Save Mart Center · at Fresno St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | FRES | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects FRES 81–68 · win probability FRES 87%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 148.7
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: FRES has more of the edges
SOU 2, FRES 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
SOU has played the 269th-hardest schedule, FRES the 103rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
FRES offense vs SOU defense
Offense 176th of 366 against a defense 309th, on the model’s ratings
SOU offense vs FRES defense
Offense 296th of 366 against a defense 190th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: SOU 49.1 and allows 53.2; FRES 50.6 and allows 51.5
Three-pointers
SOU hits 34.8% and allows 36.7%; FRES hits 32.1% and allows 30.7%. Threes are 32.0% and 40.9% of their shots
Free throws
Free throw rate: SOU 39.8, FRES 33.8. Allowed: SOU 42.9, FRES 28.6
Turnovers
Turnover rate: SOU 16.6%, FRES 18.1%. Forced: SOU 18.6%, FRES 18.2%
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: SOU plays 72.3 a game (28th fastest), FRES 69.3 (156th). Faster games mean more points
Home court
FRES at home. This season: FRES 0-0 at home, SOU 0-0 away
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: SOU 31.4%, FRES 27.9%. Defensive: SOU 68.7%, FRES 69.4%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: SOU 2%, FRES 0%. Transfers in: SOU 8, FRES 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | FRES -12.9 | — |
| Total | — | 148.7 | — |
| Projected score | — | SOU 67.9 · FRES 80.8 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | FRES -7.6 | — |
| 1H total | 69.5 | — |
| 1H projected score | SOU 31 · FRES 38.5 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | 7-3 70% | |
| 2-8 20% | 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Southern
31 games played
Straight up
14-17
45% wins
Against the spread
12-19
39% covers · avg −1.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
20-11
65% overs · avg +4.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 77-109 | +26.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | O 186 |
| Nov 5 | @ | L 82-100 | +24.5 | W +6.5 | 155.5 | O 182 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 93-99 | +23.5 | W +17.5 | 157.5 | O 192 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 66-80 | +5.5 | L −8.5 | 150.5 | U 146 |
| Nov 29 | @ | W 75-73 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 8 | @ | L 69-95 | +22.5 | L −3.5 | 158.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 83-86 | +3.5 | W +0.5 | 142.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 67-75 | +12.5 | W +4.5 | 155.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 67-111 | +26.5 | L −17.5 | 169.5 | O 178 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 55-90 | +33.5 | L −1.5 | 163.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 84-73 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 153.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 5 | vs | L 85-89 | -7.5 | L −11.5 | 160.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 59-67 | -4.5 | L −12.5 | 153.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 12 | @ | W 77-73 | +3.5 | W +7.5 | 151.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 71-53 | +1.5 | W +19.5 | 153.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 74-75 | -9.5 | L −10.5 | 154.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 80-69 | -20.5 | L −9.5 | 141.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 73-78 | -7.5 | L −12.5 | 147.