Allen Fieldhouse · at Kansas
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | KU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects KU 94–63 · win probability KU 100%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 156.6
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: KU has more of the edges
DEN 0, KU 7 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
KU offense vs DEN defense
Offense 17th of 366 against a defense 337th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
DEN has played the 249th-hardest schedule, KU the 2nd. A record against a soft schedule means less
DEN offense vs KU defense
Offense 184th of 366 against a defense 15th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: DEN 53.6 and allows 56.0; KU 51.2 and allows 45.0
Three-pointers
DEN hits 36.8% and allows 36.7%; KU hits 34.6% and allows 30.6%. Threes are 38.6% and 35.2% of their shots
Free throws
Free throw rate: DEN 34.1, KU 32.2. Allowed: DEN 36.8, KU 27.4
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: DEN 29.8%, KU 29.3%. Defensive: DEN 67.2%, KU 70.1%
Home court
KU at home. This season: KU 0-0 at home, DEN 0-0 away
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: DEN 14.2%, KU 15.6%. Forced: DEN 13.0%, KU 13.8%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: DEN 27%, KU 9%. Transfers in: DEN 6, KU 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: DEN plays 69.4 a game (151st fastest), KU 68.8 (193rd). Faster games mean more points
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | KU -30.6 | — |
| Total | — | 156.6 | — |
| Projected score | — | DEN 63 · KU 93.6 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | KU -18.1 | — |
| 1H total | 73.2 | — |
| 1H projected score | DEN 27.5 · KU 45.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% | |
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Denver
29 games played
Straight up
12-17
41% wins
Against the spread
18-11
62% covers · avg +1.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
20-9
69% overs · avg +6.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 73-84 | +13.5 | W +2.5 | 136.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 6 | @ | L 70-84 | +27.5 | W +13.5 | 153.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 9 | @ | W 75-73 | +7.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 79-84 | -4.5 | L −9.5 | 148.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 21 | @ | W 83-81 | +18.5 | W +20.5 | 149.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 24 | @ | L 73-103 | +32.5 | W +2.5 | 154.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 26 | @ | L 59-101 | +9.5 | L −32.5 | 153.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 93-89 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 155.5 | O 182 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 79-93 | +8.5 | L −5.5 | 142.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 86-105 | -3.5 | L −22.5 | 165.5 | O 191 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 86-79 | +8.5 | W +15.5 | 159.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 85-90 | +16.5 | W +11.5 | 160.5 | O 175 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 87-74 | -9.5 | W +3.5 | 156.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 88-92 | +11.5 | W +7.5 | 163.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 79-87 | +8.5 | W +0.5 | 162.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 72-82 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 169.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 98-87 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 156.5 | O 185 |
