Strahan Arena at the University Events Center · at Texas St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | TXST | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects TXST 82–67 · win probability TXST 90%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 148.5
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: TXST has more of the edges
NICH 2, TXST 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: NICH 28.1%, TXST 33.9%. Defensive: NICH 66.3%, TXST 71.6%
TXST offense vs NICH defense
Offense 105th of 366 against a defense 282nd, on the model’s ratings
NICH offense vs TXST defense
Offense 283rd of 366 against a defense 112th, on the model’s ratings
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: NICH 20%, TXST 69%. Transfers in: NICH 6, TXST 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Turnovers
Turnover rate: NICH 17.4%, TXST 18.7%. Forced: NICH 20.5%, TXST 18.5%
Three-pointers
NICH hits 33.3% and allows 34.6%; TXST hits 32.2% and allows 35.7%. Threes are 43.9% and 24.6% of their shots
Home court
TXST at home. This season: TXST 0-0 at home, NICH 0-0 away
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: NICH 50.6 and allows 54.4; TXST 50.0 and allows 52.0
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: NICH 34.5, TXST 34.0. Allowed: NICH 37.9, TXST 39.0
Context
Schedule so far
NICH has played the 277th-hardest schedule, TXST the 298th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: NICH plays 68.3 a game (210th fastest), TXST 68.2 (223rd). Faster games mean more points
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | TXST -14.4 | — |
| Total | — | 148.5 | — |
| Projected score | — | NICH 67 · TXST 81.5 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | TXST -8.5 | — |
| 1H total | 69.4 | — |
| 1H projected score | NICH 30.5 · TXST 38.9 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | |
| 8-2 80% | 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Nicholls
32 games played
Straight up
13-19
41% wins
Against the spread
15-17
47% covers · avg −0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-15
53% overs · avg +1.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 51-77 | +31.5 | W +5.5 | 157.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 57-65 | -2.5 | L −10.5 | 135.5 | U 122 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 63-68 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 79-99 | +14.5 | L −5.5 | 157.5 | O 178 |
| Nov 22 | @ | L 81-95 | +23.5 | W +9.5 | 155.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 28 | @ | L 72-82 | +8.5 | L −1.5 | 148.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 76-96 | +18.5 | L −1.5 | 143.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 74-67 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 145.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 79-64 | -3.5 | W +11.5 | 137.5 | O 143 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 82-95 | +8.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 29 | @ | W 76-71 | +5.5 | W +10.5 | 137.5 | O 147 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 71-69 | +3.5 | W +5.5 | 145.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 80-58 | -6.5 | W +15.5 | 146.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 5 | vs | W 74-72 | -8.5 | L −6.5 | 144.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 90-77 | -3.5 | W +9.5 | 154.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 12 | @ | L 68-94 | +15.5 | L −10.5 | 146.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 80-90 | -3.5 | L −13.5 | 139.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 19 | vs | L 62-79 | +4.5 | L −12.5 | 144.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 61-67 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 27 | vs | L 62-80 | -4.5 | L −22.5 | 157.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 72-68 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 146.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 2 | @ | W 61-58 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 147.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 76-83 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 137.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 9 | vs | L 72-92 | +3.5 | L −16.5 | 147.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 91-83 | +2.5 | W +10.5 | 148.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 16 | @ | L 68-72 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 136.5 | O 140 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 78-81 | +12.5 | W +9.5 | 147.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 23 | @ | W 53-52 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 143.5 | U 105 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 68-60 | -4.5 | W +3.5 | 139.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 2 | vs | L 65-75 | +9.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | U 140 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 61-47 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 138.5 | U 108 |
