Dean E. Smith Center · at North Carolina
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UNC | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects UNC 90–66 · win probability UNC 98%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 155.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: UNC has more of the edges
MRSH 1, UNC 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Free throws
Free throw rate: MRSH 29.2, UNC 37.1. Allowed: MRSH 41.1, UNC 23.8
UNC offense vs MRSH defense
Offense 40th of 366 against a defense 277th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
MRSH has played the 234th-hardest schedule, UNC the 61st. A record against a soft schedule means less
MRSH offense vs UNC defense
Offense 198th of 366 against a defense 52nd, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: MRSH 31.9%, UNC 31.2%. Defensive: MRSH 66.2%, UNC 72.2%
Three-pointers
MRSH hits 36.8% and allows 33.6%; UNC hits 34.2% and allows 34.7%. Threes are 44.3% and 42.2% of their shots
Home court
UNC at home. This season: UNC 0-0 at home, MRSH 0-0 away
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: MRSH plays 70.7 a game (86th fastest), UNC 69.0 (180th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: MRSH 54.8 and allows 50.3; UNC 54.3 and allows 48.4
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: MRSH 27%, UNC 20%. Transfers in: MRSH 7, UNC 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: MRSH 16.6%, UNC 13.9%. Forced: MRSH 16.2%, UNC 13.6%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | UNC -24.1 | — |
| Total | — | 155.1 | — |
| Projected score | — | MRSH 65.5 · UNC 89.6 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UNC -14.2 | — |
| 1H total | 72.5 | — |
| 1H projected score | MRSH 29.1 · UNC 43.4 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 2-8 20% | 9-1 90% | |
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Marshall
31 games played
Straight up
18-13
58% wins
Against the spread
10-21
32% covers · avg −1.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-12
61% overs · avg +4.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | W 78-72 | +4.5 | W +10.5 | 152.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 8 | @ | W 85-73 | +2.5 | W +14.5 | 160.5 | U 158 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 96-89 | -8.5 | L −1.5 | 155.5 | O 185 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 78-104 | +20.5 | L −5.5 | 155.5 | O 182 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 98-70 | -20.5 | W +7.5 | 164.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 69-60 | -11.5 | L −2.5 | 147.5 | U 129 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 67-90 | -7.5 | L −30.5 | 157.5 | U 157 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 69-70 | +8.5 | W +7.5 | 150.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 81-88 | +3.5 | L −3.5 | 157.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 77-61 | -1.5 | W +14.5 | 159.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 76-74 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 63-70 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 155.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 84-80 | -13.5 | L −9.5 | 151.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 88-81 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 141.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 66-64 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 152.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 73-81 | -4.5 | L −12.5 | 153.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 83-85 | -9.5 | L −11.5 | 151.