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 2 | @ | W 96-91 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 152.5 | O 187 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 81-68 | -6.5 | W +6.5 | 143.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 9 | vs | W 69-68 | -6.5 | L −5.5 | 149.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 87-82 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 159.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 16 | @ | L 73-74 | -4.5 | L −5.5 | 151.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 87-73 | -5.5 | W +8.5 | 142.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 26 | vs | L 71-82 | -8.5 | L −19.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 79-82 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 153.5 | O 161 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 71-64 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 153.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 5 | @ | W 88-85 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 145.5 | O 173 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 84-81 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 151.5 | O 165 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 73-70 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 141.5 | O 143 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 66-72 | -3.5 | L −9.5 | 145.5 | U 138 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
ARK
L 77-109
−5.5
5
@
MARQ
L 82-100
+6.5
18
@
WASH
L 93-99
+17.5
21
@
SJSU
L 66-80
−8.5
29
@
NWST
W 75-73
−1.5
8
@
TEX
L 69-95
−3.5
10
@
TXST
L 83-86
+0.5
16
@
CBU
L 67-75
+4.5
21
@
BAY
L 67-111
−17.5
29
@
ILL
L 55-90
−1.5
3
vs
TXSO
W 84-73
+4.5
5
vs
PV
L 85-89
−11.5
10
@
FAMU
L 59-67
−12.5
12
@
BCU
W 77-73
+7.5
17
@
GRAM
W 71-53
+19.5
24
vs
UAPB
L 74-75
−10.5
28
vs
MVSU
W 80-69
−9.5
31
@
ALCN
L 73-78
−12.5
2
@
JKST
W 96-91
−0.5
7
vs
AAMU
W 81-68
+6.5
9
vs
ALST
W 69-68
−5.5
14
@
PV
W 87-82
−0.5
16
@
TXSO
L 73-74
−5.5
21
vs
GRAM
W 87-73
+8.5
26
vs
FAMU
L 71-82
−19.5
28
vs
BCU
L 79-82
−5.5
3
@
ALST
W 71-64
+8.5
5
@
AAMU
W 88-85
+1.5
12
vs
UAPB
W 84-81
−1.5
13
vs
FAMU
W 73-70
+1.5
14
vs
PV
L 66-72
−9.5
covered 12didn’t cover 19avg −1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
ARK
L 77-109
+35.5
5
@
MARQ
L 82-100
+26.5
18
@
WASH
L 93-99
+34.5
21
@
SJSU
L 66-80
−4.5
29
@
NWST
W 75-73
+3.5
8
@
TEX
L 69-95
+5.5
10
@
TXST
L 83-86
+26.5
16
@
CBU
L 67-75
−13.5
21
@
BAY
L 67-111
+8.5
29
@
ILL
L 55-90
−18.5
3
vs
TXSO
W 84-73
+3.5
5
vs
PV
L 85-89
+13.5
10
@
FAMU
L 59-67
−27.5
12
@
BCU
W 77-73
−1.5
17
@
GRAM
W 71-53
−29.5
24
vs
UAPB
L 74-75
−5.5
28
vs
MVSU
W 80-69
+7.5
31
@
ALCN
L 73-78
+3.5
2
@
JKST
W 96-91
+34.5
7
vs
AAMU
W 81-68
+5.5
9
vs
ALST
W 69-68
−12.5
14
@
PV
W 87-82
+9.5
16
@
TXSO
L 73-74
−4.5
21
vs
GRAM
W 87-73
+17.5
26
vs
FAMU
L 71-82
+5.5
28
vs
BCU
L 79-82
+7.5
3
@
ALST
W 71-64
−18.5
5
@
AAMU
W 88-85
+27.5
12
vs
UAPB
W 84-81
+13.5
13
vs
FAMU
W 73-70
+1.5
14
vs
PV
L 66-72
−7.5
over 20under 11avg +4.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Fresno St
31 games played
Straight up
12-19
39% wins
Against the spread
21-10
68% covers · avg +2.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-19
