Moody Coliseum (Abilene) · at Abilene Chrstn
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | ACU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects SDST 73–72 · win probability SDST 52%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 144.5
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: SDST has more of the edges
SDST 4, ACU 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Shooting
Effective FG%: SDST 52.0 and allows 51.8; ACU 47.5 and allows 56.5
Three-pointers
SDST hits 34.0% and allows 34.1%; ACU hits 31.0% and allows 40.9%. Threes are 38.8% and 32.8% of their shots
Context
Schedule so far
SDST has played the 271st-hardest schedule, ACU the 183rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
ACU offense vs SDST defense
Offense 298th of 366 against a defense 221st, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: SDST 16.2%, ACU 20.8%. Forced: SDST 14.5%, ACU 23.4%
Home court
ACU at home. This season: ACU 0-0 at home, SDST 0-0 away
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: SDST 51%, ACU 25%. Transfers in: SDST 3, ACU 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: SDST 30.3%, ACU 31.0%. Defensive: SDST 74.9%, ACU 70.9%
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: SDST 29.7, ACU 41.7. Allowed: SDST 34.5, ACU 53.5
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: SDST plays 68.2 a game (220th fastest), ACU 69.2 (167th). Faster games mean more points
Even
SDST offense vs ACU defense
Offense 185th of 366 against a defense 200th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | SDST -0.6 | — |
| Total | — | 144.5 | — |
| Projected score | — | SDST 72.6 · ACU 72 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | SDST -0.5 | — |
| 1H total | 67.6 | — |
| 1H projected score | SDST 34 · ACU 33.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 3-7 30% | 3-7 30% | |
| 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
S Dakota St
29 games played
Straight up
11-18
38% wins
Against the spread
12-17
41% covers · avg −1.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-15
48% overs · avg −2.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 75-66 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 143.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 58-65 | +10.5 | W +3.5 | 150.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 69-83 | +16.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 105-58 | -12.5 | W +34.5 | 143.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 52-75 | +1.5 | L −21.5 | 151.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 52-64 | +2.5 | L −9.5 | 144.5 | U 116 |
| Dec 3 | @ | W 75-62 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 148.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 81-84 | -5.5 | L −8.5 | 147.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 9 | @ | W 68-64 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 142.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 15 | vs | L 72-87 | +3.5 | L −11.5 | 149.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 87-88 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 151.5 | O 175 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 71-99 | +31.5 | W +3.5 | 159.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 84-69 | -9.5 | W +5.5 | 152.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 87-90 | -7.5 | L −10.5 | 152.5 | O 177 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 87-79 | -8.5 | L −0.5 | 162.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 65-76 | +5.5 | L −5.5 | 151.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 90-62 | -13.5 | W +14.5 | 151.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 69-74 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 155.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 71-80 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 150.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 95-72 | -13.5 | W +9.5 | 150.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 62-77 | -1.5 | L −16.5 | 157.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 67-68 | -11.5 | L −12.5 | 159.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 61-79 | -2.5 | L −20.5 | 160.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 87-69 | -5.5 | W +12.5 | 147.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 66-74 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 146.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 91-83 | -9.5 | L −1.5 | 151.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 26 | @ | W 73-59 | -12.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 70-75 | -3.5 | L −8.5 | 151.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 67-80 | +4.5 | L −8.5 | 150.5 | U 147 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