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 77-72 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 115-60 | -18.5 | W +36.5 | 160.5 | O 175 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 68-72 | -3.5 | L −7.5 | 147.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 70-61 | +3.5 | W +12.5 | 165.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 81-77 | -10.5 | L −6.5 | 148.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 74-90 | +1.5 | L −14.5 | 162.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 81-79 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 155.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 87-101 | -2.5 | L −16.5 | 162.5 | O 188 |
| Feb 16 | vs | W 84-80 | -6.5 | L −2.5 | 150.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 94-93 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 143.5 | O 187 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 75-79 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 153.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 97-88 | -7.5 | W +1.5 | 159.5 | O 185 |
| Feb 27 | vs | L 82-99 | -7.5 | L −24.5 | 168.5 | O 181 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 78-82 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 166.5 | U 160 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
MASS
W 78-72
+10.5
8
@
TOL
W 85-73
+14.5
12
vs
ELON
W 96-89
−1.5
15
@
UVA
L 78-104
−5.5
20
vs
UAPB
W 98-70
+7.5
23
vs
MERC
W 69-60
−2.5
26
vs
LIP
L 67-90
−30.5
3
@
UNCW
L 69-70
+7.5
6
@
OHIO
L 81-88
−3.5
10
vs
WKU
W 77-61
+14.5
13
vs
WRST
W 76-74
−1.5
20
@
TROY
L 63-70
−2.5
31
vs
GAST
W 84-80
−9.5
3
vs
APP
W 88-81
−0.5
7
@
JMU
W 66-64
+3.5
10
@
GAST
L 73-81
−12.5
14
vs
CCU
L 83-85
−11.5
17
vs
JMU
W 77-72
−1.5
22
vs
ULM
W 115-60
+36.5
28
@
TXST
L 68-72
−7.5
31
@
ARST
W 70-61
+12.5
4
vs
USM
W 81-77
−6.5
7
vs
M-OH
L 74-90
−14.5
11
@
ODU
W 81-79
−1.5
14
@
GASO
L 87-101
−16.5
16
vs
USA
W 84-80
−2.5
19
@
APP
W 94-93
+4.5
21
@
CCU
L 75-79
−6.5
24
vs
ODU
W 97-88
+1.5
27
vs
GASO
L 82-99
−24.5
8
vs
GASO
L 78-82
−6.5
covered 10didn’t cover 21avg −1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
MASS
W 78-72
−2.5
8
@
TOL
W 85-73
−2.5
12
vs
ELON
W 96-89
+29.5
15
@
UVA
L 78-104
+26.5
20
vs
UAPB
W 98-70
+3.5
23
vs
MERC
W 69-60
−18.5
26
vs
LIP
L 67-90
−0.5
3
@
UNCW
L 69-70
−11.5
6
@
OHIO
L 81-88
+11.5
10
vs
WKU
W 77-61
−21.5
13
vs
WRST
W 76-74
+0.5
20
@
TROY
L 63-70
−22.5
31
vs
GAST
W 84-80
+12.5
3
vs
APP
W 88-81
+27.5
7
@
JMU
W 66-64
−22.5
10
@
GAST
L 73-81
+0.5
14
vs
CCU
L 83-85
+16.5
17
vs
JMU
W 77-72
−0.5
22
vs
ULM
W 115-60
+14.5
28
@
TXST
L 68-72
−7.5
31
@
ARST
W 70-61
−34.5
4
vs
USM
W 81-77
+9.5
7
vs
M-OH
L 74-90
+1.5
11
@
ODU
W 81-79
+4.5
14
@
GASO
L 87-101
+25.5
16
vs
USA
W 84-80
+13.5
19
@
APP
W 94-93
+43.5
21
@
CCU
L 75-79
+0.5
24
vs
ODU
W 97-88
+25.5
27
vs
GASO
L 82-99
+12.5
8
vs
GASO
L 78-82
−6.5
over 19under 12avg +4.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
North Carolina
33 games played
Straight up
24-9
73% wins
Against the spread
19-14
58% covers · avg +0.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-17
48% overs · avg −2.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 94-54 | -31.5 | W +8.5 | 157.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 87-74 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 159.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 89-74 | -20.5 | L −5.5 | 162.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 97-53 | -34.5 | W +9.5 | 159.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 73-61 | -26.5 | L −14.5 | 160.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 85-70 | -10.5 | W +4.5 | 152.5 | O 155 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 58-74 | +1.5 | L −14.5 | 152.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 67-64 | +7.5 | W +10.5 | 163.