39% overs · avg −4.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | vs | L 66-67 | -9.5 | L −10.5 | 164.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 82-62 | -6.5 | W +13.5 | 142.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 12 | vs | L 73-78 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 148.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 75-74 | +4.5 | W +5.5 | 156.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 80-78 | +2.5 | W +4.5 | 146.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 85-76 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 154.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 76-53 | -2.5 | W +20.5 | 150.5 | U 129 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 71-76 | -10.5 | L −15.5 | 150.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 58-82 | +19.5 | L −4.5 | 161.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 87-89 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 161.5 | O 176 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 72-84 | +8.5 | L −3.5 | 159.5 | U 156 |
| Dec 30 | vs | L 63-72 | +14.5 | W +5.5 | 154.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 65-66 | +4.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 6 | @ | W 70-55 | -1.5 | W +13.5 | 149.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 52-71 | +14.5 | L −4.5 | 146.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 79-69 | +3.5 | W +13.5 | 139.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 63-60 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 74-83 | +15.5 | W +6.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 57-68 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 79-62 | -9.5 | W +7.5 | 141.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 98-96 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 153.5 | O 194 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 59-69 | +11.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 10 | @ | L 78-91 | +21.5 | W +8.5 | 152.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 93-63 | -14.5 | W +15.5 | 142.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 82-92 | +9.5 | L −0.5 | 148.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 78-80 | +9.5 | W +7.5 | 156.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 70-74 | +8.5 | W +4.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 53-69 | +7.5 | L −8.5 | 149.5 | U 122 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 82-68 | -7.5 | W +6.5 | 151.5 | U 150 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 60-85 | +12.5 | L −12.5 | 149.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 63-67 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 130 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
vs
UPST
L 66-67
−10.5
8
vs
LBSU
W 82-62
+13.5
12
vs
UCSD
L 73-78
−6.5
15
vs
UVU
W 75-74
+5.5
18
vs
SFA
W 80-78
+4.5
21
vs
NOLA
W 85-76
+2.5
26
vs
PEPP
W 76-53
+20.5
30
vs
CSUB
L 71-76
−15.5
6
@
ARK
L 58-82
−4.5
10
@
CSUN
L 87-89
+1.5
20
@
UNLV
L 72-84
−3.5
30
vs
USU
L 63-72
+5.5
3
vs
NEV
L 65-66
+3.5
6
@
SJSU
W 70-55
+13.5
10
@
SDSU
L 52-71
−4.5
13
vs
CSU
W 79-69
+13.5
17
vs
WYO
W 63-60
+6.5
21
@
UNM
L 74-83
+6.5
24
vs
GCU
L 57-68
−6.5
31
@
AF
W 79-62
+7.5
3
vs
UNLV
W 98-96
+3.5
7
@
NEV
L 59-69
+1.5
10
@
USU
L 78-91
+8.5
14
vs
AF
W 93-63
+15.5
17
@
WYO
L 82-92
−0.5
21
vs
UNM
L 78-80
+7.5
24
@
CSU
L 70-74
+4.5
28
vs
BOIS
L 53-69
−8.5
3
vs
SJSU
W 82-68
+6.5
7
@
GCU
L 60-85
−12.5
11
vs
CSU
L 63-67
+3.5
covered 21didn’t cover 10avg +2.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
vs
UPST
L 66-67
−31.5
8
vs
LBSU
W 82-62
+1.5
12
vs
UCSD
L 73-78
+2.5
15
vs
UVU
W 75-74
−7.5
18
vs
SFA
W 80-78
+11.5
21
vs
NOLA
W 85-76
+6.5
26
vs
PEPP
W 76-53
−21.5
30
vs
CSUB
L 71-76
−3.5
6
@
ARK
L 58-82
−21.5
10
@
CSUN
L 87-89
+14.5
20
@
UNLV
L 72-84
−3.5
30
vs
USU
L 63-72
−19.5
3
vs
NEV
L 65-66
−15.5
6
@
SJSU
W 70-55
−24.5
10
@
SDSU
L 52-71
−23.5
13
vs
CSU
W 79-69
+8.5
17
vs
WYO
W 63-60
−22.5
21
@
UNM
L 74-83
+5.5
24
vs
GCU
L 57-68
−20.5