MRMK
W 75-66
+2.5
9
@
UNI
L 58-65
+3.5
12
@
ORE
L 69-83
+2.5
21
vs
GAST
W 105-58
+34.5
25
vs
UVU
L 52-75
−21.5
26
vs
UCI
L 52-64
−9.5
3
@
NAU
W 75-62
+10.5
6
vs
IDHO
L 81-84
−8.5
9
@
BALL
W 68-64
−1.5
15
vs
WYO
L 72-87
−11.5
19
@
MILW
L 87-88
−2.5
29
@
ARIZ
L 71-99
+3.5
1
vs
OMA
W 84-69
+5.5
3
@
UND
L 87-90
−10.5
8
vs
DEN
W 87-79
−0.5
14
@
NDSU
L 65-76
−5.5
17
vs
KC
W 90-62
+14.5
22
@
STMN
L 69-74
+1.5
28
@
OMA
L 71-80
−10.5
31
vs
ORU
W 95-72
+9.5
4
vs
STMN
L 62-77
−16.5
7
vs
SDAK
L 67-68
−12.5
12
@
DEN
L 61-79
−20.5
14
@
ORU
W 87-69
+12.5
18
vs
NDSU
L 66-74
−6.5
21
vs
UND
W 91-83
−1.5
26
@
KC
W 73-59
+1.5
28
@
SDAK
L 70-75
−8.5
5
vs
STMN
L 67-80
−8.5
covered 12didn’t cover 17avg −1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
MRMK
W 75-66
−2.5
9
@
UNI
L 58-65
−27.5
12
@
ORE
L 69-83
+6.5
21
vs
GAST
W 105-58
+19.5
25
vs
UVU
L 52-75
−24.5
26
vs
UCI
L 52-64
−28.5
3
@
NAU
W 75-62
−11.5
6
vs
IDHO
L 81-84
+17.5
9
@
BALL
W 68-64
−10.5
15
vs
WYO
L 72-87
+9.5
19
@
MILW
L 87-88
+23.5
29
@
ARIZ
L 71-99
+10.5
1
vs
OMA
W 84-69
+0.5
3
@
UND
L 87-90
+24.5
8
vs
DEN
W 87-79
+3.5
14
@
NDSU
L 65-76
−10.5
17
vs
KC
W 90-62
+0.5
22
@
STMN
L 69-74
−12.5
28
@
OMA
L 71-80
+0.5
31
vs
ORU
W 95-72
+16.5
4
vs
STMN
L 62-77
−18.5
7
vs
SDAK
L 67-68
−24.5
12
@
DEN
L 61-79
−20.5
14
@
ORU
W 87-69
+8.5
18
vs
NDSU
L 66-74
−6.5
21
vs
UND
W 91-83
+22.5
26
@
KC
W 73-59
−20.5
28
@
SDAK
L 70-75
−6.5
5
vs
STMN
L 67-80
−3.5
over 14under 15avg −2.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Abilene Chrstn
30 games played
Straight up
11-19
37% wins
Against the spread
14-16
47% covers · avg −2.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-14
53% overs · avg +1.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6 | vs | W 73-71 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 150.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 66-76 | +6.5 | L −3.5 | 142.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 49-63 | +1.5 | L −12.5 | 138.5 | U 112 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 61-50 | -2.5 | W +8.5 | 144.5 | U 111 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 58-92 | -1.5 | L −35.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 71-63 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 137.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 77-69 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 131.5 | O 146 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 62-96 | +34.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 67-85 | +33.5 | W +15.5 | 146.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 22 | @ | W 75-68 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 138.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 1 | vs | L 64-79 | -5.5 | L −20.5 | 139.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 85-68 | +7.5 | W +24.5 | 139.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 84-80 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 140.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 72-82 | +3.5 | L −6.5 | 134.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 15 | vs | L 58-74 | -1.5 | L −17.5 | 140.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 52-74 | -3.5 | L −25.5 | 149.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 29 | vs | L 70-76 | -3.5 | L −9.5 | 145.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 76-79 | -6.5 | L −9.5 | 150.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 55-68 | +14.5 | W +1.5 | 145.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 63-65 | +8.5 | W +6.5 | 135.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 67-63 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 134.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 73-59 | -3.5 | W +10.5 | 134.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 16 | @ | L 62-65 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 134.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 87-83 | -8.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | O 170 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 81-85 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 139.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 67-74 | +14.5 | W +7.5 | 140.5 | O 141 |
| Mar 5 | @ | L 48-87 | +9.5 | L −29.5 | 136.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 57-64 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 131.5 | U 121 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 84-78 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 134.5 | O 162 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 74-80 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 142.5 | O 154 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
6
vs
OMA
W 73-71
−2.5
14
@
SFA
L 66-76
−3.5
18
@
TXST
L 49-63
−12.5
