Save Mart Center · at Fresno St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | FRES | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects FRES 81–68 · win probability FRES 87%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 149.4
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: FRES has more of the edges
ALST 2, FRES 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
ALST has played the 333rd-hardest schedule, FRES the 103rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
FRES offense vs ALST defense
Offense 176th of 366 against a defense 330th, on the model’s ratings
Free throws
Free throw rate: ALST 34.9, FRES 33.8. Allowed: ALST 42.3, FRES 28.6
Three-pointers
ALST hits 31.8% and allows 34.2%; FRES hits 32.1% and allows 30.7%. Threes are 38.5% and 40.9% of their shots
Shooting
Effective FG%: ALST 47.1 and allows 52.2; FRES 50.6 and allows 51.5
ALST offense vs FRES defense
Offense 269th of 366 against a defense 190th, on the model’s ratings
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: ALST 32%, FRES 0%. Transfers in: ALST 3, FRES 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Home court
FRES at home. This season: FRES 0-0 at home, ALST 0-0 away
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: ALST 31.9%, FRES 27.9%. Defensive: ALST 68.5%, FRES 69.4%
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: ALST plays 71.3 a game (59th fastest), FRES 69.3 (156th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: ALST 18.3%, FRES 18.1%. Forced: ALST 18.7%, FRES 18.2%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | FRES -12.9 | — |
| Total | — | 149.4 | — |
| Projected score | — | ALST 68.2 · FRES 81.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | FRES -7.6 | — |
| 1H total | 69.9 | — |
| 1H projected score | ALST 31.1 · FRES 38.7 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | |
| 2-8 20% | 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Alabama St
31 games played
Straight up
9-22
29% wins
Against the spread
13-18
42% covers · avg −1.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-17
45% overs · avg −1.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ | L 64-101 | +24.5 | L −12.5 | 166.5 | U 165 |
| Nov 11 | @ | W 77-74 | +19.5 | W +22.5 | 164.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 17 | @ | L 66-94 | +22.5 | L −5.5 | 156.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 64-66 | +2.5 | W +0.5 | 138.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 101-80 | +2.5 | W +23.5 | 181.5 | U 181 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 68-83 | +1.5 | L −13.5 | 142.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 26 | @ | L 87-93 | +19.5 | W +13.5 | 148.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 64-74 | +6.5 | L −3.5 | 144.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 11 | @ | L 77-85 | +26.5 | W +18.5 | 155.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 51-88 | +21.5 | L −15.5 | 145.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 67-88 | +20.5 | L −0.5 | 151.5 | O 155 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 56-94 | +17.5 | L −20.5 | 154.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 89-69 | -13.5 | W +6.5 | 144.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 5 | @ | L 79-90 | -1.5 | L −12.5 | 159.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 64-75 | -7.5 | L −18.5 | 153.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 12 | vs | W 81-66 | -9.5 | W +5.5 | 151.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 19 | vs | L 69-73 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 146.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 95-80 | -1.5 | W +13.5 | 158.5 | O 175 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 64-96 | +2.5 | L −29.5 | 155.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 54-69 | +1.5 | L −13.5 | 152.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 2 | vs | W 79-66 | -3.5 | W +9.5 | 139.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 47-57 | +4.5 | L −5.5 | 144.5 | U 104 |
