5
8
@
UVU
L 72-89
+6.5
10
@
CBU
L 55-58
−37.5
15
vs
TAR
W 106-105
+60.5
17
vs
ACU
W 74-52
−23.5
21
vs
UVU
W 84-70
−6.5
24
@
UTU
L 91-102
+43.5
29
@
UTA
L 61-80
−3.5
31
@
ACU
W 79-76
+4.5
7
vs
TAR
L 59-62
−28.5
12
vs
CBU
L 66-83
+1.5
14
@
UTA
W 78-73
+7.5
19
@
TAR
L 74-78
+7.5
21
@
ACU
L 83-87
+26.5
28
vs
UTU
W 81-67
−8.5
5
vs
UVU
L 88-92
+29.5
7
vs
CBU
L 75-82
+8.5
12
vs
UTA
L 63-69
−9.5
over 17under 12avg +3.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
FIU
29 games played
Straight up
12-17
41% wins
Against the spread
16-13
55% covers · avg +1.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-15
48% overs · avg +1.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | L 66-96 | +21.5 | L −8.5 | 156.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 13 | @ | L 81-98 | +21.5 | W +4.5 | 158.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 72-80 | -2.5 | L −10.5 | 155.5 | U 152 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 74-61 | -4.5 | W +8.5 | 157.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 89-83 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 154.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 88-65 | -5.5 | W +17.5 | 145.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 81-98 | +22.5 | W +5.5 | 161.5 | O 179 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 86-79 | -6.5 | W +0.5 | 161.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 28 | vs | L 94-97 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | O 191 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 89-74 | +1.5 | W +16.5 | 157.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 76-64 | -6.5 | W +5.5 | 152.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 64-71 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 71-79 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 153.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 86-89 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 175.5 | U 175 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 63-76 | -2.5 | L −15.5 | 168.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 77-83 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 151.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 81-78 | +7.5 | W +10.5 | 159.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 74-78 | -3.5 | L −7.5 | 148.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 88-84 | +5.5 | W +9.5 | 154.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 70-80 | +4.5 | L −5.5 | 159.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 66-68 | -8.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 77-64 | -3.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 89-90 | +9.5 | W +8.5 | 152.5 | O 179 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 70-67 | -3.5 | L −0.5 | 154.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 67-100 | +6.5 | L −26.5 | 161.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 84-76 | +2.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | O 160 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 67-73 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 153.5 | U 140 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 92-67 | +1.5 | W +26.5 | 160.5 | U 159 |
| Mar 10 | vs | L 72-75 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 152.5 | U 147 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
NEB
L 66-96
−8.5
13
@
LSU
L 81-98
+4.5
24
vs
JMU
L 72-80
−10.5
26
vs
OMA
W 74-61
+8.5
3
vs
FGCU
W 89-83
+7.5
6
vs
JAX
W 88-65
+17.5
16
@
MIA
L 81-98
+5.5
20
vs
LIU
W 86-79
+0.5
28
vs
LIB
L 94-97
+1.5
2
vs
NMSU
W 89-74
+16.5
4
vs
UTEP
W 76-64
+5.5
7
@
JXST
L 64-71
−5.5
10
@
MOST
L 71-79
−5.5
14
@
KENN
L 86-89
+2.5
17
vs
SHSU
L 63-76
−15.5
22
@
UTEP
L 77-83
−7.5
24
@
NMSU
W 81-78
+10.5
28
vs
JXST
L 74-78
−7.5
4
@
MTSU
W 88-84
+9.5
7
@
WKU
L 70-80
−5.5
12
vs
DEL
L 66-68
−10.5
14
vs
LT
W 77-64
+9.5
19
@
LIB
L 89-90
+8.5
21
vs
MOST
W 70-67
−0.5
26
@
SHSU
L 67-100
−26.5
28
@
LT
W 84-76
+10.5
5
vs
MTSU
L 67-73
−7.5
7
vs
WKU
W 92-67
+26.5
10
vs
MOST
L 72-75
