Breslin Center · at Michigan St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MSU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects MSU 87–59 · win probability MSU 99%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 146.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: MSU has more of the edges
DRKE 1, MSU 7 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: DRKE 26.6%, MSU 37.8%. Defensive: DRKE 70.1%, MSU 77.6%
Three-pointers
DRKE hits 34.0% and allows 36.4%; MSU hits 36.3% and allows 33.0%. Threes are 45.7% and 36.4% of their shots
DRKE offense vs MSU defense
Offense 168th of 366 against a defense 5th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: DRKE 51.4 and allows 52.6; MSU 53.8 and allows 48.9
Context
Schedule so far
DRKE has played the 147th-hardest schedule, MSU the 16th. A record against a soft schedule means less
MSU offense vs DRKE defense
Offense 21st of 366 against a defense 132nd, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: DRKE 15.0%, MSU 17.1%. Forced: DRKE 14.6%, MSU 14.9%
Free throws
Free throw rate: DRKE 33.5, MSU 35.9. Allowed: DRKE 32.0, MSU 30.2
Home court
MSU at home. This season: MSU 0-0 at home, DRKE 0-0 away
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: DRKE plays 68.4 a game (209th fastest), MSU 67.3 (264th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: DRKE 51%, MSU 63%. Transfers in: DRKE 3, MSU 1. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | MSU -28.6 | — |
| Total | — | 146.0 | — |
| Projected score | — | DRKE 58.7 · MSU 87.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | MSU -16.9 | — |
| 1H total | 68.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | DRKE 25.7 · MSU 42.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | |
| 7-3 70% | 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Drake
32 games played
Straight up
12-20
38% wins
Against the spread
12-20
38% covers · avg −0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-14
56% overs · avg +3.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 77-71 | -8.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 6 | vs | L 79-81 | -7.5 | L −9.5 | 151.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 14 | vs | L 59-61 | -7.5 | L −9.5 | 142.5 | U 120 |
| Nov 17 | @ | W 71-62 | +7.5 | W +16.5 | 153.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 62-71 | +11.5 | W +2.5 | 151.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 84-74 | +4.5 | W +14.5 | 137.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 108-57 | -17.5 | W +33.5 | 138.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 5 | vs | L 69-74 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 148.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 94-99 | -5.5 | L −10.5 | 145.5 | O 193 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 72-81 | +7.5 | L −1.5 | 156.5 | U 153 |
| Dec 21 | @ | W 66-65 | +2.5 | W +3.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 29 | vs | L 56-73 | +4.5 | L −12.5 | 145.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 74-72 | -6.5 | L −4.5 | 149.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 66-93 | +6.5 | L −20.5 | 144.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 76-78 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 148.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 76-73 | +5.5 | W +8.5 | 144.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 67-74 | +5.5 | L −1.5 | 139.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 101-90 | +4.5 | W +15.5 | 156.5 | O 191 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 76-62 | +3.5 | W +17.5 | 151.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 82-78 | -8.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 73-87 | +2.5 | L −11.5 | 150.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 90-103 | +9.5 | L −3.5 | 154.5 | O 193 |