| Feb 9 | @ | L 68-69 | +6.5 | W +5.5 | 149.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 79-61 | -3.5 | W +14.5 | 149.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 16 | vs | W 92-55 | -16.5 | W +20.5 | 142.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 71-82 | +5.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 63-76 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 144.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 89-88 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 143.5 | O 177 |
| Mar 3 | vs | L 64-71 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 153.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 63-65 | -2.5 | L −4.5 | 144.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 9 | vs | L 65-77 | -7.5 | L −19.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@
FSU
L 64-101
−12.5
11
@
UAB
W 77-74
+22.5
17
@
COLO
L 66-94
−5.5
19
@
AF
L 64-66
+0.5
21
vs
IUIN
W 101-80
+23.5
23
vs
SIUE
L 68-83
−13.5
26
@
UNM
L 87-93
+13.5
7
@
UTM
L 64-74
−3.5
11
@
MIZ
L 77-85
+18.5
17
@
CIN
L 51-88
−15.5
22
@
MEM
L 67-88
−0.5
29
@
MSST
L 56-94
−20.5
3
@
MVSU
W 89-69
+6.5
5
@
UAPB
L 79-90
−12.5
10
vs
JKST
L 64-75
−18.5
12
vs
ALCN
W 81-66
+5.5
19
vs
AAMU
L 69-73
−5.5
24
@
PV
W 95-80
+13.5
27
@
TXSO
L 64-96
−29.5
31
vs
BCU
L 54-69
−13.5
2
vs
FAMU
W 79-66
+9.5
7
@
GRAM
L 47-57
−5.5
9
@
SOU
L 68-69
+5.5
14
vs
UAPB
W 79-61
+14.5
16
vs
MVSU
W 92-55
+20.5
19
@
BCU
L 71-82
−5.5
21
@
FAMU
L 63-76
−14.5
28
@
AAMU
W 89-88
+2.5
3
vs
SOU
L 64-71
−8.5
5
vs
GRAM
L 63-65
−4.5
9
vs
ALCN
L 65-77
−19.5
covered 13didn’t cover 18avg −1.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@
FSU
L 64-101
−1.5
11
@
UAB
W 77-74
−13.5
17
@
COLO
L 66-94
+3.5
19
@
AF
L 64-66
−8.5
21
vs
IUIN
W 101-80
−0.5
23
vs
SIUE
L 68-83
+8.5
26
@
UNM
L 87-93
+31.5
7
@
UTM
L 64-74
−6.5
11
@
MIZ
L 77-85
+6.5
17
@
CIN
L 51-88
−6.5
22
@
MEM
L 67-88
+3.5
29
@
MSST
L 56-94
−4.5
3
@
MVSU
W 89-69
+13.5
5
@
UAPB
L 79-90
+9.5
10
vs
JKST
L 64-75
−14.5
12
vs
ALCN
W 81-66
−4.5
19
vs
AAMU
L 69-73
−4.5
24
@
PV
W 95-80
+16.5
27
@
TXSO
L 64-96
+4.5
31
vs
BCU
L 54-69
−29.5
2
vs
FAMU
W 79-66
+5.5
7
@
GRAM
L 47-57
−40.5
9
@
SOU
L 68-69
−12.5
14
vs
UAPB
W 79-61
−9.5
16
vs
MVSU
W 92-55
+4.5
19
@
BCU
L 71-82
+5.5
21
@
FAMU
L 63-76
−5.5
28
@
AAMU
W 89-88
+33.5
3
vs
SOU
L 64-71
−18.5
5
vs
GRAM
L 63-65
−16.5
9
vs
ALCN
L 65-77
+0.5
over 14under 17avg −1.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Fresno St
31 games played
Straight up
12-19
39% wins
Against the spread
21-10
68% covers · avg +2.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-19
