Convocation Center (LA) · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | FRES | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects FRES 76–73 · win probability FRES 60%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 148.4
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: FRES has more of the edges
SDST 2, FRES 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
SDST has played the 271st-hardest schedule, FRES the 103rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: SDST 30.3%, FRES 27.9%. Defensive: SDST 74.9%, FRES 69.4%
Free throws
Free throw rate: SDST 29.7, FRES 33.8. Allowed: SDST 34.5, FRES 28.6
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: SDST 51%, FRES 0%. Transfers in: SDST 3, FRES 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Turnovers
Turnover rate: SDST 16.2%, FRES 18.1%. Forced: SDST 14.5%, FRES 18.2%
FRES offense vs SDST defense
Offense 176th of 366 against a defense 221st, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: SDST plays 68.2 a game (220th fastest), FRES 69.3 (156th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Three-pointers
SDST hits 34.0% and allows 34.1%; FRES hits 32.1% and allows 30.7%. Threes are 38.8% and 40.9% of their shots
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: SDST 52.0 and allows 51.8; FRES 50.6 and allows 51.5
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Even
SDST offense vs FRES defense
Offense 185th of 366 against a defense 190th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | FRES -2.8 | — |
| Total | — | 148.4 | — |
| Projected score | — | SDST 72.8 · FRES 75.6 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | FRES -1.5 | — |
| 1H total | 69.4 | — |
| 1H projected score | SDST 33.9 · FRES 35.5 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 3-7 30% | 3-7 30% | |
| 2-8 20% | 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
S Dakota St
29 games played
Straight up
11-18
38% wins
Against the spread
12-17
41% covers · avg −1.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-15
48% overs · avg −2.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 75-66 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 143.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 58-65 | +10.5 | W +3.5 | 150.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 69-83 | +16.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 105-58 | -12.5 | W +34.5 | 143.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 52-75 | +1.5 | L −21.5 | 151.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 52-64 | +2.5 | L −9.5 | 144.5 | U 116 |
| Dec 3 | @ | W 75-62 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 148.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 81-84 | -5.5 | L −8.5 | 147.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 9 | @ | W 68-64 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 142.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 15 | vs | L 72-87 | +3.5 | L −11.5 | 149.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 87-88 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 151.5 | O 175 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 71-99 | +31.5 | W +3.5 | 159.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 84-69 | -9.5 | W +5.5 | 152.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 87-90 | -7.5 | L −10.5 | 152.5 | O 177 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 87-79 | -8.5 | L −0.5 | 162.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 65-76 | +5.5 | L −5.5 | 151.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 90-62 | -13.5 | W +14.5 | 151.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 69-74 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 155.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 71-80 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 150.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 95-72 | -13.5 | W +9.5 | 150.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 62-77 | -1.5 | L −16.5 | 157.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 67-68 | -11.5 | L −12.5 | 159.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 61-79 | -2.5 | L −20.5 | 160.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 87-69 | -5.5 | W +12.5 | 147.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 66-74 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 146.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 91-83 | -9.5 | L −1.5 | 151.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 26 | @ | W 73-59 | -12.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 70-75 | -3.5 | L −8.5 | 151.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 67-80 | +4.5 | L −8.5 | 150.5 | U 147 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