| Feb 6 | @ | L 76-86 | +10.5 | W +0.5 | 144.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 9 | vs | L 76-81 | -3.5 | L −8.5 | 144.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 70-80 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 62-86 | +8.5 | L −15.5 | 138.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 61-66 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 149.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 71-74 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 146.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 1 | vs | L 53-75 | +4.5 | L −17.5 | 137.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 67-63 | +5.5 | W +9.5 | 140.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 100-79 | +12.5 | W +33.5 | 152.5 | O 179 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 51-72 | +4.5 | L −16.5 | 144.5 | U 123 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
NAU
W 77-71
−2.5
6
vs
RMU
L 79-81
−9.5
14
vs
SIUE
L 59-61
−9.5
17
@
COFC
W 71-62
+16.5
28
vs
LSU
L 62-71
+2.5
29
vs
GT
W 84-74
+14.5
2
vs
WIU
W 108-57
+33.5
5
vs
UAB
L 69-74
−6.5
13
vs
NDSU
L 94-99
−10.5
18
@
MUR
L 72-81
−1.5
21
@
EVAN
W 66-65
+3.5
29
vs
ILST
L 56-73
−12.5
4
vs
INST
W 74-72
−4.5
7
@
BRAD
L 66-93
−20.5
10
vs
BEL
L 76-78
+2.5
14
@
SIU
W 76-73
+8.5
17
@
UIC
L 67-74
−1.5
21
vs
MUR
W 101-90
+15.5
24
@
INST
W 76-62
+17.5
28
vs
EVAN
W 82-78
−4.5
31
vs
BRAD
L 73-87
−11.5
3
@
BEL
L 90-103
−3.5
6
@
ILST
L 76-86
+0.5
9
vs
VAL
L 76-81
−8.5
12
vs
UIC
L 70-80
−8.5
15
@
UNI
L 62-86
−15.5
18
vs
SIU
L 61-66
−3.5
25
@
VAL
L 71-74
−0.5
1
vs
UNI
L 53-75
−17.5
5
vs
SIU
W 67-63
+9.5
6
vs
BEL
W 100-79
+33.5
7
vs
UIC
L 51-72
−16.5
covered 12didn’t cover 20avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
NAU
W 77-71
+3.5
6
vs
RMU
L 79-81
+8.5
14
vs
SIUE
L 59-61
−22.5
17
@
COFC
W 71-62
−20.5
28
vs
LSU
L 62-71
−18.5
29
vs
GT
W 84-74
+20.5
2
vs
WIU
W 108-57
+26.5
5
vs
UAB
L 69-74
−5.5
13
vs
NDSU
L 94-99
+47.5
18
@
MUR
L 72-81
−3.5
21
@
EVAN
W 66-65
−10.5
29
vs
ILST
L 56-73
−16.5
4
vs
INST
W 74-72
−3.5
7
@
BRAD
L 66-93
+14.5
10
vs
BEL
L 76-78
+5.5
14
@
SIU
W 76-73
+4.5
17
@
UIC
L 67-74
+1.5
21
vs
MUR
W 101-90
+34.5
24
@
INST
W 76-62
−13.5
28
vs
EVAN
W 82-78
+16.5
31
vs
BRAD
L 73-87
+9.5
3
@
BEL
L 90-103
+38.5
6
@
ILST
L 76-86
+17.5
9
vs
VAL
L 76-81
+12.5
12
vs
UIC
L 70-80
+3.5
15
@
UNI
L 62-86
+9.5
18
vs
SIU
L 61-66
−22.5
25
@
VAL
L 71-74
−1.5
1
vs
UNI
L 53-75
−9.5
5
vs
SIU
W 67-63
−10.5
6
vs
BEL
W 100-79
+26.5
7
vs
UIC
L 51-72
−21.5
over 18under 14avg +3.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Michigan St
35 games played
Straight up
27-8
77% wins
Against the spread
18-17
51% covers · avg +1.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-19
46% overs · avg +1.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 80-69 | -22.5 | L −11.5 | 144.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 69-66 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 155.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 13 | vs | W 79-60 | -24.5 | L −5.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 83-66 | +3.5 | W +20.5 | 152.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 84-56 | -30.5 | L −2.5 | 149.5 | U 140 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 89-56 | -19.5 | W +13.5 | 140.5 | O 145 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 74-58 | -1.5 | W +14.5 | 152.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 71-52 | -5.5 | W +13.5 | 133.5 | U 123 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 60-66 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 141.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 76-72 | -12.5 | L −8.5 | 145.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 92-69 | -23.5 | L −0.5 | 150.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 79-70 | -19.5 | L −10.5 | 155.5 | U 149 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 114-97 | -23.5 | L −6.5 | 160.5 | O 211 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 56-58 | +2.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | U 114 |