| Jan 22 | vs | L 77-82 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 160.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 86-93 | -5.5 | L −12.5 | 162.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 69-61 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 161.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 82-84 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 158.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 78-71 | +12.5 | W +19.5 | 156.5 | U 149 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 98-79 | +3.5 | W +22.5 | 161.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 79-61 | +2.5 | W +20.5 | 160.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 76-83 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 160.5 | U 159 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 90-70 | -5.5 | W +14.5 | 163.5 | U 160 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 82-80 | +3.5 | W +5.5 | 168.5 | U 162 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 80-102 | -2.5 | L −24.5 | 156.5 | O 182 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 67-83 | -2.5 | L −18.5 | 160.5 | U 150 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
SEA
L 73-84
+2.5
6
@
WASH
L 70-84
+13.5
9
@
MTST
W 75-73
+9.5
15
vs
UTSA
L 79-84
−9.5
21
@
CSU
W 83-81
+20.5
24
@
ARIZ
L 73-103
+2.5
26
@
WYO
L 59-101
−32.5
3
vs
EWU
W 93-89
+2.5
6
@
IDST
L 79-93
−5.5
13
vs
CSUF
L 86-105
−22.5
20
@
UNCO
W 86-79
+15.5
22
@
TLSA
L 85-90
+11.5
31
vs
KC
W 87-74
+3.5
4
@
STMN
L 88-92
+7.5
8
@
SDST
L 79-87
+0.5
10
@
SDAK
L 72-82
−11.5
14
vs
ORU
W 98-87
+4.5
22
vs
NDSU
L 77-82
−0.5
24
vs
UND
L 86-93
−12.5
28
@
KC
W 69-61
+4.5
31
vs
OMA
L 82-84
−3.5
5
@
NDSU
W 78-71
+19.5
7
@
UND
W 98-79
+22.5
12
vs
SDST
W 79-61
+20.5
15
@
OMA
L 76-83
−4.5
19
vs
SDAK
W 90-70
+14.5
21
vs
STMN
W 82-80
+5.5
26
@
ORU
L 80-102
−24.5
6
vs
UND
L 67-83
−18.5
covered 18didn’t cover 11avg +1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
SEA
L 73-84
+20.5
6
@
WASH
L 70-84
+0.5
9
@
MTST
W 75-73
+1.5
15
vs
UTSA
L 79-84
+14.5
21
@
CSU
W 83-81
+14.5
24
@
ARIZ
L 73-103
+21.5
26
@
WYO
L 59-101
+6.5
3
vs
EWU
W 93-89
+26.5
6
@
IDST
L 79-93
+29.5
13
vs
CSUF
L 86-105
+25.5
20
@
UNCO
W 86-79
+5.5
22
@
TLSA
L 85-90
+14.5
31
vs
KC
W 87-74
+4.5
4
@
STMN
L 88-92
+16.5
8
@
SDST
L 79-87
+3.5
10
@
SDAK
L 72-82
−15.5
14
vs
ORU
W 98-87
+28.5
22
vs
NDSU
L 77-82
−1.5
24
vs
UND
L 86-93
+16.5
28
@
KC
W 69-61
−31.5
31
vs
OMA
L 82-84
+7.5
5
@
NDSU
W 78-71
−7.5
7
@
UND
W 98-79
+15.5
12
vs
SDST
W 79-61
−20.5
15
@
OMA
L 76-83
−1.5
19
vs
SDAK
W 90-70
−3.5
21
vs
STMN
W 82-80
−6.5
26
@
ORU
L 80-102
+25.5
6
vs
UND
L 67-83
−10.5
over 20under 9avg +6.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Kansas
35 games played
Straight up
24-11
69% wins
Against the spread
21-14
60% covers · avg +1.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
11-24
31% overs · avg −4.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 94-51 | -30.5 | W +12.5 | 152.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 74-87 | +2.5 | L −10.5 | 159.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 77-46 | -25.5 | W +5.5 | 145.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 76-57 | -22.5 | L −3.5 | 144.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 18 | vs | L 66-78 | +10.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 71-61 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 143.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 71-60 | -4.5 | W +6.5 | 144.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 81-76 | +7.5 | W +12.5 | 140.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 2 | vs | L 56-61 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 141.5 | U 117 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 80-60 | -5.5 | W +14.5 | 150.