MRMK
W 75-66
+2.5
9
@
UNI
L 58-65
+3.5
12
@
ORE
L 69-83
+2.5
21
vs
GAST
W 105-58
+34.5
25
vs
UVU
L 52-75
−21.5
26
vs
UCI
L 52-64
−9.5
3
@
NAU
W 75-62
+10.5
6
vs
IDHO
L 81-84
−8.5
9
@
BALL
W 68-64
−1.5
15
vs
WYO
L 72-87
−11.5
19
@
MILW
L 87-88
−2.5
29
@
ARIZ
L 71-99
+3.5
1
vs
OMA
W 84-69
+5.5
3
@
UND
L 87-90
−10.5
8
vs
DEN
W 87-79
−0.5
14
@
NDSU
L 65-76
−5.5
17
vs
KC
W 90-62
+14.5
22
@
STMN
L 69-74
+1.5
28
@
OMA
L 71-80
−10.5
31
vs
ORU
W 95-72
+9.5
4
vs
STMN
L 62-77
−16.5
7
vs
SDAK
L 67-68
−12.5
12
@
DEN
L 61-79
−20.5
14
@
ORU
W 87-69
+12.5
18
vs
NDSU
L 66-74
−6.5
21
vs
UND
W 91-83
−1.5
26
@
KC
W 73-59
+1.5
28
@
SDAK
L 70-75
−8.5
5
vs
STMN
L 67-80
−8.5
covered 12didn’t cover 17avg −1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
MRMK
W 75-66
−2.5
9
@
UNI
L 58-65
−27.5
12
@
ORE
L 69-83
+6.5
21
vs
GAST
W 105-58
+19.5
25
vs
UVU
L 52-75
−24.5
26
vs
UCI
L 52-64
−28.5
3
@
NAU
W 75-62
−11.5
6
vs
IDHO
L 81-84
+17.5
9
@
BALL
W 68-64
−10.5
15
vs
WYO
L 72-87
+9.5
19
@
MILW
L 87-88
+23.5
29
@
ARIZ
L 71-99
+10.5
1
vs
OMA
W 84-69
+0.5
3
@
UND
L 87-90
+24.5
8
vs
DEN
W 87-79
+3.5
14
@
NDSU
L 65-76
−10.5
17
vs
KC
W 90-62
+0.5
22
@
STMN
L 69-74
−12.5
28
@
OMA
L 71-80
+0.5
31
vs
ORU
W 95-72
+16.5
4
vs
STMN
L 62-77
−18.5
7
vs
SDAK
L 67-68
−24.5
12
@
DEN
L 61-79
−20.5
14
@
ORU
W 87-69
+8.5
18
vs
NDSU
L 66-74
−6.5
21
vs
UND
W 91-83
+22.5
26
@
KC
W 73-59
−20.5
28
@
SDAK
L 70-75
−6.5
5
vs
STMN
L 67-80
−3.5
over 14under 15avg −2.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Fresno St
31 games played
Straight up
12-19
39% wins
Against the spread
21-10
68% covers · avg +2.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-19
39% overs · avg −4.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | vs | L 66-67 | -9.5 | L −10.5 | 164.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 82-62 | -6.5 | W +13.5 | 142.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 12 | vs | L 73-78 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 148.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 75-74 | +4.5 | W +5.5 | 156.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 80-78 | +2.5 | W +4.5 | 146.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 85-76 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 154.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 76-53 | -2.5 | W +20.5 | 150.5 | U 129 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 71-76 | -10.5 | L −15.5 | 150.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 58-82 | +19.5 | L −4.5 | 161.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 87-89 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 161.5 | O 176 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 72-84 | +8.5 | L −3.5 | 159.5 | U 156 |
| Dec 30 | vs | L 63-72 | +14.5 | W +5.5 | 154.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 65-66 | +4.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 6 | @ | W 70-55 | -1.5 | W +13.5 | 149.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 52-71 | +14.5 | L −4.5 | 146.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 79-69 | +3.5 | W +13.5 | 139.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 63-60 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 74-83 | +15.5 | W +6.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 57-68 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 79-62 | -9.5 | W +7.5 | 141.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 98-96 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 153.5 | O 194 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 59-69 | +11.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 10 | @ | L 78-91 | +21.5 | W +8.5 | 152.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 93-63 | -14.5 | W +15.5 | 142.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 82-92 | +9.5 | L −0.5 | 148.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 78-80 | +9.5 | W +7.5 | 156.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 70-74 | +8.5 | W +4.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 53-69 | +7.5 | L −8.5 | 149.5 | U 122 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 82-68 | -7.5 | W +6.5 | 151.5 | U 150 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 60-85 | +12.5 | L −12.5 | 149.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 63-67 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 130 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
vs
UPST
L 66-67
−10.5
8
vs
LBSU
W 82-62
+13.5
12
vs
UCSD
L 73-78
−6.5
15
vs
UVU
W 75-74
+5.5
18
vs
SFA
W 80-78
+4.5
21
vs
NOLA
W 85-76
+2.5
26
vs
PEPP
W 76-53
+20.5
30
vs
CSUB
L 71-76
−15.5
6
@
ARK
L 58-82
−4.5
10
@
CSUN
L 87-89
+1.5
20
@
UNLV
L 72-84
