Dean E. Smith Center · at North Carolina
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UNC | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects UNC 85–66 · win probability UNC 95%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 150.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: UNC has more of the edges
MONM 1, UNC 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Shooting
Effective FG%: MONM 49.6 and allows 50.0; UNC 54.3 and allows 48.4
Context
Schedule so far
MONM has played the 190th-hardest schedule, UNC the 61st. A record against a soft schedule means less
MONM offense vs UNC defense
Offense 173rd of 366 against a defense 52nd, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: MONM 31.2%, UNC 31.2%. Defensive: MONM 67.2%, UNC 72.2%
Free throws
Free throw rate: MONM 32.7, UNC 37.1. Allowed: MONM 32.2, UNC 23.8
UNC offense vs MONM defense
Offense 40th of 366 against a defense 144th, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: MONM 16.7%, UNC 13.9%. Forced: MONM 19.8%, UNC 13.6%
Home court
UNC at home. This season: UNC 0-0 at home, MONM 0-0 away
Even
Three-pointers
MONM hits 34.2% and allows 33.9%; UNC hits 34.2% and allows 34.7%. Threes are 34.4% and 42.2% of their shots
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: MONM 37%, UNC 20%. Transfers in: MONM 5, UNC 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: MONM plays 67.9 a game (234th fastest), UNC 69.0 (180th). Faster games mean more points
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | UNC -19.2 | — |
| Total | — | 150.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | MONM 65.8 · UNC 85 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UNC -11.3 | — |
| 1H total | 70.5 | — |
| 1H projected score | MONM 29.6 · UNC 40.9 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | |
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Monmouth
33 games played
Straight up
18-15
55% wins
Against the spread
17-16
52% covers · avg +1.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-17
48% overs · avg +0.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | L 60-73 | +4.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 13 | @ | L 58-70 | +15.5 | W +3.5 | 135.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 73-78 | +21.5 | W +16.5 | 145.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 71-70 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 148.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 80-73 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 136.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 79-83 | -6.5 | L −10.5 | 145.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 30 | @ | W 88-74 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 141.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 63-58 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 139.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 67-79 | +10.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | O 146 |
| Dec 14 | @ | L 65-73 | -2.5 | L −10.5 | 143.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 17 | vs | L 75-85 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 145.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 76-62 | -9.5 | W +4.5 | 143.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 65-68 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 152.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 62-48 | +8.5 | W +22.5 | 136.5 | U 110 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 81-70 | +2.5 | W +13.5 | 156.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 64-67 | +7.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 15 | vs | L 51-73 | -5.5 | L −27.5 | 127.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 81-68 | -3.5 | W +9.5 | 143.