| Jan 5 | vs | W 80-51 | -11.5 | W +17.5 | 151.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 76-66 | -13.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 81-60 | -6.5 | W +14.5 | 145.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 80-63 | -3.5 | W +13.5 | 145.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 20 | @ | W 68-52 | -10.5 | W +5.5 | 139.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 91-48 | -18.5 | W +24.5 | 141.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 27 | @ | W 88-79 | -14.5 | L −5.5 | 138.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 30 | vs | L 71-83 | +2.5 | L −9.5 | 149.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 73-76 | -8.5 | L −11.5 | 136.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 85-82 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 142.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 13 | @ | L 71-92 | -1.5 | L −22.5 | 149.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 82-59 | -8.5 | W +14.5 | 139.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 22 | vs | W 66-60 | -10.5 | L −4.5 | 146.5 | U 126 |
| Feb 26 | @ | W 76-74 | +5.5 | W +7.5 | 143.5 | O 150 |
| Mar 1 | @ | W 77-64 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 144.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 91-87 | -20.5 | L −16.5 | 141.5 | O 178 |
| Mar 8 | @ | L 80-90 | +10.5 | W +0.5 | 152.5 | O 170 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 84-88 | -5.5 | L −9.5 | 141.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 19 | vs | W 92-67 | -16.5 | W +8.5 | 144.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 21 | vs | W 77-69 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 151.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 27 | vs | L 63-67 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 136.5 | U 130 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
COLG
W 80-69
−11.5
8
vs
ARK
W 69-66
+0.5
13
vs
SJSU
W 79-60
−5.5
18
vs
UK
W 83-66
+20.5
21
vs
DETM
W 84-56
−2.5
25
vs
ECU
W 89-56
+13.5
27
vs
UNC
W 74-58
+14.5
2
vs
IOWA
W 71-52
+13.5
6
vs
DUKE
L 60-66
−4.5
13
@
PSU
W 76-72
−8.5
16
vs
TOL
W 92-69
−0.5
20
vs
OAK
W 79-70
−10.5
29
vs
COR
W 114-97
−6.5
2
@
NEB
L 56-58
+0.5
5
vs
USC
W 80-51
+17.5
8
vs
NU
W 76-66
−3.5
13
vs
IU
W 81-60
+14.5
17
@
WASH
W 80-63
+13.5
20
@
ORE
W 68-52
+5.5
24
vs
MD
W 91-48
+24.5
27
@
RUTG
W 88-79
−5.5
30
vs
MICH
L 71-83
−9.5
4
@
MINN
L 73-76
−11.5
7
vs
ILL
W 85-82
+1.5
13
@
WIS
L 71-92
−22.5
17
vs
UCLA
W 82-59
+14.5
22
vs
OSU
W 66-60
−4.5
26
@
PUR
W 76-74
+7.5
1
@
IU
W 77-64
+10.5
5
vs
RUTG
W 91-87
−16.5
8
@
MICH
L 80-90
+0.5
13
vs
UCLA
L 84-88
−9.5
19
vs
NDSU
W 92-67
+8.5
21
vs
LOU
W 77-69
+2.5
27
vs
CONN
L 63-67
−1.5
covered 18didn’t cover 17avg +1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
COLG
W 80-69
+4.5
8
vs
ARK
W 69-66
−20.5
13
vs
SJSU
W 79-60
−4.5
18
vs
UK
W 83-66
−3.5
21
vs
DETM
W 84-56
−9.5
25
vs
ECU
W 89-56
+4.5
27
vs
UNC
W 74-58
−20.5
2
vs
IOWA
W 71-52
−10.5
6
vs
DUKE
L 60-66
−15.5
13
@
PSU
W 76-72
+2.5
16
vs
TOL
W 92-69
+10.5
20
vs
OAK
W 79-70
−6.5
29
vs
COR
W 114-97
+50.5
2
@
NEB
L 56-58
−32.5
5
vs
USC
W 80-51