39% overs · avg −4.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | vs | L 66-67 | -9.5 | L −10.5 | 164.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 82-62 | -6.5 | W +13.5 | 142.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 12 | vs | L 73-78 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 148.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 75-74 | +4.5 | W +5.5 | 156.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 80-78 | +2.5 | W +4.5 | 146.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 85-76 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 154.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 76-53 | -2.5 | W +20.5 | 150.5 | U 129 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 71-76 | -10.5 | L −15.5 | 150.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 58-82 | +19.5 | L −4.5 | 161.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 87-89 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 161.5 | O 176 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 72-84 | +8.5 | L −3.5 | 159.5 | U 156 |
| Dec 30 | vs | L 63-72 | +14.5 | W +5.5 | 154.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 65-66 | +4.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 6 | @ | W 70-55 | -1.5 | W +13.5 | 149.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 52-71 | +14.5 | L −4.5 | 146.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 79-69 | +3.5 | W +13.5 | 139.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 63-60 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 74-83 | +15.5 | W +6.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 57-68 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 79-62 | -9.5 | W +7.5 | 141.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 98-96 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 153.5 | O 194 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 59-69 | +11.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 10 | @ | L 78-91 | +21.5 | W +8.5 | 152.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 93-63 | -14.5 | W +15.5 | 142.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 82-92 | +9.5 | L −0.5 | 148.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 78-80 | +9.5 | W +7.5 | 156.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 70-74 | +8.5 | W +4.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 53-69 | +7.5 | L −8.5 | 149.5 | U 122 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 82-68 | -7.5 | W +6.5 | 151.5 | U 150 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 60-85 | +12.5 | L −12.5 | 149.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 63-67 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 130 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
vs
UPST
L 66-67
−10.5
8
vs
LBSU
W 82-62
+13.5
12
vs
UCSD
L 73-78
−6.5
15
vs
UVU
W 75-74
+5.5
18
vs
SFA
W 80-78
+4.5
21
vs
NOLA
W 85-76
+2.5
26
vs
PEPP
W 76-53
+20.5
30
vs
CSUB
L 71-76
−15.5
6
@
ARK
L 58-82
−4.5
10
@
CSUN
L 87-89
+1.5
20
@
UNLV
L 72-84
−3.5
30
vs
USU
L 63-72
+5.5
3
vs
NEV
L 65-66
+3.5
6
@
SJSU
W 70-55
+13.5
10
@
SDSU
L 52-71
−4.5
13
vs
CSU
W 79-69
+13.5
17
vs
WYO
W 63-60
+6.5
21
@
UNM
L 74-83
+6.5
24
vs
GCU
L 57-68
−6.5
31
@
AF
W 79-62
+7.5
3
vs
UNLV
W 98-96
+3.5
7
@
NEV
L 59-69
+1.5
10
@
USU
L 78-91
+8.5
14
vs
AF
W 93-63
+15.5
17
@
WYO
L 82-92
−0.5
21
vs
UNM
L 78-80
+7.5
24
@
CSU
L 70-74
+4.5
28
vs
BOIS
L 53-69
−8.5
3
vs
SJSU
W 82-68
+6.5
7
@
GCU
L 60-85
−12.5
11
vs
CSU
L 63-67
+3.5
covered 21didn’t cover 10avg +2.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
vs
UPST
L 66-67
−31.5
8
vs
LBSU
W 82-62
+1.5
12
vs
UCSD
L 73-78
+2.5
15
vs
UVU
W 75-74
−7.5
18
vs
SFA
W 80-78
+11.5
21
vs
NOLA
W 85-76
+6.5
26
vs
PEPP
W 76-53
−21.5
30
vs
CSUB
L 71-76
−3.5
6
@
ARK
L 58-82
−21.5
10
@
CSUN
L 87-89
+14.5
20
@
UNLV
L 72-84
−3.5
30
vs
USU
L 63-72
−19.5
3
vs
NEV
L 65-66
−15.5
6
@
SJSU
W 70-55
−24.5
10
@
SDSU
L 52-71
−23.5
13
vs
CSU
W 79-69
+8.5
17
vs
WYO
W 63-60
−22.5
21
@
UNM
L 74-83
+5.5
24
vs
GCU
L 57-68
−20.5
31
@
AF
W 79-62
−0.5
3
vs
UNLV
W 98-96