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 77-76 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 148.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 73-49 | -14.5 | W +9.5 | 137.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 90-61 | -14.5 | W +14.5 | 139.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 75-81 | -4.5 | L −10.5 | 157.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 104-100 | -6.5 | L −2.5 | 143.5 | O 204 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 75-86 | -2.5 | L −13.5 | 139.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 84-63 | +3.5 | W +24.5 | 152.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 16 | vs | W 80-62 | -7.5 | W +10.5 | 156.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 20 | @ | W 75-69 | -4.5 | W +1.5 | 155.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 86-62 | -4.5 | W +19.5 | 158.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 90-82 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 159.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 2 | @ | W 64-61 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 155.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 71-59 | -18.5 | L −6.5 | 150.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 9 | vs | W 82-78 | +5.5 | W +9.5 | 152.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 56-74 | +7.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 81-69 | -7.5 | W +4.5 | 158.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 68-84 | -8.5 | L −24.5 | 139.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 23 | vs | W 69-56 | +2.5 | W +15.5 | 138.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 61-84 | +9.5 | L −13.5 | 151.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 60-70 | -5.5 | L −15.5 | 151.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 104-85 | -17.5 | W +1.5 | 157.5 | O 189 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 78-73 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | O 151 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 47-69 | +5.5 | L −16.5 | 139.5 | U 116 |
| Mar 20 | vs | W 68-60 | -14.5 | L −6.5 | 142.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 22 | vs | L 65-67 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | U 132 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
GB
W 94-51
+12.5
7
@
UNC
L 74-87
−10.5
11
vs
AMCC
W 77-46
+5.5
15
vs
PRIN
W 76-57
−3.5
18
vs
DUKE
L 66-78
−1.5
24
vs
ND
W 71-61
+4.5
25
vs
SYR
W 71-60
+6.5
26
vs
TENN
W 81-76
+12.5
2
vs
CONN
L 56-61
−1.5
7
vs
MIZ
W 80-60
+14.5
13
@
NCSU
W 77-76
+2.5
16
vs
TOW
W 73-49
+9.5
22
vs
DAV
W 90-61
+14.5
3
@
UCF
L 75-81
−10.5
6
vs
TCU
W 104-100
−2.5
10
@
WVU
L 75-86
−13.5
13
vs
ISU
W 84-63
+24.5
16
vs
BAY
W 80-62
+10.5
20
@
COLO
W 75-69
+1.5
24
@
KSU
W 86-62
+19.5
31
vs
BYU
W 90-82
+5.5
2
@
TTU
W 64-61
+6.5
7
vs
UTAH
W 71-59
−6.5
9
vs
ARIZ
W 82-78
+9.5
14
@
ISU
L 56-74
−10.5
18
@
OKST
W 81-69
+4.5
21
vs
CIN
L 68-84
−24.5
23
vs
HOU
W 69-56
+15.5
28
@
ARIZ
L 61-84
−13.5
3
@
ASU
L 60-70
−15.5
7
vs
KSU
W 104-85
+1.5
12
vs
TCU
W 78-73
+0.5
13
vs
HOU
L 47-69
−16.5
20
vs
CBU
W 68-60
−6.5
22
vs
SJU
L 65-67
+1.5
covered 21didn’t cover 14avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
GB
W 94-51
−7.5
7
@
UNC
L 74-87
+1.5
11
vs
AMCC
W 77-46
−22.5
15
vs
PRIN
W 76-57
−11.5
18
vs
DUKE
L 66-78
−5.5
24
vs
ND
W 71-61
−11.5
25
vs
SYR
W 71-60
−13.5
26
vs
TENN
W 81-76
+16.5
2
vs
CONN
L 56-61
−24.5
7
vs
MIZ
W 80-60
−10.5
13
@
NCSU
W 77-76
+4.5
16
vs
TOW
W 73-49
−15.5
22
vs
DAV
W 90-61
+11.5
3
@
UCF
L 75-81
−1.5
6
vs
TCU
W 104-100
+60.5
10
@
WVU
L 75-86
+21.5
13
vs
ISU
W 84-63
−5.5
16
vs
BAY
W 80-62
−14.5
20
@
COLO
W 75-69
−11.5
24