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 63-65 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 135.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 88-73 | +4.5 | W +19.5 | 148.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 83-81 | -9.5 | L −7.5 | 144.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 57-73 | +1.5 | L −14.5 | 140.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 76-75 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 137.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 93-73 | +1.5 | W +21.5 | 133.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 15 | vs | W 72-71 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 138.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 69-79 | +7.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 63-74 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 149.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 82-69 | -3.5 | W +9.5 | 145.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 73-57 | -3.5 | W +12.5 | 150.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 89-83 | -3.5 | W +2.5 | 148.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 65-57 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 136.5 | U 122 |
| Mar 9 | vs | W 74-64 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 151.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 10 | vs | L 69-75 | +4.5 | L −1.5 | 133.5 | O 144 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
LAS
L 60-73
−8.5
13
@
HALL
L 58-70
+3.5
18
@
SYR
L 73-78
+16.5
23
vs
RMU
W 71-70
−1.5
28
vs
BALL
W 80-73
+4.5
29
vs
LEM
L 79-83
−10.5
30
@
LAF
W 88-74
+12.5
3
vs
PRIN
W 63-58
−0.5
6
@
GT
L 67-79
−1.5
14
@
FAIR
L 65-73
−10.5
17
vs
QUIN
L 75-85
−11.5
21
vs
LEH
W 76-62
+4.5
31
vs
CAM
L 65-68
−4.5
3
@
TOW
W 62-48
+22.5
8
vs
W&M
W 81-70
+13.5
10
@
HOF
L 64-67
+4.5
15
vs
DREX
L 51-73
−27.5
19
vs
NE
W 81-68
+9.5
22
@
HAMP
L 63-65
−0.5
24
@
CAM
W 88-73
+19.5
29
vs
NCAT
W 83-81
−7.5
31
vs
HOF
L 57-73
−14.5
5
@
STBK
W 76-75
+2.5
12
@
DREX
W 93-73
+21.5
15
vs
TOW
W 72-71
−0.5
19
@
UNCW
L 69-79
−2.5
21
@
COFC
L 63-74
−6.5
26
vs
STBK
W 82-69
+9.5
28
vs
ELON
W 73-57
+12.5
3
@
NE
W 89-83
+2.5
8
vs
DREX
W 65-57
+4.5
9
vs
CAM
W 74-64
+8.5
10
vs
HOF
L 69-75
−1.5
covered 17didn’t cover 16avg +1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
LAS
L 60-73
−10.5
13
@
HALL
L 58-70
−7.5
18
@
SYR
L 73-78
+5.5
23
vs
RMU
W 71-70
−7.5
28
vs
BALL
W 80-73
+16.5
29
vs
LEM
L 79-83
+16.5
30
@
LAF
W 88-74
+20.5
3
vs
PRIN
W 63-58
−18.5
6
@
GT
L 67-79
+1.5
14
@
FAIR
L 65-73
−5.5
17
vs
QUIN
L 75-85
+14.5
21
vs
LEH
W 76-62
−5.5
31
vs
CAM
L 65-68
−19.5
3
@
TOW
W 62-48
−26.5
8
vs
W&M
W 81-70
−5.5
10
@
HOF
L 64-67
−8.5
15
vs
DREX
L 51-73
−3.5
19
vs
NE
W 81-68
+5.5
22
@
HAMP
L 63-65
−7.5
24
@
CAM
W 88-73
+12.5
29
vs
NCAT
W 83-81
+19.5
31
vs
HOF
L 57-73
−10.5
5
@
STBK
W 76-75
+13.5
12
@
DREX
W 93-73
+32.5
15
vs
TOW
W 72-71
+4.5
19
@
UNCW
L 69-79
+3.5
21
@
COFC
L 63-74
−12.5
26
vs
STBK
W 82-69
+5.5
28
vs
ELON
W 73-57
−20.5
3
@
NE
W 89-83
+23.5
8
vs
DREX
W 65-57
−14.5
9
vs
CAM
W 74-64
−13.5
10
vs
HOF
L 69-75
+10.5
over 16under 17avg +0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
North Carolina
33 games played
Straight up
24-9
73% wins
Against the spread
19-14
58% covers · avg +0.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-17