−3.5
30
vs
USU
L 63-72
+5.5
3
vs
NEV
L 65-66
+3.5
6
@
SJSU
W 70-55
+13.5
10
@
SDSU
L 52-71
−4.5
13
vs
CSU
W 79-69
+13.5
17
vs
WYO
W 63-60
+6.5
21
@
UNM
L 74-83
+6.5
24
vs
GCU
L 57-68
−6.5
31
@
AF
W 79-62
+7.5
3
vs
UNLV
W 98-96
+3.5
7
@
NEV
L 59-69
+1.5
10
@
USU
L 78-91
+8.5
14
vs
AF
W 93-63
+15.5
17
@
WYO
L 82-92
−0.5
21
vs
UNM
L 78-80
+7.5
24
@
CSU
L 70-74
+4.5
28
vs
BOIS
L 53-69
−8.5
3
vs
SJSU
W 82-68
+6.5
7
@
GCU
L 60-85
−12.5
11
vs
CSU
L 63-67
+3.5
covered 21didn’t cover 10avg +2.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
vs
UPST
L 66-67
−31.5
8
vs
LBSU
W 82-62
+1.5
12
vs
UCSD
L 73-78
+2.5
15
vs
UVU
W 75-74
−7.5
18
vs
SFA
W 80-78
+11.5
21
vs
NOLA
W 85-76
+6.5
26
vs
PEPP
W 76-53
−21.5
30
vs
CSUB
L 71-76
−3.5
6
@
ARK
L 58-82
−21.5
10
@
CSUN
L 87-89
+14.5
20
@
UNLV
L 72-84
−3.5
30
vs
USU
L 63-72
−19.5
3
vs
NEV
L 65-66
−15.5
6
@
SJSU
W 70-55
−24.5
10
@
SDSU
L 52-71
−23.5
13
vs
CSU
W 79-69
+8.5
17
vs
WYO
W 63-60
−22.5
21
@
UNM
L 74-83
+5.5
24
vs
GCU
L 57-68
−20.5
31
@
AF
W 79-62
−0.5
3
vs
UNLV
W 98-96
+40.5
7
@
NEV
L 59-69
−21.5
10
@
USU
L 78-91
+16.5
14
vs
AF
W 93-63
+13.5
17
@
WYO
L 82-92
+25.5
21
vs
UNM
L 78-80
+1.5
24
@
CSU
L 70-74
−5.5
28
vs
BOIS
L 53-69
−27.5
3
vs
SJSU
W 82-68
−1.5
7
@
GCU
L 60-85
−4.5
11
vs
CSU
L 63-67
−16.5
over 12under 19avg −4.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Fresno St has the better starters
Position by position: S Dakota St 0, Fresno St 2, even 3
S Dakota StBetterFresno St
G J. Sayler14.8 pts · 3.6 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 54
=No call
G D. Lungu TR13.2 pts · 5.4 reb · 3 ast
Not ranked
G K. Garry10.6 pts · 5.1 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 49
→FRESSmall
G R. Candelino TR11.2 pts · 5 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 76
G E. Ryans TR7.7 pts · 1.7 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 12
→FRESSmall
G B. Amuneke TR2.1 pts · 0.7 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 28
F M. Thompson TR10.8 pts · 6.1 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 38
=Even
F B. Henige TR4.9 pts · 5.5 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 38
C A. Squires4.4 pts · 3 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 29
=No call
C B. Fall TR0.6 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
S Dakota StBetterFresno St
SDST offense185th of 366 · -5.7
=Even
FRES defense190th of 366 · -4.4
SDST defense221st of 366 · -5.7
=Even
FRES offense176th of 366 · -5.4
Backcourt-4.4 · 3 players
→FRESBig
Backcourt+1.3 · 3 players
Frontcourt-1.8 · 2 players
→FRESSmall
Frontcourt-0.8 · 2 players
Bench-1.4 · 4 players
=No call
BenchNo numbers yet
Score, worst to bestSDST betterFRES betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Sayler33 minK. Garry30 minE. Ryans27 min · TRT. Buchanan13 minJ. Rogers9 minJ. Cascio Jensen2 min
Forwards
M. Thompson29 min · TRJ. Mekonnen4 min · TRJ. Van KalsbeekNewD. KernNewY. YatabareNewB. EllweinNew
Centers
A. Squires14 min
Guards
D. Lungu27 min · TRR. Candelino25 min · TRB. Amuneke8 min · TRN. ZulemieNewK. PerryNewQ. RhymesNew
Forwards
B. Henige20 min · TRR. ParsleyNewY. Kesse-BedaNewA. GrangerNewM. VuckovicNewC. SchroederNew
Centers
B. Fall5 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 74.4 #182 | Points per game | 72.3 #233 |
| 1.09 #150 | Points per possession | 1.04 #266 |
| 68.2 #220 | Pace (possessions) | 69.3 #156 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.0 #143 | Effective FG% | 50.6 #206 |
| 34.0 #174 | 3-point % | 32.1 #274 |
| 38.8 #193 | 3-point attempt rate | 40.9 #146 |
| 29.7 #317 | Free throw rate | 33.8 #218 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.2 #150 | Turnover rate | 18.1 #277 |
| 30.3 #186 | Offensive rebound rate | 27.9 #272 |
| 13.8 #160 | Assists per game | 12.6 #247 |
| Defense | ||
| 74.5 #177 | Points allowed | 73.5 #142 |
| 1.09 #198 | Points allowed per possession | 1.06 #110 |
| 51.8 #204 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.5 #184 |
| 34.1 #191 | Opponent 3-point % | 30.7 #30 |
| 14.5 #323 | Turnovers forced | 18.2 #88 |
| 74.9 #9 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.4 #183 |
| 5.5 #291 | Steals per game | 6.7 #154 |
| 2.2 #336 | Blocks per game | 2.2 #331 |
S Dakota St
11-18 in 2025-26 overall · 7-10 in conference · Summit League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs St Thomas67–80
- L@ South Dakota70–75
- W@ Kansas City73–59
- Wvs North Dakota91–83
- Lvs N Dakota St66–74
A week or more of rest.
Fresno St
12-19 in 2025-26 overall · 7-14 in conference · Pac-12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Colorado St63–67
- L@ Grand Canyon60–85
- Wvs San José St82–68
- Lvs Boise St53–69
- L@ Colorado St70–74
A week or more of rest.