31
@
AF
W 79-62
−0.5
3
vs
UNLV
W 98-96
+40.5
7
@
NEV
L 59-69
−21.5
10
@
USU
L 78-91
+16.5
14
vs
AF
W 93-63
+13.5
17
@
WYO
L 82-92
+25.5
21
vs
UNM
L 78-80
+1.5
24
@
CSU
L 70-74
−5.5
28
vs
BOIS
L 53-69
−27.5
3
vs
SJSU
W 82-68
−1.5
7
@
GCU
L 60-85
−4.5
11
vs
CSU
L 63-67
−16.5
over 12under 19avg −4.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Fresno St has the better starters
Position by position: Southern 0, Fresno St 2, even 3
SouthernBetterFresno St
G J. Page TR12.3 pts · 2.2 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 42
=No call
G D. Lungu TR13.2 pts · 5.4 reb · 3 ast
Not ranked
G D. Dormu TR5.4 pts · 1.3 reb · 2 ast
Score 14
→FRESBig
G R. Candelino TR11.2 pts · 5 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 76
G M. Ferguson TR5.2 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 9
→FRESSmall
G B. Amuneke TR2.1 pts · 0.7 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 28
F R. King TR4.7 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 42
=Even
F B. Henige TR4.9 pts · 5.5 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 38
C I. Olajuwon TR3.7 pts · 2.9 reb · 0.1 ast
Score 20
=No call
C B. Fall TR0.6 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
SouthernBetterFresno St
SOU offense296th of 366 · -9.2
→FRESSmall
FRES defense190th of 366 · -4.4
SOU defense309th of 366 · -8.0
→FRESBig
FRES offense176th of 366 · -5.4
Backcourt-5.4 · 3 players
→FRESBig
Backcourt+1.3 · 3 players
Frontcourt-1.5 · 2 players
=Even
Frontcourt-0.8 · 2 players
Bench-3.3 · 4 players
=No call
BenchNo numbers yet
Score, worst to bestSOU betterFRES betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Page30 min · TRD. Dormu19 min · TRM. Ferguson17 min · TRL. Larvadain11 min · TRS. Van Dorn3 min · TRJ. HunterNew
Forwards
R. King13 min · TRA. HallNew
Centers
I. Olajuwon14 min · TRN. Boyde11 min · TRL. Bell5 min
Guards
D. Lungu27 min · TRR. Candelino25 min · TRB. Amuneke8 min · TRN. ZulemieNewK. PerryNewQ. RhymesNew
Forwards
B. Henige20 min · TRR. ParsleyNewY. Kesse-BedaNewA. GrangerNewM. VuckovicNewC. SchroederNew
Centers
B. Fall5 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 76.2 #136 | Points per game | 72.3 #233 |
| 1.06 #239 | Points per possession | 1.04 #266 |
| 72.3 #28 | Pace (possessions) | 69.3 #156 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.1 #287 | Effective FG% | 50.6 #206 |
| 34.8 #129 | 3-point % | 32.1 #274 |
| 32.0 #329 | 3-point attempt rate | 40.9 #146 |
| 39.8 #61 | Free throw rate | 33.8 #218 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.6 #169 | Turnover rate | 18.1 #277 |
| 31.4 #144 | Offensive rebound rate | 27.9 #272 |
| 13.9 #156 | Assists per game | 12.6 #247 |
| Defense | ||
| 80.2 #324 | Points allowed | 73.5 #142 |
| 1.11 #236 | Points allowed per possession | 1.06 #110 |
| 53.2 #274 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.5 #184 |
| 36.7 #339 | Opponent 3-point % | 30.7 #30 |
| 18.6 #67 | Turnovers forced | 18.2 #88 |
| 68.7 #217 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.4 #183 |
| 8.3 #26 | Steals per game | 6.7 #154 |
| 3.8 #97 | Blocks per game | 2.2 #331 |
Southern
14-17 in 2025-26 overall · 13-8 in conference · Southwestern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Prairie View66–72
- Wvs Florida A&M73–70
- Wvs AR-Pine Bluff84–81
- W@ Alabama A&M88–85
- W@ Alabama St71–64
A week or more of rest.
Fresno St
12-19 in 2025-26 overall · 7-14 in conference · Pac-12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Colorado St63–67
- L@ Grand Canyon60–85
- Wvs San José St82–68
- Lvs Boise St53–69
- L@ Colorado St70–74
A week or more of rest.