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 81-61 | -10.5 | W +9.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 80-62 | -29.5 | L −11.5 | 151.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 77-58 | -17.5 | W +1.5 | 150.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 71-70 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 157.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 99-51 | -25.5 | W +22.5 | 144.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 30 | vs | W 79-66 | -12.5 | W +0.5 | 166.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 83-97 | +1.5 | L −12.5 | 155.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 87-84 | -10.5 | L −7.5 | 154.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 90-95 | -4.5 | L −9.5 | 147.5 | O 185 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 78-84 | -7.5 | L −13.5 | 151.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 91-69 | -13.5 | W +8.5 | 149.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 85-80 | +6.5 | W +11.5 | 152.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 91-75 | -9.5 | W +6.5 | 160.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 2 | vs | W 87-77 | -11.5 | L −1.5 | 158.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 71-68 | +6.5 | W +9.5 | 152.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 10 | @ | L 66-75 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 156.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 79-65 | -11.5 | W +2.5 | 142.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 58-82 | +8.5 | L −15.5 | 156.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 77-64 | +2.5 | W +15.5 | 154.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 23 | vs | W 77-74 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 162.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 89-82 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 149.5 | O 171 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 67-63 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 141.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 61-76 | +18.5 | W +3.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 79-80 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 140.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 78-82 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 150.5 | O 160 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
CARK
W 94-54
+8.5
7
vs
KU
W 87-74
+10.5
11
vs
RAD
W 89-74
−5.5
14
vs
NCCU
W 97-53
+9.5
18
vs
NAVY
W 73-61
−14.5
25
vs
SBU
W 85-70
+4.5
27
vs
MSU
L 58-74
−14.5
2
@
UK
W 67-64
+10.5
7
vs
GTWN
W 81-61
+9.5
13
vs
UPST
W 80-62
−11.5
16
vs
ETSU
W 77-58
+1.5
20
vs
OSU
W 71-70
−1.5
22
vs
ECU
W 99-51
+22.5
30
vs
FSU
W 79-66
+0.5
3
@
SMU
L 83-97
−12.5
10
vs
WAKE
W 87-84
−7.5
14
@
STAN
L 90-95
−9.5
17
@
CAL
L 78-84
−13.5
21
vs
ND
W 91-69
+8.5
24
@
UVA
W 85-80
+11.5
31
@
GT
W 91-75
+6.5
2
vs
SYR
W 87-77
−1.5
7
vs
DUKE
W 71-68
+9.5
10
@
MIA
L 66-75
−7.5
14
vs
PITT
W 79-65
+2.5
17
@
NCSU
L 58-82
−15.5
21
@
SYR
W 77-64
+15.5
23
vs
LOU
W 77-74
+6.5
28
vs
VT
W 89-82
−0.5
3
vs
CLEM
W 67-63
+1.5
7
@
DUKE
L 61-76
+3.5
12
vs
CLEM
L 79-80
+1.5
19
vs
VCU
L 78-82
−6.5
covered 19didn’t cover 14avg +0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
CARK
W 94-54
−9.5
7
vs
KU
W 87-74
+1.5
11
vs
RAD
W 89-74
+0.5
14
vs
NCCU
W 97-53
−9.5
18
vs
NAVY
W 73-61
−26.5
25
vs
SBU
W 85-70
+2.5
27
vs
MSU
L 58-74
−20.5
2
@
UK
W 67-64
−32.5
7
vs
GTWN
W 81-61
−7.5
13
vs
UPST
W 80-62
−9.5
16
vs
ETSU
W 77-58
−15.5
20
vs
OSU
W 71-70
−16.5
22
vs
ECU
W 99-51
+5.5
30
vs
FSU
W 79-66
−21.5
3
@
SMU
L 83-97
+24.5
10
vs
WAKE
W 87-84
+16.5
14
@
STAN
L 90-95
+37.5
17
@
CAL
L 78-84
+10.5
21
vs
ND
W 91-69
+10.5