48% overs · avg −2.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 94-54 | -31.5 | W +8.5 | 157.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 87-74 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 159.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 89-74 | -20.5 | L −5.5 | 162.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 97-53 | -34.5 | W +9.5 | 159.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 73-61 | -26.5 | L −14.5 | 160.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 85-70 | -10.5 | W +4.5 | 152.5 | O 155 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 58-74 | +1.5 | L −14.5 | 152.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 67-64 | +7.5 | W +10.5 | 163.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 81-61 | -10.5 | W +9.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 80-62 | -29.5 | L −11.5 | 151.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 77-58 | -17.5 | W +1.5 | 150.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 71-70 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 157.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 99-51 | -25.5 | W +22.5 | 144.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 30 | vs | W 79-66 | -12.5 | W +0.5 | 166.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 83-97 | +1.5 | L −12.5 | 155.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 87-84 | -10.5 | L −7.5 | 154.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 90-95 | -4.5 | L −9.5 | 147.5 | O 185 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 78-84 | -7.5 | L −13.5 | 151.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 91-69 | -13.5 | W +8.5 | 149.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 85-80 | +6.5 | W +11.5 | 152.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 91-75 | -9.5 | W +6.5 | 160.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 2 | vs | W 87-77 | -11.5 | L −1.5 | 158.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 71-68 | +6.5 | W +9.5 | 152.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 10 | @ | L 66-75 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 156.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 79-65 | -11.5 | W +2.5 | 142.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 58-82 | +8.5 | L −15.5 | 156.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 77-64 | +2.5 | W +15.5 | 154.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 23 | vs | W 77-74 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 162.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 89-82 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 149.5 | O 171 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 67-63 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 141.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 61-76 | +18.5 | W +3.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 79-80 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 140.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 78-82 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 150.5 | O 160 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
CARK
W 94-54
+8.5
7
vs
KU
W 87-74
+10.5
11
vs
RAD
W 89-74
−5.5
14
vs
NCCU
W 97-53
+9.5
18
vs
NAVY
W 73-61
−14.5
25
vs
SBU
W 85-70
+4.5
27
vs
MSU
L 58-74
−14.5
2
@
UK
W 67-64
+10.5
7
vs
GTWN
W 81-61
+9.5
13
vs
UPST
W 80-62
−11.5
16
vs
ETSU
W 77-58
+1.5
20
vs
OSU
W 71-70
−1.5
22
vs
ECU
W 99-51
+22.5
30
vs
FSU
W 79-66
+0.5
3
@
SMU
L 83-97
−12.5
10
vs
WAKE
W 87-84
−7.5
14
@
STAN
L 90-95
−9.5
17
@
CAL
L 78-84
−13.5
21
vs
ND
W 91-69
+8.5
24
@
UVA
W 85-80
+11.5
31
@
GT
W 91-75
+6.5
2
vs
SYR
W 87-77
−1.5
7
vs
DUKE
W 71-68
+9.5
10
@
MIA
L 66-75
−7.5
14
vs
PITT
W 79-65
+2.5
17
@
NCSU
L 58-82
−15.5
21
@
SYR
W 77-64
+15.5
23
vs
LOU
W 77-74
+6.5
28
vs
VT
W 89-82
−0.5
3
vs
CLEM
W 67-63
+1.5
7
@
DUKE
L 61-76
+3.5
12
vs
CLEM
L 79-80
+1.5
19
vs
VCU
L 78-82
−6.5
covered 19didn’t cover 14avg +0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
CARK
W 94-54
−9.5
7
vs
KU
W 87-74
+1.5
11
vs
RAD
W 89-74
+0.5
14
vs
NCCU
W 97-53
−9.5
18
vs
NAVY
W 73-61
−26.5
25
vs
SBU
W 85-70
+2.5
27
vs
MSU
L 58-74
−20.5
2
@
UK
W 67-64
−32.5
7
vs
GTWN
W 81-61
−7.5
13
vs
UPST
W 80-62
−9.5
16
vs
ETSU
W 77-58
−15.5
20
vs
OSU
W 71-70
−16.5
22
