Breslin Center · at Michigan St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MSU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects MSU 87–53 · win probability MSU 100%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 139.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: MSU has more of the edges
MRMK 1, MSU 8 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: MRMK 24.8%, MSU 37.8%. Defensive: MRMK 60.1%, MSU 77.6%
MRMK offense vs MSU defense
Offense 316th of 366 against a defense 5th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
MRMK has played the 286th-hardest schedule, MSU the 16th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Turnovers
Turnover rate: MRMK 14.8%, MSU 17.1%. Forced: MRMK 20.4%, MSU 14.9%
MSU offense vs MRMK defense
Offense 21st of 366 against a defense 139th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: MRMK 49.1 and allows 46.7; MSU 53.8 and allows 48.9
Free throws
Free throw rate: MRMK 38.2, MSU 35.9. Allowed: MRMK 37.1, MSU 30.2
Home court
MSU at home. This season: MSU 0-0 at home, MRMK 0-0 away
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: MRMK 37%, MSU 63%. Transfers in: MRMK 3, MSU 1. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 66 possessions: MRMK plays 64.4 a game (357th fastest), MSU 67.3 (264th). Faster games mean more points
Three-pointers
MRMK hits 32.7% and allows 30.3%; MSU hits 36.3% and allows 33.0%. Threes are 46.1% and 36.4% of their shots
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | MSU -34.4 | — |
| Total | — | 139.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | MRMK 52.7 · MSU 87.1 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | MSU -20.3 | — |
| 1H total | 65.4 | — |
| 1H projected score | MRMK 22.6 · MSU 42.9 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8-2 80% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% | |
| 7-3 70% | 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% |
Next 3 games
With how the last meeting with each opponent went
No more games listed yet.
No more games listed yet.
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Merrimack
34 games played
Straight up
23-11
68% wins
Against the spread
20-14
59% covers · avg +2.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-22
35% overs · avg −3.3 pts vs the total
Against the spread
20-1459%
2 straight misses ATS1 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 66-75 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 143.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 6 | @ | L 57-95 | +23.5 | L −14.5 | 148.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 62-76 | +4.5 | L −9.5 | 142.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 15 | @ | W 91-79 | +2.5 | W +14.5 | 135.5 | O 170 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 72-65 | -6.5 | W +0.5 | 130.5 | O 137 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 45-80 | +36.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | U 125 |
| Nov 28 | @ | L 65-77 | +2.5 | L −9.5 | 152.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 58-78 | +5.5 | L −14.5 | 135.5 | O 136 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 66-60 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 132.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 4 | vs | W 68-66 | -9.5 | L −7.5 | 138.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 74-63 | -3.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 10 | @ | W 59-56 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 134.5 | U 115 |