24
vs
UTSA
W 61-50
+8.5
25
vs
W&M
L 58-92
−35.5
2
@
PEPP
W 71-63
+6.5
6
vs
NMSU
W 77-69
+9.5
16
@
ARIZ
L 62-96
+0.5
19
@
BYU
L 67-85
+15.5
22
@
TXSO
W 75-68
+2.5
1
vs
UTU
L 64-79
−20.5
3
vs
UVU
W 85-68
+24.5
8
@
TAR
W 84-80
+8.5
10
@
UTA
L 72-82
−6.5
15
vs
CBU
L 58-74
−17.5
17
@
SUU
L 52-74
−25.5
29
vs
UTU
L 70-76
−9.5
31
vs
SUU
L 76-79
−9.5
5
@
UVU
L 55-68
+1.5
7
@
CBU
L 63-65
+6.5
12
vs
UTA
W 67-63
+2.5
14
vs
TAR
W 73-59
+10.5
16
@
TAR
L 62-65
−4.5
21
vs
SUU
W 87-83
−4.5
26
@
UTU
L 81-85
−1.5
28
@
UVU
L 67-74
+7.5
5
@
CBU
L 48-87
−29.5
7
vs
UTA
L 57-64
−8.5
11
vs
TAR
W 84-78
+4.5
12
vs
UTU
L 74-80
−4.5
covered 14didn’t cover 16avg −2.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
6
vs
OMA
W 73-71
−6.5
14
@
SFA
L 66-76
−0.5
18
@
TXST
L 49-63
−26.5
24
vs
UTSA
W 61-50
−33.5
25
vs
W&M
L 58-92
+2.5
2
@
PEPP
W 71-63
−3.5
6
vs
NMSU
W 77-69
+14.5
16
@
ARIZ
L 62-96
+12.5
19
@
BYU
L 67-85
+5.5
22
@
TXSO
W 75-68
+4.5
1
vs
UTU
L 64-79
+3.5
3
vs
UVU
W 85-68
+13.5
8
@
TAR
W 84-80
+23.5
10
@
UTA
L 72-82
+19.5
15
vs
CBU
L 58-74
−8.5
17
@
SUU
L 52-74
−23.5
29
vs
UTU
L 70-76
+0.5
31
vs
SUU
L 76-79
+4.5
5
@
UVU
L 55-68
−22.5
7
@
CBU
L 63-65
−7.5
12
vs
UTA
W 67-63
−4.5
14
vs
TAR
W 73-59
−2.5
16
@
TAR
L 62-65
−7.5
21
vs
SUU
W 87-83
+26.5
26
@
UTU
L 81-85
+26.5
28
@
UVU
L 67-74
+0.5
5
@
CBU
L 48-87
−1.5
7
vs
UTA
L 57-64
−10.5
11
vs
TAR
W 84-78
+27.5
12
vs
UTU
L 74-80
+11.5
over 16under 14avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: S Dakota St 1, Abilene Chrstn 1, even 3
S Dakota StBetterAbilene Chrstn
G J. Sayler14.8 pts · 3.6 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 54
←SDSTSmall
G N. Bolanga TR11.6 pts · 5.9 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 38
G K. Garry10.6 pts · 5.1 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 49
=Even
G Y. Rivera7.4 pts · 1.5 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 41
G E. Ryans TR7.7 pts · 1.7 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 12
=No call
G I. Dye1.7 pts · 0.8 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
F M. Thompson TR10.8 pts · 6.1 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 38
=No call
G E. Boisdur TR1.3 pts · 0.4 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
C A. Squires4.4 pts · 3 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 29
→ACUSmall
F C. Hornecker5.2 pts · 3.5 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 48
S Dakota StBetterAbilene Chrstn
SDST offense185th of 366 · -5.7
=Even
ACU defense200th of 366 · -5.0
SDST defense221st of 366 · -5.7
←SDSTSmall
ACU offense298th of 366 · -9.2
Backcourt-4.4 · 3 players
=Even
Backcourt-3.6 · 4 players
Frontcourt-1.8 · 2 players
→ACUSmall
Frontcourt-0.2 · 1 player
Bench-1.4 · 4 players
→ACUSmall
Bench-0.0 · 2 players
Score, worst to bestSDST betterACU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Sayler33 minK. Garry30 minE. Ryans27 min · TRT. Buchanan13 minJ. Rogers9 minJ. Cascio Jensen2 min
Forwards
M. Thompson29 min · TRJ. Mekonnen4 min · TRJ. Van KalsbeekNewD. KernNewY. YatabareNewB. EllweinNew
Centers
A. Squires14 min
Guards
N. Bolanga34 min · TRY. Rivera25 minI. Dye6 minE. Boisdur6 min · TRT. Pons5 min · TRI. Neyhart3 min
Forwards
C. Hornecker16 minV. Yimga MoukouriNewS. RowleyNewW. Marie-AnaisNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 74.4 #182 | Points per game | 67.9 #313 |
| 1.09 #150 | Points per possession | 0.98 #340 |
| 68.2 #220 | Pace (possessions) | 69.2 #167 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.0 #143 | Effective FG% | 47.5 #326 |
| 34.0 #174 | 3-point % | 31.0 #319 |
| 38.8 #193 | 3-point attempt rate | 32.8 #318 |
| 29.7 #317 | Free throw rate | 41.7 #34 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.2 #150 | Turnover rate | 20.8 #356 |
| 30.3 #186 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.0 #164 |
| 13.8 #160 | Assists per game | 12.5 #249 |
| Defense | ||
| 74.5 #177 | Points allowed | 73.9 #151 |
| 1.09 #198 | Points allowed per possession | 1.07 #123 |
| 51.8 #204 | Opponent effective FG% | 56.5 #352 |
| 34.1 #191 | Opponent 3-point % | 40.9 #365 |
| 14.5 #323 | Turnovers forced | 23.4 #3 |
| 74.9 #9 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.9 #113 |
| 5.5 #291 | Steals per game | 9.6 #4 |
| 2.2 #336 | Blocks per game | 2.6 #298 |
S Dakota St
11-18 in 2025-26 overall · 7-10 in conference · Summit League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs St Thomas67–80
- L@ South Dakota70–75
- W@ Kansas City73–59
- Wvs North Dakota91–83
- Lvs N Dakota St66–74
A week or more of rest.
Abilene Chrstn
11-19 in 2025-26 overall · 6-14 in conference · United Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Utah Tech74–80
- Wvs Tarleton St84–78
- Lvs UT Arlington57–64
- L@ CA Baptist48–87
- L@ Utah Valley67–74
A week or more of rest.