−1.5
covered 16didn’t cover 13avg +1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
NEB
L 66-96
+5.5
13
@
LSU
L 81-98
+20.5
24
vs
JMU
L 72-80
−3.5
26
vs
OMA
W 74-61
−22.5
3
vs
FGCU
W 89-83
+17.5
6
vs
JAX
W 88-65
+7.5
16
@
MIA
L 81-98
+17.5
20
vs
LIU
W 86-79
+3.5
28
vs
LIB
L 94-97
+38.5
2
vs
NMSU
W 89-74
+5.5
4
vs
UTEP
W 76-64
−12.5
7
@
JXST
L 64-71
−15.5
10
@
MOST
L 71-79
−3.5
14
@
KENN
L 86-89
−0.5
17
vs
SHSU
L 63-76
−29.5
22
@
UTEP
L 77-83
+8.5
24
@
NMSU
W 81-78
−0.5
28
vs
JXST
L 74-78
+3.5
4
@
MTSU
W 88-84
+17.5
7
@
WKU
L 70-80
−9.5
12
vs
DEL
L 66-68
−13.5
14
vs
LT
W 77-64
−5.5
19
@
LIB
L 89-90
+26.5
21
vs
MOST
W 70-67
−17.5
26
@
SHSU
L 67-100
+5.5
28
@
LT
W 84-76
+14.5
5
vs
MTSU
L 67-73
−13.5
7
vs
WKU
W 92-67
−1.5
10
vs
MOST
L 72-75
−5.5
over 14under 15avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Southern Utah 1, FIU 1, even 3
Southern UtahBetterFIU
G B. Johnson0 pts · 0.3 reb · 0.9 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G T. Saine TR18.1 pts · 2.3 reb · 4.4 ast
Score 91
G Z. Kidd0.3 pts · 0.8 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G C. Caulker TR7.9 pts · 2.4 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 22
F J. Feroah14 pts · 6.9 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 87
=No call
G H. Cuevas TR2.6 pts · 1 reb · 0.6 ast
Not ranked
F J. Nicholls TR10.8 pts · 5.3 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 95
←SUUBig
F J. Colonel TR4.6 pts · 7.3 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 52
F C. Barclay4.5 pts · 2.7 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 8
→FIUBig
F R. Seals TR7.5 pts · 4 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 61
Southern UtahBetterFIU
SUU offense211th of 366 · -6.4
=Even
FIU defense217th of 366 · -5.7
SUU defense329th of 366 · -8.6
→FIUBig
FIU offense144th of 366 · -4.3
Backcourt-0.4 · 2 players
=Even
Backcourt-0.8 · 3 players
Frontcourt+3.8 · 3 players
←SUUBig
Frontcourt-0.0 · 2 players
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench-0.9 · 1 player
Score, worst to bestSUU betterFIU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
B. Johnson4 minZ. Kidd3 minD. SandersNewA. BrelandNewJ. BrownNewC. DegraffenriedNew
Forwards
J. Feroah31 minJ. Nicholls18 min · TRC. Barclay16 minJ. RiakNewJ. NichollsNewD. SmithNew
Centers
M. ProtsenkoNew
Guards
T. Saine34 min · TRC. Caulker31 min · TRH. Cuevas13 min · TRN. MendyNewM. BlazerNewC. HallNew
Forwards
J. Colonel26 min · TRR. Seals18 min · TRJ. Payne7 min · TRG. GiceviciusNewC. RingNewS. N'DiayeNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 72.3 #235 | Points per game | 77.7 #100 |
| 1.01 #310 | Points per possession | 1.08 #197 |
| 71.2 #62 | Pace (possessions) | 72.4 #26 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.8 #200 | Effective FG% | 50.6 #210 |
| 33.0 #231 | 3-point % | 34.7 #137 |
| 35.5 #261 | 3-point attempt rate | 32.8 #321 |
| 33.1 #235 | Free throw rate | 38.6 #87 |
| Possessions | ||
| 20.3 #352 | Turnover rate | 17.8 #258 |
| 28.8 #239 | Offensive rebound rate | 33.9 #69 |
| 12.9 #223 | Assists per game | 13.6 #173 |
| Defense | ||
| 81.3 #335 | Points allowed | 79.1 #301 |
| 1.14 #308 | Points allowed per possession | 1.09 #194 |
| 53.3 #276 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.9 #264 |
| 38.0 #358 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.2 #313 |
| 14.8 #302 | Turnovers forced | 20.0 #22 |
| 66.4 #309 | Defensive rebound rate | 65.2 #335 |
| 5.2 #317 | Steals per game | 8.8 #12 |
| 4.1 #60 | Blocks per game | 4.4 #43 |
Southern Utah
7-22 in 2025-26 overall · 6-13 in conference · Big Sky Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs UT Arlington63–69
- Lvs CA Baptist75–82
- Lvs Utah Valley88–92
- Wvs Utah Tech81–67
- L@ Abilene Chrstn83–87
A week or more of rest.
FIU
12-17 in 2025-26 overall · 8-13 in conference · Conference USA
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Missouri St72–75
- Wvs Western KY92–67
- Lvs MTSU67–73
- W@ Louisiana Tech84–76
- L@ Sam Houston67–100
A week or more of rest.