−20.5
8
vs
NU
W 76-66
−1.5
13
vs
IU
W 81-60
−4.5
17
@
WASH
W 80-63
−2.5
20
@
ORE
W 68-52
−19.5
24
vs
MD
W 91-48
−2.5
27
@
RUTG
W 88-79
+28.5
30
vs
MICH
L 71-83
+4.5
4
@
MINN
L 73-76
+12.5
7
vs
ILL
W 85-82
+24.5
13
@
WIS
L 71-92
+13.5
17
vs
UCLA
W 82-59
+1.5
22
vs
OSU
W 66-60
−20.5
26
@
PUR
W 76-74
+6.5
1
@
IU
W 77-64
−3.5
5
vs
RUTG
W 91-87
+36.5
8
@
MICH
L 80-90
+17.5
13
vs
UCLA
L 84-88
+30.5
19
vs
NDSU
W 92-67
+14.5
21
vs
LOU
W 77-69
−5.5
27
vs
CONN
L 63-67
−6.5
over 16under 19avg +1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Michigan St has the better starters
Position by position: Drake 0, Michigan St 4, even 1
DrakeBetterMichigan St
G A. Alia6.8 pts · 4.7 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 27
→MSUBig
G J. Fears15.2 pts · 2.4 reb · 9.4 ast
Score 99
G O. Larson10 pts · 3.3 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 42
→MSUSmall
G K. Teng7.3 pts · 2 reb · 1 ast
Score 63
G E. Shetlar9 pts · 4.3 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 57
→MSUSmall
F C. Carr12 pts · 5.4 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 85
F G. Oldham TR5.5 pts · 7.5 reb · 1 ast
Score 21
→MSUSmall
F J. Scott5.8 pts · 3.1 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 53
F J. Carroll TR10.7 pts · 8.1 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 78
=Even
C A. Bonke TR10.4 pts · 8.1 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 80
DrakeBetterMichigan St
DRKE offense168th of 366 · -5.1
→MSUBig
MSU defense5th of 366 · +9.3
DRKE defense132nd of 366 · -2.5
→MSUSmall
MSU offense21st of 366 · +7.6
Backcourt-3.7 · 3 players
→MSUBig
Backcourt+7.0 · 2 players
Frontcourt-0.5 · 2 players
→MSUBig
Frontcourt+4.8 · 3 players
Bench+0.1 · 2 players
=Even
Bench+0.9 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestDRKE betterMSU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
A. Alia32 minO. Larson29 minE. Shetlar28 minD. Kindell17 min · TRD. IjadimbolaNewL. RushNew
Forwards
G. Oldham26 min · TRJ. Carroll25 min · TRG. Goodbary13 minJ. BurnsNewM. FlemonsNew
Guards
J. Fears32 minK. Teng18 minM. WatkinsNewJ. JervisNewC. MedlockNew
Forwards
C. Carr29 minJ. Scott21 minC. Ward15 minJ. McCulloch7 minB. Walton1 minC. Walton1 min
Centers
A. Bonke26 min · TRE. TaylorNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 73.9 #200 | Points per game | 78.8 #84 |
| 1.08 #182 | Points per possession | 1.17 #40 |
| 68.4 #209 | Pace (possessions) | 67.3 #264 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.4 #179 | Effective FG% | 53.8 #72 |
| 34.0 #172 | 3-point % | 36.3 #47 |
| 45.7 #53 | 3-point attempt rate | 36.4 #241 |
| 33.5 #223 | Free throw rate | 35.9 #157 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.0 #64 | Turnover rate | 17.1 #217 |
| 26.6 #310 | Offensive rebound rate | 37.8 #10 |
| 13.1 #202 | Assists per game | 18.6 #4 |
| Defense | ||
| 76.3 #225 | Points allowed | 68.3 #37 |
| 1.12 #261 | Points allowed per possession | 1.02 #40 |
| 52.6 #246 | Opponent effective FG% | 48.9 #61 |
| 36.4 #323 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.0 #119 |
| 14.6 #315 | Turnovers forced | 14.9 #296 |
| 70.1 #155 | Defensive rebound rate | 77.6 #1 |
| 5.2 #319 | Steals per game | 5.1 #328 |
| 2.9 #241 | Blocks per game | 4.1 #59 |
Drake
12-20 in 2025-26 overall · 8-15 in conference · Missouri Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs UIC51–72
- Wvs Belmont100–79
- Wvs S Illinois67–63
- Lvs Northern Iowa53–75
- L@ Valparaiso71–74
A week or more of rest.
Michigan St
27-8 in 2025-26 overall · 15-6 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs UConn63–67
- Wvs Louisville77–69
- Wvs N Dakota St92–67
- Lvs UCLA84–88
- L@ Michigan80–90
A week or more of rest.