| Dec 14 | @ | L 59-66 | +6.5 | L −0.5 | 136.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 29 | @ | W 80-72 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 144.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 75-65 | -3.5 | W +6.5 | 141.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 73-66 | -6.5 | W +0.5 | 148.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 9 | @ | W 63-59 | +5.5 | W +9.5 | 132.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 11 | @ | L 63-76 | +1.5 | L −11.5 | 133.5 | O 139 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 83-71 | +1.5 | W +13.5 | 141.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 19 | @ | W 68-55 | +6.5 | W +19.5 | 133.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 60-61 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 143.5 | U 121 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 67-59 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 134.5 | U 126 |
| Feb 1 | vs | W 75-58 | -5.5 | W +11.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 87-70 | -2.5 | W +14.5 | 134.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 73-47 | -8.5 | W +17.5 | 137.5 | U 120 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 81-56 | -2.5 | W +22.5 | 128.5 | O 137 |
| Feb 15 | @ | W 56-49 | +3.5 | W +10.5 | 141.5 | U 105 |
| Feb 20 | vs | W 79-72 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 133.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 22 | vs | W 88-86 | -6.5 | L −4.5 | 136.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 27 | @ | L 62-67 | -8.5 | L −13.5 | 129.5 | U 129 |
| Mar 1 | @ | W 73-66 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 126.5 | O 139 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 70-48 | -6.5 | W +15.5 | 143.5 | U 118 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 58-57 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 128.5 | U 115 |
| Mar 10 | vs | L 54-64 | -2.5 | L −12.5 | 128.5 | U 118 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
SDST
L 66-75
−2.5
6
@
AUB
L 57-95
−14.5
11
@
TAR
L 62-76
−9.5
15
@
BU
W 91-79
+14.5
19
vs
ME
W 72-65
+0.5
21
@
FLA
L 45-80
+1.5
28
@
PENN
L 65-77
−9.5
29
vs
HOF
L 58-78
−14.5
30
vs
LAS
W 66-60
+8.5
4
vs
RID
W 68-66
−7.5
7
vs
FAIR
W 74-63
+7.5
10
@
PRIN
W 59-56
+5.5
14
@
UVM
L 59-66
−0.5
29
@
SHU
W 80-72
+9.5
2
vs
MSM
W 75-65
+6.5
4
vs
MAN
W 73-66
+0.5
9
@
SIE
W 63-59
+9.5
11
@
SPU
L 63-76
−11.5
17
vs
QUIN
W 83-71
+13.5
19
@
MRST
W 68-55
+19.5
22
@
IONA
L 60-61
−2.5
24
vs
SPU
W 67-59
+5.5
1
vs
SHU
W 75-58
+11.5
5
@
MSM
W 87-70
+14.5
7
@
RID
W 73-47
+17.5
12
vs
MRST
W 81-56
+22.5
15
@
QUIN
W 56-49
+10.5
20
vs
SIE
W 79-72
+4.5
22
vs
IONA
W 88-86
−4.5
27
@
CAN
L 62-67
−13.5
1
@
NIA
W 73-66
−0.5
6
vs
SHU
W 70-48
+15.5
8
vs
MRST
W 58-57
−1.5
10
vs
SIE
L 54-64
−12.5
covered 20didn’t cover 14avg +2.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
SDST
L 66-75
−2.5
6
@
AUB
L 57-95
+3.5
11
@
TAR
L 62-76
−4.5
15
@
BU
W 91-79
+34.5
19
vs
ME
W 72-65
+6.5
21
@
FLA
L 45-80
−33.5
28
@
PENN
L 65-77
−10.5
29
vs
HOF
L 58-78
+0.5
30
vs
LAS
W 66-60
−6.5
4
vs
RID
W 68-66
−4.5
7
vs
FAIR
W 74-63
−7.5
10
@
PRIN
W 59-56
−19.5
14
@
UVM
L 59-66
−11.5
29
@
SHU
W 80-72
+7.5
2
vs
MSM
W 75-65
−1.5
4
vs
MAN
W 73-66
−9.5
9
@
SIE
W 63-59
−10.5
11
@
SPU
L 63-76
+5.5
17
vs
QUIN
W 83-71
+12.5
19
@
MRST
W 68-55
−10.5
22
@
IONA
L 60-61
−22.5
24
vs
SPU
W 67-59
−8.5
1
vs
SHU
W 75-58
−14.5
5
@
MSM
W 87-70
+22.5
7
@
RID
W 73-47
−17.5
12
vs
MRST
W 81-56
+8.5
15
@
QUIN
W 56-49
−36.5
20
vs
SIE
W 79-72
+17.5
22
vs
IONA
W 88-86
+37.5
27
@
CAN
L 62-67
−0.5
1
@
NIA
W 73-66
+12.5
6
vs
SHU
W 70-48
−25.5
8
vs
MRST
W 58-57
−13.5
10
vs
SIE
L 54-64
−10.5
over 12under 22avg −3.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Michigan St
35 games played
Straight up
27-8
77% wins
Against the spread
18-17
51% covers · avg +1.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-19