| Mar 9 | vs | L 68-86 | +5.5 | L −12.5 | 143.5 | O 154 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
UK
L 51-77
+5.5
7
@
EIU
L 57-65
−10.5
12
@
VAL
L 63-68
−2.5
15
@
MUR
L 79-99
−5.5
22
@
OKST
L 81-95
+9.5
28
@
TULN
L 72-82
−1.5
2
@
CREI
L 76-96
−1.5
6
vs
UIW
W 74-67
+8.5
17
vs
HCU
W 79-64
+11.5
21
@
PAC
L 82-95
−4.5
29
@
AMCC
W 76-71
+10.5
31
@
RGV
W 71-69
+5.5
3
vs
ETAM
W 80-58
+15.5
5
vs
NWST
W 74-72
−6.5
10
@
NOLA
W 90-77
+9.5
12
@
MCN
L 68-94
−10.5
17
vs
LAM
L 80-90
−13.5
19
vs
SFA
L 62-79
−12.5
24
@
SELA
L 61-67
−3.5
27
vs
NOLA
L 62-80
−22.5
31
@
ETAM
W 72-68
+5.5
2
@
NWST
W 61-58
+1.5
7
vs
AMCC
L 76-83
−8.5
9
vs
RGV
L 72-92
−16.5
14
@
UIW
W 91-83
+10.5
16
@
HCU
L 68-72
−2.5
21
@
SFA
L 78-81
+9.5
23
@
LAM
W 53-52
+4.5
28
vs
SELA
W 68-60
+3.5
2
vs
MCN
L 65-75
−0.5
8
vs
NWST
W 61-47
+12.5
9
vs
RGV
L 68-86
−12.5
covered 15didn’t cover 17avg −0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
UK
L 51-77
−29.5
7
@
EIU
L 57-65
−13.5
12
@
VAL
L 63-68
−13.5
15
@
MUR
L 79-99
+20.5
22
@
OKST
L 81-95
+20.5
28
@
TULN
L 72-82
+5.5
2
@
CREI
L 76-96
+28.5
6
vs
UIW
W 74-67
−4.5
17
vs
HCU
W 79-64
+5.5
21
@
PAC
L 82-95
+37.5
29
@
AMCC
W 76-71
+9.5
31
@
RGV
W 71-69
−5.5
3
vs
ETAM
W 80-58
−8.5
5
vs
NWST
W 74-72
+1.5
10
@
NOLA
W 90-77
+12.5
12
@
MCN
L 68-94
+15.5
17
vs
LAM
L 80-90
+30.5
19
vs
SFA
L 62-79
−3.5
24
@
SELA
L 61-67
−13.5
27
vs
NOLA
L 62-80
−15.5
31
@
ETAM
W 72-68
−6.5
2
@
NWST
W 61-58
−28.5
7
vs
AMCC
L 76-83
+21.5
9
vs
RGV
L 72-92
+16.5
14
@
UIW
W 91-83
+25.5
16
@
HCU
L 68-72
+3.5
21
@
SFA
L 78-81
+11.5
23
@
LAM
W 53-52
−38.5
28
vs
SELA
W 68-60
−11.5
2
vs
MCN
L 65-75
−5.5
8
vs
NWST
W 61-47
−30.5
9
vs
RGV
L 68-86
+10.5
over 17under 15avg +1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Texas St
30 games played
Straight up
17-13
57% wins
Against the spread
14-16
47% covers · avg −0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-14
53% overs · avg +2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 48-83 | +5.5 | L −29.5 | 146.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 71-79 | +12.5 | W +4.5 | 146.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 80-69 | -2.5 | W +8.5 | 147.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 77-67 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 144.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 63-49 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 138.5 | U 112 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 65-56 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 131.5 | U 121 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 52-66 | +7.5 | L −6.5 | 136.5 | U 118 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 74-78 | -6.5 | L −10.5 | 135.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 72-77 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 133.5 | O 149 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 86-83 | -3.5 | L −0.5 | 142.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 17 | vs | L 70-89 | +4.5 | L −14.5 | 151.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 67-65 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 136.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 80-100 | +8.5 | L −11.5 | 145.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 84-79 | -10.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 70-80 | +2.5 | L −7.5 | 144.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 82-83 | +11.5 | W +10.5 | 156.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 59-54 | -8.5 | L −3.5 | 133.5 | U 113 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 74-67 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 140.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 70-72 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 57-82 | +5.5 | L −19.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 72-68 | +3.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 81-64 | -2.5 | W +14.5 | 143.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 77-71 | +4.5 | W +10.5 | 151.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 77-61 | -6.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 74-62 | +5.5 | W +17.5 | 140.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 95-84 | -14.5 | L −3.5 | 149.5 | O 179 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 90-82 | +3.5 | W +11.5 | 137.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 54-67 | -3.5 | L −16.5 | 134.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 27 | vs | W 60-57 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 135.5 | U 117 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 77-81 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 140.5 | O 158 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