@
KSU
W 86-62
−10.5
31
vs
BYU
W 90-82
+12.5
2
@
TTU
W 64-61
−30.5
7
vs
UTAH
W 71-59
−20.5
9
vs
ARIZ
W 82-78
+7.5
14
@
ISU
L 56-74
−17.5
18
@
OKST
W 81-69
−8.5
21
vs
CIN
L 68-84
+12.5
23
vs
HOU
W 69-56
−13.5
28
@
ARIZ
L 61-84
−6.5
3
@
ASU
L 60-70
−21.5
7
vs
KSU
W 104-85
+31.5
12
vs
TCU
W 78-73
+4.5
13
vs
HOU
L 47-69
−23.5
20
vs
CBU
W 68-60
−14.5
22
vs
SJU
L 65-67
−12.5
over 11under 24avg −4.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Kansas has the better starters
Position by position: Denver 0, Kansas 4, even 1
DenverBetterKansas
G C. Johnson19.9 pts · 1.9 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 73
=Even
G L. Blyden TR16.5 pts · 4.1 reb · 4.5 ast
Score 85
G K. Martin TR5.3 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 24
→KUBig
G D. Parker TR18.6 pts · 5.9 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 94
G C. Hyland TR5 pts · 1.3 reb · 1 ast
Score 20
→KUBig
F K. Dawes TR12.5 pts · 8.8 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 91
F J. Rogers TR5.7 pts · 5.2 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 27
→KUBig
F T. Kaufman-Renn TR14.2 pts · 8.3 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 98
F S. Wysocki5.8 pts · 2.9 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 14
→KUBig
C C. Reeves TR11 pts · 7.8 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 94
DenverBetterKansas
DEN offense184th of 366 · -5.7
→KUBig
KU defense15th of 366 · +6.3
DEN defense337th of 366 · -8.9
→KUBig
KU offense17th of 366 · +8.6
Backcourt-1.7 · 3 players
→KUBig
Backcourt+5.7 · 2 players
Frontcourt-3.3 · 2 players
→KUBig
Frontcourt+13.0 · 3 players
Bench-2.4 · 3 players
→KUSmall
Bench+0.1 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestDEN betterKU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
C. Johnson36 minK. Martin16 min · TRC. Hyland15 min · TRT. Cady11 min · TRL. ThreattNewJ. NelsonNew
Forwards
J. Rogers27 min · TRS. Wysocki19 minS. Mahoney5 min · TRH. BatesNewC. DimmockNewO. Wickstrom StumerNew
Centers
B. Mbengue9 min · TR
Guards
L. Blyden34 min · TRD. Parker30 min · TRK. Rosario12 minW. Thengvall2 minT. StokesNewT. PerryNew
Forwards
K. Dawes31 min · TRT. Kaufman-Renn28 min · TRD. AdkinsNewA. RichmondNewG. MordiniNew
Centers
C. Reeves21 min · TRP. Mbiya5 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 80.3 #61 | Points per game | 75.1 #161 |
| 1.16 #53 | Points per possession | 1.09 #152 |
| 69.4 #151 | Pace (possessions) | 68.8 #193 |
| Shooting | ||
| 53.6 #79 | Effective FG% | 51.2 #186 |
| 36.8 #32 | 3-point % | 34.6 #139 |
| 38.6 #199 | 3-point attempt rate | 35.2 #268 |
| 34.1 #203 | Free throw rate | 32.2 #255 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.2 #30 | Turnover rate | 15.6 #111 |
| 29.8 #213 | Offensive rebound rate | 29.3 #227 |
| 11.2 #327 | Assists per game | 13.9 #150 |
| Defense | ||
| 84.0 #357 | Points allowed | 69.1 #47 |
| 1.21 #360 | Points allowed per possession | 1.00 #28 |
| 56.0 #344 | Opponent effective FG% | 45.0 #2 |
| 36.7 #338 | Opponent 3-point % | 30.6 #24 |
| 13.0 #355 | Turnovers forced | 13.8 #340 |
| 67.2 #291 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.1 #152 |
| 4.5 #356 | Steals per game | 5.4 #310 |
| 1.9 #348 | Blocks per game | 5.8 #6 |
Denver
12-17 in 2025-26 overall · 8-9 in conference · West Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs North Dakota67–83
- L@ Oral Roberts80–102
- Wvs St Thomas82–80
- Wvs South Dakota90–70
- L@ Omaha76–83
A week or more of rest.
Kansas
24-11 in 2025-26 overall · 13-7 in conference · Big 12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs St John's65–67
- Wvs CA Baptist68–60
- Lvs Houston47–69
- Wvs TCU78–73
- Wvs Kansas St104–85
A week or more of rest.