+40.5
7
@
NEV
L 59-69
−21.5
10
@
USU
L 78-91
+16.5
14
vs
AF
W 93-63
+13.5
17
@
WYO
L 82-92
+25.5
21
vs
UNM
L 78-80
+1.5
24
@
CSU
L 70-74
−5.5
28
vs
BOIS
L 53-69
−27.5
3
vs
SJSU
W 82-68
−1.5
7
@
GCU
L 60-85
−4.5
11
vs
CSU
L 63-67
−16.5
over 12under 19avg −4.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Fresno St has the better starters
Position by position: Alabama St 0, Fresno St 2, even 3
Alabama StBetterFresno St
G M. James TR21 pts · 3.3 reb · 2.7 ast
Score 77
=No call
G D. Lungu TR13.2 pts · 5.4 reb · 3 ast
Not ranked
G A. Brown13.8 pts · 2.8 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 46
→FRESSmall
G R. Candelino TR11.2 pts · 5 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 76
G T. Miller7 pts · 1 reb · 3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G B. Amuneke TR2.1 pts · 0.7 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 28
F J. Walker4.6 pts · 3.3 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 19
→FRESSmall
F B. Henige TR4.9 pts · 5.5 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 38
F J. Scott TR3.7 pts · 3 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 33
=No call
C B. Fall TR0.6 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
Alabama StBetterFresno St
ALST offense269th of 366 · -8.2
→FRESSmall
FRES defense190th of 366 · -4.4
ALST defense330th of 366 · -8.6
→FRESBig
FRES offense176th of 366 · -5.4
Backcourt-1.0 · 3 players
→FRESSmall
Backcourt+1.3 · 3 players
Frontcourt-1.8 · 2 players
→FRESSmall
Frontcourt-0.8 · 2 players
Bench-0.0 · 1 player
=No call
BenchNo numbers yet
Score, worst to bestALST betterFRES betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
M. James37 min · TRA. Brown26 minT. Miller22 minD. BondsNewP. McMillanNewJ. RogersNew
Forwards
J. Walker16 minJ. Scott12 min · TRI. Barganier1 min · TRP. MensahNewM. DixonNewT. HamptonNew
Guards
D. Lungu27 min · TRR. Candelino25 min · TRB. Amuneke8 min · TRN. ZulemieNewK. PerryNewQ. RhymesNew
Forwards
B. Henige20 min · TRR. ParsleyNewY. Kesse-BedaNewA. GrangerNewM. VuckovicNewC. SchroederNew
Centers
B. Fall5 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 71.5 #260 | Points per game | 72.3 #233 |
| 1.01 #318 | Points per possession | 1.04 #266 |
| 71.3 #59 | Pace (possessions) | 69.3 #156 |
| Shooting | ||
| 47.1 #335 | Effective FG% | 50.6 #206 |
| 31.8 #288 | 3-point % | 32.1 #274 |
| 38.5 #200 | 3-point attempt rate | 40.9 #146 |
| 34.9 #185 | Free throw rate | 33.8 #218 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.3 #289 | Turnover rate | 18.1 #277 |
| 31.9 #128 | Offensive rebound rate | 27.9 #272 |
| 11.7 #303 | Assists per game | 12.6 #247 |
| Defense | ||
| 77.6 #256 | Points allowed | 73.5 #142 |
| 1.09 #185 | Points allowed per possession | 1.06 #110 |
| 52.2 #222 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.5 #184 |
| 34.2 #194 | Opponent 3-point % | 30.7 #30 |
| 18.7 #63 | Turnovers forced | 18.2 #88 |
| 68.5 #230 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.4 #183 |
| 7.9 #50 | Steals per game | 6.7 #154 |
| 3.8 #102 | Blocks per game | 2.2 #331 |
Alabama St
9-22 in 2025-26 overall · 7-12 in conference · Southwestern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Alcorn St65–77
- Lvs Grambling63–65
- Lvs Southern64–71
- W@ Alabama A&M89–88
- L@ Florida A&M63–76
A week or more of rest.
Fresno St
12-19 in 2025-26 overall · 7-14 in conference · Pac-12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Colorado St63–67
- L@ Grand Canyon60–85
- Wvs San José St82–68
- Lvs Boise St53–69
- L@ Colorado St70–74
A week or more of rest.