vs
ECU
W 99-51
+5.5
30
vs
FSU
W 79-66
−21.5
3
@
SMU
L 83-97
+24.5
10
vs
WAKE
W 87-84
+16.5
14
@
STAN
L 90-95
+37.5
17
@
CAL
L 78-84
+10.5
21
vs
ND
W 91-69
+10.5
24
@
UVA
W 85-80
+12.5
31
@
GT
W 91-75
+5.5
2
vs
SYR
W 87-77
+5.5
7
vs
DUKE
W 71-68
−13.5
10
@
MIA
L 66-75
−15.5
14
vs
PITT
W 79-65
+1.5
17
@
NCSU
L 58-82
−16.5
21
@
SYR
W 77-64
−13.5
23
vs
LOU
W 77-74
−11.5
28
vs
VT
W 89-82
+21.5
3
vs
CLEM
W 67-63
−11.5
7
@
DUKE
L 61-76
−10.5
12
vs
CLEM
L 79-80
+18.5
19
vs
VCU
L 78-82
+9.5
over 16under 17avg −2.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
North Carolina has the better starters
Position by position: Monmouth 0, North Carolina 4, even 1
MonmouthBetterNorth Carolina
G J. Collins6.9 pts · 4.6 reb · 4.4 ast
Score 18
→UNCBig
G N. Avdalas TR12.1 pts · 3.1 reb · 4.6 ast
Score 67
G J. Sanders TR10.8 pts · 3.4 reb · 4.4 ast
Score 39
→UNCBig
G T. Brown TR19.9 pts · 2.4 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 98
G L. Walker TR14.5 pts · 2.5 reb · 1.3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G A. Brizzi TR14.7 pts · 2.7 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 65
G A. Walker TR7.8 pts · 3.7 reb · 3.2 ast
Score 47
→UNCSmall
F J. Stevenson8.1 pts · 4.4 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 65
F S. Spartalis10.5 pts · 5 reb · 1 ast
Score 54
→UNCSmall
C C. Fens TR14.8 pts · 8.8 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 85
MonmouthBetterNorth Carolina
MONM offense173rd of 366 · -5.3
→UNCSmall
UNC defense52nd of 366 · +1.9
MONM defense144th of 366 · -3.1
→UNCSmall
UNC offense40th of 366 · +5.0
Backcourt-5.3 · 4 players
→UNCBig
Backcourt+6.0 · 3 players
Frontcourt-0.1 · 1 player
→UNCBig
Frontcourt+3.9 · 2 players
Bench+0.4 · 5 players
=Even
Bench+0.4 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestMONM betterUNC betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Collins35 minJ. Sanders30 min · TRL. Walker28 min · TRA. Walker28 min · TRM. Durr21 min · TRJ. Dobuol6 min
Forwards
S. Spartalis24 minO. Harvey3 minS. Osei3 min · TRQ. Peters2 minD. PerryNewS. MarjanovicNew
Guards
N. Avdalas32 min · TRT. Brown32 min · TRA. Brizzi30 min · TRM. Able22 min · TRJ. Young7 minI. Denis3 min
Forwards
J. Stevenson26 minJ. Holbrook2 minA. SamodurovNewM. AdamsNew
Centers
C. Fens26 min · TRC. BennermanNewS. KeitaNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 72.0 #241 | Points per game | 79.7 #73 |
| 1.07 #212 | Points per possession | 1.16 #50 |
| 67.9 #234 | Pace (possessions) | 69.0 #180 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.6 #259 | Effective FG% | 54.3 #57 |
| 34.2 #156 | 3-point % | 34.2 #159 |
| 34.4 #288 | 3-point attempt rate | 42.2 #132 |
| 32.7 #244 | Free throw rate | 37.1 #127 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.7 #176 | Turnover rate | 13.9 #20 |
| 31.2 #157 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.2 #159 |
| 13.7 #167 | Assists per game | 16.0 #47 |
| Defense | ||
| 70.9 #73 | Points allowed | 71.6 #97 |
| 1.04 #74 | Points allowed per possession | 1.04 #65 |
| 50.0 #103 | Opponent effective FG% | 48.4 #44 |
| 33.9 #174 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.7 #234 |
| 19.8 #28 | Turnovers forced | 13.6 #344 |
| 67.2 #287 | Defensive rebound rate | 72.2 #59 |
| 7.6 #69 | Steals per game | 5.4 #308 |
| 4.2 #57 | Blocks per game | 3.4 #167 |
Monmouth
18-15 in 2025-26 overall · 13-8 in conference · Coastal Athletic Association
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Hofstra69–75
- Wvs Campbell74–64
- Wvs Drexel65–57
- W@ Northeastern89–83
- Wvs Elon73–57
A week or more of rest.
North Carolina
24-9 in 2025-26 overall · 12-7 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs VCU78–82
- Lvs Clemson79–80
- L@ Duke61–76
- Wvs Clemson67–63
- Wvs Virginia Tech89–82
A week or more of rest.