46% overs · avg +1.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 80-69 | -22.5 | L −11.5 | 144.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 69-66 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 155.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 13 | vs | W 79-60 | -24.5 | L −5.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 83-66 | +3.5 | W +20.5 | 152.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 84-56 | -30.5 | L −2.5 | 149.5 | U 140 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 89-56 | -19.5 | W +13.5 | 140.5 | O 145 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 74-58 | -1.5 | W +14.5 | 152.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 71-52 | -5.5 | W +13.5 | 133.5 | U 123 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 60-66 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 141.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 76-72 | -12.5 | L −8.5 | 145.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 92-69 | -23.5 | L −0.5 | 150.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 79-70 | -19.5 | L −10.5 | 155.5 | U 149 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 114-97 | -23.5 | L −6.5 | 160.5 | O 211 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 56-58 | +2.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | U 114 |
| Jan 5 | vs | W 80-51 | -11.5 | W +17.5 | 151.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 76-66 | -13.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 81-60 | -6.5 | W +14.5 | 145.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 80-63 | -3.5 | W +13.5 | 145.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 20 | @ | W 68-52 | -10.5 | W +5.5 | 139.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 91-48 | -18.5 | W +24.5 | 141.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 27 | @ | W 88-79 | -14.5 | L −5.5 | 138.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 30 | vs | L 71-83 | +2.5 | L −9.5 | 149.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 73-76 | -8.5 | L −11.5 | 136.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 85-82 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 142.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 13 | @ | L 71-92 | -1.5 | L −22.5 | 149.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 82-59 | -8.5 | W +14.5 | 139.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 22 | vs | W 66-60 | -10.5 | L −4.5 | 146.5 | U 126 |
| Feb 26 | @ | W 76-74 | +5.5 | W +7.5 | 143.5 | O 150 |
| Mar 1 | @ | W 77-64 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 144.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 91-87 | -20.5 | L −16.5 | 141.5 | O 178 |
| Mar 8 | @ | L 80-90 | +10.5 | W +0.5 | 152.5 | O 170 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 84-88 | -5.5 | L −9.5 | 141.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 19 | vs | W 92-67 | -16.5 | W +8.5 | 144.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 21 | vs | W 77-69 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 151.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 27 | vs | L 63-67 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 136.5 | U 130 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
COLG
W 80-69
−11.5
8
vs
ARK
W 69-66
+0.5
13
vs
SJSU
W 79-60
−5.5
18
vs
UK
W 83-66
+20.5
21
vs
DETM
W 84-56
−2.5
25
vs
ECU
W 89-56
+13.5
27
vs
UNC
W 74-58
+14.5
2
vs
IOWA
W 71-52
+13.5
6
vs
DUKE
L 60-66
−4.5
13
@
PSU
W 76-72
−8.5
16
vs
TOL
W 92-69
−0.5
20
vs
OAK
W 79-70
−10.5
29
vs
COR
W 114-97
−6.5
2
@
NEB
L 56-58
+0.5
5
vs
USC
W 80-51
+17.5
8
vs
NU
W 76-66
−3.5
13
vs
IU
W 81-60
+14.5
17
@
WASH
W 80-63
+13.5
20
@
ORE
W 68-52
+5.5
24
vs
MD
W 91-48
+24.5
27
@
RUTG
W 88-79
−5.5
30
vs
MICH
L 71-83
−9.5
4
@
MINN
L 73-76
−11.5
7
vs
ILL
W 85-82
+1.5
13
@
WIS
L 71-92
−22.5
17
vs
UCLA
W 82-59
+14.5
22
vs
OSU
W 66-60
−4.5
26
@
PUR
W 76-74
+7.5
1
@
IU
W 77-64
+10.5
5
vs
RUTG
W 91-87
−16.5
8
@
MICH
L 80-90
+0.5
13
vs
UCLA
L 84-88
−9.5
19
vs
NDSU
W 92-67
+8.5
21
vs
LOU
W 77-69
+2.5
27
vs
CONN
L 63-67
−1.5
covered 18didn’t cover 17avg +1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
COLG
W 80-69
+4.5
8
vs
ARK
W 69-66
−20.5
13
vs
SJSU
W 79-60
−4.5
18
vs
UK
W 83-66
−3.5
21
vs
DETM
W 84-56
−9.5
25
vs
ECU
W 89-56
+4.5
27
vs
UNC
W 74-58
−20.5
2
vs
IOWA
W 71-52
−10.5