BGSU
L 48-83
−29.5
8
@
TULN
L 71-79
+4.5
12
vs
UTSA
W 80-69
+8.5
15
vs
TXSO
W 77-67
+5.5
18
vs
ACU
W 63-49
+12.5
21
vs
LR
W 65-56
+3.5
28
vs
SEA
L 52-66
−6.5
29
vs
LEH
L 74-78
−10.5
3
@
RICE
L 72-77
−1.5
10
vs
SOU
W 86-83
−0.5
17
vs
ARST
L 70-89
−14.5
20
vs
USA
W 67-65
−1.5
31
@
TROY
L 80-100
−11.5
3
@
ULM
W 84-79
−5.5
8
@
USM
L 70-80
−7.5
10
@
ARST
L 82-83
+10.5
14
vs
UL
W 59-54
−3.5
17
vs
USM
W 74-67
+4.5
22
@
CCU
L 70-72
−0.5
24
@
JMU
L 57-82
−19.5
28
vs
MRSH
W 72-68
+7.5
31
vs
ODU
W 81-64
+14.5
4
@
GASO
W 77-71
+10.5
7
vs
WMU
W 77-61
+9.5
11
vs
TROY
W 74-62
+17.5
14
vs
ULM
W 95-84
−3.5
19
@
USA
W 90-82
+11.5
21
@
UL
L 54-67
−16.5
27
vs
APP
W 60-57
+4.5
6
vs
USM
L 77-81
−5.5
covered 14didn’t cover 16avg −0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
BGSU
L 48-83
−15.5
8
@
TULN
L 71-79
+3.5
12
vs
UTSA
W 80-69
+1.5
15
vs
TXSO
W 77-67
−0.5
18
vs
ACU
W 63-49
−26.5
21
vs
LR
W 65-56
−10.5
28
vs
SEA
L 52-66
−18.5
29
vs
LEH
L 74-78
+16.5
3
@
RICE
L 72-77
+15.5
10
vs
SOU
W 86-83
+26.5
17
vs
ARST
L 70-89
+7.5
20
vs
USA
W 67-65
−4.5
31
@
TROY
L 80-100
+34.5
3
@
ULM
W 84-79
+12.5
8
@
USM
L 70-80
+5.5
10
@
ARST
L 82-83
+8.5
14
vs
UL
W 59-54
−20.5
17
vs
USM
W 74-67
+0.5
22
@
CCU
L 70-72
+1.5
24
@
JMU
L 57-82
−4.5
28
vs
MRSH
W 72-68
−7.5
31
vs
ODU
W 81-64
+1.5
4
@
GASO
W 77-71
−3.5
7
vs
WMU
W 77-61
−8.5
11
vs
TROY
W 74-62
−4.5
14
vs
ULM
W 95-84
+29.5
19
@
USA
W 90-82
+34.5
21
@
UL
L 54-67
−13.5
27
vs
APP
W 60-57
−18.5
6
vs
USM
L 77-81
+17.5
over 16under 14avg +2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Texas St has the better starters
Position by position: Nicholls 1, Texas St 2, even 2
NichollsBetterTexas St
G D. Cockrill TR11.4 pts · 2.6 reb · 2 ast
Score 75
←NICHSmall
G M. Drone14 pts · 3.3 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 56
G C. Winborne7.9 pts · 1.7 reb · 1 ast
Score 29
→TXSTBig
G Q. House TR15.1 pts · 3.4 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 84
G S. Sharp4.1 pts · 1.9 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 19
→TXSTBig
G K. Younger TR15.1 pts · 4.3 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 76
F A. Dent TR6 pts · 0 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F D. Hall15.7 pts · 7.8 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 94
F J. Sileu TR0.3 pts · 1.1 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F P. Djobet TR17.5 pts · 6.6 reb · 2 ast
Score 89
NichollsBetterTexas St
NICH offense283rd of 366 · -8.7
→TXSTBig
TXST defense112th of 366 · -1.4
NICH defense282nd of 366 · -7.0
→TXSTBig
TXST offense105th of 366 · -1.4
Backcourt-2.5 · 3 players
→TXSTBig
Backcourt+2.5 · 3 players
Frontcourt-0.7 · 2 players
→TXSTBig
Frontcourt+7.5 · 2 players
Bench-0.3 · 4 players
=Even
Bench-0.3 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestNICH betterTXST betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
D. Cockrill24 min · TRC. Winborne23 minS. Sharp17 minH. Carter4 min · TRC. Simpson3 min · TRJ. Matthews2 min
Forwards
A. Dent13 min · TRJ. Sileu7 min · TRA. Arop2 min · TRM. MboupNewJ. TaylorNew
Guards
M. Drone31 minQ. House31 min · TRK. Younger29 min · TRK. Gumbs28 minD. Pernell22 minC. Steger11 min · TR
Forwards
D. Hall30 minP. Djobet30 min · TRR. Jessamy27 min · TRK. GrandisonNewD. AbisogunNewK. SandersNew
Centers
R. Fields16 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 71.0 #266 | Points per game | 71.9 #247 |
| 1.04 #275 | Points per possession | 1.06 #230 |
| 68.3 #210 | Pace (possessions) | 68.2 #223 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.6 #205 | Effective FG% | 50.0 #238 |
| 33.3 #215 | 3-point % | 32.2 #271 |
| 43.9 #90 | 3-point attempt rate | 24.6 #364 |
| 34.5 #195 | Free throw rate | 34.0 #211 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.4 #232 | Turnover rate | 18.7 #309 |
| 28.1 #263 | Offensive rebound rate | 33.9 #68 |
| 12.9 #219 | Assists per game | 12.7 #239 |
| Defense | ||
| 75.7 #209 | Points allowed | 72.5 #117 |
| 1.11 #243 | Points allowed per possession | 1.06 #106 |
| 54.4 #311 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.0 #210 |
| 34.6 #224 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.7 #293 |
| 20.5 #15 | Turnovers forced | 18.5 #75 |
| 66.3 #314 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.6 #81 |
| 8.7 #15 | Steals per game | 7.9 #41 |
| 2.8 #270 | Blocks per game | 3.6 #120 |
Nicholls
13-19 in 2025-26 overall · 13-11 in conference · Southland Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs UT Rio Grande68–86
- Wvs N'Western St61–47
- Lvs McNeese65–75
- Wvs SE Louisiana68–60
- W@ Lamar53–52
A week or more of rest.
Texas St
17-13 in 2025-26 overall · 11-8 in conference · Pac-12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Southern Miss77–81
- Wvs App State60–57
- L@ Louisiana54–67
- W@ South Alabama90–82
- Wvs UL Monroe95–84
A week or more of rest.