24
@
UVA
W 85-80
+12.5
31
@
GT
W 91-75
+5.5
2
vs
SYR
W 87-77
+5.5
7
vs
DUKE
W 71-68
−13.5
10
@
MIA
L 66-75
−15.5
14
vs
PITT
W 79-65
+1.5
17
@
NCSU
L 58-82
−16.5
21
@
SYR
W 77-64
−13.5
23
vs
LOU
W 77-74
−11.5
28
vs
VT
W 89-82
+21.5
3
vs
CLEM
W 67-63
−11.5
7
@
DUKE
L 61-76
−10.5
12
vs
CLEM
L 79-80
+18.5
19
vs
VCU
L 78-82
+9.5
over 16under 17avg −2.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
North Carolina has the better starters
Position by position: Marshall 0, North Carolina 5, even 0
MarshallBetterNorth Carolina
G N. Otshudi14.5 pts · 3.3 reb · 3.5 ast
Score 45
→UNCSmall
G N. Avdalas TR12.1 pts · 3.1 reb · 4.6 ast
Score 67
G F. Oshodi TR8.6 pts · 1.2 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 47
→UNCBig
G T. Brown TR19.9 pts · 2.4 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 98
G L. Rasmussen TR2.6 pts · 1.8 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 15
→UNCBig
G A. Brizzi TR14.7 pts · 2.7 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 65
G D. Johnson TR2.5 pts · 2.1 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 17
→UNCBig
F J. Stevenson8.1 pts · 4.4 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 65
F E. Harding3.8 pts · 2.8 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 11
→UNCBig
C C. Fens TR14.8 pts · 8.8 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 85
MarshallBetterNorth Carolina
MRSH offense198th of 366 · -6.1
→UNCBig
UNC defense52nd of 366 · +1.9
MRSH defense277th of 366 · -7.0
→UNCBig
UNC offense40th of 366 · +5.0
Backcourt-4.7 · 4 players
→UNCBig
Backcourt+6.0 · 3 players
Frontcourt-1.5 · 1 player
→UNCBig
Frontcourt+3.9 · 2 players
Bench-1.4 · 5 players
→UNCSmall
Bench+0.4 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestMRSH betterUNC betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
N. Otshudi32 minF. Oshodi20 min · TRL. Rasmussen15 min · TRD. Johnson15 min · TRB. Slay8 minE. Manyuon2 min · TR
Forwards
E. Harding14 minC. Langdon3 min · TRV. Kuridza2 min · TRB. DjigoNew
Centers
K. Maker6 min · TR
Guards
N. Avdalas32 min · TRT. Brown32 min · TRA. Brizzi30 min · TRM. Able22 min · TRJ. Young7 minI. Denis3 min
Forwards
J. Stevenson26 minJ. Holbrook2 minA. SamodurovNewM. AdamsNew
Centers
C. Fens26 min · TRC. BennermanNewS. KeitaNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 80.5 #56 | Points per game | 79.7 #73 |
| 1.14 #71 | Points per possession | 1.16 #50 |
| 70.7 #86 | Pace (possessions) | 69.0 #180 |
| Shooting | ||
| 54.8 #42 | Effective FG% | 54.3 #57 |
| 36.8 #34 | 3-point % | 34.2 #159 |
| 44.3 #82 | 3-point attempt rate | 42.2 #132 |
| 29.2 #328 | Free throw rate | 37.1 #127 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.6 #172 | Turnover rate | 13.9 #20 |
| 31.9 #127 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.2 #159 |
| 16.2 #43 | Assists per game | 16.0 #47 |
| Defense | ||
| 78.9 #292 | Points allowed | 71.6 #97 |
| 1.11 #253 | Points allowed per possession | 1.04 #65 |
| 50.3 #118 | Opponent effective FG% | 48.4 #44 |
| 33.6 #162 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.7 #234 |
| 16.2 #206 | Turnovers forced | 13.6 #344 |
| 66.2 #316 | Defensive rebound rate | 72.2 #59 |
| 6.1 #225 | Steals per game | 5.4 #308 |
| 4.8 #23 | Blocks per game | 3.4 #167 |
Marshall
18-13 in 2025-26 overall · 11-8 in conference · Sun Belt Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs GA Southern78–82
- Lvs GA Southern82–99
- Wvs Old Dominion97–88
- L@ Coastal75–79
- W@ App State94–93
A week or more of rest.
North Carolina
24-9 in 2025-26 overall · 12-7 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs VCU78–82
- Lvs Clemson79–80
- L@ Duke61–76
- Wvs Clemson67–63
- Wvs Virginia Tech89–82
A week or more of rest.