6
vs
DUKE
L 60-66
−15.5
13
@
PSU
W 76-72
+2.5
16
vs
TOL
W 92-69
+10.5
20
vs
OAK
W 79-70
−6.5
29
vs
COR
W 114-97
+50.5
2
@
NEB
L 56-58
−32.5
5
vs
USC
W 80-51
−20.5
8
vs
NU
W 76-66
−1.5
13
vs
IU
W 81-60
−4.5
17
@
WASH
W 80-63
−2.5
20
@
ORE
W 68-52
−19.5
24
vs
MD
W 91-48
−2.5
27
@
RUTG
W 88-79
+28.5
30
vs
MICH
L 71-83
+4.5
4
@
MINN
L 73-76
+12.5
7
vs
ILL
W 85-82
+24.5
13
@
WIS
L 71-92
+13.5
17
vs
UCLA
W 82-59
+1.5
22
vs
OSU
W 66-60
−20.5
26
@
PUR
W 76-74
+6.5
1
@
IU
W 77-64
−3.5
5
vs
RUTG
W 91-87
+36.5
8
@
MICH
L 80-90
+17.5
13
vs
UCLA
L 84-88
+30.5
19
vs
NDSU
W 92-67
+14.5
21
vs
LOU
W 77-69
−5.5
27
vs
CONN
L 63-67
−6.5
over 16under 19avg +1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Michigan St has the better starters
Position by position: Merrimack 0, Michigan St 4, even 1
MerrimackBetterMichigan St
G T. Dorset11.7 pts · 3.1 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 45
→MSUBig
G J. Fears15.2 pts · 2.4 reb · 9.4 ast
Score 99
G D. Anglin TR9.3 pts · 2.1 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 19
→MSUBig
G K. Teng7.3 pts · 2 reb · 1 ast
Score 63
G A. Vladimir Soqui Urbano TR2 pts · 0.5 reb · 0.2 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F C. Carr12 pts · 5.4 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 85
F T. Brogna6.1 pts · 4.7 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 16
→MSUBig
F J. Scott5.8 pts · 3.1 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 53
F E. Wilborn TR2.3 pts · 3 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 30
→MSUBig
C A. Bonke TR10.4 pts · 8.1 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 80
MerrimackBetterMichigan St
MRMK offense316th of 366 · -10.3
→MSUBig
MSU defense5th of 366 · +9.3
MRMK defense139th of 366 · -2.9
→MSUSmall
MSU offense21st of 366 · +7.6
Backcourt-5.1 · 3 players
→MSUBig
Backcourt+7.0 · 2 players
Frontcourt-3.0 · 2 players
→MSUBig
Frontcourt+4.8 · 3 players
Bench-0.6 · 1 player
→MSUSmall
Bench+0.9 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestMRMK betterMSU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Dorset36 minD. Anglin28 min · TRA. Vladimir Soqui Urbano10 min · TRA. LesburtNewJ. AndersonNewQ. KwasniakNew
Forwards
T. Brogna29 minE. Wilborn9 min · TRD. Veillette8 minJ. MooreNewD. MunroNewJ. SkoricNew
Guards
J. Fears32 minK. Teng18 minM. WatkinsNewJ. JervisNewC. MedlockNew
Forwards
C. Carr29 minJ. Scott21 minC. Ward15 minJ. McCulloch7 minB. Walton1 minC. Walton1 min
Centers
A. Bonke26 min · TRE. TaylorNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 68.5 #304 | Points per game | 78.8 #84 |
| 1.06 #221 | Points per possession | 1.17 #40 |
| 64.4 #357 | Pace (possessions) | 67.3 #264 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.1 #288 | Effective FG% | 53.8 #72 |
| 32.7 #243 | 3-point % | 36.3 #47 |
| 46.1 #46 | 3-point attempt rate | 36.4 #241 |
| 38.2 #99 | Free throw rate | 35.9 #157 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.8 #55 | Turnover rate | 17.1 #217 |
| 24.8 #343 | Offensive rebound rate | 37.8 #10 |
| 12.4 #257 | Assists per game | 18.6 #4 |
| Defense | ||
| 66.5 #19 | Points allowed | 68.3 #37 |
| 1.03 #62 | Points allowed per possession | 1.02 #40 |
| 46.7 #17 | Opponent effective FG% | 48.9 #61 |
| 30.3 #12 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.0 #119 |
| 20.4 #16 | Turnovers forced | 14.9 #296 |
| 60.1 #365 | Defensive rebound rate | 77.6 #1 |
| 8.2 #32 | Steals per game | 5.1 #328 |
| 5.2 #13 | Blocks per game | 4.1 #59 |
Merrimack
23-11 in 2025-26 overall · 19-4 in conference · Metro Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Siena54–64
- Wvs Marist58–57
- Wvs Sacred Heart70–48
- W@ Niagara73–66
- L@ Canisius62–67
A week or more of rest.
Michigan St
27-8 in 2025-26 overall · 15-6 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs UConn63–67
- Wvs Louisville77–69
- Wvs N Dakota St92–67
- Lvs UCLA84–88
- L@ Michigan80–90
A week or more of rest.